Cocaine DependencePhase 2NCT01822327
Treating Cocaine Abuse: A Behavioral Approach
A Phase 2 study testing Contingency Management in people with Cocaine Dependence, run by University of Vermont at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to advance our development of a treatment for cocaine dependence. The investigators hypothesize that clients with high-risk characteristics will benefit from enhanced levels of treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cocaine Dependence
- What is being tested?
- Contingency Management
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 124 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years and older
- Meets DSM IV criteria for cocaine dependence
Who cannot join
- Psychosis
- Pregnancy
- Leaving immediate geographic area sooner than 6 months
- An organic psychiatric disorder
- Medical illness such that participation is not feasible (e.g., on dialysis).
- Subjects in acute alcohol withdrawal
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Significant depression or suicidal ideation (pending psychological evaluation)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Substance Abuse Treatment Center, University of Vermont; UHC
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
About this study
This study is designed to advance our development of a treatment for cocaine dependence. The investigators hypothesize that clients with high-risk characteristics will benefit from enhanced levels of treatment.
Read the detailed description
Treatment development for cocaine dependence often proceeds without effort to adapt treatment parameters to patient characteristics. Such a one-size-fits-all approach is problematic because of the heterogeneity of the clinical population. Additionally, the approach is often subject to opposing biases either towards constraining costs or maximizing efficacy. This project includes two sequential clinical trails examining variations of the CRA + Vouchers treatment for cocaine dependence that are designed to explore matching treatment parameters to patient baseline characteristics known to moderate treatment response among cocaine-dependent outpatients. In Trial 1, all patients were randomly assigned to receive 24 weeks of CRA therapy but randomly assigned to one of three voucher-based incentive conditions: (a) 6 weeks of vouchers contingent on abstinence and incentive monetary value at usual level; (b) 6 weeks of vouchers contingent on abstinence but incentive value set at usual level for low-severity patients (intranasal cocaine users or married patients) and at twice the usual value for high severity patients (i.e., unmarried cocaine smokers/injectors), or to (c) a control condition where incentives were provided independent of recent cocaine use. In Trial 2, all patients receive 12 weeks of abstinence-contingent incentives, but randomly assigned to also receive (a) 24 weeks of CRA therapy or (b) 4 weeks of CRA therapy. The overarching goal of the two trials is to strike a balance between the aforementioned biases towards constraining costs or maximizing efficacy and thereby facilitate cost containment without compromising efficacy, especially among more severe patients.
- Conditions
- Cocaine Dependence
- Being tested
- Contingency Management
- Medical subject headings
- Cocaine-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Contingency ManagementBehavioural
CRA plus Vouchers contingent on drug abstinence with values the same across all patients
Contingency ManagementBehavioural
CRA plus Vouchers contingent on cocaine abstinence with more severe patients receiving greater value vouchers
Contingency ManagementBehavioural
CRA plus Vouchers earned independent of cocaine use
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Contingent Vouchers Unmatched | Experimental | CRA therapy plus Voucher incentives contingent on cocaine abstinence with monetary values set at usual monetary values across all patients. Receives: Behavioral: Contingency Management |
| Contingent Vouchers, Matched | Experimental | CRA therapy plus Vouchers contingent on cocaine abstinence, with more severe patients receiving twice the usual voucher monetary values. Receives: Behavioral: Contingency Management |
| Non-Contingent Vouchers control | Active comparator | CRA therapy plus Vouchers earned independent of drug use Receives: Behavioral: Contingency Management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biochemically-Verified Cocaine Use
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Addiction Severity Inventory Scores
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionMar 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2014 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cocaine DependenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Vermont
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stephen T. Higgins, University of Vermont
- Investigators
- Stephen T Higgins, Ph.D, Principal investigator, University of Vermont
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01822327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01DA009378
- Status last verified
- Mar 2013
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Garcia-Rodriguez O, Secades-Villa R, Higgins ST, Fernandez-Hermida JR, Carballo JL. Financing a voucher program for cocaine abusers through community donations in Spain. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):623-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-623.
