Multiple Chemical SensitivityNCT01834781
Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
A study testing Pulsed electromagnetic fields and w/o pulsed electromagnetic fields in people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, run by The Danish Research Centre for Chemical Sensitivities at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether pulsed electromagnetic fields(PEMF) is effective in the treatment of multiple chemical sensitivity in terms of life impact, symptoms, psychological distress, markers of central sensitization and the immune system, and quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
- What is being tested?
- Pulsed electromagnetic fields and w/o pulsed electromagnetic fields
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Lacour's criteria for multiple chemical sensitivity
- Lifestyle or functional impairments that score ≥ 35 on the Life Impact scale of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- previous PEMF therapy
- psychosis or a comparable disorder
- epilepsy
- cerebral tumours
- leukaemia or malignancies in the head or neck region
- having a pacemaker or other active implants
Show all 12Show fewer
- pregnancy or nursing
- unreliable contraception
- drug or alcohol abuse
- a pending application or intentions to apply for early retirement
- initiation of pharmacological treatment which have not steadied
- participation in another research study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
The Danish Research Centre for Chemical Sensitivities
Gentofte Municipality, DK-2820
About this study
Official title: Transcranial Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: a Study Protocol for a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine whether pulsed electromagnetic fields(PEMF) is effective in the treatment of multiple chemical sensitivity in terms of life impact, symptoms, psychological distress, markers of central sensitization and the immune system, and quality of life.
- Conditions
- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
- Being tested
- Pulsed electromagnetic fields, w/o pulsed electromagnetic fields
- Keywords
- multiple chemical sensitivity, re5 therapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pulsed electromagnetic fieldsDevice
Also called Re5 Independent System, Re5 therapy
w/o pulsed electromagnetic fieldsDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pulsed electromagnetic fields | Active comparator | Pulsed electromagnetic fields is applied transcranially 30 minutes twice a day for 7 days a week over 6 consecutive weeks Receives: Device: Pulsed electromagnetic fields |
| Wearing the inactive device | Placebo comparator | The inactive device is worn on the head for 30 minutes twice a day for 7 days a week over 6 consecutive weeks Receives: Device: w/o pulsed electromagnetic fields |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in Life Impact Scale (Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory)
The Life Impact Scale is part of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI). The QEESI consists of five scales measuring different domains related to chemical sensitivities, i.e. commonly reported symptoms, chemical (inhalant) intolerances, other intolerances, life impact attributed to chemical intolerances, and on-going exposures from routinely used products (Masking Index). The Life Impact Scale consists of 10 items, where responses are rated on an 11 point scale ranging from "not at all a problem" (0) to "disabling symptoms" (10)), resulting in a score range from 0 to 100.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change from baseline in Symptom Severity Scale (Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory)
The Symptom severity scale from the QEESI consist of ten items where responses are rated on an eleven point scale ranging from "not at all a problem" (0) to "disabling symptoms" (10), resulting in a score range from 0 to 100.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in Chemical Intolerance Scale (Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory)
The Chemical Intolerance scale from the QEESI consist of ten items where responses are rated on an eleven point scale ranging from "not at all a problem" (0) to "disabling symptoms" (10), resulting in a score range from 0 to 100.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale
The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is widely used in psychiatry, but has also been applied to many other chronic medical illnesses. It uses visuo-spatial, numeric and descriptive anchors to measure impaired functioning in three domains: work, social life and family life. The scale generates four disability scores, one for each domain and a total score by adding up the three individual domain scores
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in individual self-selected tasks
In addition to the Life Impact scale used as the primary outcome measure, the participants will need to select three tasks in the areas of work, social life and family life, which are impaired by MCS at baseline. The degree of impairment associated with each task is scored on a scale from 0-10 with visuo-spatial, numeric and descriptive anchors similar to SDS.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in noise sensitivity
To measure the participants' sensitivity to noise, they will be asked to grade their responses to 10 different noises (e.g. drone of a machine, stroke of a hammer, rustling of paper) on a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: Week 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in depression (Symptom Check List-92)
The Symptom Checklist 92 (SCL-92) subscales for depression, anxiety and somatization will be included. These subscales comprise 35 items on which responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from not at all to very much.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in anxiety (Symptom Check List-92)
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in somatization (Symptom Check List-92)
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in 6-item Hamiltons Depression Scale
The 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) is a short self-administered measure of depression. The scale has been shown to be as sensitive as the more widely used 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) to measure antidepressive treatment effects.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in Perceived Stress Scale
The short version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) consists of 10 questions and measures the self-perception of stress by grading how different life situations are perceived. The PSS-10 has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of perceived stress.
Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in World Health Organization Quality Of Life Brief version
The brief version of World Health Organization Quality Of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) is a short multidimensional questionnaire, which measures health-related quality of life. The scale consists of four domains: physical health, psychological well-being, social relationships and environment.
Measured: Week 6 and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in capsaicin-induced secondary punctate hyperalgesia
Measured: Week 6
Change from baseline in immunological markers in serum
IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, IL-21, IL-22, IL-23, TNFα, IFNγ
Measured: Week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionMar 2014
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple Chemical SensitivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Danish Research Centre for Chemical Sensitivities
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aage Bangs Fond
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01834781
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MCS-Re5
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Tran MT, Skovbjerg S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Christensen KB, Elberling J. Transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields for multiple chemical sensitivity: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Aug 16;14:256. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-256.
PubMed 23947742
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcranial Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: a Study Protocol for a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01834781
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MCS-Re5
- Conditions
- Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
- Keywords
- multiple chemical sensitivity, re5 therapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Danish Research Centre for Chemical SensitivitiesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aage Bangs Fond
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether pulsed electromagnetic fields(PEMF) is effective in the treatment of multiple chemical sensitivity in terms of life impact, symptoms, psychological distress, markers of central sensitization and the immune system, and quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pulsed electromagnetic fields | Active comparator | Device: Pulsed electromagnetic fieldsPulsed electromagnetic fields is applied transcranially 30 minutes twice a day for 7 days a week over 6 consecutive weeks |
| Wearing the inactive device | Placebo comparator | Device: w/o pulsed electromagnetic fieldsThe inactive device is worn on the head for 30 minutes twice a day for 7 days a week over 6 consecutive weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Lacour's criteria for multiple chemical sensitivity
- Lifestyle or functional impairments that score ≥ 35 on the Life Impact scale of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- previous PEMF therapy
- psychosis or a comparable disorder
- epilepsy
- cerebral tumours
- leukaemia or malignancies in the head or neck region
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pulsed electromagnetic fieldsAlso: Re5 Independent System, Re5 therapy | Device | Pulsed electromagnetic fields |
| w/o pulsed electromagnetic fields | Device | Wearing the inactive device |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in Life Impact Scale (Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory)
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
The Life Impact Scale is part of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI). The QEESI consists of five scales measuring different domains related to chemical sensitivities, i.e. commonly reported symptoms, chemical (inhalant) intolerances, other intolerances, life impact attributed to chemical intolerances, and on-going exposures from routinely used products (Masking Index). The Life Impact Scale consists of 10 items, where responses are rated on an 11 point scale ranging from "not at all a problem" (0) to "disabling symptoms" (10)), resulting in a score range from 0 to 100.
13 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in Symptom Severity Scale (Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory)
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in Chemical Intolerance Scale (Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory)
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in individual self-selected tasks
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in noise sensitivity
Time frame: Week 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in depression (Symptom Check List-92)
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in anxiety (Symptom Check List-92)
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in somatization (Symptom Check List-92)
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in 6-item Hamiltons Depression Scale
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in World Health Organization Quality Of Life Brief version
Time frame: Week 6 and 4½ month follow-ups
Change from baseline in capsaicin-induced secondary punctate hyperalgesia
Time frame: Week 6
Change from baseline in immunological markers in serum
Time frame: Week 6
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23947742Tran MT, Skovbjerg S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Christensen KB, Elberling J. Transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields for multiple chemical sensitivity: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Aug 16;14:256. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-256.
Related trials for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Subconjunctival Humira for Boston Keratoprosthesis
Penetrating Keratoplasty, Multiple Graft Failure
Recruiting
Effectiveness of a Cognitive and Behavioral Treatment Program in People With Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance (IEI)
Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance
Active, not recruiting
Central Processing of Odour Stimuli in Patients With Functional Somatic Disorder, MCS or Post Covid Compared to Healthy Controls
Functional Disorder, Bodily Distress Syndrome
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Crohn Disease, Ulcerative Colitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pulsed electromagnetic fields and w/o pulsed electromagnetic fields in people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, run by The Danish Research Centre for Chemical Sensitivities at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in Life Impact Scale (Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory) (time frame: Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 2½ and 4½ month follow-ups). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01834781, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2014.