Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and NeckPhase 2CETMETNCT01830556
Randomised Phase II, Cetuximab in Combination With 5FU and Cisplatin or Carboplatin Versus Cetuximab in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
A Phase 2 study testing Cetuximab in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 5 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Primary To investigate in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck whether progression free survival (PFS) in the arm with cetuximab, paclitaxel and carboplatin based chemotherapy is not markedly worse than PFS in the arm with cetuximab and 5-FU, cisplatin or carboplatin based… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
- What is being tested?
- Cetuximab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >18 years
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed SCCHN, relapsed and/or metastatic
- Patient must have a life expectancy of at least 3 months allowing adequate follow-up toxicity evaluation.
- Clinical examination
- 1 unidimensional lesion according to RECIST 1.1.
- PS WHO 0-1 at study entry
Show all 10Show fewer
- Adequate hematological function defined as WBC ≥3 x 109/litre and platelets ≥100 x 109/litre, ANC > 1.5 x 109/litre and Hb > 100 g/L
- Adequate liver function; bilirubin < 1.5 x UNL, ALAT or ASAT<3.0 UNL, alkaline phosphates < 2.5 UNL.
- Creatinine clearance > 50mL/min
- Written informed consent must be obtained according to the local Ethics committee.
Who cannot join
- > 75 years
- Nasopharyngeal cancer and cancer of the paranasal sinuses
- Inability to follow the treatment and evaluation schedule
- Any other condition or therapy which in the investigator's opinion may pose a risk to the patient or interfere with the study objectives
- Pregnant or nursing females or male or female of child-bearing potential not using adequate methods of birth-control
- Patients with active infections or any other serious underlying medical condition, which would impair the ability of the patients to receive the protocol treatment
Show all 12Show fewer
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the treatment
- Legal incapacity
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease, e.g. cardiac failure of New York Heart Association classes III-IV, uncontrolled coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, uncontrolled arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension, or history of myocardial infarction in the last 12 months.
- Patients with clinically relevant neuropathy
- Previously treated for relapsed or metastatic SCCHN except radiotherapy for previously treated relapse if terminated > 3 months before start of treatment.
- Previously treated with cetuximab, cisplatin/carboplatin, 5-FU or taxanes for locally advanced SCCHN within 3 months before study entry.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 2 countries.
5 sites in 2 countries
Sweden4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hedda Haugen
Gothenburg, 413 45
Hedda Haugen, MD, hedda.haugen@vgregion.se
Hedda Haugen, MD
- Recruiting
Karolinska Universityhospital
Stockholm, Stockholm County, 17176
Teresa herlestam-calero-moreno, MD, maria.herlestam-calero-moreno@karolinska.se
Teresa maria.herlestam-calero-moreno, MD
- Recruiting
Karin Söderström
Umeå, 90189
Karin Söderström, D, karin.soderstrom@onkologi.umu.se
Karin Söderström, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Akademiska Universityhospital
Uppsala, 751 85
Silvia Johansson, MD, silvia.johansson@onkologi.uu.se
Silvia Johansson, MD
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Lena Specht
Copenhagen, 2100
Lena Specht, MD DMSc Professor, lena.specht@rh.regionh.dk
Lena Specht, MD DMSc Professor
About this study
Official title: Cetuximab 5-FU and Cisplatin or Carboplatin Versus Cetuximab With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
Primary To investigate in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck whether progression free survival (PFS) in the arm with cetuximab, paclitaxel and carboplatin based chemotherapy is not markedly worse than PFS in the arm with cetuximab and 5-FU, cisplatin or carboplatin based chemotherapy.
Secondary
To compare in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck the following study variables between both treatment arms:
- Best overall response
- Duration of response
- Time to treatment failure
- Overall survival
- Safety
Read the detailed description
Recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN patients are, by definition patients with recurrent disease and/or with newly diagnosed distant metastases, although this group of patients has a very heterogeneous disease characteristic, they share a dismal prognosis that has changed little in the past 30 years. The median survival time remains around 6-8 months with a poor quality of life. Patients with resectable locoregionally recurrent SCCHN may benefit from surgery. Patients with recurrent SCCHN who are not suitable for curative salvage surgery or re-irradiation, and patients who have distant metastases, usually receive CT (Cohen EE et al.) A number of compounds demonstrate single-agent activity in recurrent and/or metastatic disease including cisplatin, carboplatin, methotrexate, 5-FU, bleomycin and the taxanes ( Scantz SP et al). Cisplatin is one of the most active agents identified for head and neck cancer, with carboplatin providing an alternative for patients unable to tolerate cisplatin. While carboplatin is associated with lower response rates than cisplatin, there appears to be no difference between the agents in terms of survival
Cetuximab is a targeted therapeutic agent, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the EGFR with high affinity, internalising the receptor and preventing the ligands EGF and TGF-alfa from interacting with the receptors and thus effectively blocking ligand-induced EGFR phosphorylation. In addition, cetuximab has been found to potentiate the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in experimental systems. The dose of cetuximab has been found to be generally safe and effective in several studies in major tumor types expressing the EGFR. These included colorectal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer, with cetuximab given either in combination studies with chemotherapy and radiotherapy or as monotherapy. The main side effects of cetuximab monotherapy are hypersensitivity- and acne-like skin reactions.