PubMed 19192866Higgins, S.T., Heil, S.H., Rogers, R.E., & Chivers, L. (2008). Cocaine. In S.T. Higgins, K. Silverman, & S.H. Heil (Eds.), Contingency management in substance abuse treatment (pp. 19-410. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Higgins, S.T., Sigmon, S.C., Heil, S.H. (2008). Drug abuse and dependence. In D.H. Barlow (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders (4th ed.). (pp. 547-577). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
Higgins, S.T. & Silverman, K., (2008). Contingency Management. In M. Galanter and H.D. Kleber (Eds.) Textbook of substance abuse treatment (4th ed.). (pp. 387-399). The American Psychiatric Press..
Higgins, S.T. & Silverman, K. (2008). Introduction. In S.T. Higgins, K. Silverman, & S.H. Heil (Eds.), Contingency management in substance abuse treatment (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Rogers RE, Higgins ST, Silverman K, Thomas CS, Badger GJ, Bigelow G, Stitzer M. Abstinence-contingent reinforcement and engagement in non-drug-related activities among illicit drug abusers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Dec;22(4):544-50. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.4.544.
PubMed 19071979Silverman K, Roll JM, Higgins ST. Introduction to the special issue on the behavior analysis and treatment of drug addiction. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):471-80. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-471.
PubMed 19192853Garcia-Rodriguez O, Secades-Villa R, Higgins ST, Fernandez-Hermida JR, Carballo JL, Errasti Perez JM, Al-halabi Diaz S. Effects of voucher-based intervention on abstinence and retention in an outpatient treatment for cocaine addiction: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Jun;17(3):131-8. doi: 10.1037/a0015963.
PubMed 19586227Higgins ST. Comments on contingency management and conditional cash transfers. Health Econ. 2010 Oct;19(10):1255-8. doi: 10.1002/hec.1543.
PubMed 19670269Higgins, S. T., Heil, S. H., & Sigmon, S. C. (2010). Voucher-based contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Higgins, S.T. and Rogers, R.E. (2009). Contingency management and community reinforcement approach. In Peter M. Miller (Ed.). Evidence-based addiction treatment (pp. 249-267). Burlington: Academic Press, Elsevier Inc.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treating Cocaine Abuse: A Behavioral Approach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01822327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01DA009378
- Conditions
- Cocaine Dependence
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of VermontUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to advance our development of a treatment for cocaine dependence. The investigators hypothesize that clients with high-risk characteristics will benefit from enhanced levels of treatment.
Detailed description
Treatment development for cocaine dependence often proceeds without effort to adapt treatment parameters to patient characteristics. Such a one-size-fits-all approach is problematic because of the heterogeneity of the clinical population. Additionally, the approach is often subject to opposing biases either towards constraining costs or maximizing efficacy. This project includes two sequential clinical trails examining variations of the CRA + Vouchers treatment for cocaine dependence that are designed to explore matching treatment parameters to patient baseline characteristics known to moderate treatment response among cocaine-dependent outpatients. In Trial 1, all patients were randomly assigned to receive 24 weeks of CRA therapy but randomly assigned to one of three voucher-based incentive conditions: (a) 6 weeks of vouchers contingent on abstinence and incentive monetary value at usual level; (b) 6 weeks of vouchers contingent on abstinence but incentive value set at usual level for low-severity patients (intranasal cocaine users or married patients) and at twice the usual value for high severity patients (i.e., unmarried cocaine smokers/injectors), or to (c) a control condition where incentives were provided independent of recent cocaine use. In Trial 2, all patients receive 12 weeks of abstinence-contingent incentives, but randomly assigned to also receive (a) 24 weeks of CRA therapy or (b) 4 weeks of CRA therapy. The overarching goal of the two trials is to strike a balance between the aforementioned biases towards constraining costs or maximizing efficacy and thereby facilitate cost containment without compromising efficacy, especially among more severe patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Contingent Vouchers Unmatched | Experimental | Behavioral: Contingency ManagementCRA therapy plus Voucher incentives contingent on cocaine abstinence with monetary values set at usual monetary values across all patients. |
| Contingent Vouchers, Matched | Experimental | Behavioral: Contingency ManagementCRA therapy plus Vouchers contingent on cocaine abstinence, with more severe patients receiving twice the usual voucher monetary values. |
| Non-Contingent Vouchers control | Active comparator | Behavioral: Contingency ManagementCRA therapy plus Vouchers earned independent of drug use |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 18 years and older
- Meets DSM IV criteria for cocaine dependence
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Psychosis
- Pregnancy
- Leaving immediate geographic area sooner than 6 months
- An organic psychiatric disorder
- Medical illness such that participation is not feasible (e.g., on dialysis).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Contingency ManagementCRA plus Vouchers contingent on drug abstinence with values the same across all patients | Behavioural | Contingent Vouchers Unmatched |
| Contingency ManagementCRA plus Vouchers contingent on cocaine abstinence with more severe patients receiving greater value vouchers | Behavioural | Contingent Vouchers, Matched |
| Contingency ManagementCRA plus Vouchers earned independent of cocaine use | Behavioural | Non-Contingent Vouchers control |
Primary outcome
Biochemically-Verified Cocaine Use
Time frame: 2 years
1 secondary outcome
Addiction Severity Inventory Scores
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2013.
