Female InfertilityPhase 3Lotus INCT01850030
A Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Oral Dydrogesterone 30 mg Daily Versus Intravaginal Micronized Progesterone Capsules 600 mg Daily for Luteal Support in In-Vitro Fertilization
A Phase 3 study testing Dydrogesterone 30 mg and Micronized Progesterone 600 mg in people with Female Infertility, run by Abbott at 40 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
Female inability to conceive a child. The purpose of this randomized, two-arm and double blind, double dummy study is to demonstrate that the treatment of a daily dose of 3x10mg dydrogesterone orally is as effective and safe as the daily dose of 3x200 mg micronized progesterone capsules administered intravaginally for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 41 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Female Infertility
- What is being tested?
- Dydrogesterone 30 mg and Micronized Progesterone 600 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,070 participants
- Where
- 40 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2013to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 41 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent
- Premenopausal females, age > 18 years < 42 years
- Non-smokers. For females who were past smokers, they must have stopped tobacco usage for at least 3 months prior baseline visit
- Early follicular phase (Day 2-4) Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) less than or equal to 15 IU/L and estradiol (E2)within normal limits
- Luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin (PRL), T (testosterone) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), within the normal limits for the clinical laboratory, or considered not clinically significant by the Investigator within 6 months prior to screening
- Documented history of infertility (e.g., unable to conceive for at least one year or for 6 months for women ≥ 38 years of age or bilateral tubal occlusion or absence)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Normal transvaginal ultrasound at screening (or within 14 days of screening) without evidence of clinically significant abnormality consistent with finding adequate for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) with respect to uterus and adnexa (no hydrosalpinx or clinically relevant uterine fibroids)
- Negative pregnancy test on the day of pituitary down regulation (prior to administration of gonadotropin releasing hormones (GnRH) agonist or GnRH antagonist)
- Clinically indicated protocol for induction of IVF with a fresh embryo
- Single or dual embryo transfer
- BMI ≥ 18 and ≤ 30 kg/m2
Who cannot join
- Evidence of cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal/hepatic, hematologic/immunologic, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat (HEENT), dermatologic/connective tissue, musculoskeletal, metabolic/nutritional, endocrine, neurologic/psychiatric, allergy, recent major surgery (< 3 months), or other relevant diseases as revealed by history, physical examination and/or laboratory assessments which could limit participation in or completion of the study
- Acute urogenital disease
- Known allergic reactions to progesterone products
- Known allergic reactions to peanuts and peanut oil
- Intake of experimental drug or participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days prior to study start
- Mental disability or any other lack of fitness, in the Investigator's opinion, to preclude subjects to participate in or to complete the study
Show all 12Show fewer
- Current or recent substance abuse, including alcohol and tobacco (Note: Patients who stopped tobacco usage at least 3 months prior to screening visit would be allowed)
- History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- Patients with more than 3 unsuccessful IVF attempts
- Contraindication for pregnancy
- Refusal or inability to comply with the requirements of the study protocol for any reason, including scheduled clinic visits and laboratory tests
- History of recurrent pregnancy loss defined as 3 or more spontaneous miscarriages
Trial locations and contacts
40 sites in 7 countries.
