Rectal CancerTaTMENCT01836926
TaTME Versus Open Intersphincteric Resection After Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
A study testing Open intersphincteric resection and transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resection in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Osama Mohammad Ali ElDamshety at 2 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
The two surgical options for lower 1/3 rectal cancer is APR and sphincter sparing procedures. Intersphincteric resection is procedure to treat very low rectal cancer within 2 cm from the dentate line to avoid permanent colostomy,improves the quality of life with better genitourinary function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Open intersphincteric resection and transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resection
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with low rectal carcinoma(The lowest margin of tumor located 3 cm from anal verge ; ≤ 2 cm from dentate lines; 1 cm from anorectal rings.
- Local spread restricted to the rectal wall or the internal anal sphincter.
- Adequate preoperative sphincter function and continence.
- Absence of distant metastasis.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to major surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status scoring 4.
- Metastatic rectal cancer.
- Those in Dukes stage D (T4 lesion).
- Undifferentiated tumours.
- Local infiltration of external anal sphincter or levator ani muscles.
- Tumor located more than 2 cm above the dentate line.
- Presence of fecal incontinence.
- Patients unwilling to take part in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Egypt2 sites
Mansoura oncology centre
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate
Mansoura university oncology centre
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate
About this study
Official title: Transanal Minimally Invasive TME (TaTME) Versus Open Intersphincteric Resection and Total Mesorectal Excision of Stage II/III Ultralow Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
The two surgical options for lower 1/3 rectal cancer is APR and sphincter sparing procedures. Intersphincteric resection is procedure to treat very low rectal cancer within 2 cm from the dentate line to avoid permanent colostomy,improves the quality of life with better genitourinary function. Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is routine for T3 cases.
Read the detailed description
During the period between April 2013 and July 2019, a non-randomized controlled study was performed at two tertiary centers; Oncology Centre of Mansoura University and Policlinico Umberto Primo surgery department of SAPIENZA university of Rome after referral from the clinical oncology and nuclear medicine department. After diagnosis of ultralow rectal cancer, a written informed consent was obtained from patients after full explanation of the procedure, the likely outcome and the potential complications that may occur. Digital rectal examination was conducted to assess the distance of lower tumor margin from the anal verge and the anal tone. Anesthetic fitness and tumour markers (CEA) were assessed. Pelvis MRI and/or endorectal ultrasound (EUS), abdomen and chest CT scan and colonoscopy with biopsy were done for all cases. Re-evaluation after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy by MRI and EUS. Inclusion criteria included a very low rectal cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge with normally continent and tumor-free external anal sphincter. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to all patients with T3 or node positive tumors. Exclusion criteria were T4, metastatic tumors and fecal incontinence. Fifty patients were excluded from the study (Fig.1). One hundred and ten patients with ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma, with matched age and sex (table 1), were non-randomly classified into two equal groups: the control group included 55 patents that underwent sphincter sparing by open ISR with TME (O-ISR Group) and the 2nd group included 55 patents that underwent Transanal minimally invasive ISR with TME (TAMIS Group).
Surgical technique:
In open ISR, the inferior mesenteric vessels were highly ligated. After full mobilization of the left colon and splenic flexure was done, the plane for TME was followed down in the pelvis superficial to the hypogastric fascia as low as possible to enter into the posterior intersphincteric plane. A non-endoscopic perineal phase was then initiated using an anal lone-star retractor to expose the anal canal. Both the mucosa and the muscular layer were incised 1cm below the tumor margin to transect the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and then closed by purse string sutures. The dissection continued between IAS and the external anal sphincter (EAS) starting posteriorly then laterally, where EAS is easier to identify, then anteriorly where the plane presented more adhesions with the urethra in male or vagina in female till reaching the abdominal dissection. Proximal division of the specimen started just below the site of inferior mesenteric vessels ligation and continued till division of the marginal artery at the site of the required anastomosis. The Specimen extraction and division was done extra-anal. A defunctioning ileostomy was done in all cases.
