AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT01849757

Comparison of Priming Constituents in Patients Undergoing CPB Assisted Cardiac Surgery: HES 130/0.4 or Albumin 5%

A study testing prime crystalloid, Human Albumin and Voluven in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Aortic Valve Disease, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to determine which priming fluid is the safest for use for priming the heart-lung machine used during cardiopulmonary bypass for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The fluids to be compared are albumin and voluven. A control group will receive only crystalloid. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 90 years
What is being tested?
prime crystalloid, Human Albumin and Voluven
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Nov 2013to Nov 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass assisted cardiac surgery
  • -

Who cannot join

  • emergencies and patients in renal failure or dialysis -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Royal University Hospital

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

The purpose of the study is to determine which priming fluid is the safest for use for priming the heart-lung machine used during cardiopulmonary bypass for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The fluids to be compared are albumin and voluven. A control group will receive only crystalloid.

Read the detailed description

Project title:

Comparison of priming constituents in patients undergoing CPB assisted cardiac surgery: 6% HES 130/0.4 or Albumen 5%

Principal investigator:

Jo-Anne Marcoux M. Sc., CPC, CCP

Department:

Clinical Perfusion

Sub-investigators:

Victor Uppal B. Sc., CPC, CCP Taras Mycyk MD, FRCSC,

Research will be conducted at: the cardiac operating rooms of the Royal University Hospital, and affiliated hospitals

Hypothesis It is hypothesized that the use of an artificial colloid (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4) (HES) as a priming constituent is more disruptive to the coagulation and renal systems compared to the use of human derived albumen.

It is further hypothesized that patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with HES 130/0.4 as a priming constituent will demonstrate decreased creatinine clearance and increased post-operative bleeding and transfusion requirements.

Academic validity Permissive hemodilution results when crystalloids and colloids are substituted for blood as priming fluids in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. While there are obvious benefits to decreasing autologous blood exposure to the patients undergoing CPB, determining the most physiological substitution has not been conclusively resolved. Historically, available HES had a greater molecular weight then the product currently in use and was associated with detrimental adverse events when compared to saline as fluid replacement therapy (5.3% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). (1) When albumin was compared to HES 450/0.7 and HES 200/0.05 for fluid management in adult CPB surgery, (18 trials of 970 patients) HES increased transfusion of red blood cells by 28.4% (p = 0.027), increased the transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma by 30.6% (p = 0.008) and increased the transfusion of platelets by 29.8% (p = 0.027). HES 130/0.4 could not be compared to albumen in this same study because there was insufficient data collected. However, no significant differences were found when comparing transfusion requirements between HES 450/0.7, HES 200/0.05 and HES 130/0.4. (2) Viscoelastic device analysis concluded that the administration of HES 130/0.4 in patients or healthy volunteers resulted in a weaker and smaller clot. (3) Short-time infusions of HES 200/0.5 and HES 130/0.4 after cardiac surgery produced a temporary impairment of fibrin formation and clot strength while human albumin had no effect. (4)

In regards to the association between HES and renal failure, on the one hand use of HES 130/0.4 as a priming fluid used in children undergoing CPB did not result in any negative effects on renal function and was safe to use in the pediatric population. (5) On the other hand, when used for resuscitative measures in 7000 randomly assigned patients admitted to intensive care, though there was no difference in 90 day mortality between the group assigned HES 130/0.4 and the group assigned saline, more patients assigned HES 130/0.4 required renal replacement therapy. (1) When used immediately after CPB in a double-blind clinical trial comparing 4% gelatin, Ringer's solution and HES 130/0.4, it was found that significantly lower mean creatinine levels were found in the HES 130/0.4 group compared to the other two groups. (6)

Our research is directed toward determining conclusively if HES 130/0.4 has a similar risk profile to HES 450/0.7 and HES 200/0.05 when used as a priming constituent for the CPB circuit. Additionally we will determine if an albumin/crystalloid prime is superior to a HES 130/0.4/crystalloid prime. A fully crystalloid prime control group will be included for a controlled comparison.

Research design/Methods

The will be a randomized, control trial. Three groups of subjects will be studied:

  1. Control group: Crystalloid prime
  • 2 L crystalloid prime,
  • 2.5 mL/kg Mannitol 20%,
  • 1 ampoule of NaHCO-3 (50 mL),
  • 10,000 iu heparin
  1. Voluven (light?):
  • HES 130/0.4 prime 500 mL
  • balance of crystalloid
  • 2.5 mL/kg Mannitol 20%,
  • 1 ampoule of NaHCO-3 (50 mL),
  • 10,000 iu heparin
  1. Albumin:
  • Human albumin 500 mL 5%
  • balance of crystalloid
  • 2.5 mL/kg Mannitol 20%,
  • 1 ampoule of NaHCO-3 (50 mL),
  • 10,000 iu heparin

Statistical Analysis We would like to have 7000 subjects included in this research project. Study populations and outcomes for patients undergoing CPB assisted cardiac surgery are extremely varied. An extremely large population size will be necessary to answer the research question proposed as the priming differences in question result in very subtle outcome differences.

