AzTrials
AzTrials

Epiretinal MembraneNCT01846351

Intravitreal Anti-VEGF in Exudative AMD With Epiretinal Membranes

An observational study of Epiretinal Membrane and Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by New England Retina Associates.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study designed to evaluate the effect of significant ERM on the visual and anatomic outcomes of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for eAMD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 58 to 90 years
How many people
16 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2006to Feb 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 58 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: age-related macular degeneration

Who may be able to join

  • Significant epiretinal membrane
  • Anti-VEGF treatment for age-related macular degeneration

Who cannot join

  • Uveitis
  • Macular disorders
  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • Vascular occlusions

About this study

Official title: Visual and Anatomic Outcomes of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration With Concurrent Significant Epiretinal Membrane.

Study designed to evaluate the effect of significant ERM on the visual and anatomic outcomes of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for eAMD.

Read the detailed description

Gass in 1987 described three cases of epiretinal membrane (ERM) associated with wet macular degeneration. Since then we have seen that is not rare to find the coexistence of these entities. An ERM may produce intrinsic disorganization of the outer retina leading to persistent increased macular thickness and/or edema. This persistent edema may affect the effectiveness in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD). Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of significant ERM on the visual and anatomic outcomes of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for eAMD.

Keywords
choroidal neovascularization, epiretinal membrane, anti-VEGF
Medical subject headings
Epiretinal Membrane, Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neovascularization

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluate the best visual acuity during the follow up.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Central macular thickness

    Evaluation of the retinal thickness changes with anti-VEGF treatment

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Fluorescein angiogram

    Evaluation of changes in lesion size during follow-up.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2006
  3. Primary completionFeb 2010
  4. Study completionFeb 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01846351
Sponsor's protocol ID
NAC270608
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
1 May 2013
Last updated
3 May 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Epiretinal Membrane and Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by New England Retina Associates.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Best corrected visual acuity (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in