40 sites in 7 countries
Belgium10 sites
Site reference no. 93593
Brasschaat, 2930
Site reference no. 93598
Brussels, 1070
Site reference no. 93615
Brussels, 1090
Site reference no. 93617
Brussels, 1200
Site reference no. 93613
Genk, 3600
Site reference no. 93594
Ghent, 9000
Site reference no. 93597
Ghent, 9000
Site reference no. 93616
Hasselt, 3500
Site reference no. 93595
Leuven, 3000
Site reference no. 93614
Mons, 7000
Russia8 sites
FGBU Endocrinology Research Center of Minzdrav of Russia
Moscow, 117036
Moscow State Medical Dentistry University
Moscow, 117036
CJSC "Nasledniki"
Moscow, 119192
Moscow State Medical Dentistry University
Moscow, 127473
SBEIHPE - NWSMU n.a.l.l.Melnichko MoH and SD of RF
Saint Petersburg, 191014
St. Petersburg SBHI "Maternity Hospital No 17" (main address)
Saint Petersburg, 192174
FSBI "Ural SRI of Maternity and Child Protection" of MoH and SD
Yekaterinburg, 620028
Center of Family Medicine LC
Yekaterinburg, 620043
Spain6 sites
Site reference no. 119915
Baracaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Site reference ID ORG-000791
Barcelona, 08017
Site reference no. ORG-000639
Bilbao, 48940
Site reference no. ORG-000640
Pozuelo de Alarcon (Madrid), 28223
Site reference no. ORG-000638
Seville, 41011
Site reference no. ORG-000637
Valencia, 46015
Finland5 sites
Site reference ID ORG-000884
Helsinki, 00180
Site reference ID ORG-000885
Jyväskylä, 40100
Site reference no. ORG-000635
Oulu, 90014
Site reference ID ORG-000795
Tampere, 33100
Site reference no. ORG-000633
Turku, 20520
Germany5 sites
Site reference ID ORG-000645
Berlin, 10117
Site reference ID ORG-000643
Berlin, 14050
Site reference ID ORG-000642
Dresden, 01307
Site reference ID ORG-000644
Heidelberg, 69120
Site reference ID ORG-000883
Lübeck, 23562
Israel5 sites
Site reference no. 93635
Beersheba, 84101
Research facility ID ORG-000934
Hadera, 38100
Research facility ID ORG-000935
Haifa, 3339419
Site reference no. 93638
Jerusalem, 91120
Site reference no. 93641
Tel Aviv, 69710
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Two-arm, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Oral Dydrogesterone 30 mg Daily Versus Intravaginal Micronized Progesterone Capsules 600 mg Daily for Luteal Support in In-Vitro Fertilization (Lotus I)
Female inability to conceive a child. The purpose of this randomized, two-arm and double blind, double dummy study is to demonstrate that the treatment of a daily dose of 3x10mg dydrogesterone orally is as effective and safe as the daily dose of 3x200 mg micronized progesterone capsules administered intravaginally for the luteal support in patients undergoing IVF. The treatment will start on the day of oocyte retrieval and continue until pregnancy is negative or until week 12 gestation.Patients will be followed after treatment until 30 days after delivery to record any safety and tolerability data of the patient and their newborn(s).
- Conditions
- Female Infertility
- Being tested
- Dydrogesterone 30 mg, Micronized Progesterone 600 mg, Placebo progesterone, Placebo dydrogesterone
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility, Female
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dydrogesterone 30 mgDrug
Oral Dydrogesterone 10 mg tablets tid
Micronized Progesterone 600 mgDrug
Intravaginal micronized progesterone 200 mg capsules tid
Placebo progesteroneDrug
Placebo intravaginal micronized progesterone 200 mg capsules tid
Placebo dydrogesteroneDrug
placebo oral dydrogesterone 10 mg tablets tid
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dydrogesterone 30 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Dydrogesterone 30 mg; Drug: Placebo progesterone |
| Micronized Progesterone 600 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Micronized Progesterone 600 mg; Drug: Placebo dydrogesterone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Being Pregnant as Measured by the Presence of Fetal Heart Beats at 12 Weeks´Gestation Using Transvaginal Ultrasound
Percentage of participants being pregnant as measured by the presence of fetal heart beats at 12 weeks´gestation using transvaginal ultrasound
Measured: 12 weeks´ gestation (at visit 6)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percentage of Participants Being Pregnant as Measured by the Positive Biochemical Pregnancy Test on Day 14 After Embryo Transfer
Percentage of participants being pregnant as measured by the positive biochemical pregnancy test on Day 14 after embryo transfer
Measured: Day 14 after embryo transfer
Percentage of Participants With a Successful Completion of Pregnancy
Incidence of live births and healthy newborns
Measured: After delivery (about 9 months after IVF)
Gender of the Newborn
was recorded and collected for Newborn
Measured: After delivery (about 9 months after IVF)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2013
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Female InfertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,070 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Quintiles, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Darline Cheatham-Seitz, MD, PhD, Study director, Abbott
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01850030
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M13-563
- Other IDs
- 2012-002215-26
- Acronym
- Lotus I
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Tournaye H, Sukhikh GT, Kahler E, Griesinger G. A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex023.
