PoliomyelitisPhase 4IPVNCT01847872
IPV Clinical Trial - The Gambia
A Phase 4 study testing IPV IM Needle, IPV ID Needle and IPV IM Device in people with Poliomyelitis, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in The Gambia.
Trial summary
The overall goal of this study is to identify interference between intramuscular Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) and other vaccines (Measles Rubella and Yellow Fever) co-administered at nine months of age and to confirm the safety of co-administration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 9 to 10 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Poliomyelitis
- What is being tested?
- IPV IM Needle, IPV ID Needle and IPV IM Device
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,504 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThe Gambia
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 9 to 10 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Nine to ten months of age inclusive
- Receipt of at least three doses of tOPV (excluding a dose given at birth) a minimum of four weeks prior to recruitment date
- Informed consent for trial participation obtained from a parent/guardian (see section 19.1.2 for definition of guardian and section 19.1.3 for details regarding consent procedure)
- Resident in the study area and with no plans to travel outside the study area during the period of subject participation
- Willingness and capacity to comply with the study protocol as judged by a member of the clinical trial team
Who cannot join
- Use of any Investigational Medicinal Product(IMP) within the 28 days preceding enrolment
- Planned administration of any vaccine outside those defined in the study protocol at anytime during trial participation (for procedure in the event of a national OPV campaign see section 12.5.1.1)
- Previous receipt of a measles, rubella, yellow fever or IPV vaccine
- Bacillus Calmette-Guérin(BCG) vaccination in the month prior to recruitment
- Any suspected or confirmed congenital or acquired state of immune deficiency including but not limited to primary immunodeficiencies including thymus disorders, HIV/AIDS, hematological or lymphoid malignancies (blood tests will not be routinely undertaken with this regard as part of the study)
- Any current immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory medication or treatment including, but not limited to corticosteroids, cyclosporin, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, radiotherapy, bone marrow transplantation
Show all 15Show fewer
- Receipt of any immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory medication or treatment within the six months preceding trial enrolment (for corticosteroids this is defined as a dose of prednisolone (or equivalent) of greater than 2mg/kg/day for one week or 1mg/kg/day for one month. The use of inhaled or topical corticosteroids is not an exclusion criteria
- Receipt of pooled human immunoglobulin, other blood product or any monoclonal antibody therapy at any point prior to recruitment or plans to receive such therapy at any point during the trial-
- Any significant congenital defect or significant chronic health problem (e.g. chronic hematological (including severe anemia), renal, gastrointestinal, respiratory, neurological and cardiovascular disorders).
- A history of anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reaction to egg, chicken proteins, neomycin, streptomycin polymyxin B, any previous vaccination or any individual component of one of the vaccines
- Confirmed fructose intolerance
- Severe protein-energy malnutrition (weight-for-age Z-score of less than -3)
- Any clinically suspected or confirmed congenital or acquired clotting or bleeding disorder or any mediation known to significantly interfere with clotting (e.g. hemophilia or current anti-coagulant therapy) (blood tests will not be routinely undertaken with this regard as part of the study)
- Any other condition which, in the opinion of the research clinician or ultimately the PI, is likely to interfere with the assessment of the primary and secondary objectives
- Any significant signs or symptoms of an acute illness or infection including a tympanic temperature >38.0°C or documented fever >38°C in the preceding 48 hours
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 4, Randomized Trial to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine When Given Concomitantly With Measles and Rubella Combined Vaccine and Yellow Fever Vaccine at Nine Months and When Administered Via Different Vaccination Routes
The overall goal of this study is to identify interference between intramuscular Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) and other vaccines (Measles Rubella and Yellow Fever) co-administered at nine months of age and to confirm the safety of co-administration. In addition, the study will compare the immunogenicity and safety of IPV when administered via different routes.
A total of 1504 healthy infants between the ages of nine to ten months, who have completed their primary immunizations, including at least three doses of trivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (tOPV) will be recruited for this study.
Read the detailed description
In studies conducted to date, Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) appears to boost the systemic immunity generated by Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) priming significantly more effectively than the use of additional doses of OPV. The use of IPV to both enhance the immunity generated by OPV and also to provide protection against circulating Vaccine Derived Polio Virus type 2 outbreaks and Vaccine Associated Paralytic Poliomyelitis has the potential to address concerns regarding a switch to bivalent OPV.
