Cervical CancerTMMR-RSNCT01819077
TMMR (Total Mesometrial Resection) Register Study
An observational study of Cervical Cancer, run by University Hospital, Essen at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
TMMR/tLNE was shown to result in very low locoregional recurrence rates and low morbidity in surgical treatment of cervical cancer stage IB-IIA without any adjuvant radiotherapy even in high risk situations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer
- What is being tested?
- TMMR
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Mar 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with cervical cancer Stages IB - IIA treated with TMMR and tLNE.
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven cervical cancer: squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma; FIGO stages IB - IIA (preoperatively); Karnofsky-Index ≥ 70; unrestricted operability; BMI <35; age >=18 years.
- Individual decision for treatment of TMMR and therapeutic LNE without adjuvant radiotherapy by the responsible clinic (clinician) on a clinical routine basis.
- Informed consent of the patient
Who cannot join
- Neuroendocrine differentiation and all preoperative FIGO stage IA or >IIA;
- Distant metastases except in para-aortic lymph nodes; sclerodermia, lupus erythematodes, mixed connective tissue disease; secondary malignancy; previous radiotherapy of the pelvis.
- Patients with diseases of the connective tissue will be excluded because of unforeseeable (e.g. neurological) symptoms and disorders after surgery. Patients with a BMI ≥ 35 will be excluded because of very high risks regarding wound healing, infections and thrombosis independent on the type of surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Essen
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122
Rainer Kimmig, Prof. Dr., 00492017232241, rainer.kimmig@uk-essen.de
Paul Buderath, Dr., 004920172385293, paul.buderath@uk-essen.de
About this study
Official title: Register Study: TMMR and Therapeutic Lymphadenectomy According to M.Hoeckel for Treatment of Cervical Cancer FIGO IB-IIA
TMMR/tLNE was shown to result in very low locoregional recurrence rates and low morbidity in surgical treatment of cervical cancer stage IB-IIA without any adjuvant radiotherapy even in high risk situations. More and more this therapeutic strategy is implemented in clinical routine in specialized cancer centres, thus, treatment of cervical cancer could be performed for these stages in a systematically defined and reproducible radicality; adjuvant radiotherapy could be spared for recurrent disease, thus lowering morbidity and resource assignment in primary treatment dramatically. Due to the nerve-sparing character of the procedure bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction would also be minimized and markedly benefit the patient.
This study is designed to follow up the results of this therapeutic concept adapted to clinical routine in a multiinstitutional register study accompanied by detailed assessment of pathological work-up, quality of life and bladder and sexual function following surgery.
Read the detailed description
Rationale for the multimodal treatment of cervical cancer in FIGO stages IB-IIA according to M. Hoeckel: Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) is a newly developed procedure for surgical treatment of cervical cancer of FIGO stage IB to IIB. The procedure is based on embryologically determined surgical anatomy that was generated from investigations of the embryonal and fetal development of the Müllerian organ system and of local tumor spread of cervical cancer at the macroscopic, microscopic and molecular level (11-13). The observation that the cervical cancer follows the embryologically derived compartment hierarchy led to the definition of a new principle of radicality for oncological surgery, i.e., the resection of a tumor within the borders of the compartment representing the morphogenetic unit of the tumor origin. A resection that follows this principle leads to high local control (>95%) without additional radiotherapy. The resection line of the vagina is located inside the compartment, therefore intraoperative frozen section examination of the TMMR specimen is necessary to achieve wide margins. Adjacent structures that belong to another morphogenetic unit can be saved in spite of immediate proximity to the tumor. The autonomic nerves are saved with the TMMR concept as well as the ureters, the urinary bladder and their mesenteries containing all blood vessels, and the rectum with the mesorectum.
