Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3MTX-IRNCT01844895
Methotrexate-Inadequate Response Autoinjector Device Sub Study
A Phase 3 study testing Abatacept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to implement a substudy in approximately 120 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) subjects to compare the steady-state serum trough concentration (Cminss), Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) during the dosing interval (TAU) of subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept injection of 125 mg via the autoinjector and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Abatacept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects who have been treated in the long term (LT) with open-label SC Abatacept for at least 3 months
- Must continue to meet inclusion criteria specified in main IM101-174 Study Protocol
Who cannot join
- Participation in previous device substudy (implemented by Amendment 10)
- Must continue to meet exclusion criteria specified in main IM101-174 Study Protocol
About this study
Official title: Substudy-A Phase IIIB Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Administered Subcutaneously and Intravenously in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Receiving Background Methotrexate, and Experiencing an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
The purpose of this study is to implement a substudy in approximately 120 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) subjects to compare the steady-state serum trough concentration (Cminss), Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) during the dosing interval (TAU) of subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept injection of 125 mg via the autoinjector and via the BD Hypak™ Physiolis prefilled syringe.
Read the detailed description
Study Classification:
- Safety: show if the drug is safe under conditions of proposed use
- Efficacy: measure of an intervention's influence on a disease or health condition
- Safety/Efficacy
- Pharmacokinetics: the action of a drug in the body over a period of time including the process of absorption, distribution and localization in tissue, biotransformation, and excretion of the compound.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Abatacept
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept (Autoinjector and Prefilled Syringe) | Experimental | Abatacept (prefilled syringe) 125 mg/device solution subcutaneously weekly for 3 months
Abatacept (autoinjector) 125 mg/device solution subcutaneously weekly for 1 month Receives: Drug: Abatacept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis: Adjusted Geometric Mean Observed Serum Trough Concentration at Steady State (Cminss) of Abatacept Using a Prefilled Syringe (Measured on Day 29) and Using an Autoinjector (Measured on Day 113)
Abatacept SC was self-administered with a prefilled syringe every 7 days for the first 4 weeks until Day 29; Blood samples for PK were taken pre-dose (0 hour) on Days 29 and 113. Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Steady-state trough observed concentration in serum (Cminss) was measured in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL). Adjusted geometric mean and 90% confidence interval (CI) are presented.
Measured: Day 29, Day 113
Secondary outcomes (5)
PK Analysis: Geometric Mean of Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Abatacept During the Sampling Period Between Substudy Days 22 and 29 for the Prefilled Syringe and Between Substudy Days 106 and Day 113 for the Autoinjector
Abatacept SC was self-administered with a BD Hypak™ Physiolis prefilled syringe every 7 days for the first 4 weeks of the substudy until Day 29; Blood samples for PK were taken on Days 1 and 22 at 0 hour (predose), Day 24 at 48 hour (h) post dose, Day 25 at 72 h post dose, Day 26 at 96 h post dose and Day 29 at 0 h (predose). On substudy Day 29, participants were switched from the prefilled syringe to the autoinjector. Participants continued to self-administer abatacept with the autoinjector every 7 days following Day 29 for the remaining 3 months of the substudy; Blood samples for PK were taken on Day 108 at 48 h post dose, Day 109 at 72 h post dose, Day 110 at 96 h post dose and at Day 113 0h (predose). Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated ELISA. Cmax was measured in μg/mL.