Concomitant administration with Expanded Program of Immunisations(EPI) vaccines given at about nine months would be a feasible programmatic approach. Maternal antibodies will have largely waned by this point negating any inhibitory effect which they may have within the priming schedule. Significant interference between IPV, Measles and Rubella (MR) and Yellow Fever (YF) vaccines must be excluded to ensure that IPV introduction does not negatively impact on the immunogenicity or safety of the other vaccines in the program at the same point.
Restricted manufacturing capacity in the context of a higher manufacturing cost than OPV would currently limit the rate at which IPV could be rolled out within a modified EPI schedule. The administration of a fractional dose of the vaccine by the Intradermal route would facilitate vaccine role out through limiting the cost and the manufacturing scale-up required. The proposed study is phase 4, eight-arm, open label, randomized controlled clinical vaccine trial. A total of 1504 randomized healthy infants between nine and ten months will receive IPV, MR and YF vaccines either alone, in combinations of two vaccines, or all three vaccines will be given together. Different routes (IM and fractional dose ID) and needle free jet injections devices for administration of IPV will be compared in the different groups. The participants will be assigned to one of eight groups using blocked randomization scheme in a 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio.
Non- inferiority of serological responses and median antibody titers will be the primary immunogenicity end points. The incidence of serious adverse events and other important medical events at any point during the study will be the primary safety end point in all groups. Following device of reference needle/syringe administration, any local adverse event (reactogenicity), which will be collected on day 0(day of vaccination), day 1, day 2 and day 3 will be a second primary safety endpoint.
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Being tested
- IPV IM Needle, IPV ID Needle, IPV IM Device, IPV ID Device
- Keywords
- Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine, Randomised Control Phase IV Study, Gambia, IPV, Safety and Immunogenicity, Non-interference study, IM Jet injector, ID Jet Injector
- Medical subject headings
- Poliomyelitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IPV IM NeedleDrug
Also called Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Intramuscular using syringe and needle pair
IPV ID NeedleDrug
Also called Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Intradermal using syringe and needle pair
IPV IM DeviceDrug
Also called Intramuscular Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine using intramuscular Jet injector device
IPV ID DeviceDrug
Also called Intradermal Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine using intradermal device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IPV IM (Visit 1) | Experimental | IM IPV vaccine using syringe and needle pair is given at visit 1 followed by MR vaccine at visit 2 and YF vaccine at visit 3 Receives: Drug: IPV IM Needle |
| IPV IM (Visit 2) | Experimental | MR vaccine at visit 1 followed by IM IPV vaccine using syringe and needle pair at visit 2, then YF vaccine at visit 3 Receives: Drug: IPV IM Needle |
| IPV IM (Device - Visit 2) | Experimental | YF vaccine at visit 1 followed by IPV given IM using a Jet injector device at visit 2 and MR vaccine at visit 3 Receives: Drug: IPV IM Device |
| IPV IM and MR (Visit1) | Experimental | IM IPV using syringe and needle pair is given alongside MR at visit 1 followed by YF vaccine at visit 2 Receives: Drug: IPV IM Needle |
| IPV IM and YF (Visit 1) | Experimental | IM IPV using syringe and needle pair is given alongside YF vaccine at visit 1 followed by MR at visit 2 Receives: Drug: IPV IM Needle |
| IPV ID (Visit 2) | Experimental | MR and YF vaccines are co-administered at visit 1 followed by ID IPV using syringe and needle pair is given at visit 2 Receives: Drug: IPV ID Needle |
| IPV IM and MR and YF (Visit 1) | Experimental | IM IPV using syringe and needle pair is given alongside YF vaccine and MR vaccine at visit 1 Receives: Drug: IPV IM Needle |
| IPV (ID Device Visit 2) | Experimental | MR vaccine is given at visit 1 followed by IPV vaccine by ID Jet injector device at visit 2 and YF vaccine at visit 3 Receives: Drug: IPV ID Device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
interference and immunugenicity
Serological responses (seropositivity for polioviruses 1, 2 and 3 and seroconversion for measles, rubella and yellow fever) will be measured four weeks following vaccination.
