Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7)Early Phase 1NCT01822015
Sirolimus, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Early Phase 1 study testing Sirolimus, Idarubicin and Cytarabine in people with Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7) and Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a), run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This pilot clinical trial studies sirolimus, idarubicin, and cytarabine in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Sirolimus may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7), Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a), Adult Acute Monocytic Leukemia (M5b)
- What is being tested?
- Sirolimus, Idarubicin and Cytarabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2013to 12 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have histologic evidence of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (non-M3 AML) as documented by the presence of >20% myeloid blasts in the bone marrow
- Subjects must be 18 years of age and <= 60
- Subjects must have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. (see attachment 1).
- Subjects must have a life expectancy of at least 4 weeks.
- Subjects must be able to consume oral medication.
- Required initial laboratory values: Creatinine 2.0mg/dL; total or direct bilirubin 1.5mg/dL; SGPT(ALT) 3xULN (if not due to the leukemia itself); negative pregnancy test for women with child-bearing potential.
- Patients must be able to sign consent and be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and laboratory testing.
- Subjects must have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of >/= 45%.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with APL - FAB M3 (t(15;17)(q22;q21)[PML-RAR] are not eligible
- Subjects must not have received any chemotherapeutic agents for the AML (except Hydroxyurea). Intrathecal ARA-C and intrathecal methotrexate are permissible (as they are not systemic and only isolated to the central nervous system).
- Subjects must not be receiving growth factors, except for erythropoietin.
- Subjects with a "currently active" second malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin cancers are not eligible.
- Subjects with uncontrolled high blood pressure, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within the past 6 months or serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia are not eligible.
- Subjects taking the following are not eligible:
Show all 27Show fewer
- Carbamazepine (e.g., Tegretol)
- Rifabutin (e.g., Mycobutin)
- Rifampin (e.g., Rifadin)
- Rifapentine (e.g., Priftin)
- St. John's wort
- Clarithromycin (e.g., Biaxin)
- Cyclosporine (e.g. Neoral or Sandimmune)
- Diltiazem (e.g., Cardizem)
- Erythromycin (e.g., Akne-Mycin, Ery-Tab)
- Itraconazole (e.g., Sporanox)
- Ketoconazole (e.g., Nizoral)
- Telithromycin (e.g., Ketek)
- Verapamil (e.g., Calan SR, Isoptin, Verelan)
- Voriconazole (e.g., VFEND)
- Tacrolimus (e.g. Prograf)
- Subjects taking fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and ketoconazole within 72 hours of study entry are not eligible. Reinstitution of fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, ketoconazole and diltiazem is permissible 72 hours after the last dose of sirolimus.
- Subjects who require HIV protease inhibitors or those with AIDS-related illness
- Subjects with other severe concurrent disease which in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study are ineligible.
- Subjects must not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Pregnancy tests must be obtained for all females of child-bearing potential. Pregnant or lactating patients are ineligible for this study due to the unknown human fetal or teratogenic toxicities of sirolimus. Males or females of reproductive age may not participate unless they have agreed to use an effective contraceptive method.
- Subjects who have uncontrolled infection are not eligible. Patients must have any active infections under control. Fungal disease must be stable for at least 2 weeks before study entry.
- Subjects with bacteremia must have documented negative blood cultures prior to study entry.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
About this study
Official title: A Pilot, Pharmacodynamic Correlate Trial of Sirolimus in Combination With Chemotherapy (Idarubicin, Cytarabine) for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
This pilot clinical trial studies sirolimus, idarubicin, and cytarabine in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Sirolimus may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as idarubicin and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving sirolimus together with idarubicin and cytarabine may kill more cancer cells.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether there is an association between baseline mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation paired with mTOR target inhibition post-treatment in leukemic blasts and clinical response in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with sirolimus idarubicin/cytarabine.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To estimate the response rate of sirolimus idarubicin/cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed AML compared to historical data using idarubicin/cytarabine alone.
- To determine the ability of oral sirolimus to inhibit mTOR in leukemic blasts.
- To assess if mTOR pathway inhibition correlates with clinical response.
- To collect further information on the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sirolimus in combination with idarubicin/cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed AML.
- To describe the progression-free survival and overall survival (1 year, 2 year and 5 year) of patients treated with sirolimus idarubicin/cytarabine.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive sirolimus orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-10, idarubicin intravenously (IV) over 3-5 minutes on days 4-6, and cytarabine IV continuously over 24 hours on days 4-10.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 5 years.