In TAMIS-TME, using a lone star retractor, the 1st step was to divide and close the anal canal by purse-string suturing to enter the intersphincteric plane. Using TEo platform (Karl Storz, Tuttilingen, Germany) (fig. 2) with a 4 cm size operating proctoscope diameter, Transanal endoscopic dissection was initiated and continued in the intersphincteric plane starting posteriorly then laterally. Partial or high ISR started at the dentate line to remove the upper half of IAS for ultralow tumors at 3 to 4.5 from anal verge. Total or low ISR started 1 cm below the dentate line, removing the whole of IAS for tumours below 3 cm from the anal verge. The endoscopic dissection continued in the same sequence as the control group along the levator ani. Then continue posteriorly till reaching as much as possible, then dissection continued laterally and anteriorly to reach the peritoneal reflection. Then, the laparoscopic phase was initiated to ligate the inferior mesenteric vessels and mobilize the splenic flexure and left colon. The peritoneal reflections were then divided to connect to the transanal part. The specimen was then extracted transanally and the Colo-anal anastomosis was done in two layers. A defunctioning ileostomy was done in all cases.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Open intersphincteric resection, transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resection
- Keywords
- sphincter sparing procedures, intersphincteric resection, rectal cancer, ultralow rectal cancer, sphincter preserving procedures, Abdominoperineal resection, Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery, TAMIS versus open colorectal resection, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Open intersphincteric resectionProcedure or surgery
Also called sphincter preserving procedures in low rectal cancer, very low rectal cancer resection, interspincteric resection
laparotomy arm: surgical Instruments for open approach operation: Abdominal anterior resection combined with peranal intersphincteric resection of the rectum
Abdominal step a high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed together with a full mobilization of the left colon. A circular incision of the anal canal is performed 1 cm below the tumour. Both the mucosa and the muscular layer are incised to transect the internal anal sphincter. A coloanal anastomosis, transverse coloplasty or colonic J-pouch and a diverting loop ileostomy are associated with the hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis.
laparoscopic approach group: instruments used: laparoscopic instruments mentioned at the arm description
intervention: laparoscopic mobilization of the rectum and colon combined with the peranal intersphincteric resection as in the laparotomy approach
transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resectionDevice
Also called laparoscopic low anterior resection combined with trans-anal endoscopic intersphincteric resection, lTAMIS
minimally invasive approach group: instruments used: laparoscopic instruments mentioned at the arm description instruments: laparoscopic instruments mentioned in the laparoscopic rectal resection arm intervention: laparoscopic mobilization of the rectum and colon combined with the peranal intersphincteric resection as in the laparotomy approach
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Open intersphincteric resection | Active comparator | surgical Instruments for open approach intervention: Open laparotomy through abdominal incision and mobilization of the colon and rectum up to the splenic flexure with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels and mesorectal excision till the levator ani then the peranal approach to resect the distal margin of the rectum through high or low intersphincteric resection in the plane between internal and external anal sphincters. Receives: Procedure: Open intersphincteric resection |
| laparoscopic intersphincteric resection . | Active comparator | instruments used: 4 or 5 laparoscopic trocars (two or three (10-mm) trocar, Two 5-mm trocars and a 12-mm trocar with reducers),Three 5-mm fenestrated grasping forceps, Five-millimetre coagulating shears, a 5-mm straight grasping forceps, Harmonic scalpel, 5 or 10 mm, a 10-mm fenestrated forceps, a 10-mm dissector,5 mm Bipolar grasper, a 5-mm needle holder, Twelve-millimetre linear staplers
intervention:
1. Trocar Placement and Exposure
2. Rectosigmoid Mobilization and Control of Inferior Mesenteric Vessels
3. Taking Down the Splenic Flexure
4. rectal dissection till the levator ani muscle and resection of thye lateral ligaments
then the peranal phase as in the laparotomy approach. Receives: Device: transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Early Complications number
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (11)
Duration of the intervention
Duration of surgery
Measured: 1 day
Amount of blood loss and rate of blood transfusion
Amount of blood loss and blood transfusion through the operation
Measured: 1 Day
conversion rate for open ISR
Measured: 1 day
The onset of intestinal motility.