Therapeutic LNE: With TMMR tLNE has to be done with therapeutic intent, so that in case of lymph node metastases a high regional tumor control without adjuvant radiotherapy can be achieved (27). Therapeutic pelvic tLNE needs the removal of the lymph node groups within the scope of the classical systematic pelvic LNE and additionally, the paravisceral fatty tissue inferior to the obturator nerve, perispinal, gluteal and presacral lymph nodes to S2. The therapeutic pelvic LNE is done with exposition and protection of the plexus hypogastricus superior, the nervus hypogastricus and the plexus hypogastricus inferior and all ureter supplying vessels, bilaterally. In case of intraoperative evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases in first line nodes stepwise ascending therapeutic para-aortic LND with protection of the plexus hypogastricus superior and the nervi splanchnici lumbales has to be done. To date no prospective, randomized trial has proven a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with early cervical cancer and histopathological risk factors. However, retrospective studies and the results of Peters et al. (20), comparing adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients after surgery for cervical cancer suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may exert an impact on survival. The possible effect of adjuvant chemotherapy should be taken into consideration when applying only surgical therapeutic concepts (23;25). Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy in case of risk factors was performed Hoeckel's trial. The mono-institutional prospective study of the University of Leipzig, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, has shown that the treatment concept for cervical cancer FIGO stages IB-IIB including TMMR and therapeutic LNE without adjuvant radiotherapy achieves a markedly improved therapeutic index in comparison with historic controls (16;22): locoregional control was 96% versus 91%, relapse-free survival after three years was 93% vs. 84%, treatment-caused side effects were 9% exclusively grade II vs. 28% grade II and III (11-13).
Scientific aims
- Observation of results of standardization of radical hysterectomy and therapeutic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer FIGO IB -IIA on the basis of ontogenetically defined compartment theory in a multicentric approach by TMMR/LND in clinical routine
- Assessment of locoregional recurrence in this concept without any radiation therapy showing that postoperative irradiation and associated morbidity can also be avoided and irradiation may be maintained for rescue in recurrency under conditions of clinical routine
- Confirmation of the low morbidity of TMMR due to autonomous nerve and vessel preservation by concomitant urogynecological and psychosexual subprotocols in clinical routine treatment
Requirements for participating centers of the register study
- Study of educational video (M. Hoeckel, Leipzig 2010; R. Kimmig, Essen 2012)
- Passed Participation of 2 day educational training concerning TMMR at "Leipzig School of Oncological Surgery"
- Performing at least 10 TMMR procedures at participating institution/year
- Evaluation of surgical technique at the participating institution by Prof. Hoeckel (Leipzig) or Prof. Kimmig (Essen) or substitute determined by M.Hoeckel or R. Kimmig
- Securing standardized workup of the surgical specimen by pathologists according to the protocol (Prof. Horn, Leipzig)
- Acceptance of study participation by the responsible project leader and commitment of online documentation of primary histopathological and clinical data as well as follow up data when assessed.
Primary outcome measures:
(1) Progression-free survival, defined as time from TMMR to a local or regional relapse, of a distant metastasis or to death of any cause whichever event comes first. Simultaneous occurrence of pelvic and distant metastases is considered as distant but should be documented in detail.
Secondary efficacy measures:
- Overall survival, defined as time from TMMR to death of any cause; Rate of locoregional relapse and rate of distant metastases at 3 years.
- Postoperative dysfunction of the bladder/urethra and of psychosexual function, assessed as described in the urogynecological and psychosexual subprotocol.
Secondary safety measures:
- Therapy-induced morbidity on bladder/urethra, rectum/bowel, vagina/vulva, assessed by the LENT-SOMA scoring system at the following times after surgery: subjective scale on day 1, week 1 and 2, month 3; subjective and objective scale on month 12 and 24. The questionnaires developed by Davidson (7) will be used; Time from surgery to first micturition; Acute complications of surgery; adverse and serious adverse events.
- Quality of life by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire at 12 and 24 months after surgery.
Aim of the study is to assess recurrence rate and morbidity following TMMR/LNE without additional radiotherapy in a multicentric observation of clinical routine treatment. In addition standardization of radical hysterectomy and of pathological work up for stage Ib to IIa cervical cancer will be achieved as described in "Requirements of participating centers". Two primary endpoints will be investigated, ranked according to their relevance: (1) PFS and (2) Late effects on bladder/urethra, measured by the subjective scale of the LENT-SOMA system. A hierarchical strategy will be used.
