TraumaPhase 2GIFT PilotNCT01835990
Feasibility Study of Geko vs. IPCs in Trauma
A Phase 2 study testing geko and IPCs in people with Trauma and Venous Thromboembolism, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Trauma patients are at a high risk of developing blood clots in the legs (deep vein thrombosis - DVT), which can travel to the lungs and cause serious health consequences. Often, these patients cannot receive blood-thinning medication to prevent these blood clots because of the risk of bleeding; in this case, they are… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Trauma, Venous Thromboembolism
- What is being tested?
- geko and IPCs
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of trauma, meeting criteria for referral to the HHS trauma service - ANY of the following (1-3):
- patient with obvious major injuries in two or more systems, each requiring a specialist and inpatient care
- spinal injury with paraplegia or tetraplegia; severe penetrating injury to the head, neck, trunk or groin; amputation above the wrist or ankle; burns, second or third degree, involving 20% or more body surface area, or involving the face or genitalia
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than or equal to 10, as a result of trauma or any two of:
- significant decrease in level of consciousness
- pulse < 50 or > 120
Show all 13Show fewer
- BP < 80 or absent radial pulse
- Respiratory rate < 10 or > 24
- Subject admitted to the Hamilton General Hospital ICU or the hospital ward step-down units
- Age 18 years or older
- Contraindication to anticoagulation expected to last for more than 3 days. Contraindication to anticoagulation may include intracranial hemorrhage, ocular injury with associated hemorrhage, solid intra-abdominal organ injury (i.e. liver, spleen, kidney), and/or pelvic or retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfusion. [12] The final determination of whether anticoagulant prophylaxis is contraindicated will be made by the treating physician.
- Projected hospitalization greater than 3 days (as determined by treating physician)
- Informed consent can be provided by the subject or substitute decision maker within 48 hours of admission
Who cannot join
- Inability to wear either IPCs or gekoTM on both legs, including but not limited to:
- unstable fracture of the lower extremity;
- compartment syndrome of the lower extremity;
- skin breakdown affecting the area on which the devices will be applied;
- prior amputation affecting the area on which the devices will be applied;
- severe peripheral ischemic vascular disease;
Show all 20Show fewer
- uncontrolled bleeding of the lower extremity;
- Diagnosis of DVT within 1 month prior to assessment for enrollment
- Use of anticoagulant medication within 24h of enrollment (except when used solely as a flush for intravenous catheters), or ongoing effect of anticoagulant medication at time of enrollment as determined by history of medication use and laboratory evidence of medication effect. For the purposes of this study, anticoagulant medications include:
- unfractionated heparin (intravenous or subcutaneous)
- low molecular weight heparin
- fondaparinux
- dabigatran
- rivaroxaban
- warfarin
- argatroban
- danaparoid
- lepirudin
- Leg circumference greater than 24 inches at the location the gekoTM device would be secured to the leg.
- Presence of cardiac demand pacemaker
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Feasibility Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Device vs. Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients
Trauma patients are at a high risk of developing blood clots in the legs (deep vein thrombosis - DVT), which can travel to the lungs and cause serious health consequences. Often, these patients cannot receive blood-thinning medication to prevent these blood clots because of the risk of bleeding; in this case, they are usually given intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs) to prevent blood clots. IPCs are inflatable sleeves that fit over the legs and periodically inflate and deflate, helping to pump blood out of the legs and thus reduce the risk of blood clot formation. Several studies suggest that IPCs are working properly on the patient only 60-70% of the time. Some patients also find them uncomfortable. A new device (geko) that works by stimulating the leg muscles and increasing blood flow in the legs has recently been developed. To compare the geko with IPCs, this study will randomly assign trauma patients who cannot receive blood thinners for blood clot prevention to either IPCs or geko. The main goal is to determine the feasibility of doing a larger study which would compare the efficacy of these devices in preventing blood clots. The amount of time the devices are properly used on the patients, comfort and tolerability, development of blood clots, and blood flow in the leg veins and arteries will also be measured and compared between the devices.