- Conditions
- Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7), Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a), Adult Acute Monocytic Leukemia (M5b), Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia With Maturation (M2), Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Without Maturation (M1), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities
- Being tested
- Sirolimus, Idarubicin, Cytarabine
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute, Leukemia, Monocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Congenital Abnormalities, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute, Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SirolimusDrug
Also called rapamycin, Rapamune
Given PO
IdarubicinDrug
Also called 4-demethoxydaunorubicin, Zavedos, Idamycin
Given IV
CytarabineDrug
Also called cytosine arabinoside, Cytosar-U, Depocyt, Ara-C
Given IV
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (sirolimus, idarubicin, cytarabine) | Experimental | Patients receive sirolimus PO QD on days 1-10, idarubicin IV over 3-5 minutes on days 4-6, and cytarabine IV continuously over 24 hours on days 4-10. Receives: Drug: Sirolimus; Drug: Idarubicin; Drug: Cytarabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in measurement of mTOR activation paired with mTOR target inhibition
The association between mTOR response and clinical response (complete or partial response) will be evaluated using the two-sided Fisher's exact test with alpha 0.05.
Measured: Baseline to day 4
Secondary outcomes (4)
Overall survival
Will be evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method stratified by mTOR response. Log rank test will be used to compare the overall survival in patients with and without mTOR response. Based on the estimated survival curves, the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates will be computed with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Measured: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Progression free survival
Based on the estimated survival curves, the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates will be computed with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Measured: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Incidence of toxicities, graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) 4.0 guidelines
Safety data analysis is descriptive. All estimates of adverse events rates will be presented with corresponding confidence intervals using the exact method.
Measured: Up to 45 days
Response defined as patients achieving a complete remission (CR), complete response in absence of total platelet recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR)
Proportions of complete response and partial response with be computed separately in patients with and without mTOR response and presented with corresponding exact binomial 95% confidence intervals.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study start15 Mar 2013
- Primary completion12 Dec 2019
- Study completion12 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (79)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Margaret Kasner, MD, Principal investigator, Thomas Jefferson University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01822015
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12D.588
- Other IDs
- 2012-55, JT 3038
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bishop JF, Matthews JP, Young GA, Szer J, Gillett A, Joshua D, Bradstock K, Enno A, Wolf MM, Fox R, Cobcroft R, Herrmann R, Van Der Weyden M, Lowenthal RM, Page F, Garson OM, Juneja S. A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1996 Mar 1;87(5):1710-7.
PubMed 8634416Gilliland DG, Jordan CT, Felix CA. The molecular basis of leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2004:80-97. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2004.1.80.
PubMed 15561678Castaigne S, Chevret S, Archimbaud E, Fenaux P, Bordessoule D, Tilly H, de Revel T, Simon M, Dupriez B, Renoux M, Janvier M, Miclea JM, Thomas X, Bastard C, Preudhomme C, Bauters F, Degos L, Dombret H. Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a "3 + 7" induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 study. Blood. 2004 Oct 15;104(8):2467-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3561. Epub 2004 May 13.
PubMed 15142880Stone RM. The difficult problem of acute myeloid leukemia in the older adult. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):363-71. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.6.363.
PubMed 12469764Burnett AK, Hills RK, Milligan DW, Goldstone AH, Prentice AG, McMullin MF, Duncombe A, Gibson B, Wheatley K. Attempts to optimize induction and consolidation treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the MRC AML12 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):586-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9088. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
PubMed 20038732Buchner T, Berdel WE, Haferlach C, Haferlach T, Schnittger S, Muller-Tidow C, Braess J, Spiekermann K, Kienast J, Staib P, Gruneisen A, Kern W, Reichle A, Maschmeyer G, Aul C, Lengfelder E, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Wormann B, Hiddemann W. Age-related risk profile and chemotherapy dose response in acute myeloid leukemia: a study by the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):61-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4245. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
PubMed 19047294Cassileth PA, Harrington DP, Appelbaum FR, Lazarus HM, Rowe JM, Paietta E, Willman C, Hurd DD, Bennett JM, Blume KG, Head DR, Wiernik PH. Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1649-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392301.
PubMed 9834301Estey E. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in older patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 10;25(14):1908-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2731.
PubMed 17488990Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, Berg DT, Sarno E, Frei E 3rd. Intensive post-remission therapy with Ara-C in adults with acute myeloid leukemia: initial results of a CALGB phase III trial. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Leukemia. 1992;6 Suppl 2:66-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 1578945Menzin J, Lang K, Earle CC, Kerney D, Mallick R. The outcomes and costs of acute myeloid leukemia among the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jul 22;162(14):1597-603. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.14.1597.