Further time to event endpoints will be illustrated by Kaplan-Meier plots and analyzed like the primary endpoint see above.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Being tested
- TMMR
- Keywords
- Cervical cancer, TMMR, therapeutic lymphadenectomy, register study
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TMMRProcedure or surgery
Radical hysterectomy by Total Mesometrial Resection (TMMR) and therapeutic lymphadenectomy (tLNE)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TMMR | Patients with cervical cancer Stages IB - IIA treated with TMMR and tLNE Receives: Procedure: TMMR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival
Progression-free survival, defined as time from TMMR to a local or regional relapse, of a distant metastasis or to death of any cause whichever event comes first. Simultaneous occurrence of pelvic and distant metastases is considered as distant but should be documented in detail.
Measured: 60 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Overall Survival
Overall survival, defined as time from TMMR to death of any cause; Rate of locoregional relapse and rate of distant metastases at 3 years.
Measured: 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionJan 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Essen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Paul Buderath, University Hospital, Essen
- Investigators
- Rainer Kimmig, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Essen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01819077
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TMMR-RS
- Acronym
- TMMR-RS
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 27 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Hockel M, Horn LC, Hentschel B, Hockel S, Naumann G. Total mesometrial resection: high resolution nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy based on developmentally defined surgical anatomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Nov-Dec;13(6):791-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2003.13608.x.
PubMed 14675316Hockel M. Do we need a new classification for radical hysterectomy? Insights in surgical anatomy and local tumor spread from human embryology. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.049. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
PubMed 17727931Hockel M, Horn LC, Tetsch E, Einenkel J. Pattern analysis of regional spread and therapeutic lymph node dissection in cervical cancer based on ontogenetic anatomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.419. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
PubMed 22155677Buderath P, Stukan M, Ruhwedel W, Strutas D, Feisel-Schwickardi G, Wimberger P, Kimmig R. Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) for cervical cancer FIGO IB-IIA: first results from the multicentric TMMR register study. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e9. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
PubMed 34910390
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Register Study: TMMR and Therapeutic Lymphadenectomy According to M.Hoeckel for Treatment of Cervical Cancer FIGO IB-IIA
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01819077
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TMMR-RS / TMMR-RS
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- Cervical cancer, TMMR, therapeutic lymphadenectomy, register study
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, EssenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
TMMR/tLNE was shown to result in very low locoregional recurrence rates and low morbidity in surgical treatment of cervical cancer stage IB-IIA without any adjuvant radiotherapy even in high risk situations. More and more this therapeutic strategy is implemented in clinical routine in specialized cancer centres, thus, treatment of cervical cancer could be performed for these stages in a systematically defined and reproducible radicality; adjuvant radiotherapy could be spared for recurrent disease, thus lowering morbidity and resource assignment in primary treatment dramatically. Due to the nerve-sparing character of the procedure bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction would also be minimized and markedly benefit the patient.
This study is designed to follow up the results of this therapeutic concept adapted to clinical routine in a multiinstitutional register study accompanied by detailed assessment of pathological work-up, quality of life and bladder and sexual function following surgery.
Detailed description
Rationale for the multimodal treatment of cervical cancer in FIGO stages IB-IIA according to M. Hoeckel: Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) is a newly developed procedure for surgical treatment of cervical cancer of FIGO stage IB to IIB. The procedure is based on embryologically determined surgical anatomy that was generated from investigations of the embryonal and fetal development of the Müllerian organ system and of local tumor spread of cervical cancer at the macroscopic, microscopic and molecular level (11-13). The observation that the cervical cancer follows the embryologically derived compartment hierarchy led to the definition of a new principle of radicality for oncological surgery, i.e., the resection of a tumor within the borders of the compartment representing the morphogenetic unit of the tumor origin. A resection that follows this principle leads to high local control (>95%) without additional radiotherapy. The resection line of the vagina is located inside the compartment, therefore intraoperative frozen section examination of the TMMR specimen is necessary to achieve wide margins. Adjacent structures that belong to another morphogenetic unit can be saved in spite of immediate proximity to the tumor. The autonomic nerves are saved with the TMMR concept as well as the ureters, the urinary bladder and their mesenteries containing all blood vessels, and the rectum with the mesorectum.