Median antibody titers will be measured four weeks following vaccine administration
Measured: 4 - 6 weeks after vaccination
Safety
Severe Adverse Event or Important Medical Event at any point during the study Any local AE (reactogenicity) on days 0, 1, 2 or 3 following vaccination using the IM or ID needle-free jet-injector devices or in the reference needle/syringe groups Any local or systemic Adverse Event on days 0 or 3 following all other vaccinations
Measured: up to 10 weeks after first vaccination
Secondary outcomes (4)
Cellular immune responses (B and T cells) to IPV vaccination
The poliovirus specific B-cell and T-cell responses following IPV vaccination using the IM or ID needle-free jet-injector or in the reference needle/syringe groups
Measured: up to 4 - 6 weeks post vaccination
stool tOPV quantification
The level of poliovirus in the stool 14-21 days after a dose of tOPV in the context of previous IPV boosting using the IM or ID jet injector or in the reference needle/syringe routes.
Measured: Day 14 - 21 after tOPV administration
time motion study
The time taken to administer IPV when the IM and ID needle/syringe routes are compared with the same routes of administration using a jet injector device
Measured: 4- 6 weeks
Perception of devices
The perceptions of the vaccinators and parents/guardians regarding the needle-free jet-injector devices.
For the parent/guardian a questionnaire with 4 questions will be administered following vaccination to assess parental/guardian perception of the device compared to standard needle and syringe base use.
For the vaccinators will a questionnaire will be administered to assess their perception of the device in terms of ease of use and speed compared to standard needle and syringe base pair
Measured: 4 to 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PoliomyelitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,504 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ed Clarke, MD, Principal investigator, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01847872
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCC 1327
- Acronym
- IPV
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bibby J, Saidu Y, Umesi A, Moneke-Anyanwoke N, Bashorun AO, Hydara MB, Adigweme I, Adetifa JU, Okoye M, Roberts E, Clemens R, Bandyopadhyay AS, Muhammad AK, Mulwa S, Royals M, Jarrahian C, Jeffries D, Kampmann B, Clarke E. The Immunogenicity of Fractional Intradermal Doses of the Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Is Associated With the Size of the Intradermal Fluid Bleb. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 1;65(5):851-854. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix381.
PubMed 28444156Clarke E, Saidu Y, Adetifa JU, Adigweme I, Hydara MB, Bashorun AO, Moneke-Anyanwoke N, Umesi A, Roberts E, Cham PM, Okoye ME, Brown KE, Niedrig M, Chowdhury PR, Clemens R, Bandyopadhyay AS, Mueller J, Jeffries DJ, Kampmann B. Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated poliovirus vaccine when given with measles-rubella combined vaccine and yellow fever vaccine and when given via different administration routes: a phase 4, randomised, non-inferiority trial in The Gambia. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Aug;4(8):e534-47. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30075-4. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PubMed 27364568
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 4, Randomized Trial to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine When Given Concomitantly With Measles and Rubella Combined Vaccine and Yellow Fever Vaccine at Nine Months and When Administered Via Different Vaccination Routes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01847872
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IPV / SCC 1327
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Keywords
- Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine, Randomised Control Phase IV Study, Gambia, IPV, Safety and Immunogenicity, Non-interference study, IM Jet injector, ID Jet Injector
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,504 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall goal of this study is to identify interference between intramuscular Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) and other vaccines (Measles Rubella and Yellow Fever) co-administered at nine months of age and to confirm the safety of co-administration. In addition, the study will compare the immunogenicity and safety of IPV when administered via different routes.
A total of 1504 healthy infants between the ages of nine to ten months, who have completed their primary immunizations, including at least three doses of trivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (tOPV) will be recruited for this study.
Detailed description
In studies conducted to date, Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) appears to boost the systemic immunity generated by Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) priming significantly more effectively than the use of additional doses of OPV. The use of IPV to both enhance the immunity generated by OPV and also to provide protection against circulating Vaccine Derived Polio Virus type 2 outbreaks and Vaccine Associated Paralytic Poliomyelitis has the potential to address concerns regarding a switch to bivalent OPV.
