AzTrials
AzTrials

ObesityMILEPOSTNCT01843231

Use of the Incisionless Operating Platform as a Primary Treatment for Obesity vs. Diet-Exercise Alone

A study testing g-CathTM EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter in people with Obesity, run by USGI Medical at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a multi-center, open/unblended study (3:1Treatment: Control) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the g-Cath EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter as an early weight loss intervention compared to a diet and exercise control only. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Obesity
What is being tested?
g-CathTM EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Sep 2013to Aug 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 20-60 years
  • Body Mass Index [BMI] of >30 and <40 with or without a co-morbid condition
  • Subject has failed more conservative weight reduction alternatives such as supervised diet, exercise or behavior modification programs in the last year
  • No significant weight change (+/- 5% of total body weight) in last 6 months
  • American Society Anesthesiologists-Physical Status score ≤ 2 (Appendix III),
  • Subject agrees not to have any additional weight loss interventional procedures or liposuction for at least 30 months following study enrollment,
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Has not taken any prescription or over the counter weight loss medications for at least 6 months,
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Subject is willing to cooperate with post-operative dietary recommendations and assessment tests,

Who cannot join

  • History of (or intraoperative evidence of) bariatric, gastric or esophageal surgery
  • Esophageal stricture or other anatomy and/or condition that could preclude passage of endolumenal instruments
  • Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), defined as symptoms that cause subject severe discomfort, compromise performance of daily activities, and/or condition is not entirely controlled with prescription drug therapy
  • Known hiatal hernia >3 centimeters by history or as determined by Upper Gastrointestinal exam or endoscopy
  • Pancreatic insufficiency/disease
  • Active peptic ulcer
Show all 29Show fewer
  • Pregnancy or plans of pregnancy in the next 12 months
  • Present Corticosteroid Use
  • History of inflammatory disease of Gastrointestinal [GI] tract; Coagulation disorders; hepatic insufficiency or cirrhosis
  • History or present use of insulin or insulin derivatives for treatment of diabetes
  • Type II Diabetes Mellitus [DM] (as defined by Glycosylated Hemoglobin [HgbA1c] >6.5) for greater than 2 years at the time of enrollment
  • Uncontrolled Type II DM (HgbA1c > 7.0 at screening)
  • Quit smoking within last 6 months at time of enrollment or plans to quit smoking in the next year
  • Immunosuppression
  • Portal hypertension and/or varices
  • Active gastric ulcer disease
  • Gastric outlet obstruction or stenosis
  • Beck Depression Inventory (Short) Score ≥12 (see Appendix IV);
  • Subject has a history of drug or alcohol abuse or actively abusing either as defined by Cage and DAST [drug use] questionnaires or positive Urinalysis [UA] drug screen
  • Severe disturbances in eating behavior (i.e. binge eating)
  • Known presence of a significant depression, psychosis, or other mood or eating disorder
  • Actively treated depression (except for stable treated depression for >1year and normal [Beck Depression Inventory [BDI] and psych exam)
  • Present or past history of psychosis or other mood or eating disorder
  • Non-ambulatory or has significant impairment of mobility
  • Known hormonal or genetic cause for obesity with the exception of treated hypothyroidism.
  • Participating in another clinical study
  • Is a first degree relative of investigator, or support staff involved in the study.
  • Employed by investigator or institution involved in the study
  • Subject is not able to provide written informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

3 sites in 3 countries

Austria1 site
  • Krakenhaus Hallein

    Hallein, State of Salzburg

Other trials in Austria

Netherlands1 site
  • Atrium Medical Centre

    Heerlen

Other trials in Netherlands

Spain1 site
  • Centro Medico Teknon

    Barcelona

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Feasibility Study of an IncisionLEss Operating Platform for Primary ObeSiTy vs. Diet-exercise Alone: The MILEPOST Study

This study is a multi-center, open/unblended study (3:1Treatment: Control) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the g-Cath EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter as an early weight loss intervention compared to a diet and exercise control only. Mean % Total Body Weight Loss [TBWL] in Treatment subjects versus that of Control subjects at 12 months is the primary endpoint. The proportion of subjects achieving ≥ 5% TBWL at 12 months in the treatment group is a co-primary endpoint.

Read the detailed description

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the g-Cath EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter as an early weight loss intervention compared to a diet and exercise control only. The weight loss outcomes will be used to assess treatment effect. This study is a multi-center, open/unblinded, prospective randomized feasibility study (3:1Treatment: Control) study. Patients in the control group will be offered the opportunity to crossover to the treatment group at 12 months.

Conditions
Obesity
Being tested
g-CathTM EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter, Diet and Exercise Control Group
Keywords
g-Cath EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter, Weight Loss Intervention
Medical subject headings
Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • g-CathTM EZ Suture Anchor Delivery CatheterDevice

    Use of the g-Cath EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter for the placement of g-cath EZ suture anchors as an early weight loss intervention + diet and exercise as compared to those in the diet and exercise control group

  • Diet and Exercise Control GroupOther

    Patients in a diet and exercise only control group that will be compared to those in the g-Cath EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter treatment group

Study groups in NCT01843231
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
g-Cath EZ Treatment GroupExperimentalEvaluate the safety and effectiveness of the g-CathTM EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter as an early weight loss intervention
Receives: Device: g-CathTM EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter
Diet and exercise Control GroupActive comparatorDiet and Exercise only control group
Receives: Other: Diet and Exercise Control Group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Safety Endpoint

    Incidence and severity of Adverse Events [AE] over 12 Months

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Primary Efficacy Endpoint

    Mean % TBWL at 12 months for Treatment subjects compared to Control subjects

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint

    The proportion of Treatment subjects achieving ≥ 5% TBWL at 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. First Secondary Efficacy Endpoint

    Mean % TBWL at 24 months.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Second Secondary Efficacy endpoint

    Proportion of subjects achieving ≥ 5% TBWL at 24 months

    Measured: 24 months

  3. Third Secondary Efficacy endpoint

    Satiety changes (volume and time to satiety at 2, 6, 12 months post-procedure)

    Measured: 2, 6, 12 months

  4. Fourth Secondary Efficacy endpoint

    % Estimated Weight Loss [EWL] at 12 months and 18 months [% EWL will be calculated using BMI-25 criteria]

    Measured: 12 & 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionAug 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01843231
Sponsor's protocol ID
41936
Acronym
MILEPOST
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
22 Apr 2013
Last updated
3 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Miller K, Turro R, Greve JW, Bakker CM, Buchwald JN, Espinos JC. MILEPOST Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: 12-Month Weight Loss and Satiety Outcomes After pose SM vs. Medical Therapy. Obes Surg. 2017 Feb;27(2):310-322. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2295-9.

    PubMed 27468907

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing g-CathTM EZ Suture Anchor Delivery Catheter in people with Obesity, run by USGI Medical at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Austria, Netherlands, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Safety Endpoint (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01843231, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in