PubMed 12123403Bennett JM, Andersen JW, Cassileth PA. Long term survival in acute myeloid leukemia: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) experience. Leuk Res. 1991;15(4):223-7. doi: 10.1016/0145-2126(91)90124-c.
PubMed 2030603Weick JK, Kopecky KJ, Appelbaum FR, Head DR, Kingsbury LL, Balcerzak SP, Bickers JN, Hynes HE, Welborn JL, Simon SR, Grever M. A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood. 1996 Oct 15;88(8):2841-51.
PubMed 8874180Ohtake S, Miyawaki S, Fujita H, Kiyoi H, Shinagawa K, Usui N, Okumura H, Miyamura K, Nakaseko C, Miyazaki Y, Fujieda A, Nagai T, Yamane T, Taniwaki M, Takahashi M, Yagasaki F, Kimura Y, Asou N, Sakamaki H, Handa H, Honda S, Ohnishi K, Naoe T, Ohno R. Randomized study of induction therapy comparing standard-dose idarubicin with high-dose daunorubicin in adult patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: the JALSG AML201 Study. Blood. 2011 Feb 24;117(8):2358-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-273243. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
PubMed 20693429Druker BJ, Talpaz M, Resta DJ, Peng B, Buchdunger E, Ford JM, Lydon NB, Kantarjian H, Capdeville R, Ohno-Jones S, Sawyers CL. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 5;344(14):1031-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104053441401.
PubMed 11287972Thomas DA, Faderl S, Cortes J, O'Brien S, Giles FJ, Kornblau SM, Garcia-Manero G, Keating MJ, Andreeff M, Jeha S, Beran M, Verstovsek S, Pierce S, Letvak L, Salvado A, Champlin R, Talpaz M, Kantarjian H. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate. Blood. 2004 Jun 15;103(12):4396-407. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2958. Epub 2003 Oct 9.
PubMed 14551133
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot, Pharmacodynamic Correlate Trial of Sirolimus in Combination With Chemotherapy (Idarubicin, Cytarabine) for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01822015
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12D.588
- Conditions
- Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7), Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a), Adult Acute Monocytic Leukemia (M5b), Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia With Maturation (M2), Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Without Maturation (M1), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot clinical trial studies sirolimus, idarubicin, and cytarabine in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Sirolimus may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as idarubicin and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving sirolimus together with idarubicin and cytarabine may kill more cancer cells.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether there is an association between baseline mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation paired with mTOR target inhibition post-treatment in leukemic blasts and clinical response in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with sirolimus idarubicin/cytarabine.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To estimate the response rate of sirolimus idarubicin/cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed AML compared to historical data using idarubicin/cytarabine alone.
- To determine the ability of oral sirolimus to inhibit mTOR in leukemic blasts.
- To assess if mTOR pathway inhibition correlates with clinical response.
- To collect further information on the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sirolimus in combination with idarubicin/cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed AML.
- To describe the progression-free survival and overall survival (1 year, 2 year and 5 year) of patients treated with sirolimus idarubicin/cytarabine.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive sirolimus orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-10, idarubicin intravenously (IV) over 3-5 minutes on days 4-6, and cytarabine IV continuously over 24 hours on days 4-10.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (sirolimus, idarubicin, cytarabine) | Experimental | Drug: Sirolimus, Drug: Idarubicin, Drug: CytarabinePatients receive sirolimus PO QD on days 1-10, idarubicin IV over 3-5 minutes on days 4-6, and cytarabine IV continuously over 24 hours on days 4-10. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients must have histologic evidence of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (non-M3 AML) as documented by the presence of >20% myeloid blasts in the bone marrow
- Subjects must be 18 years of age and <= 60
- Subjects must have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. (see attachment 1).
- Subjects must have a life expectancy of at least 4 weeks.
- Subjects must be able to consume oral medication.
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Subjects with APL - FAB M3 (t(15;17)(q22;q21)[PML-RAR] are not eligible
- Subjects must not have received any chemotherapeutic agents for the AML (except Hydroxyurea). Intrathecal ARA-C and intrathecal methotrexate are permissible (as they are not systemic and only isolated to the central nervous system).
- Subjects must not be receiving growth factors, except for erythropoietin.
- Subjects with a "currently active" second malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin cancers are not eligible.
