Self-Injurious BehaviorNCT01823120
Text Message Intervention to Reduce Repeat Self-harm
A study testing Supportive and interactive text messages in people with Self-Injurious Behavior, run by University of Dublin, Trinity College at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
Between 6% and 30% of people who harm themselves repeat this self-harm within the following 12 months. The investigators know that people who harm themselves are much more likely to commit suicide, but the investigators have no clear evidence about the best way to reduce the likelihood of someone harming themselves… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Self-Injurious Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Supportive and interactive text messages
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients 18 years and over, presenting to the ED with self-harm.
- All patients should have a mobile phone, be familiar with text messaging technology and be willing to take part in the study.
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not consent to take part in the study.
- Patients who do not have a mobile phone or are unable to use the mobile text message technology.
- Patients who are admitted as a psychiatric inpatient following the assessment in the ED or those who require admission to a medical ward for longer than 48 hours.
- Patients who would be unavailable for follow-up during the study period.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Text Message Intervention to Reduce Repeat Self-harm in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
Between 6% and 30% of people who harm themselves repeat this self-harm within the following 12 months. The investigators know that people who harm themselves are much more likely to commit suicide, but the investigators have no clear evidence about the best way to reduce the likelihood of someone harming themselves again.
Text messaging is now a common form of communication. Previous research has shown us that the investigators can use text messages for different types of health care interventions. Examples of this include reminding patients of medical appointments, delivering test results, to check patient side effects following treatment and to reduce depressive symptoms in patients with depression and alcohol problems. The Samaritans have introduced interactive text messages (where you can have a conversation by text with their service) and have noted an increasing use of this contact with their service.
Read more
This research study is taking place to find out if using supportive and interactive text messages can reduce further episodes of self-harm in patients who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with self-harm.
The investigators hypothesize that supportive, informative and interactive text messages delivered to patients discharged from an ED after an episode of self-harm will significantly reduce the frequency and intensity of thoughts of self-harm and self-harming behaviour in patients compared with those receiving only follow-up treatment as usual. A secondary hypothesis is that patients receiving the text messages will report a favourable experience and an overall satisfaction with the system.
Read the detailed description
Repetition of self-harm is common, ranging from 6% to 30% in 12 months. Repetition is strongly associated with subsequent suicide and has important implications for healthcare resources. In every country including Ireland, fatal suicide attempts rank among the top ten causes of death for individual of all ages and one of the three leading causes of death in the 15 -35 years age group.
Previous studies of interventions to reduce the repetition of self-harm in unselected patient groups have been unsuccessful in reducing the proportion of repeaters. These interventions have included the use of antidepressants, problem solving, intensive care with outreach, an emergency card, psychosocial crisis intervention, and guaranteed inpatient shelter in cases of emergency. In a study involving the use of low cost postcards after an episode of self-poisoning, although no significant difference in the proportion of individual patients who repeated self-harm were detected, there was a clinically and statistically significant reduction in the number of events per individual by about 50%.
Only a few non-pharmacological interventions have been reported to be effective in reducing repetition in selected subsets of populations with self-harm including; partial hospitalization, dialectical behaviour therapy and psychodynamic interpersonal therapy. These interventions are all resource intensive and therefore may only be applicable to carefully selected patients.
Given the recent global financial crisis with consequent diminution of health care resources, interventions are needed that could be delivered economically to entire populations of patients who self-harm. In light of the growing interest in using text messages as an intervention in healthcare, the investigators will focus in this study on exploring the potential for using text messages to reduce repeat self-harm in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED).
There is established research evidence for using text messages to remind patients of scheduled medical appointments, to coordinate medical staff,to deliver medical test results and to monitor patient side effects following treatment.
In a review of the literature on the use of text messaging for clinical and healthy behaviour interventions, Wei et al. (2011) found that among 16 randomized controlled trials, 10 reported significant improvement with interventions and six reported differences suggesting positive trends. In one meta-analysis of four randomised trials of mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation, it was reported that text message interventions resulted in a significant increase in short-term self-reported quitting (RR of 2.18, 95% CI 1.80 to 2.65). In the same review, when data from an internet and a mobile phone programme were pooled and meta-analysed, they found significant increases in both short-, and long-term, self-reported quitting (RR of 2.03, 95% Conficence Intervals (CI)= 1.40 to 2.94).