the onset of the intestinal motility guided by (the onset of borborygmus and its sequence, time to give off flatus, time to intake liquid and solid food)
Measured: 2 weeks
Pain score
Recording of the needed analgesia guided by pain score
Measured: the first two weeks in the postoperative period
Postoperative hospital stay
Outcome observers will assess the hospital stay days after both procedures
Measured: 30 Days
30 days follow up for re-operation in the postoperative period
readmission within 30 days after patient discharge
Measured: 1 month
Late complications
Measured: 2 years
Local recurrence within 2 years
The patients will be observed after the operation for 2 years for local pelvic recurrence
Measured: 2 years
Distant metastasis within 2 years
Distant metastasis after the opertaion for 2 years
Measured: 2 years
Clinical functional outcome
Investigators will assess the continence using Per Anal Scoring System (PASS) from 0 to 4
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionJul 2019
- Study completionJul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Osama Mohammad Ali ElDamshety
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mansoura University, Marche Polytechnic university, Ancona, Italy
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Osama Mohammad Ali ElDamshety, Mansoura University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01836926
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Mansoura oncology centre
- Acronym
- TaTME
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 5 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
[1] Zeeneldin A, Saber M, Seif El-din I, Frag S. Colorectal carcinoma in Gharbiah district, Egypt: Comparison between the elderly and non-elderly. Journal of Solid Tumors 2012; Vol. 2, No. 3. [2] Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982; 69:613-616 [3] Daniels IR, Fisher SE, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 290-301. [4] Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 811-820. [5] Bai X., Li S., Yu B., Su H., Jin W., Chen G., Du J. And Zuo F. Sphincter-preserving surgery after preoperative radiochemotherapy for T3 low rectal cancers. Oncology Letters 2012; 3: 1336-1340 [6] Tytherleigh MG and Mortensen MN. Options for sphincter preservation in surgery for low rectal cancer , British Journal of Surgery 2003; 90: 922-933 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4296 [7] Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1376-1378. [8] Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:638-646
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transanal Minimally Invasive TME (TaTME) Versus Open Intersphincteric Resection and Total Mesorectal Excision of Stage II/III Ultralow Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01836926
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TaTME / Mansoura oncology centre
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Keywords
- sphincter sparing procedures, intersphincteric resection, rectal cancer, ultralow rectal cancer, sphincter preserving procedures, Abdominoperineal resection, Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery, TAMIS versus open colorectal resection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Osama Mohammad Ali ElDamshetyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mansoura University, Marche Polytechnic university, Ancona, Italy
- Study start
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The two surgical options for lower 1/3 rectal cancer is APR and sphincter sparing procedures. Intersphincteric resection is procedure to treat very low rectal cancer within 2 cm from the dentate line to avoid permanent colostomy,improves the quality of life with better genitourinary function. Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is routine for T3 cases.