- Conditions
- Trauma, Venous Thromboembolism
- Being tested
- geko, IPCs
- Keywords
- venous thromboembolism, trauma, mechanical methods of prophylaxis
- Medical subject headings
- Wounds and Injuries, Venous Thromboembolism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
gekoDevice
Also called neuromuscular stimulation device
The geko is a neuromuscular stimulation device that stimulates the common peroneal nerve resulting in contraction of the leg muscles and increased venous and arterial flow. It is Health Canada approved for prevention of deep venous thrombosis.
IPCsDevice
Also called intermittent pneumatic compression devices, Arjo Huntleigh Flowtron
devices that pneumatically compress the leg, resulting in increased venous blood flow.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| geko | Experimental | For subjects randomized to the experimental treatment arm, one gekoTM device will be applied to each leg according to the manufacturer's instructions by the subject's primary care nurse. All nurses applying the devices must be trained on proper application technique. The old devices will be removed and new devices applied daily. The subject will continue to use the devices until he or she exits the study. Receives: Device: geko |
| IPCs | Active comparator | The control treatment will consist of the hospital's standard IPC devices. The IPCs will be applied to each leg by the subject's primary care nurse according to the manufacturer's instructions. They will continue to be applied until exit from the study. At the time of withdrawal from the study, the decision regarding continued use of IPCs will be made by the treating physician. Receives: Device: IPCs |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of completing a larger, phase III trial with DVT incidence as primary outcome
This endpoint will be considered to have been met if, after enrollment of 40 subjects, both of the following conditions are met:
- the time from enrollment of the first subject to enrollment of the 40th subject is less than 18 months; AND ii. all secondary outcomes are evaluable for at least 80% of subjects.
Measured: earliest of when 40th subject is enrolled or 18 months from study start
Secondary outcomes (4)
Compliance
Study personnel will assess compliance. For subjects randomized to gekoTM, the subject will be considered compliant for the visit if:
- one gekoTM device is attached to each leg; AND ii) a muscle contraction caused by each device can be visualized with the subject's leg at rest;
For subjects randomized to IPCs, the subject will be considered compliant for the visit if:
- one calf sleeve is affixed to each leg; AND ii) both sleeves are visibly inflating and deflating.
A compliance statistic will be computed for each subject by dividing the number of compliant observations by the total number of observations. A mean value will be determined for each study arm. The means will be compared using a two-tailed Student's t-test with alpha = 0.05. The proportion of subjects with a compliance statistic of at least 80% will be calculated. The proportion of subjects with at least 80% compliance will be compared between study treatment arms using Fisher's exact test.
Measured: Twice daily (excluding weekends and holidays), until subject exits study
Development of venous thromboembolism
Development of VTE defined either by 1) a positive screening duplex ultrasound of the deep veins of the legs, or 2) an objectively verified clinical diagnosis of DVT and/or PE, established by patient's treating physician.
The proportion of patients in each arm who develop VTE during the study will be calculated. The sample is projected to be too low to enable any further statistical comparison of efficacy in prevention of VTE.
Measured: At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Tolerability
The tolerability questionnaire will be administered by the research coordinator on the day of study exit.
The proportion of subjects selecting each of the possible answers for each of the questions on the tolerability questionnaire will be computed for each study arm. Further statistical comparison between the groups will not be undertaken for the tolerability questionnaire, but the data will be used for hypothesis-generation regarding specific causes of increased or decreased tolerability between the devices.
Measured: At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Venous and arterial physiological flow
Mean values and standard error for each study arm will be computed for the volume flow and peak velocity in the superficial femoral vein and femoral artery using pulsed Doppler by duplex ultrasound.
The values will be compared using a two-tailed Student's t-test (alpha = 0.05).