In a study of text message services based on qualitative interviews with 12 young people, the aim of which was to provide young people with information on cannabis and help them to reduce their consumption of the drug, participants reported that they saw the messages as flexible and discrete, and as being personally meant for them. They paid more attention to the messages than they did to mass approaches such as public information broadcasts on TV. Along with other factors, the participants reported feeling motivated to decrease their level of cannabis abuse and to maintain a reduced level. .
In another study, young adults in 3 urban EDs (n= 45; aged 18 to 24 years, 54% women) who were identified as hazardous drinkers by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Score were randomly assigned by the researchers to weekly text message-based feedback with goal setting (Intervention), weekly text message-based drinking assessments without feedback (Assessment), or to a control who received no text messages. At 3 months, they found that participants who were exposed to the text message-based intervention had 3.4 (Standard Deviation (SD)= 5.4) fewer heavy drinking days in the last month and 2.1 (SD 1.5) fewer drinks per drinking day when compared to baseline.
In a recent randomised trial in Ireland of supportive text messages for patients with depression and comorbid alcohol use disorder, there was a trend towards finding a greater cumulative abstinence duration in the group that received twice daily supportive text messages compared to the control group who only received fortnightly tank you text messages: 88.3 (SD=6.2) vs. 79.3 (SD=24.1), t=1.78, df=48, p=0.08. In this trial, after adjusting for baseline scores, patients in the supportive text message group also had significantly lower Beck's Depression Inventory Scores compared to the control groups; 8.5 (SD=8.0) vs. 16.7 (SD=10.3) respectively, F (1, 49) = 9.54, p=0.003, ƞp2=0.17.
In a study by Owens et al. (2010) to engage a group of self-harmers in the development of a text-messaging intervention to reduce repetition of self-harm, three broad categories of message emerged, namely, those that affirmed or validated emotions (e.g. "it's ok to feel angry"), those that prescribed actions, distractions or cognitive strategies (e.g. "call Samaritans," "have a warm bath"," take it a minute at a time") and those that were interrogative or designed to initiate dialogue (e.g. "do you want to talk?"). They also found that the group were unable to reach an agreement on a set of messages that might work in all circumstances to reduce the urge to self-harm or to enable people to feel cared for, concluding instead that text messages may need to be individualised. A major limitation of this study was its small sample size of only 8 people. Furthermore, participants in this study only reported how they envisaged they would respond to text messages rather than how they actually responded to text messages which could vary significantly from what is reported. In the recent randomised trial in Ireland of generic supportive text messages for patients with depression and comorbid alcohol use disorder, 20 of the 24 patients (83%) reported that the intervention had played a useful role in helping to improve their mental health.
Recently, the Samaritans in Ireland introduce a limited interactive text message programme for patients who experience suicidal ideation. This service allows clients to receive support when in crisis via an interactive text messaging programme from a trained volunteer.
After an extensive review of the literature using Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Pub Med, ERIC, Web of Science, Science Direct and PsychINFO, no published randomised trial was found on the use of text messages delivered via mobile phone as an intervention to address suicidal ideation and repeat self-harm in patients presenting with self-harm to the ED. Thus, the investigators seek to determine if text messaging is a useful and effective strategy to help reduce the frequency and intensity of thoughts of self-harm and depressive symptoms after patients are discharged from an ED following a presentation with self-harm.
The investigators hypothesize that supportive, informative and interactive text messages delivered to patients discharged from an ED after an episode of self-harm will significantly reduce the frequency and intensity of thoughts of self-harm and self-harming behaviour in patients compared with those receiving only follow-up treatment as usual. A secondary hypothesis is that patients receiving the text messages will report a favourable experience and an overall satisfaction with the system.