- Being tested
- Cetuximab
- Medical subject headings
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CetuximabDrug
Also called Erbitux
Group A:Day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes Day 1 Cisplatin 100mg/m2 or Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1-4 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 iv 24 h Group B day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes day 1 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1 Carboplatin AUC 5 treatment for 6 cycles thereafter day 1 Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every second week treatment until progress or unacceptable toxicity
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: cetuximab with 5FU and carboplatin or cisplatin | Active comparator | Arm A:Day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes Day 1 Cisplatin 100mg/m2 or Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1-4 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 iv 24 h maintenance treatment thereafter with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every second week until PD or toxicity Receives: Drug: Cetuximab |
| Arm B: cetuximab paclitaxel and carboplatin | Experimental | Arm B day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes day 1 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1 Carboplatin AUC 5 treatment for 6 cycles thereafter maintenance treatment day 1 Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every second week treatment until progress or unacceptable toxicity Receives: Drug: Cetuximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression free survival
To investigate in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck whether progression free survival (PFS) in the arm with cetuximab, paclitaxel and carboplatin based chemotherapy is not markedly worse than PFS in the arm with cetuximab and 5-FU, cisplatin or carboplatin based chemotherapy.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Best overall response
To compare in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck the following study variables between both treatment arms:
- Best overall response
- Duration of response
- Time to treatment failure
- Overall survival
- Safety
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionNov 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and NeckStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Signe Friesland, Karolinska University Hospital
- Investigators
- Signe Friesland, MD Phd, Principal investigator, Karolinska Universityhospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01830556
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CETMET study
- Acronym
- CETMET
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 21 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cetuximab 5-FU and Cisplatin or Carboplatin Versus Cetuximab With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01830556
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CETMET / CETMET study
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary To investigate in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck whether progression free survival (PFS) in the arm with cetuximab, paclitaxel and carboplatin based chemotherapy is not markedly worse than PFS in the arm with cetuximab and 5-FU, cisplatin or carboplatin based chemotherapy.
Secondary
To compare in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck the following study variables between both treatment arms:
- Best overall response
- Duration of response
- Time to treatment failure
- Overall survival
- Safety
Detailed description
Recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN patients are, by definition patients with recurrent disease and/or with newly diagnosed distant metastases, although this group of patients has a very heterogeneous disease characteristic, they share a dismal prognosis that has changed little in the past 30 years. The median survival time remains around 6-8 months with a poor quality of life. Patients with resectable locoregionally recurrent SCCHN may benefit from surgery. Patients with recurrent SCCHN who are not suitable for curative salvage surgery or re-irradiation, and patients who have distant metastases, usually receive CT (Cohen EE et al.) A number of compounds demonstrate single-agent activity in recurrent and/or metastatic disease including cisplatin, carboplatin, methotrexate, 5-FU, bleomycin and the taxanes ( Scantz SP et al). Cisplatin is one of the most active agents identified for head and neck cancer, with carboplatin providing an alternative for patients unable to tolerate cisplatin. While carboplatin is associated with lower response rates than cisplatin, there appears to be no difference between the agents in terms of survival
Cetuximab is a targeted therapeutic agent, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the EGFR with high affinity, internalising the receptor and preventing the ligands EGF and TGF-alfa from interacting with the receptors and thus effectively blocking ligand-induced EGFR phosphorylation. In addition, cetuximab has been found to potentiate the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in experimental systems. The dose of cetuximab has been found to be generally safe and effective in several studies in major tumor types expressing the EGFR. These included colorectal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer, with cetuximab given either in combination studies with chemotherapy and radiotherapy or as monotherapy. The main side effects of cetuximab monotherapy are hypersensitivity- and acne-like skin reactions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: cetuximab with 5FU and carboplatin or cisplatin | Active comparator | Drug: CetuximabArm A:Day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes Day 1 Cisplatin 100mg/m2 or Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1-4 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 iv 24 h maintenance treatment thereafter with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every second week until PD or toxicity |
| Arm B: cetuximab paclitaxel and carboplatin | Experimental | Drug: CetuximabArm B day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes day 1 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1 Carboplatin AUC 5 treatment for 6 cycles thereafter maintenance treatment day 1 Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every second week treatment until progress or unacceptable toxicity |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- >18 years
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed SCCHN, relapsed and/or metastatic
- Patient must have a life expectancy of at least 3 months allowing adequate follow-up toxicity evaluation.
- Clinical examination
- 1 unidimensional lesion according to RECIST 1.1.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- > 75 years
- Nasopharyngeal cancer and cancer of the paranasal sinuses
- Inability to follow the treatment and evaluation schedule
- Any other condition or therapy which in the investigator's opinion may pose a risk to the patient or interfere with the study objectives
- Pregnant or nursing females or male or female of child-bearing potential not using adequate methods of birth-control
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CetuximabAlso: ErbituxGroup A:Day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes Day 1 Cisplatin 100mg/m2 or Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1-4 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 iv 24 h Group B day 1 Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 iv 120 minutes Day 8 and 15 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 iv 60 minutes day 1 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1 Carboplatin AUC 5 treatment for 6 cycles thereafter day 1 Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every second week treatment until progress or unacceptable toxicity | Drug | Arm A: cetuximab with 5FU and carboplatin or cisplatin, Arm B: cetuximab paclitaxel and carboplatin |
Primary outcome
Progression free survival
Time frame: 3 years
To investigate in patients with relapsed or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck whether progression free survival (PFS) in the arm with cetuximab, paclitaxel and carboplatin based chemotherapy is not markedly worse than PFS in the arm with cetuximab and 5-FU, cisplatin or carboplatin based chemotherapy.
1 secondary outcome
Best overall response
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2013.
Related trials for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Signe Friesland, MD Phd principal investigator
Karolinska Universityhospital
5 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cetuximab in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, run by Karolinska University Hospital at 5 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Sweden, Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression free survival (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2013.