Concomitant administration with Expanded Program of Immunisations(EPI) vaccines given at about nine months would be a feasible programmatic approach. Maternal antibodies will have largely waned by this point negating any inhibitory effect which they may have within the priming schedule. Significant interference between IPV, Measles and Rubella (MR) and Yellow Fever (YF) vaccines must be excluded to ensure that IPV introduction does not negatively impact on the immunogenicity or safety of the other vaccines in the program at the same point.
Restricted manufacturing capacity in the context of a higher manufacturing cost than OPV would currently limit the rate at which IPV could be rolled out within a modified EPI schedule. The administration of a fractional dose of the vaccine by the Intradermal route would facilitate vaccine role out through limiting the cost and the manufacturing scale-up required. The proposed study is phase 4, eight-arm, open label, randomized controlled clinical vaccine trial. A total of 1504 randomized healthy infants between nine and ten months will receive IPV, MR and YF vaccines either alone, in combinations of two vaccines, or all three vaccines will be given together. Different routes (IM and fractional dose ID) and needle free jet injections devices for administration of IPV will be compared in the different groups. The participants will be assigned to one of eight groups using blocked randomization scheme in a 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio.
Non- inferiority of serological responses and median antibody titers will be the primary immunogenicity end points. The incidence of serious adverse events and other important medical events at any point during the study will be the primary safety end point in all groups. Following device of reference needle/syringe administration, any local adverse event (reactogenicity), which will be collected on day 0(day of vaccination), day 1, day 2 and day 3 will be a second primary safety endpoint.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IPV IM (Visit 1) | Experimental | Drug: IPV IM NeedleIM IPV vaccine using syringe and needle pair is given at visit 1 followed by MR vaccine at visit 2 and YF vaccine at visit 3 |
| IPV IM (Visit 2) | Experimental | Drug: IPV IM NeedleMR vaccine at visit 1 followed by IM IPV vaccine using syringe and needle pair at visit 2, then YF vaccine at visit 3 |
| IPV IM (Device - Visit 2) | Experimental | Drug: IPV IM DeviceYF vaccine at visit 1 followed by IPV given IM using a Jet injector device at visit 2 and MR vaccine at visit 3 |
| IPV IM and MR (Visit1) | Experimental | Drug: IPV IM NeedleIM IPV using syringe and needle pair is given alongside MR at visit 1 followed by YF vaccine at visit 2 |
| IPV IM and YF (Visit 1) | Experimental | Drug: IPV IM NeedleIM IPV using syringe and needle pair is given alongside YF vaccine at visit 1 followed by MR at visit 2 |
| IPV ID (Visit 2) | Experimental | Drug: IPV ID NeedleMR and YF vaccines are co-administered at visit 1 followed by ID IPV using syringe and needle pair is given at visit 2 |
| IPV IM and MR and YF (Visit 1) | Experimental | Drug: IPV IM NeedleIM IPV using syringe and needle pair is given alongside YF vaccine and MR vaccine at visit 1 |
| IPV (ID Device Visit 2) | Experimental | Drug: IPV ID DeviceMR vaccine is given at visit 1 followed by IPV vaccine by ID Jet injector device at visit 2 and YF vaccine at visit 3 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 9 to 10 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Nine to ten months of age inclusive
- Receipt of at least three doses of tOPV (excluding a dose given at birth) a minimum of four weeks prior to recruitment date
- Informed consent for trial participation obtained from a parent/guardian (see section 19.1.2 for definition of guardian and section 19.1.3 for details regarding consent procedure)
- Resident in the study area and with no plans to travel outside the study area during the period of subject participation
- Willingness and capacity to comply with the study protocol as judged by a member of the clinical trial team
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Use of any Investigational Medicinal Product(IMP) within the 28 days preceding enrolment
- Planned administration of any vaccine outside those defined in the study protocol at anytime during trial participation (for procedure in the event of a national OPV campaign see section 12.5.1.1)
- Previous receipt of a measles, rubella, yellow fever or IPV vaccine
- Bacillus Calmette-Guérin(BCG) vaccination in the month prior to recruitment