- Conditions
- Self-Injurious Behavior
- Being tested
- Supportive and interactive text messages
- Keywords
- Self harm, Emergency Department, Repetition, Supportive Text messages, Interactive
- Medical subject headings
- Self-Injurious Behavior, Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Supportive and interactive text messagesOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No text messages | No intervention | Patients in the non-intervention group will not receive any text messages. However, they will also receive the routine outpatient follow-up arrangements associated with attendance at an ED with self-harm including the provision of a contact phone number for the Samaritans. |
| Supportive and interactive text messages | Experimental | We will deliver daily supportive and informative text messages for one month followed by one supportive and informative text message every other day the second month and then one weekly text message the third month to patients in the intervention group after they have been discharged from the ED following an episode of self-harm. Supportive text messages will mainly target relieving the patients of mood symptoms and providing them with strategies for dealing with suicidal thoughts while the informative ones will provide patients with a dedicated mobile phone number through which they can receive interactive support from the Samaritans. The text messages will encourage participants to text the Samaritans in times of crisis. Please see appendix I for examples of the relevant text messages. Receives: Other: Supportive and interactive text messages |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Repetition of self-harm
Proportion of patients repeating self-harm
Measured: Three months
Change scores on the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire from baseline
The change scores on the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire from baseline
Measured: Baseline and three months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Repeat episodes of self-harm per person
Number of repeat episodes of self-harm per person
Measured: Three months
Change scores in the Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation from baseline
The change scores on the Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation from baseline
Measured: Baseline anf three months
Change scores on the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory from baseline
The change scores on the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory from baseline
Measured: Baseline and three months
Change scores on the Beck Hopelessness Scale from baseline
The change scores on the Beck Hopelessness Scale from baseline
Measured: Baseline and three months
Change scores on the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale from baseline
The change scores on the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale from baseline
Measured: Baseline and three months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Resignation of critical volunteer staff and lack of funding
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Self-Injurious BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Dublin, Trinity College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vincent Agyapong, University of Dublin, Trinity College
- Investigators
- Vincent IO Agyapong, MRCPsych MD, Principal investigator, University of Dublin, Trinity College DublinSiobhan MacHale, FRCPsych, Study chair, Beaumont Hospital Dublin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01823120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13/18
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Agyapong, V., J. Milnes, M. McLoughlin and C. Farren (2012).
Agyapong VI, Ahern S, McLoughlin DM, Farren CK. Supportive text messaging for depression and comorbid alcohol use disorder: single-blind randomised trial. J Affect Disord. 2012 Dec 10;141(2-3):168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.040. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
PubMed 22464008Australian Bureau of Statistics (2003). Household Use of Information Technology Canberra, Australia. B., P. (2003).
Bateman, A. and P. Fonagy (1999).
Brianna S., Fjeldsoe B.A. and Alison L. (2009).
Carter, G. L., K. Clover, I. M. Whyte, A. H. Dawson and C. D'Este (2005).
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Academic Press. New York. Downer, S., J. Meara and A. Da Costa (2005).
Guthrie E, Kapur N, Mackway-Jones K, Chew-Graham C, Moorey J, Mendel E, Marino-Francis F, Sanderson S, Turpin C, Boddy G, Tomenson B. Randomised controlled trial of brief psychological intervention after deliberate self poisoning. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.135.
PubMed 11463679Hawton K, Arensman E, Townsend E, Bremner S, Feldman E, Goldney R, Gunnell D, Hazell P, van Heeringen K, House A, Owens D, Sakinofsky I, Traskman-Bendz L. Deliberate self harm: systematic review of efficacy of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments in preventing repetition. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):441-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.441.
PubMed 9703526Haynes RB., S. D., Guyatt G., Tugwell, P., (2005). Clinical Epidemiology: How to do Clinical Practice Research. Philadelphia PA, Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins.
House A, Owens D, Patchett L. Deliberate self harm. Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;8(2):137-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.2.137. No abstract available.
PubMed 10557677Jeffery RW, Drewnowski A, Epstein LH, Stunkard AJ, Wilson GT, Wing RR, Hill DR. Long-term maintenance of weight loss: current status. Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;19(1S):5-16. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.5.
PubMed 10709944Leong KC, Chen WS, Leong KW, Mastura I, Mimi O, Sheikh MA, Zailinawati AH, Ng CJ, Phua KL, Teng CL. The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2006 Dec;23(6):699-705. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml044. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
PubMed 16916871Linehan MM, Armstrong HE, Suarez A, Allmon D, Heard HL. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;48(12):1060-4. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810360024003.
