AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerECLNI-MCNCT01837173

Multicentric Retrospective Review of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement After Esophagectomy

An observational study of Cancer, run by University Hospital, Gasthuisberg at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is well known that lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in oesophageal carcinoma. The investigators want to determine the influence of lymph node characteristics, being either intracapsular or extracapsular, on overall survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer
How many people
2,000 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Mar 2013to Nov 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Multicentric cohort study, patient chart analysis Since several high volume European institutions have published their results on patients with extracapsular lymph node involvement, we plan a pooling of their 'raw' data regarding type of treatment, histology, extracapsular LNI and (disease-free) survival.

Who may be able to join

  • Adequate lymph node sampling is of paramount importance. (pT1 - min. 10 LN; >pT2 min. 20 LN resected). At least the following lymph node stations should be examined: perioesophageal distal 1/3 and perigastric LN, left gastric artery, splenic artery, common hepatic artery, subcarinal lymph nodes. Sugical technique (transthoracic, transhiatal or minimal invasive) is less important if the criterium of adequate lymph node sampling is fulfilled but should be mentioned.

Who cannot join

  • unforeseen organ metastasis
  • subcardia tumors
  • histology other than adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma
  • Postoperative (inhospital or 30-day) mortality

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospital Leuven, Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Can Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement be a Tool to Fine-tune UICC TNM 7th Edition for Esophageal Carcinoma?

It is well known that lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in oesophageal carcinoma.

The investigators want to determine the influence of lymph node characteristics, being either intracapsular or extracapsular, on overall survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Read the detailed description

The classification of carcinoma of the esophagus has undergone a major modification between the UICC sixth (TNM-6) and TNM-7 edition. Regional lymph nodes (N) are now subdivided by the number of involved lymph nodes (pN0, 0; pN1, 1-2; pN2, 3-6; pN3 > 6), and distant metastasis (M) has been simplified to M1 rather than subdivided by location [1].

Nevertheless, TNM-7 doesn't take into consideration the morphologic characteristics of the metastatic lymph node itself. Since our first publications showing a negative relationship between presence of extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) and survival [2], little has been published about the prognostic impact of this specific characteristic .

In our latest publication "Can extracapsular lymph node involvement be a tool to fine-tune pN1 for adenocarcinoma in UICC TNM 7th Edition?" [3], the investigators found a significant survival benefit for adenocarcinoma without extracapsular lymph node involvement in pN1 (= 1-2 positive lymph nodes) as compared to N2-N3 disease, treated by primary surgery. Moreover, pN1 patients with extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) showed a survival that was comparable to patients with more than 2 positive lymph nodes (i.e. stage IIIB). These findings may have important consequences for future TNM adaptations.

The aim of this study is to validate our results on a larger, multicentric cohort, and if possible make recommendations and possible fine-tuning for a future TNM adaptation, including the characteristics of the metastatic lymph node itself, being intra- or extracapsular.

Furthermore the investigators want to examine if these effects are valid in pre-treated patients, i.e. surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radiation) therapy. Although these patients are not incorporated in the current TNM classification, future adaptations to the TNM classification system will also examine the effects of neoadjuvant therapy (cfr. Rice/Blackstone WECC -Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration).

Conditions
Cancer
Keywords
Adenocarcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Neoadjuvant treatment, Esophagectomy
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01837173
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Extracapsular LNIPatients with positive lymph nodes that show extracapsular lymph node involvement
Intracapsular LNIPatients with positive lymph nodes that show NO extracapsular lymph node involvement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival by LN-status (being ECLNI or ICLNI)

    according UICC TNM7 pN (pN1-2-3)

    Measured: 5 yrs from surgery

  2. Cancer-specific survival by LN-status (being ECLNI or ICLNI)

    according UICC TNM7 pN (pN1-2-3)- censoring non-esophageal cancer related deaths

    Measured: 5 yrs from surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Cancer specific survival for intra- and extracapsular lymph node involvement

    Differentiation of intra- and extracapsular lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy followed by surgery versus primary surgery

    Measured: 5 yrs from surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Apr 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionJul 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
2,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01837173
Sponsor's protocol ID
ECLNI-MC2013
Acronym
ECLNI-MC
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
2 Apr 2013
Last updated
23 Apr 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cancer, run by University Hospital, Gasthuisberg at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival by LN-status (being ECLNI or ICLNI) (time frame: 5 yrs from surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in