All patients will undergo CPB assisted cardiac surgery. Blood samples will be drawn at routine intervals from each subject. Blood will be sampled upon entering the operating room, at the completion of surgery, and at 24 hours post-operatively.

The amount of blood drawn will not be above and beyond the usual tests and analyses related to the care of all affected patients undergoing CPB assisted cardiac surgery.

a)

Inclusion criteria:

  • greater than 50 years of age
  • will be afflicted with co-morbidities associated with cardiac disease (increased cholesterol, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, previous myocardial infarctions and decreased ejection fraction)

Exclusion criteria:

  • emergencies
  • renal failure
  • dialysis dependent

The cardiac center involved to date is:

RUH Saskatoon The goal is recruitment of all cardiac centers in western Canada.

Primary end-points: are postoperative bleeding and transfusion of autologous units of red blood cells, frozen plasma and platelets.

Secondary end-points: Post-operative renal function parameter creatinine

Data collection will be ongoing. Interim analysis will be completed once half the patients have been recruited with final statistical analysis to be conducted once data capture is complete.

Potential Significance/Justification CPB assisted cardiac surgical outcomes have improved tremendously since the first such procedure was done in 1953. Outcome improvements have always come from small changes that were evidence based. This research project means to determine the safest prime for a procedure, which occurs roughly 2,000,000/year throughout the world. In regards to the cost of the study solutions in question, there is a $4.10 difference between the cost of 500 mL of HES 130/0.4 prime and 500 mL of 5% Albumin with HES 130/0.4 being more expensive.

Being tested
prime crystalloid, Human Albumin, Voluven
Keywords
Cardiopulmonary bypass, prime, crystalloid, albumin, HES 130/0.4
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Aortic Valve Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • prime crystalloidOther

    Also called saline 0.9%, Normosol, Ringer's lactate, Plasmalyte

    used for priming the CPB circuit

  • Human AlbuminOther

    Also called Albumin 5%, Albumin 25%

    Used as a constituent for priming the CPB circuit

  • VoluvenOther

    Also called Hydroethylstarch HES130/0.4

    Used as a constituent for priming the CPB circuit

Study groups in NCT01849757
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Human AlbuminActive comparatorHuman albumin solution used as part of the priming volume for the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
Receives: Other: Human Albumin
Voluven or hydroethylstarch HES 130/0.4Active comparatorHydroethylstarch HES 130/0.4 used as part of the priming volume for the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
Receives: Other: Voluven
CrystalloidPlacebo comparatorCrystalloid will be used to prime the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit
Receives: Other: prime crystalloid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-operative bleeding and transfusion requirements

    Postoperative cardiac patients have chest tubes in place which drain any blood oozing from around the pericardial cavity. The chest tubes are attached to a blood collection apparatus which measures the amount of blood loss. Too much post-operative blood loss results in a transfusion requirement of red blood cells, plasma and/or platelets.

    Measured: 24-48 hours post-operatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. renal function, creatinine levels

    Use of some colloids have been associated with a deterioration of renal function. Data will be collected post-operatively to determine he effect of the different priming fluids on renal function

    Measured: 24-48 hours post-operatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2013
  3. Primary completionNov 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2017 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Pentaspan is no longer used at our institution. Pentaspan was an arm of the study

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01849757
Sponsor's protocol ID
ruh/westerncan/primestudy
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
6 May 2013
Last updated
3 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, Glass P, Lipman J, Liu B, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Rajbhandari D, Taylor CB, Webb SA; CHEST Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1901-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209759. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

    PubMed 23075127
  • Navickis RJ, Haynes GR, Wilkes MM. Effect of hydroxyethyl starch on bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jul;144(1):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 May 9.

    PubMed 22578894
  • Hartog CS, Reuter D, Loesche W, Hofmann M, Reinhart K. Influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 on hemostasis as measured by viscoelastic device analysis: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Nov;37(11):1725-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2385-z. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

    PubMed 21989733
  • Schramko AA, Suojaranta-Ylinen RT, Kuitunen AH, Kukkonen SI, Niemi TT. Rapidly degradable hydroxyethyl starch solutions impair blood coagulation after cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):30-6. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818c1282.

    PubMed 19095827
  • Akkucuk FG, Kanbak M, Ayhan B, Celebioglu B, Aypar U. The effect of HES (130/0.4) usage as the priming solution on renal function in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Ren Fail. 2013;35(2):210-5. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2012.747139. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

    PubMed 23228215
  • Alavi SM, Ahmadi BB, Baharestani B, Babaei T. Comparison of the effects of gelatin, Ringer's solution and a modern hydroxyl ethyl starch solution after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2012 Sep;23(8):428-31. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2012-026.

    PubMed 23044498

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing prime crystalloid, Human Albumin and Voluven in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Aortic Valve Disease, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-operative bleeding and transfusion requirements (time frame: 24-48 hours post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01849757, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in