- Background: PubMed 19192866Garcia-Rodriguez O, Secades-Villa R, Higgins ST, Fernandez-Hermida JR, Carballo JL. Financing a voucher program for cocaine abusers through community donations in Spain. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):623-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-623.
- BackgroundHiggins, S.T., Heil, S.H., Rogers, R.E., & Chivers, L. (2008). Cocaine. In S.T. Higgins, K. Silverman, & S.H. Heil (Eds.), Contingency management in substance abuse treatment (pp. 19-410. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- BackgroundHiggins, S.T., Sigmon, S.C., Heil, S.H. (2008). Drug abuse and dependence. In D.H. Barlow (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders (4th ed.). (pp. 547-577). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
- BackgroundHiggins, S.T. & Silverman, K., (2008). Contingency Management. In M. Galanter and H.D. Kleber (Eds.) Textbook of substance abuse treatment (4th ed.). (pp. 387-399). The American Psychiatric Press..
- BackgroundHiggins, S.T. & Silverman, K. (2008). Introduction. In S.T. Higgins, K. Silverman, & S.H. Heil (Eds.), Contingency management in substance abuse treatment (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Background: PubMed 19071979Rogers RE, Higgins ST, Silverman K, Thomas CS, Badger GJ, Bigelow G, Stitzer M. Abstinence-contingent reinforcement and engagement in non-drug-related activities among illicit drug abusers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Dec;22(4):544-50. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.4.544.
- Background: PubMed 19192853Silverman K, Roll JM, Higgins ST. Introduction to the special issue on the behavior analysis and treatment of drug addiction. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Winter;41(4):471-80. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-471.
- Background: PubMed 19586227Garcia-Rodriguez O, Secades-Villa R, Higgins ST, Fernandez-Hermida JR, Carballo JL, Errasti Perez JM, Al-halabi Diaz S. Effects of voucher-based intervention on abstinence and retention in an outpatient treatment for cocaine addiction: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Jun;17(3):131-8. doi: 10.1037/a0015963.
- Background: PubMed 19670269Higgins ST. Comments on contingency management and conditional cash transfers. Health Econ. 2010 Oct;19(10):1255-8. doi: 10.1002/hec.1543.
- BackgroundHiggins, S. T., Heil, S. H., & Sigmon, S. C. (2010). Voucher-based contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Results publicationHiggins, S.T. and Rogers, R.E. (2009). Contingency management and community reinforcement approach. In Peter M. Miller (Ed.). Evidence-based addiction treatment (pp. 249-267). Burlington: Academic Press, Elsevier Inc.
- Substance Abuse Treatment CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Cocaine Dependence
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Recruiting
rTMS and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy for Cocaine Use Disorder
Cocaine Use, Cocaine Dependence
Recruiting
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Treatment of Substance Use Disorder
Cocaine Use Disorder, Cocaine Dependence
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety Study of a Disrupted Adenovirus (Ad) Serotype Cocaine Vaccine for Cocaine-dependent Individuals
Cocaine Dependence
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
AAV8-hCocH for Cocaine Use Disorder
Cocaine Dependence, in Remission
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen T Higgins, Ph.D principal investigator
University of Vermont
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Contingency Management in people with Cocaine Dependence, run by University of Vermont at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biochemically-Verified Cocaine Use (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01822327, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2013.