Measured: Days 22, 24, 25, 26, 29 (prefilled syringe); Days 106, 108, 109, 110, 113 (autoinjector)
PK Analysis: Median Time to Achieve Cmax (Tmax) During the Sampling Period Between Days 22 and 29 for the Prefilled Syringe and Between Days 106 and Day 113 for the Autoinjector
Abatacept SC was self-administered with a BD Hypak™ Physiolis prefilled syringe every 7 days for the first 4 weeks of the substudy until Day 29; Blood samples for PK were taken on Days 1 and 22 at 0 hour (predose), Day 24 at 48 hour (h) post dose, Day 25 at 72 h post dose, Day 26 at 96 h post dose and Day 29 at 0 h (predose). On substudy Day 29, participants were switched from the prefilled syringe to the autoinjector. Participants continued to self-administer abatacept with the autoinjector every 7 days following Day 29 for the remaining 3 months of the substudy; Blood samples for PK were taken on Day 108 at 48 h post dose, Day 109 at 72 h post dose, Day 110 at 96 h post dose and at Day 113 0h (predose). Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated ELISA. Tmax was measured in hours (h).
Measured: Days 22, 24, 25, 26, 29 (prefilled syringe); Days 106, 108, 109, 110,113 (autoinjector)
Geometric Mean of Area Under Serum Concentration-time (AUC) During a Dosing Interval (TAU) of Abatacept During the Sampling Period Between Days 22 and 29 for the Prefilled Syringe and Between Days 106 and Day 113 for the Autoinjector
Abatacept SC was self-administered with a BD Hypak™ Physiolis prefilled syringe every 7 days for the first 4 weeks of the substudy until Day 29; Blood samples for PK were taken on Days 1 and 22 at 0 hour (predose), Day 24 at 48 hour (h) post dose, Day 25 at 72 h post dose, Day 26 at 96 h post dose and Day 29 at 0 h (predose). On substudy Day 29, participants were switched from the prefilled syringe to the autoinjector. Participants continued to self-administer abatacept with the autoinjector every 7 days following Day 29 for the remaining 3 months of the substudy; Blood samples for PK were taken on Day 106 at 0 h (predose), Day 108 at 48 h post dose, Day 109 at 72 h post dose, Day 110 at 96 h post dose and at Day 113 0h (predose). Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated ELISA. AUC(TAU) where TAU = 168 hours was calculated in µg*h/mL
Measured: Days 22, 24, 25, 26,29 (prefilled syringe); Days 106, 108, 109, 110, 113 (autoinjector)
Geometric Mean of Trough Serum Concentration (Cmin) Over Time and During the Switch From Prefilled Syringe to Autoinjector on Days 22, 29, 57, 85, 106, and 113
Abatacept SC was self-administered with a BD Hypak™ Physiolis prefilled syringe every 7 days for the first 4 weeks of the substudy until Day 29; Blood samples for PK were taken at 0 hour (predose). On substudy Day 29, participants were switched from the prefilled syringe to the autoinjector. Participants continued to self-administer abatacept with the autoinjector every 7 days following Day 29 for the remaining 3 months of the substudy. Blood samples for PK were taken at 0 hour (predose). Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated ELISA. Steady-state trough observed concentration in serum (Cminss) was measured in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL).
Measured: Days 22, 29, 57, 85, 106, and 113
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Abatacept or Anti-CTLA4 Antibody Responses by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) on Day 29 and Day 113.
Serum samples for immunogenicity were evaluated for presence of anti-abatacept antibodies using a validated bridging ECL on Day 29 and Day 113. The ECL assay differentiated between 2 antibody specificities: the immunoglobulin (Ig) G and/or junction region and cytotoxic leukocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and possibly Ig. A positive immunogenicity response relative to baseline was defined as: A missing baseline immunogenicity measurement and a positive analytical laboratory reported immunogenicity response post-baseline; A negative baseline immunogenicity response and a positive analytical laboratory reported immunogenicity response post-baseline; A positive baseline immunogenicity response and a positive analytical laboratory reported immunogenicity response post-baseline that has a titer value strictly greater than the baseline titer value.
