AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseaseNCT01838226

Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prevention Coaching

A study testing Problem Solving in people with Cardiovascular Disease, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prevention of cardiovascular disease is a primary focus of the Secretary's New Models of Care Transformational Initiative. However, prevention has been hard to accomplish. The VA is committed to using group visits to address a wide array of primary care problems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiovascular Disease
What is being tested?
Problem Solving
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
401 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
29 Aug 2014to 30 Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A diagnosis of inadequately controlled hypertension, as defined by an outpatient ICD-9 code of 401.x and a most recent blood pressure with either systolic > 140 mmHg or diastolic > 90 mmHg
  • OR (2) inadequately controlled dyslipidemia, as defined by most recent total cholesterol > 200 mg/dl or HDL cholesterol < 35 mg/dl
  • OR (3) current smoking, which can be identified using the CPRS Health Factor tied to the smoking clinical reminder.
  • Medication-taking status for these illnesses is neither required nor excluded.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with very high risk of cardiovascular event, as determined by any personal history of coronary artery disease (CAD) or other major cardiovascular disease (ICD-9 code of 410-414, or 425-429)
  • cerebrovascular disease (code 433-438)
  • peripheral arterial disease (codes 440.x or 443.x)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • VA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo, NY

    Buffalo, New York, 14215-1129

  • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705-3875

Other trials in United States

About this study

Prevention of cardiovascular disease is a primary focus of the Secretary's New Models of Care Transformational Initiative. However, prevention has been hard to accomplish. The VA is committed to using group visits to address a wide array of primary care problems. Coaching is a method to help Veterans set and reach health goals by helping them overcome barriers to behavior change. Coaching can be performed one-on-one or in groups. This study will test the effectiveness of a group prevention coaching (GPC) intervention in improving cardiovascular risk. GPCs will focus on changing a behavior of the patient's choice that is likely to lead to improvements in heart disease risk. The coach will adopt a problem-solving approach to helping Veterans make these improvements. The primary outcome will be change in 10-year risk of major cardiac event; the investigators will also assess improvements in food choice, physical activity and weight.

Read the detailed description

Cardiovascular (CV) event prevention (e.g., myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident) remains the single most important public health problem in the United States, and cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death among VA users. Improving the provision of prevention services is a primary focus of the Secretary's New Models of Care Transformational Initiative. However, prevention has been challenging to achieve. Multifactorial behavioral interventions are effective in treating a number of chronic illnesses (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), but less is known about their ability to reduce risk among patients without a unifying chronic illness. Group visits are an efficient, effective strategy for delivering a multifactorial behavior change intervention; the VA is committed to the group visit strategy to address a wide array of primary care problems. Groups have been shown to be an effective means of improving a number of outcomes in a number of individual diseases, but, again, their role in cardiovascular prevention among patients without a single common illness is unknown. Coaching is a type of multi-factorial behavioral intervention that involves goal-setting, and working to overcome barriers to behavior change. Coaching can be performed one-on-one, but coaching interventions have been delivered in group settings. The investigators have shown, in a 150-subject RCT, that group coaching plus individualized telephone coaching reduces cardiovascular risk, but the population in that study was very different from typical VA users. The investigators propose a three-site, two-arm randomized trial measuring the effectiveness of a group prevention coaching (GPC) intervention in improving cardiovascular risk, compared to VA usual care. The study will be performed at the Durham, Buffalo, and Syracuse VAMCs. Each arm will have 200 patients; patients will be VA users without prior history of cardiovascular event, but with at least 5% risk of such an event, and with either inadequately controlled hypertension or dyslipidemia, or current smoking. The GPC intervention will focus on changing a behavior of the patient's choice that is likely to lead to improvements in cholesterol, blood pressure, or to smoking cessation. Behaviors that will be reinforced will include but not be limited to healthy eating, decreased caloric intake, increased physical activity, stress reduction, and participatory decision making with physicians. Barriers to these behaviors will be identified. The coach will adopt a problem-solving approach to overcoming the above barriers and reinforcing the above behaviors; problem-solving is a well-described framework for behavior change. The GPC coach/interventionist for will be either the facility's Health Behavior Coordinator (HBC) or a person hired for the research enterprise but trained and credentialed identically to an HBC. All outcomes will be obtained at baseline, 6, and 12 months after enrollment by blinded research personnel. The primary outcome will be change in 10-year risk of fatal coronary event or non-fatal MI 6 months after enrollment, as measured by Framingham Risk Score. Key secondary outcomes will include dietary content by Food Frequency Questionnaire, physical activity as measured by International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and weight. The investigators will also determine if group cohesion, as measured by the Group Dynamics Inventory, influences the effectiveness of GPC. The investigators well also assess whether time spent in contact with a coach influences the effectiveness, by database log-in timekeeping strategies.