PubMed 1845222Luborsky, L. (1962).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Text Message Intervention to Reduce Repeat Self-harm in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01823120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 13/18
- Conditions
- Self-Injurious Behavior
- Keywords
- Self harm, Emergency Department, Repetition, Supportive Text messages, Interactive
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Resignation of critical volunteer staff and lack of funding
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Dublin, Trinity CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
- Study start
- Mar 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Between 6% and 30% of people who harm themselves repeat this self-harm within the following 12 months. The investigators know that people who harm themselves are much more likely to commit suicide, but the investigators have no clear evidence about the best way to reduce the likelihood of someone harming themselves again.
Text messaging is now a common form of communication. Previous research has shown us that the investigators can use text messages for different types of health care interventions. Examples of this include reminding patients of medical appointments, delivering test results, to check patient side effects following treatment and to reduce depressive symptoms in patients with depression and alcohol problems. The Samaritans have introduced interactive text messages (where you can have a conversation by text with their service) and have noted an increasing use of this contact with their service.
This research study is taking place to find out if using supportive and interactive text messages can reduce further episodes of self-harm in patients who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with self-harm.
The investigators hypothesize that supportive, informative and interactive text messages delivered to patients discharged from an ED after an episode of self-harm will significantly reduce the frequency and intensity of thoughts of self-harm and self-harming behaviour in patients compared with those receiving only follow-up treatment as usual. A secondary hypothesis is that patients receiving the text messages will report a favourable experience and an overall satisfaction with the system.
Detailed description
Repetition of self-harm is common, ranging from 6% to 30% in 12 months. Repetition is strongly associated with subsequent suicide and has important implications for healthcare resources. In every country including Ireland, fatal suicide attempts rank among the top ten causes of death for individual of all ages and one of the three leading causes of death in the 15 -35 years age group.
Previous studies of interventions to reduce the repetition of self-harm in unselected patient groups have been unsuccessful in reducing the proportion of repeaters. These interventions have included the use of antidepressants, problem solving, intensive care with outreach, an emergency card, psychosocial crisis intervention, and guaranteed inpatient shelter in cases of emergency. In a study involving the use of low cost postcards after an episode of self-poisoning, although no significant difference in the proportion of individual patients who repeated self-harm were detected, there was a clinically and statistically significant reduction in the number of events per individual by about 50%.
Only a few non-pharmacological interventions have been reported to be effective in reducing repetition in selected subsets of populations with self-harm including; partial hospitalization, dialectical behaviour therapy and psychodynamic interpersonal therapy. These interventions are all resource intensive and therefore may only be applicable to carefully selected patients.
Given the recent global financial crisis with consequent diminution of health care resources, interventions are needed that could be delivered economically to entire populations of patients who self-harm. In light of the growing interest in using text messages as an intervention in healthcare, the investigators will focus in this study on exploring the potential for using text messages to reduce repeat self-harm in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED).
There is established research evidence for using text messages to remind patients of scheduled medical appointments, to coordinate medical staff,to deliver medical test results and to monitor patient side effects following treatment.
In a review of the literature on the use of text messaging for clinical and healthy behaviour interventions, Wei et al. (2011) found that among 16 randomized controlled trials, 10 reported significant improvement with interventions and six reported differences suggesting positive trends. In one meta-analysis of four randomised trials of mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation, it was reported that text message interventions resulted in a significant increase in short-term self-reported quitting (RR of 2.18, 95% CI 1.80 to 2.65). In the same review, when data from an internet and a mobile phone programme were pooled and meta-analysed, they found significant increases in both short-, and long-term, self-reported quitting (RR of 2.03, 95% Conficence Intervals (CI)= 1.40 to 2.94).
In a study of text message services based on qualitative interviews with 12 young people, the aim of which was to provide young people with information on cannabis and help them to reduce their consumption of the drug, participants reported that they saw the messages as flexible and discrete, and as being personally meant for them. They paid more attention to the messages than they did to mass approaches such as public information broadcasts on TV. Along with other factors, the participants reported feeling motivated to decrease their level of cannabis abuse and to maintain a reduced level. .
