AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationNCT01847547

Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cohort study plans to identify initiators of oral anticoagulants using electronic claims data from a commercial insurance database to quantify associations between anticoagulant choice (warfarin and dabigatran) and the occurrence of selected outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at risk for… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
How many people
5,982 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2013to Apr 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients 18 years of age and older with non-valvular AF initiating oral anticoagulation therapy

Who may be able to join

  • A recorded diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF).
  • Initiation of anticoagulant medication (dabigatran or warfarin).
  • At least 18 years of age on the date of anticoagulant initiation CHA2DS2-VASc-Score >=1

Who cannot join

  • Patients with missing or ambiguous age or sex information
  • Patients with documented evidence of valvular disease
  • Patients with less than 12 months enrolment in the UnitedHealth Research Database preceding the date of anticoagulant initiation
  • Patients with prior use of any oral anticoagulant

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants: A Cohort Study

This cohort study plans to identify initiators of oral anticoagulants using electronic claims data from a commercial insurance database to quantify associations between anticoagulant choice (warfarin and dabigatran) and the occurrence of selected outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke.

Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01847547
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DabigatranNot described
WarfarinNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence Rate of Stroke

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  2. Incidence Rate of Major Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 and procedure codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Incidence Rate of Myocardial Infarction

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  2. Incidence Rate of Venous Thromboembolism

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  3. Incidence Rate of Deep Vein Thrombosis

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  4. Incidence Rate of Pulmonary Embolism

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  5. Incidence Rate of Major Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  6. Incidence Rate of Major Urogenital Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  7. Incidence Rate of Major Other Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  8. Incidence Rate of Transient Ischemic Attack

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  9. Incidence Rate of Major Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 and procedure codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  10. Incidence Rate of Stroke or Systemic Embolism

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  11. Incidence Rate of Systemic Embolism

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  12. Incidence Rate of Ischemic Stroke

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  13. Incidence Rate of Hemorrhagic Stroke

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  14. Incidence Rate of Stroke Uncertain Classification

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  15. Incidence Rate of Major Intracranial Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  16. Incidence Rate of Major Extracranial Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 and procedure codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

  17. Incidence Rate of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding

    Events during follow-up (October 2010- 30 June 2012) were identified using ICD 9 and procedure codes.

    Measured: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionApr 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
5,982 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01847547
Sponsor's protocol ID
1160.157
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
18 Apr 2013
Last updated
6 Jun 2014

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence Rate of Stroke (time frame: From treatment initiation until end of follow-up; up to 20 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in