Being tested
Problem Solving
Keywords
Chronic Disease, Prevention, cardiovascular disease
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Problem SolvingBehavioural

    A group problem-solving intervention, with interval phone calls delivered to check in on goal progress and reinforce group learning. Groups will meet monthly for 6 months, and each patient will be called once between each group session. Each group will consist of 10 patients. Problem-solving teaches patients to overcome internal barriers to healthful behaviors. Problem solving will be combined, at all group sessions, with self-efficacy training, so that patients will be taught simultaneously to overcome both internal and external barriers. Participants will be asked to develop personal goals related to CVD-related behaviors (e.g., smoking and weight reduction).

Study groups in NCT01838226
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group Prevention ClinicsExperimentalA group problem-solving intervention, with interval phone calls delivered to check in on goal progress and reinforce group learning. Groups will meet monthly for 6 months, and each patient will be called once between each group session. Each group will consist of 10 patients. Problem-solving teaches patients to overcome internal barriers to healthful behaviors. Problem solving will be combined, at all group sessions, with self-efficacy training, so that patients will be taught simultaneously to overcome both internal and external barriers. Participants will be asked to develop personal goals related to cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related behaviors (e.g., smoking and weight reduction).
Receives: Behavioral: Problem Solving
Treatment as usual controlNo interventionUsual VA care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Risk of Fatal Coronary Event or Non-fatal MI

    The primary outcome will be 10-year risk of fatal coronary event or non-fatal MI 6 months after enrollment, as measured by Framingham Risk Score. Scores range from 0 - 100, as this is a percentage of risk. Higher scores are worse, as they represent higher risk.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient Activation Measure

    Measure of self-efficacy. Scored from 0-100, with 100 being higher self-efficacy and a better outcome.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Risk of Fatal Coronary Event or Non-fatal MI

    The primary outcome will be 10-year risk of fatal coronary event or non-fatal MI 12 months after enrollment, as measured by Framingham Risk Score. Scores range from 0 - 100, as this is a percentage of risk. Higher scores are worse, as they represent higher risk.

    Measured: 12 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Apr 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start29 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
401 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01838226
Sponsor's protocol ID
CRE 12-285
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
18 Apr 2013
Last updated
27 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: fully deidentified data will be shared as resources allow.

Publications

  • Nieuwsma JA, Wray LO, Voils CI, Gierisch JM, Dundon M, Coffman CJ, Jackson GL, Merwin R, Vair C, Juntilla K, White-Clark C, Jeffreys AS, Harris A, Owings M, Marr J, Edelman D. A problem-solving intervention for cardiovascular disease risk reduction in veterans: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Sep;60:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

    PubMed 28600161
  • Olsen MK, Stechuchak KM, Hung A, Oddone EZ, Damschroder LJ, Edelman D, Maciejewski ML. A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Aug 13;19:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100631. eCollection 2020 Sep.

    PubMed 32913914

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Problem Solving in people with Cardiovascular Disease, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 May 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Risk of Fatal Coronary Event or Non-fatal MI (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01838226, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in