Detailed description
During the period between April 2013 and July 2019, a non-randomized controlled study was performed at two tertiary centers; Oncology Centre of Mansoura University and Policlinico Umberto Primo surgery department of SAPIENZA university of Rome after referral from the clinical oncology and nuclear medicine department. After diagnosis of ultralow rectal cancer, a written informed consent was obtained from patients after full explanation of the procedure, the likely outcome and the potential complications that may occur. Digital rectal examination was conducted to assess the distance of lower tumor margin from the anal verge and the anal tone. Anesthetic fitness and tumour markers (CEA) were assessed. Pelvis MRI and/or endorectal ultrasound (EUS), abdomen and chest CT scan and colonoscopy with biopsy were done for all cases. Re-evaluation after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy by MRI and EUS. Inclusion criteria included a very low rectal cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge with normally continent and tumor-free external anal sphincter. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to all patients with T3 or node positive tumors. Exclusion criteria were T4, metastatic tumors and fecal incontinence. Fifty patients were excluded from the study (Fig.1). One hundred and ten patients with ultralow rectal adenocarcinoma, with matched age and sex (table 1), were non-randomly classified into two equal groups: the control group included 55 patents that underwent sphincter sparing by open ISR with TME (O-ISR Group) and the 2nd group included 55 patents that underwent Transanal minimally invasive ISR with TME (TAMIS Group).
Surgical technique:
In open ISR, the inferior mesenteric vessels were highly ligated. After full mobilization of the left colon and splenic flexure was done, the plane for TME was followed down in the pelvis superficial to the hypogastric fascia as low as possible to enter into the posterior intersphincteric plane. A non-endoscopic perineal phase was then initiated using an anal lone-star retractor to expose the anal canal. Both the mucosa and the muscular layer were incised 1cm below the tumor margin to transect the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and then closed by purse string sutures. The dissection continued between IAS and the external anal sphincter (EAS) starting posteriorly then laterally, where EAS is easier to identify, then anteriorly where the plane presented more adhesions with the urethra in male or vagina in female till reaching the abdominal dissection. Proximal division of the specimen started just below the site of inferior mesenteric vessels ligation and continued till division of the marginal artery at the site of the required anastomosis. The Specimen extraction and division was done extra-anal. A defunctioning ileostomy was done in all cases.
In TAMIS-TME, using a lone star retractor, the 1st step was to divide and close the anal canal by purse-string suturing to enter the intersphincteric plane. Using TEo platform (Karl Storz, Tuttilingen, Germany) (fig. 2) with a 4 cm size operating proctoscope diameter, Transanal endoscopic dissection was initiated and continued in the intersphincteric plane starting posteriorly then laterally. Partial or high ISR started at the dentate line to remove the upper half of IAS for ultralow tumors at 3 to 4.5 from anal verge. Total or low ISR started 1 cm below the dentate line, removing the whole of IAS for tumours below 3 cm from the anal verge. The endoscopic dissection continued in the same sequence as the control group along the levator ani. Then continue posteriorly till reaching as much as possible, then dissection continued laterally and anteriorly to reach the peritoneal reflection. Then, the laparoscopic phase was initiated to ligate the inferior mesenteric vessels and mobilize the splenic flexure and left colon. The peritoneal reflections were then divided to connect to the transanal part. The specimen was then extracted transanally and the Colo-anal anastomosis was done in two layers. A defunctioning ileostomy was done in all cases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Open intersphincteric resection | Active comparator | Procedure: Open intersphincteric resectionsurgical Instruments for open approach intervention: Open laparotomy through abdominal incision and mobilization of the colon and rectum up to the splenic flexure with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels and mesorectal excision till the levator ani then the peranal approach to resect the distal margin of the rectum through high or low intersphincteric resection in the plane between internal and external anal sphincters. |
| laparoscopic intersphincteric resection . | Active comparator | Device: transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resectioninstruments used: 4 or 5 laparoscopic trocars (two or three (10-mm) trocar, Two 5-mm trocars and a 12-mm trocar with reducers),Three 5-mm fenestrated grasping forceps, Five-millimetre coagulating shears, a 5-mm straight grasping forceps, Harmonic scalpel, 5 or 10 mm, a 10-mm fenestrated forceps, a 10-mm dissector,5 mm Bipolar grasper, a 5-mm needle holder, Twelve-millimetre linear staplers intervention: 1. Trocar Placement and Exposure 2. Rectosigmoid Mobilization and Control of Inferior Mesenteric Vessels 3. Taking Down the Splenic Flexure 4. rectal dissection till the levator ani muscle and resection of thye lateral ligaments then the peranal phase as in the laparotomy approach. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with low rectal carcinoma(The lowest margin of tumor located 3 cm from anal verge ; ≤ 2 cm from dentate lines; 1 cm from anorectal rings.
