Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 4NCT01832935
Cost Effectiveness of Glargine Insulin Versus NPH Insulin
A Phase 4 study testing insulin glargine and Insulin NPH in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Tehran University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
Trial summary
Glycemic control is fundamental in the management of diabetes mellitus .If lifestyle intervention and full tolerated doses of one or two oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) fail to achieve or sustain glycemic goals, insulin should be initiated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- insulin glargine and Insulin NPH
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIran
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diabetes type 2
- HbA1c 8% or higher
- age 18 to 65
Who cannot join
- alteration in insulin sensitivity such as major surgery, infection, renal failure (Glomerular Filtration Rate < 50),
- glucocorticoid treatment,
- recent (within 2 weeks) serious hypoglycemic episode (requires assistance of another),
- simultaneous participating in another clinical study,
- using any type of insulin,
- sight or hearing impaired,
Show all 10Show fewer
- active proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy require treatment within 6 months prior to screening,
- breast feeding,
- pregnancy or nursing of the intention of becoming pregnant or
- not using adequate contraceptive measures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Iran1 site
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Tehran, Tehran Province, 13145-784
About this study
Official title: Cost Effectiveness of Glargine Insulin Versus NPH Insulin in Diabetic Patients in Iran
Glycemic control is fundamental in the management of diabetes mellitus .If lifestyle intervention and full tolerated doses of one or two oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) fail to achieve or sustain glycemic goals, insulin should be initiated. New insulin analogs are generated to improve glycemic control .New insulin analogs are generated to improve glycemic control,However, the cost of these analogs is a major problem .The aim of this piggy back evaluation was to assess the effect of Glargine insuline versus NPH plus regular human insulin on metabolic control as well as its cost-effectiveness in people with type 2 diabetes in the Iranian setting.
Read the detailed description
This was a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial of 12months on subjects with type 2 diabetes. Two hundred diabetic subjects, 18-65 years of age, were included in the study. Subjects were willing to initiate insulin therapy and had A1C >8.0%. Any current and prior medications were acceptable for participant inclusion other than any type of insulin being evaluated. Demographic and anthropometric variables were recorded. Paraclinical data including glucose and lipid profile were measured every three months.In addition, quality of life was assessed with self-administered standard EQ-5D questionnaire.
Subjects were excluded for any of the following criteria: Alteration in insulin sensitivity such as major surgery, infection, renal failure (Glomerular Filtration Rate < 50), glucocorticoid treatment, recent (within 2 weeks) serious hypoglycemic episode (requires assistance of another), simultaneous participating in another clinical study, using any type of insulin, sight or hearing impaired, active proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy require treatment within 6 months prior to screening, breast feeding, pregnancy or nursing of the intention of becoming pregnant or not using adequate contraceptive measures.
Participants were recruited between July 2011 and October 2012. They were randomly allocated to two groups using a simple randomization method The insulin therapies were prescribed by a physician in the clinic. The starting dose of insulin Glargine was 24 units per day (0.2-0.6 unit/kg) in 2 divided doses in the intervention group. The control group received NPH/Reg insulin (2:1) with initiation dose of 0.2-0.6 unit/kg in 2 divided doses.Two-thirds of the dose was given before breakfast and the remainder before dinner. In the study, insulin analogues were used in accordance with the licensed approval from the local regulatory authority. Changes to OGLDs at the time of starting the insulin analogue, or thereafter, were entirely at the discretion of the participant and physician. Paraclinical data were measured in a referral laboratory every three months. Trial visits were defined as 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks from baseline. All participants were asked to record their 7-point blood glucose values in three consecutive days before each visit. Seven-point self-monitoring blood glucose includes three pre-meals, three post-meals, and bedtime blood glucose values during each day.Insulin doses were adjusted by a titration regimen according to self-monitored blood glucose.For both groups, treatment goals were as follows: fasting blood glucose of 80-120 mg/dl, postprandial glucose <160 mg/dl, A1C<7% We collected medical costs of each patient by a checklist. All patients had been asked to attend in our clinic every one month during the study. Clinical events or hospital episodes and also all related costs were determined at each visit. Any pharmaceutical, laboratory/diagnostic and rehabilitative care, as well as any contact with specialists, general practitioners, nurses, opticians, podiatrists, and dieticians were recorded for patients with/without complication.Finally total costs were calculated.
Direct nonmedical costs:
Any services such as transportation for patients and their family to clinic and taking care of dependents were assessed for non-medical expenditures by a patient self-estimate questionnaire.
Indirect costs:
The lost productivity costs due to health problems of diabetes were determined by days absent from work, poor work performance, low earnings capacity from disabilities, and mortality. We calculated number of days in each visit who could not be present in their job because of diabetes related health care. The average net hourly wage was asked from each patient. For unemployed patients, we considered average wage of population who were economically active and in employment. Lost earnings owing to premature mortality were defined as the mortality costs. Costs from health provider perspective, were converted from Iranian Rials (IRR) into USA dollar (USD) at an official exchange rate of 12,260 IRR/1USD 2012 to have an international comparison (Central Bank of Iran).