Measured: At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for TraumaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vinai C Bhagirath, MD FRCP(C), Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01835990
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GIFT Pilot
- Acronym
- GIFT Pilot
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Device vs. Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01835990
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GIFT Pilot / GIFT Pilot
- Conditions
- Trauma, Venous Thromboembolism
- Keywords
- venous thromboembolism, trauma, mechanical methods of prophylaxis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Trauma patients are at a high risk of developing blood clots in the legs (deep vein thrombosis - DVT), which can travel to the lungs and cause serious health consequences. Often, these patients cannot receive blood-thinning medication to prevent these blood clots because of the risk of bleeding; in this case, they are usually given intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs) to prevent blood clots. IPCs are inflatable sleeves that fit over the legs and periodically inflate and deflate, helping to pump blood out of the legs and thus reduce the risk of blood clot formation. Several studies suggest that IPCs are working properly on the patient only 60-70% of the time. Some patients also find them uncomfortable. A new device (geko) that works by stimulating the leg muscles and increasing blood flow in the legs has recently been developed. To compare the geko with IPCs, this study will randomly assign trauma patients who cannot receive blood thinners for blood clot prevention to either IPCs or geko. The main goal is to determine the feasibility of doing a larger study which would compare the efficacy of these devices in preventing blood clots. The amount of time the devices are properly used on the patients, comfort and tolerability, development of blood clots, and blood flow in the leg veins and arteries will also be measured and compared between the devices.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| geko | Experimental | Device: gekoFor subjects randomized to the experimental treatment arm, one gekoTM device will be applied to each leg according to the manufacturer's instructions by the subject's primary care nurse. All nurses applying the devices must be trained on proper application technique. The old devices will be removed and new devices applied daily. The subject will continue to use the devices until he or she exits the study. |
| IPCs | Active comparator | Device: IPCsThe control treatment will consist of the hospital's standard IPC devices. The IPCs will be applied to each leg by the subject's primary care nurse according to the manufacturer's instructions. They will continue to be applied until exit from the study. At the time of withdrawal from the study, the decision regarding continued use of IPCs will be made by the treating physician. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Diagnosis of trauma, meeting criteria for referral to the HHS trauma service - ANY of the following (1-3):
- Subject admitted to the Hamilton General Hospital ICU or the hospital ward step-down units
- Age 18 years or older
- Contraindication to anticoagulation expected to last for more than 3 days. Contraindication to anticoagulation may include intracranial hemorrhage, ocular injury with associated hemorrhage, solid intra-abdominal organ injury (i.e. liver, spleen, kidney), and/or pelvic or retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfusion. [12] The final determination of whether anticoagulant prophylaxis is contraindicated will be made by the treating physician.
- Projected hospitalization greater than 3 days (as determined by treating physician)
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Inability to wear either IPCs or gekoTM on both legs, including but not limited to:
- Diagnosis of DVT within 1 month prior to assessment for enrollment
- Use of anticoagulant medication within 24h of enrollment (except when used solely as a flush for intravenous catheters), or ongoing effect of anticoagulant medication at time of enrollment as determined by history of medication use and laboratory evidence of medication effect. For the purposes of this study, anticoagulant medications include:
- Leg circumference greater than 24 inches at the location the gekoTM device would be secured to the leg.
- Presence of cardiac demand pacemaker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gekoAlso: neuromuscular stimulation deviceThe geko is a neuromuscular stimulation device that stimulates the common peroneal nerve resulting in contraction of the leg muscles and increased venous and arterial flow. It is Health Canada approved for prevention of deep venous thrombosis. | Device | geko |
| IPCsAlso: intermittent pneumatic compression devices, Arjo Huntleigh Flowtrondevices that pneumatically compress the leg, resulting in increased venous blood flow. | Device | IPCs |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of completing a larger, phase III trial with DVT incidence as primary outcome
Time frame: earliest of when 40th subject is enrolled or 18 months from study start
This endpoint will be considered to have been met if, after enrollment of 40 subjects, both of the following conditions are met: i. the time from enrollment of the first subject to enrollment of the 40th subject is less than 18 months; AND ii. all secondary outcomes are evaluable for at least 80% of subjects.
4 secondary outcomes
Compliance
Time frame: Twice daily (excluding weekends and holidays), until subject exits study
Development of venous thromboembolism
Time frame: At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Tolerability
Time frame: At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Venous and arterial physiological flow
Time frame: At time subject exits from study (day 10 or earlier)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2015.
Related trials for Trauma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Safety Study of Microlyte DualGuard
Wound Closure, Wound Care
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vinai C Bhagirath, MD FRCP(C) principal investigator
McMaster University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing geko and IPCs in people with Trauma and Venous Thromboembolism, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of completing a larger, phase III trial with DVT incidence as primary outcome (time frame: earliest of when 40th subject is enrolled or 18 months from study start). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2015.