AzTrials
AzTrials

HemorrhageNCT01837030

Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conservative Therapy for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

A study testing Ferrous sulfate and Capsule Endoscopy in people with Hemorrhage and Anemia, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a single center prospective randomized control trial comparing the utility of performing capsule endoscopy compared to conservative management with oral iron therapy as the initial course of action in patients with non-severe obscure occult or obscure overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hemorrhage, Anemia
What is being tested?
Ferrous sulfate and Capsule Endoscopy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2013to Mar 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult men and post-menopausal women with iron deficiency anemia and pre-menopausal women with iron deficiency anemia and a negative gynecologic workup or adults with overt GI bleeding as defined by melena or hematochezia with a ≥2 gram drop in hemoglobin after stabilization (Iron deficiency is defined as hemoglobin <13.7 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women with serum ferritin level <50 ng/mL). Also, patients with an otherwise unexplained drop in hemoglobin of ≥ 2 g/dL in the setting of hemoccult positive stool
  • Negative EGD and colonoscopy for source of GI bleeding within six months of enrollment into the study.

Who cannot join

  • Ongoing overt gastrointestinal bleeding requiring ≥4 units of packed RBC's on any given day in the setting of overt bleeding, blood transfusions on separate days (separated by ≥12 hours), or ≥6 units of packed RBC's over the previous 7-day period prior to presentation, in the setting of overt bleeding.
  • Myocardial infarct, acute neurologic event, sepsis, or respiratory failure within the previous 1 week
  • History of small bowel obstruction
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Age less than 18
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Known GI or hematologic malignancy
  • Achalasia
  • Contraindications to capsule endoscopy (inability to take prep), or felt unsafe to undergo capsule as per study investigators
  • Esophageal stricture that precludes even endoscopic capsule placement
  • History of upper GI or small bowel surgery
  • Inability to take oral iron.
  • Active IV iron use.
  • Alternate source of blood loss (e.g., menorrhagia)
  • Hematemesis sufficient to be the cause of the hemoglobin decline

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study is a single center prospective randomized control trial comparing the utility of performing capsule endoscopy compared to conservative management with oral iron therapy as the initial course of action in patients with non-severe obscure occult or obscure overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The investigators hypothesize that outcomes in patients with non-severe obscure GI bleeding who receive conservative therapy with oral iron will not differ to those on oral iron who undergo capsule endoscopy.

Read the detailed description

Although the American Gastroenterological Association suggests that patients with obscure GI bleeding undergo a capsule endoscopy after a negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy, current recommendations from the British Society of Gastroenterology argue that unless there is an inadequate response to iron therapy, further imaging of the small bowel is probably not necessary. Several studies have demonstrated that this approach is reasonably safe. Furthermore, Laine et al demonstrated that when patients with obscure GI bleeding were randomized to either capsule endoscopy or dedicated small bowel contrast radiography, the rates of further bleeding, measured by subsequent hospitalization and blood transfusion events, were similar between the two groups. No study has randomized patients with obscure GI bleeding to receive capsule endoscopy vs. conservative therapy with oral iron.

This study is a single center prospective randomized control trial comparing the utility of performing capsule endoscopy compared to conservative management with oral iron therapy as the initial course of action in patients with non-severe obscure occult or obscure overt gastrointestinal bleeding. All patients will be recruited in the G.I. clinic, the endoscopy unit, or during inpatient consults after negative upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. The study will be explained to patients who qualify at that time. During this visit, patients will be questioned with regard to lower or upper G.I. symptoms, including abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, diarrhea, change in stool character, melena and intermittent hematochezia. All patients will be started on standard dose oral iron therapy after informed consent. If the patient is already taking iron supplements, their dose with be adjusted to the standard regimen after informed consent. Patients will then be randomized to undergo capsule endoscopy or not. For patients randomized to undergo capsule endoscopy, all subsequent evaluation and treatment will be determined by capsule findings (i.e. capsule directed management) and standard of care at our institution.

Patients will be followed for 1 year. Follow up lab draws will occur at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. They will consist of a complete blood count (CBC) and ferritin and can be performed at either the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) or an outside facility or office. If performed outside of MUSC, a standard medical records release form will be utilized to obtain the lab information. Patients will be provided with a paper card indicating their date of enrollment in the study. This card will be kept by the patient for the entire 12 month follow up period and will be collected at the end of the follow up period. The card will have an area where the patient can write the date of their first blood transfusion after enrollment. There will also be numerical checkboxes that the patient will check off for each unit of packed red blood cells (RBCs) they receive during the 12 month follow up period. Telephone calls will be made to each patient every 3 months after enrollment to inquire about hospitalizations and bleeding related procedures (including endoscopy, capsule, small bowel radiology, interventional radiology and surgery). Records of these hospitalizations and procedures will be obtained using a standard medical records release form.

Conditions
Hemorrhage, Anemia
Being tested
Ferrous sulfate, Capsule Endoscopy
Medical subject headings
Hemorrhage, Anemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ferrous sulfateDietary supplement

    Ferrous sulfate 325mg by mouth twice daily for the duration of the 12 month follow up period

  • Capsule EndoscopyDevice

    GIVEN capsule

Study groups in NCT01837030
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oral IronOtherNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Ferrous sulfate
Oral Iron and Capsule EndoscopyOtherNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Ferrous sulfate; Device: Capsule Endoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to first blood transfusion after randomization

    Time-to-event analysis. Patients will be provided an index card on which they will record the date of their first blood transfusion after randomization

    Measured: 12 month follow up period

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Total number of blood transfusions

    Measured: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  2. Total number of hospitalizations

    Measured: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  3. Persistent Iron Deficiency Anemia as measured by ferritin and hemoglobin

    Measured: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

  4. Total number of bleeding-related procedures performed after randomization

    Measured: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  5. Mortality

    Measured: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2013

Why it stopped: not feasible due to funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01837030
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00023612
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
4 Apr 2013
Last updated
14 Jun 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Goddard AF, James MW, McIntyre AS, Scott BB; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. Gut. 2011 Oct;60(10):1309-16. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.228874. Epub 2011 May 11.

    PubMed 21561874
  • Gordon S, Bensen S, Smith R. Long-term follow-up of older patients with iron deficiency anemia after a negative GI evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 May;91(5):885-9.

    PubMed 8633576
  • McLoughlin MT, Tham TC. Long-term follow-up of patients with iron deficiency anaemia after a negative gastrointestinal evaluation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Aug;21(8):872-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328321836c.

    PubMed 19282769
  • Laine L, Sahota A, Shah A. Does capsule endoscopy improve outcomes in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding? Randomized trial versus dedicated small bowel radiography. Gastroenterology. 2010 May;138(5):1673-1680.e1; quiz e11-2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.047. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

    PubMed 20138043

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ferrous sulfate and Capsule Endoscopy in people with Hemorrhage and Anemia, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to first blood transfusion after randomization (time frame: 12 month follow up period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01837030, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in