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- insulin glargine, Insulin NPH
- Keywords
- Glargin, NPH, Cost-effectiveness
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
insulin glargineDrug
Also called Lantus
The starting dose of insulin Glargine was 24 units per day (0.2-0.6 unit/kg) in 2 divided doses
Insulin NPHDrug
The starting dose of insulin NPH was 24 units per day (0.2-0.6 unit/kg) in 2 divided doses
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| insulin glargine | Active comparator | patients receiving variable doses of Insulin glargine.start with 0.2 to 0.6unit per kg Receives: Drug: insulin glargine |
| Insulin NPH | Active comparator | patients receiving Variable doses Of Insulin NPH Start with 0.2 to 0.6 unit per kg Receives: Drug: Insulin NPH |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number Of Hypoglycemic events
The Number Of Hypoglycemic Events That Happend For Patients During Taking Both Insulines
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alireza Esteghamati, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Alireza Esteghamati, M.D., Principal investigator, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01832935
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 89-123
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cost Effectiveness of Glargine Insulin Versus NPH Insulin in Diabetic Patients in Iran
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01832935
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 89-123
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Glargin, NPH, Cost-effectiveness
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Glycemic control is fundamental in the management of diabetes mellitus .If lifestyle intervention and full tolerated doses of one or two oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) fail to achieve or sustain glycemic goals, insulin should be initiated. New insulin analogs are generated to improve glycemic control .New insulin analogs are generated to improve glycemic control,However, the cost of these analogs is a major problem .The aim of this piggy back evaluation was to assess the effect of Glargine insuline versus NPH plus regular human insulin on metabolic control as well as its cost-effectiveness in people with type 2 diabetes in the Iranian setting.
Detailed description
This was a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial of 12months on subjects with type 2 diabetes. Two hundred diabetic subjects, 18-65 years of age, were included in the study. Subjects were willing to initiate insulin therapy and had A1C >8.0%. Any current and prior medications were acceptable for participant inclusion other than any type of insulin being evaluated. Demographic and anthropometric variables were recorded. Paraclinical data including glucose and lipid profile were measured every three months.In addition, quality of life was assessed with self-administered standard EQ-5D questionnaire.
Subjects were excluded for any of the following criteria: Alteration in insulin sensitivity such as major surgery, infection, renal failure (Glomerular Filtration Rate < 50), glucocorticoid treatment, recent (within 2 weeks) serious hypoglycemic episode (requires assistance of another), simultaneous participating in another clinical study, using any type of insulin, sight or hearing impaired, active proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy require treatment within 6 months prior to screening, breast feeding, pregnancy or nursing of the intention of becoming pregnant or not using adequate contraceptive measures.
Participants were recruited between July 2011 and October 2012. They were randomly allocated to two groups using a simple randomization method The insulin therapies were prescribed by a physician in the clinic. The starting dose of insulin Glargine was 24 units per day (0.2-0.6 unit/kg) in 2 divided doses in the intervention group. The control group received NPH/Reg insulin (2:1) with initiation dose of 0.2-0.6 unit/kg in 2 divided doses.Two-thirds of the dose was given before breakfast and the remainder before dinner. In the study, insulin analogues were used in accordance with the licensed approval from the local regulatory authority. Changes to OGLDs at the time of starting the insulin analogue, or thereafter, were entirely at the discretion of the participant and physician. Paraclinical data were measured in a referral laboratory every three months. Trial visits were defined as 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks from baseline. All participants were asked to record their 7-point blood glucose values in three consecutive days before each visit. Seven-point self-monitoring blood glucose includes three pre-meals, three post-meals, and bedtime blood glucose values during each day.Insulin doses were adjusted by a titration regimen according to self-monitored blood glucose.For both groups, treatment goals were as follows: fasting blood glucose of 80-120 mg/dl, postprandial glucose <160 mg/dl, A1C<7% We collected medical costs of each patient by a checklist. All patients had been asked to attend in our clinic every one month during the study. Clinical events or hospital episodes and also all related costs were determined at each visit. Any pharmaceutical, laboratory/diagnostic and rehabilitative care, as well as any contact with specialists, general practitioners, nurses, opticians, podiatrists, and dieticians were recorded for patients with/without complication.Finally total costs were calculated.
Direct nonmedical costs:
Any services such as transportation for patients and their family to clinic and taking care of dependents were assessed for non-medical expenditures by a patient self-estimate questionnaire.
Indirect costs:
The lost productivity costs due to health problems of diabetes were determined by days absent from work, poor work performance, low earnings capacity from disabilities, and mortality. We calculated number of days in each visit who could not be present in their job because of diabetes related health care. The average net hourly wage was asked from each patient. For unemployed patients, we considered average wage of population who were economically active and in employment. Lost earnings owing to premature mortality were defined as the mortality costs. Costs from health provider perspective, were converted from Iranian Rials (IRR) into USA dollar (USD) at an official exchange rate of 12,260 IRR/1USD 2012 to have an international comparison (Central Bank of Iran).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| insulin glargine | Active comparator | Drug: insulin glarginepatients receiving variable doses of Insulin glargine.start with 0.2 to 0.6unit per kg |
| Insulin NPH | Active comparator | Drug: Insulin NPHpatients receiving Variable doses Of Insulin NPH Start with 0.2 to 0.6 unit per kg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- diabetes type 2
- HbA1c 8% or higher
- age 18 to 65
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- alteration in insulin sensitivity such as major surgery, infection, renal failure (Glomerular Filtration Rate < 50),
- glucocorticoid treatment,
- recent (within 2 weeks) serious hypoglycemic episode (requires assistance of another),
- simultaneous participating in another clinical study,
- using any type of insulin,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| insulin glargineAlso: LantusThe starting dose of insulin Glargine was 24 units per day (0.2-0.6 unit/kg) in 2 divided doses | Drug | insulin glargine |
| Insulin NPHThe starting dose of insulin NPH was 24 units per day (0.2-0.6 unit/kg) in 2 divided doses | Drug | Insulin NPH |
Primary outcome
Number Of Hypoglycemic events
Time frame: 3 months
The Number Of Hypoglycemic Events That Happend For Patients During Taking Both Insulines
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2013.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alireza Esteghamati, M.D. principal investigator
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing insulin glargine and Insulin NPH in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Tehran University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number Of Hypoglycemic events (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2013.