Therapeutic LNE: With TMMR tLNE has to be done with therapeutic intent, so that in case of lymph node metastases a high regional tumor control without adjuvant radiotherapy can be achieved (27). Therapeutic pelvic tLNE needs the removal of the lymph node groups within the scope of the classical systematic pelvic LNE and additionally, the paravisceral fatty tissue inferior to the obturator nerve, perispinal, gluteal and presacral lymph nodes to S2. The therapeutic pelvic LNE is done with exposition and protection of the plexus hypogastricus superior, the nervus hypogastricus and the plexus hypogastricus inferior and all ureter supplying vessels, bilaterally. In case of intraoperative evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases in first line nodes stepwise ascending therapeutic para-aortic LND with protection of the plexus hypogastricus superior and the nervi splanchnici lumbales has to be done. To date no prospective, randomized trial has proven a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with early cervical cancer and histopathological risk factors. However, retrospective studies and the results of Peters et al. (20), comparing adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients after surgery for cervical cancer suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may exert an impact on survival. The possible effect of adjuvant chemotherapy should be taken into consideration when applying only surgical therapeutic concepts (23;25). Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy in case of risk factors was performed Hoeckel's trial. The mono-institutional prospective study of the University of Leipzig, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, has shown that the treatment concept for cervical cancer FIGO stages IB-IIB including TMMR and therapeutic LNE without adjuvant radiotherapy achieves a markedly improved therapeutic index in comparison with historic controls (16;22): locoregional control was 96% versus 91%, relapse-free survival after three years was 93% vs. 84%, treatment-caused side effects were 9% exclusively grade II vs. 28% grade II and III (11-13).
Scientific aims
- Observation of results of standardization of radical hysterectomy and therapeutic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer FIGO IB -IIA on the basis of ontogenetically defined compartment theory in a multicentric approach by TMMR/LND in clinical routine
- Assessment of locoregional recurrence in this concept without any radiation therapy showing that postoperative irradiation and associated morbidity can also be avoided and irradiation may be maintained for rescue in recurrency under conditions of clinical routine
- Confirmation of the low morbidity of TMMR due to autonomous nerve and vessel preservation by concomitant urogynecological and psychosexual subprotocols in clinical routine treatment
Requirements for participating centers of the register study
- Study of educational video (M. Hoeckel, Leipzig 2010; R. Kimmig, Essen 2012)
- Passed Participation of 2 day educational training concerning TMMR at "Leipzig School of Oncological Surgery"
- Performing at least 10 TMMR procedures at participating institution/year
- Evaluation of surgical technique at the participating institution by Prof. Hoeckel (Leipzig) or Prof. Kimmig (Essen) or substitute determined by M.Hoeckel or R. Kimmig
- Securing standardized workup of the surgical specimen by pathologists according to the protocol (Prof. Horn, Leipzig)
- Acceptance of study participation by the responsible project leader and commitment of online documentation of primary histopathological and clinical data as well as follow up data when assessed.
Primary outcome measures:
(1) Progression-free survival, defined as time from TMMR to a local or regional relapse, of a distant metastasis or to death of any cause whichever event comes first. Simultaneous occurrence of pelvic and distant metastases is considered as distant but should be documented in detail.
Secondary efficacy measures:
- Overall survival, defined as time from TMMR to death of any cause; Rate of locoregional relapse and rate of distant metastases at 3 years.
- Postoperative dysfunction of the bladder/urethra and of psychosexual function, assessed as described in the urogynecological and psychosexual subprotocol.
Secondary safety measures:
- Therapy-induced morbidity on bladder/urethra, rectum/bowel, vagina/vulva, assessed by the LENT-SOMA scoring system at the following times after surgery: subjective scale on day 1, week 1 and 2, month 3; subjective and objective scale on month 12 and 24. The questionnaires developed by Davidson (7) will be used; Time from surgery to first micturition; Acute complications of surgery; adverse and serious adverse events.