In another study, young adults in 3 urban EDs (n= 45; aged 18 to 24 years, 54% women) who were identified as hazardous drinkers by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Score were randomly assigned by the researchers to weekly text message-based feedback with goal setting (Intervention), weekly text message-based drinking assessments without feedback (Assessment), or to a control who received no text messages. At 3 months, they found that participants who were exposed to the text message-based intervention had 3.4 (Standard Deviation (SD)= 5.4) fewer heavy drinking days in the last month and 2.1 (SD 1.5) fewer drinks per drinking day when compared to baseline.
In a recent randomised trial in Ireland of supportive text messages for patients with depression and comorbid alcohol use disorder, there was a trend towards finding a greater cumulative abstinence duration in the group that received twice daily supportive text messages compared to the control group who only received fortnightly tank you text messages: 88.3 (SD=6.2) vs. 79.3 (SD=24.1), t=1.78, df=48, p=0.08. In this trial, after adjusting for baseline scores, patients in the supportive text message group also had significantly lower Beck's Depression Inventory Scores compared to the control groups; 8.5 (SD=8.0) vs. 16.7 (SD=10.3) respectively, F (1, 49) = 9.54, p=0.003, ƞp2=0.17.
In a study by Owens et al. (2010) to engage a group of self-harmers in the development of a text-messaging intervention to reduce repetition of self-harm, three broad categories of message emerged, namely, those that affirmed or validated emotions (e.g. "it's ok to feel angry"), those that prescribed actions, distractions or cognitive strategies (e.g. "call Samaritans," "have a warm bath"," take it a minute at a time") and those that were interrogative or designed to initiate dialogue (e.g. "do you want to talk?"). They also found that the group were unable to reach an agreement on a set of messages that might work in all circumstances to reduce the urge to self-harm or to enable people to feel cared for, concluding instead that text messages may need to be individualised. A major limitation of this study was its small sample size of only 8 people. Furthermore, participants in this study only reported how they envisaged they would respond to text messages rather than how they actually responded to text messages which could vary significantly from what is reported. In the recent randomised trial in Ireland of generic supportive text messages for patients with depression and comorbid alcohol use disorder, 20 of the 24 patients (83%) reported that the intervention had played a useful role in helping to improve their mental health.
Recently, the Samaritans in Ireland introduce a limited interactive text message programme for patients who experience suicidal ideation. This service allows clients to receive support when in crisis via an interactive text messaging programme from a trained volunteer.
After an extensive review of the literature using Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Pub Med, ERIC, Web of Science, Science Direct and PsychINFO, no published randomised trial was found on the use of text messages delivered via mobile phone as an intervention to address suicidal ideation and repeat self-harm in patients presenting with self-harm to the ED. Thus, the investigators seek to determine if text messaging is a useful and effective strategy to help reduce the frequency and intensity of thoughts of self-harm and depressive symptoms after patients are discharged from an ED following a presentation with self-harm.
The investigators hypothesize that supportive, informative and interactive text messages delivered to patients discharged from an ED after an episode of self-harm will significantly reduce the frequency and intensity of thoughts of self-harm and self-harming behaviour in patients compared with those receiving only follow-up treatment as usual. A secondary hypothesis is that patients receiving the text messages will report a favourable experience and an overall satisfaction with the system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No text messages | No intervention | –Patients in the non-intervention group will not receive any text messages. However, they will also receive the routine outpatient follow-up arrangements associated with attendance at an ED with self-harm including the provision of a contact phone number for the Samaritans. |
| Supportive and interactive text messages | Experimental | Other: Supportive and interactive text messagesWe will deliver daily supportive and informative text messages for one month followed by one supportive and informative text message every other day the second month and then one weekly text message the third month to patients in the intervention group after they have been discharged from the ED following an episode of self-harm. Supportive text messages will mainly target relieving the patients of mood symptoms and providing them with strategies for dealing with suicidal thoughts while the informative ones will provide patients with a dedicated mobile phone number through which they can receive interactive support from the Samaritans. The text messages will encourage participants to text the Samaritans in times of crisis. Please see appendix I for examples of the relevant text messages. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All patients 18 years and over, presenting to the ED with self-harm.