- Subjects with uncontrolled high blood pressure, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within the past 6 months or serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia are not eligible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SirolimusAlso: rapamycin, RapamuneGiven PO | Drug | Treatment (sirolimus, idarubicin, cytarabine) |
| IdarubicinAlso: 4-demethoxydaunorubicin, Zavedos, IdamycinGiven IV | Drug | Treatment (sirolimus, idarubicin, cytarabine) |
| CytarabineAlso: cytosine arabinoside, Cytosar-U, Depocyt, Ara-CGiven IV | Drug | Treatment (sirolimus, idarubicin, cytarabine) |
Primary outcome
Change in measurement of mTOR activation paired with mTOR target inhibition
Time frame: Baseline to day 4
The association between mTOR response and clinical response (complete or partial response) will be evaluated using the two-sided Fisher's exact test with alpha 0.05.
4 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Progression free survival
Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years
Incidence of toxicities, graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) 4.0 guidelines
Time frame: Up to 45 days
Response defined as patients achieving a complete remission (CR), complete response in absence of total platelet recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 8634416Bishop JF, Matthews JP, Young GA, Szer J, Gillett A, Joshua D, Bradstock K, Enno A, Wolf MM, Fox R, Cobcroft R, Herrmann R, Van Der Weyden M, Lowenthal RM, Page F, Garson OM, Juneja S. A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1996 Mar 1;87(5):1710-7.
- Background: PubMed 15561678Gilliland DG, Jordan CT, Felix CA. The molecular basis of leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2004:80-97. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2004.1.80.
- Background: PubMed 15142880Castaigne S, Chevret S, Archimbaud E, Fenaux P, Bordessoule D, Tilly H, de Revel T, Simon M, Dupriez B, Renoux M, Janvier M, Miclea JM, Thomas X, Bastard C, Preudhomme C, Bauters F, Degos L, Dombret H. Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a "3 + 7" induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 study. Blood. 2004 Oct 15;104(8):2467-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3561. Epub 2004 May 13.
- Background: PubMed 12469764Stone RM. The difficult problem of acute myeloid leukemia in the older adult. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):363-71. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.6.363.
- Background: PubMed 20038732Burnett AK, Hills RK, Milligan DW, Goldstone AH, Prentice AG, McMullin MF, Duncombe A, Gibson B, Wheatley K. Attempts to optimize induction and consolidation treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the MRC AML12 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):586-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9088. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
- Background: PubMed 19047294Buchner T, Berdel WE, Haferlach C, Haferlach T, Schnittger S, Muller-Tidow C, Braess J, Spiekermann K, Kienast J, Staib P, Gruneisen A, Kern W, Reichle A, Maschmeyer G, Aul C, Lengfelder E, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Wormann B, Hiddemann W. Age-related risk profile and chemotherapy dose response in acute myeloid leukemia: a study by the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):61-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4245. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
- Background: PubMed 9834301Cassileth PA, Harrington DP, Appelbaum FR, Lazarus HM, Rowe JM, Paietta E, Willman C, Hurd DD, Bennett JM, Blume KG, Head DR, Wiernik PH. Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1649-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392301.
- Background: PubMed 17488990Estey E. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in older patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 10;25(14):1908-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2731.
- Background: PubMed 1578945Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA, Berg DT, Sarno E, Frei E 3rd. Intensive post-remission therapy with Ara-C in adults with acute myeloid leukemia: initial results of a CALGB phase III trial. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Leukemia. 1992;6 Suppl 2:66-7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12123403Menzin J, Lang K, Earle CC, Kerney D, Mallick R. The outcomes and costs of acute myeloid leukemia among the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jul 22;162(14):1597-603. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.14.1597.
- Background: PubMed 2030603Bennett JM, Andersen JW, Cassileth PA. Long term survival in acute myeloid leukemia: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) experience. Leuk Res. 1991;15(4):223-7. doi: 10.1016/0145-2126(91)90124-c.
- Background: PubMed 8874180Weick JK, Kopecky KJ, Appelbaum FR, Head DR, Kingsbury LL, Balcerzak SP, Bickers JN, Hynes HE, Welborn JL, Simon SR, Grever M. A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood. 1996 Oct 15;88(8):2841-51.
- Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, an NCI-Designated Cancer CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
- Thomas Jefferson University HospitalsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Multidrug Resistance Genes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Margaret Kasner, MD principal investigator
Thomas Jefferson University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Sirolimus, Idarubicin and Cytarabine in people with Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7) and Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a), run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in measurement of mTOR activation paired with mTOR target inhibition (time frame: Baseline to day 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01822015, which also lists 79 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.