- Quality of life by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire at 12 and 24 months after surgery.
Aim of the study is to assess recurrence rate and morbidity following TMMR/LNE without additional radiotherapy in a multicentric observation of clinical routine treatment. In addition standardization of radical hysterectomy and of pathological work up for stage Ib to IIa cervical cancer will be achieved as described in "Requirements of participating centers". Two primary endpoints will be investigated, ranked according to their relevance: (1) PFS and (2) Late effects on bladder/urethra, measured by the subjective scale of the LENT-SOMA system. A hierarchical strategy will be used.
Further time to event endpoints will be illustrated by Kaplan-Meier plots and analyzed like the primary endpoint see above.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TMMR | – | Procedure: TMMRPatients with cervical cancer Stages IB - IIA treated with TMMR and tLNE |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with cervical cancer Stages IB - IIA treated with TMMR and tLNE.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Histologically proven cervical cancer: squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma; FIGO stages IB - IIA (preoperatively); Karnofsky-Index ≥ 70; unrestricted operability; BMI <35; age >=18 years.
- Individual decision for treatment of TMMR and therapeutic LNE without adjuvant radiotherapy by the responsible clinic (clinician) on a clinical routine basis.
- Informed consent of the patient
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Neuroendocrine differentiation and all preoperative FIGO stage IA or >IIA;
- Distant metastases except in para-aortic lymph nodes; sclerodermia, lupus erythematodes, mixed connective tissue disease; secondary malignancy; previous radiotherapy of the pelvis.
- Patients with diseases of the connective tissue will be excluded because of unforeseeable (e.g. neurological) symptoms and disorders after surgery. Patients with a BMI ≥ 35 will be excluded because of very high risks regarding wound healing, infections and thrombosis independent on the type of surgery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TMMRRadical hysterectomy by Total Mesometrial Resection (TMMR) and therapeutic lymphadenectomy (tLNE) | Procedure or surgery | TMMR |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 60 months
Progression-free survival, defined as time from TMMR to a local or regional relapse, of a distant metastasis or to death of any cause whichever event comes first. Simultaneous occurrence of pelvic and distant metastases is considered as distant but should be documented in detail.
1 secondary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: 60 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 14675316Hockel M, Horn LC, Hentschel B, Hockel S, Naumann G. Total mesometrial resection: high resolution nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy based on developmentally defined surgical anatomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Nov-Dec;13(6):791-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2003.13608.x.
- Background: PubMed 17727931Hockel M. Do we need a new classification for radical hysterectomy? Insights in surgical anatomy and local tumor spread from human embryology. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.049. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 22155677Hockel M, Horn LC, Tetsch E, Einenkel J. Pattern analysis of regional spread and therapeutic lymph node dissection in cervical cancer based on ontogenetic anatomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.419. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34910390Buderath P, Stukan M, Ruhwedel W, Strutas D, Feisel-Schwickardi G, Wimberger P, Kimmig R. Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) for cervical cancer FIGO IB-IIA: first results from the multicentric TMMR register study. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e9. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in Adult Patients With Metastatic, Radioactive Iodine Non-Responsive Oncocytic (Hurthle-Cell) Thyroid Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Dual Energy CT - a Tool for Delineation of Tumor and Organs at Risk in Radiotherapy
Brain Metastases, Bone Metastases
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Vaginal Microbiome and HPV Pre-malignant and Cervical Dysplasia
Human Papilloma Virus, Vaginal Flora Imbalance
Recruiting
Hydrogel Spacer During Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Circulating Tumor DNA MRD-Guided Adjuvant Therapy for Curatively Resected Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rainer Kimmig, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
University Hospital, Essen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervical Cancer, run by University Hospital, Essen at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rainer Kimmig, Prof. Dr. (00492017232241, rainer.kimmig@uk-essen.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival (time frame: 60 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01819077, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2015.