- All patients should have a mobile phone, be familiar with text messaging technology and be willing to take part in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who do not consent to take part in the study.
- Patients who do not have a mobile phone or are unable to use the mobile text message technology.
- Patients who are admitted as a psychiatric inpatient following the assessment in the ED or those who require admission to a medical ward for longer than 48 hours.
- Patients who would be unavailable for follow-up during the study period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive and interactive text messages | Other | Supportive and interactive text messages |
Primary outcome
Repetition of self-harm
Time frame: Three months
Proportion of patients repeating self-harm
Change scores on the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and three months
The change scores on the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire from baseline
5 secondary outcomes
Repeat episodes of self-harm per person
Time frame: Three months
Change scores in the Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation from baseline
Time frame: Baseline anf three months
Change scores on the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and three months
Change scores on the Beck Hopelessness Scale from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and three months
Change scores on the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and three months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Resignation of critical volunteer staff and lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2014.
- BackgroundAgyapong, V., J. Milnes, M. McLoughlin and C. Farren (2012).
- Background: PubMed 22464008Agyapong VI, Ahern S, McLoughlin DM, Farren CK. Supportive text messaging for depression and comorbid alcohol use disorder: single-blind randomised trial. J Affect Disord. 2012 Dec 10;141(2-3):168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.040. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
- BackgroundAustralian Bureau of Statistics (2003). Household Use of Information Technology Canberra, Australia. B., P. (2003).
- BackgroundBateman, A. and P. Fonagy (1999).
- BackgroundBrianna S., Fjeldsoe B.A. and Alison L. (2009).
- BackgroundCarter, G. L., K. Clover, I. M. Whyte, A. H. Dawson and C. D'Este (2005).
- BackgroundCohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Academic Press. New York. Downer, S., J. Meara and A. Da Costa (2005).
- Background: PubMed 11463679Guthrie E, Kapur N, Mackway-Jones K, Chew-Graham C, Moorey J, Mendel E, Marino-Francis F, Sanderson S, Turpin C, Boddy G, Tomenson B. Randomised controlled trial of brief psychological intervention after deliberate self poisoning. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):135-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.135.
- Background: PubMed 9703526Hawton K, Arensman E, Townsend E, Bremner S, Feldman E, Goldney R, Gunnell D, Hazell P, van Heeringen K, House A, Owens D, Sakinofsky I, Traskman-Bendz L. Deliberate self harm: systematic review of efficacy of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments in preventing repetition. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):441-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.441.
- BackgroundHaynes RB., S. D., Guyatt G., Tugwell, P., (2005). Clinical Epidemiology: How to do Clinical Practice Research. Philadelphia PA, Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins.
- Background: PubMed 10557677House A, Owens D, Patchett L. Deliberate self harm. Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;8(2):137-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.2.137. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10709944Jeffery RW, Drewnowski A, Epstein LH, Stunkard AJ, Wilson GT, Wing RR, Hill DR. Long-term maintenance of weight loss: current status. Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;19(1S):5-16. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.5.
Related trials for Self-Injurious Behavior
RecruitingObservational study
Friends/Family of Individuals at Risk of Suicide Training Program
Caregiver, Caregiver Mental Health
Not yet recruiting
BEAR for Women Who Have Experienced Sexual Assault and Have Suicidal Thoughts
Sexual Assault and Rape, Suicidal Thoughts
Active, not recruiting
Motivational Interviewing to Address Suicidal Ideation for Veterans at High Risk for Suicide
Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Stigma - A Treatment for Early Psychosis to Prevent Suicide
Suicide, Mental Health Stigma
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of National Highly Specialized Care for Children and Adolescents With Severe Self-Harm or Eating Disorders
Self-harm Behavior, Eating Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vincent IO Agyapong, MRCPsych MD principal investigator
University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin
Siobhan MacHale, FRCPsych study chair
Beaumont Hospital Dublin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Supportive and interactive text messages in people with Self-Injurious Behavior, run by University of Dublin, Trinity College at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Resignation of critical volunteer staff and lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Repetition of self-harm (time frame: Three months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01823120, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2014.