Measured: Days 29 and 113
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01844895
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM101-174 Substudy-2
- Other IDs
- 2007-005434-37
- Acronym
- MTX-IR
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Substudy-A Phase IIIB Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Administered Subcutaneously and Intravenously in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Receiving Background Methotrexate, and Experiencing an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01844895
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MTX-IR / IM101-174 Substudy-2
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Jul 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to implement a substudy in approximately 120 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) subjects to compare the steady-state serum trough concentration (Cminss), Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) during the dosing interval (TAU) of subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept injection of 125 mg via the autoinjector and via the BD Hypak™ Physiolis prefilled syringe.
Detailed description
Study Classification:
- Safety: show if the drug is safe under conditions of proposed use
- Efficacy: measure of an intervention's influence on a disease or health condition
- Safety/Efficacy
- Pharmacokinetics: the action of a drug in the body over a period of time including the process of absorption, distribution and localization in tissue, biotransformation, and excretion of the compound.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept (Autoinjector and Prefilled Syringe) | Experimental | Drug: AbataceptAbatacept (prefilled syringe) 125 mg/device solution subcutaneously weekly for 3 months Abatacept (autoinjector) 125 mg/device solution subcutaneously weekly for 1 month |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects who have been treated in the long term (LT) with open-label SC Abatacept for at least 3 months
- Must continue to meet inclusion criteria specified in main IM101-174 Study Protocol
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participation in previous device substudy (implemented by Amendment 10)
- Must continue to meet exclusion criteria specified in main IM101-174 Study Protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AbataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667 | Drug | Abatacept (Autoinjector and Prefilled Syringe) |
Primary outcome
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis: Adjusted Geometric Mean Observed Serum Trough Concentration at Steady State (Cminss) of Abatacept Using a Prefilled Syringe (Measured on Day 29) and Using an Autoinjector (Measured on Day 113)
Time frame: Day 29, Day 113
Abatacept SC was self-administered with a prefilled syringe every 7 days for the first 4 weeks until Day 29; Blood samples for PK were taken pre-dose (0 hour) on Days 29 and 113. Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Steady-state trough observed concentration in serum (Cminss) was measured in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL). Adjusted geometric mean and 90% confidence interval (CI) are presented.
5 secondary outcomes
PK Analysis: Geometric Mean of Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Abatacept During the Sampling Period Between Substudy Days 22 and 29 for the Prefilled Syringe and Between Substudy Days 106 and Day 113 for the Autoinjector
Time frame: Days 22, 24, 25, 26, 29 (prefilled syringe); Days 106, 108, 109, 110, 113 (autoinjector)
PK Analysis: Median Time to Achieve Cmax (Tmax) During the Sampling Period Between Days 22 and 29 for the Prefilled Syringe and Between Days 106 and Day 113 for the Autoinjector
Time frame: Days 22, 24, 25, 26, 29 (prefilled syringe); Days 106, 108, 109, 110,113 (autoinjector)
Geometric Mean of Area Under Serum Concentration-time (AUC) During a Dosing Interval (TAU) of Abatacept During the Sampling Period Between Days 22 and 29 for the Prefilled Syringe and Between Days 106 and Day 113 for the Autoinjector
Time frame: Days 22, 24, 25, 26,29 (prefilled syringe); Days 106, 108, 109, 110, 113 (autoinjector)
Geometric Mean of Trough Serum Concentration (Cmin) Over Time and During the Switch From Prefilled Syringe to Autoinjector on Days 22, 29, 57, 85, 106, and 113
Time frame: Days 22, 29, 57, 85, 106, and 113
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Abatacept or Anti-CTLA4 Antibody Responses by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) on Day 29 and Day 113.
Time frame: Days 29 and 113
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of LPX-TI641 in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of QLS2416 Injection in Participants With Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2 Study of NKX019 in Subjects With Immune-Mediated Diseases (Ntrust-2)
Systemic Sclerosis, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Abatacept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis: Adjusted Geometric Mean Observed Serum Trough Concentration at Steady State (Cminss) of Abatacept Using a Prefilled Syringe (Measured on Day 29) and Using an Autoinjector (Measured on Day 113) (time frame: Day 29, Day 113). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2015.