- Local spread restricted to the rectal wall or the internal anal sphincter.
- Adequate preoperative sphincter function and continence.
- Absence of distant metastasis.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Contraindications to major surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status scoring 4.
- Metastatic rectal cancer.
- Those in Dukes stage D (T4 lesion).
- Undifferentiated tumours.
- Local infiltration of external anal sphincter or levator ani muscles.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Open intersphincteric resectionAlso: sphincter preserving procedures in low rectal cancer, very low rectal cancer resection, interspincteric resectionlaparotomy arm: surgical Instruments for open approach operation: Abdominal anterior resection combined with peranal intersphincteric resection of the rectum Abdominal step a high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed together with a full mobilization of the left colon. A circular incision of the anal canal is performed 1 cm below the tumour. Both the mucosa and the muscular layer are incised to transect the internal anal sphincter. A coloanal anastomosis, transverse coloplasty or colonic J-pouch and a diverting loop ileostomy are associated with the hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. laparoscopic approach group: instruments used: laparoscopic instruments mentioned at the arm description intervention: laparoscopic mobilization of the rectum and colon combined with the peranal intersphincteric resection as in the laparotomy approach | Procedure or surgery | Open intersphincteric resection |
| transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resectionAlso: laparoscopic low anterior resection combined with trans-anal endoscopic intersphincteric resection, lTAMISminimally invasive approach group: instruments used: laparoscopic instruments mentioned at the arm description instruments: laparoscopic instruments mentioned in the laparoscopic rectal resection arm intervention: laparoscopic mobilization of the rectum and colon combined with the peranal intersphincteric resection as in the laparotomy approach | Device | laparoscopic intersphincteric resection . |
Primary outcome
Early Complications number
Time frame: 2 years
11 secondary outcomes
Duration of the intervention
Time frame: 1 day
Amount of blood loss and rate of blood transfusion
Time frame: 1 Day
conversion rate for open ISR
Time frame: 1 day
The onset of intestinal motility.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Pain score
Time frame: the first two weeks in the postoperative period
Postoperative hospital stay
Time frame: 30 Days
30 days follow up for re-operation in the postoperative period
Time frame: 1 month
Late complications
Time frame: 2 years
Local recurrence within 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
Distant metastasis within 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
Clinical functional outcome
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2020.
- Results publication[1] Zeeneldin A, Saber M, Seif El-din I, Frag S. Colorectal carcinoma in Gharbiah district, Egypt: Comparison between the elderly and non-elderly. Journal of Solid Tumors 2012; Vol. 2, No. 3. [2] Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982; 69:613-616 [3] Daniels IR, Fisher SE, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 290-301. [4] Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 811-820. [5] Bai X., Li S., Yu B., Su H., Jin W., Chen G., Du J. And Zuo F. Sphincter-preserving surgery after preoperative radiochemotherapy for T3 low rectal cancers. Oncology Letters 2012; 3: 1336-1340 [6] Tytherleigh MG and Mortensen MN. Options for sphincter preservation in surgery for low rectal cancer , British Journal of Surgery 2003; 90: 922-933 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4296 [7] Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1376-1378. [8] Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:638-646
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of MGC030 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Urothelial Cancer, GastroEsophageal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Exploratory Study of Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Adebrelimab Combined With Chemotherapy for Organ Preservation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Locally Advanced Resectable Rectal Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
ABCSG R07 Rectal Cancer Registry
Rectal Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of Rectum
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Open intersphincteric resection and transanal minimally invasive intersphincteric resection in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Osama Mohammad Ali ElDamshety at 2 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Early Complications number (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01836926, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2020.