- Any suspected or confirmed congenital or acquired state of immune deficiency including but not limited to primary immunodeficiencies including thymus disorders, HIV/AIDS, hematological or lymphoid malignancies (blood tests will not be routinely undertaken with this regard as part of the study)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IPV IM NeedleAlso: Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Intramuscular using syringe and needle pair | Drug | IPV IM (Visit 1), IPV IM (Visit 2), IPV IM and MR (Visit1), IPV IM and MR and YF (Visit 1), IPV IM and YF (Visit 1) |
| IPV ID NeedleAlso: Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Intradermal using syringe and needle pair | Drug | IPV ID (Visit 2) |
| IPV IM DeviceAlso: Intramuscular Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine using intramuscular Jet injector device | Drug | IPV IM (Device - Visit 2) |
| IPV ID DeviceAlso: Intradermal Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine using intradermal device | Drug | IPV (ID Device Visit 2) |
Primary outcome
interference and immunugenicity
Time frame: 4 - 6 weeks after vaccination
Serological responses (seropositivity for polioviruses 1, 2 and 3 and seroconversion for measles, rubella and yellow fever) will be measured four weeks following vaccination. Median antibody titers will be measured four weeks following vaccine administration
Safety
Time frame: up to 10 weeks after first vaccination
Severe Adverse Event or Important Medical Event at any point during the study Any local AE (reactogenicity) on days 0, 1, 2 or 3 following vaccination using the IM or ID needle-free jet-injector devices or in the reference needle/syringe groups Any local or systemic Adverse Event on days 0 or 3 following all other vaccinations
4 secondary outcomes
Cellular immune responses (B and T cells) to IPV vaccination
Time frame: up to 4 - 6 weeks post vaccination
stool tOPV quantification
Time frame: Day 14 - 21 after tOPV administration
time motion study
Time frame: 4- 6 weeks
Perception of devices
Time frame: 4 to 6 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28444156Bibby J, Saidu Y, Umesi A, Moneke-Anyanwoke N, Bashorun AO, Hydara MB, Adigweme I, Adetifa JU, Okoye M, Roberts E, Clemens R, Bandyopadhyay AS, Muhammad AK, Mulwa S, Royals M, Jarrahian C, Jeffries D, Kampmann B, Clarke E. The Immunogenicity of Fractional Intradermal Doses of the Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Is Associated With the Size of the Intradermal Fluid Bleb. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 1;65(5):851-854. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix381.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27364568Clarke E, Saidu Y, Adetifa JU, Adigweme I, Hydara MB, Bashorun AO, Moneke-Anyanwoke N, Umesi A, Roberts E, Cham PM, Okoye ME, Brown KE, Niedrig M, Chowdhury PR, Clemens R, Bandyopadhyay AS, Mueller J, Jeffries DJ, Kampmann B. Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated poliovirus vaccine when given with measles-rubella combined vaccine and yellow fever vaccine and when given via different administration routes: a phase 4, randomised, non-inferiority trial in The Gambia. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Aug;4(8):e534-47. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30075-4. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
Related trials for Poliomyelitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Component Pertussis and Sabin Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine Adsorbed
Diphtheria, Pertussis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Combined Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whole Cell Pertussis, Hepatitis B, Recombinant Poliomyelitis and Haemophilus Influenzae Type b (Hib) Vaccine (SIIPL DTwP-HepB-rPV-Hib)
Diptheria Immunization, Tetanus Immunization
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Poliomyelitis Vaccine (rPV) in Comparison With IPOL Vaccine in Healthy Adults
Polio Immunity
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Virtual Walking on Chronic Pain and Psychological Distress for Individuals With Severe Mobility Impairment
Severe Mobility Impairment, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Mucosal Intestinal Immunity to Poliovirus Type-2 of nOPV2 at Birth Dose in Healthy IPV Vaccinated Infants
Poliomyelitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ed Clarke, MD principal investigator
Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing IPV IM Needle, IPV ID Needle and IPV IM Device in people with Poliomyelitis, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in The Gambia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in The Gambia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
interference and immunugenicity (time frame: 4 - 6 weeks after vaccination). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01847872, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2018.