PubMed 28333318
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Two-arm, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Oral Dydrogesterone 30 mg Daily Versus Intravaginal Micronized Progesterone Capsules 600 mg Daily for Luteal Support in In-Vitro Fertilization (Lotus I)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01850030
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Lotus I / M13-563
- Conditions
- Female Infertility
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,070 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbottIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Quintiles, Inc.
- Study start
- Aug 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Jan 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Female inability to conceive a child. The purpose of this randomized, two-arm and double blind, double dummy study is to demonstrate that the treatment of a daily dose of 3x10mg dydrogesterone orally is as effective and safe as the daily dose of 3x200 mg micronized progesterone capsules administered intravaginally for the luteal support in patients undergoing IVF. The treatment will start on the day of oocyte retrieval and continue until pregnancy is negative or until week 12 gestation.Patients will be followed after treatment until 30 days after delivery to record any safety and tolerability data of the patient and their newborn(s).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dydrogesterone 30 mg | Experimental | Drug: Dydrogesterone 30 mg, Drug: Placebo progesterone |
| Micronized Progesterone 600 mg | Experimental | Drug: Micronized Progesterone 600 mg, Drug: Placebo dydrogesterone |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 41 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Signed informed consent
- Premenopausal females, age > 18 years < 42 years
- Non-smokers. For females who were past smokers, they must have stopped tobacco usage for at least 3 months prior baseline visit
- Early follicular phase (Day 2-4) Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) less than or equal to 15 IU/L and estradiol (E2)within normal limits
- Luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin (PRL), T (testosterone) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), within the normal limits for the clinical laboratory, or considered not clinically significant by the Investigator within 6 months prior to screening
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Evidence of cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal/hepatic, hematologic/immunologic, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat (HEENT), dermatologic/connective tissue, musculoskeletal, metabolic/nutritional, endocrine, neurologic/psychiatric, allergy, recent major surgery (< 3 months), or other relevant diseases as revealed by history, physical examination and/or laboratory assessments which could limit participation in or completion of the study
- Acute urogenital disease
- Known allergic reactions to progesterone products
- Known allergic reactions to peanuts and peanut oil
- Intake of experimental drug or participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days prior to study start
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dydrogesterone 30 mgOral Dydrogesterone 10 mg tablets tid | Drug | Dydrogesterone 30 mg |
| Micronized Progesterone 600 mgIntravaginal micronized progesterone 200 mg capsules tid | Drug | Micronized Progesterone 600 mg |
| Placebo progesteronePlacebo intravaginal micronized progesterone 200 mg capsules tid | Drug | Dydrogesterone 30 mg |
| Placebo dydrogesteroneplacebo oral dydrogesterone 10 mg tablets tid | Drug | Micronized Progesterone 600 mg |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Being Pregnant as Measured by the Presence of Fetal Heart Beats at 12 Weeks´Gestation Using Transvaginal Ultrasound
Time frame: 12 weeks´ gestation (at visit 6)
Percentage of participants being pregnant as measured by the presence of fetal heart beats at 12 weeks´gestation using transvaginal ultrasound
3 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Being Pregnant as Measured by the Positive Biochemical Pregnancy Test on Day 14 After Embryo Transfer
Time frame: Day 14 after embryo transfer
Percentage of Participants With a Successful Completion of Pregnancy
Time frame: After delivery (about 9 months after IVF)
Gender of the Newborn
Time frame: After delivery (about 9 months after IVF)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jan 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28333318Tournaye H, Sukhikh GT, Kahler E, Griesinger G. A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex023.
Related trials for Female Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Efficacy of Corifollitropin Alfa N02 Injection in Elderly Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Inherited Reproductive Disorders
Genetic Disorder, Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Biorepository in Participants Who Undergo OTC for Gonadotoxic Therapy
Acute Ovarian Failure, Infertility
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Linzagolix in Adenomyosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure
Adenomyosis of Uterus, Implantation Failure
Recruiting
225 IU Versus 300 IU Starting FSH Dose in PPOS for Good-Prognosis Women
Infertility (IVF Patients), Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Darline Cheatham-Seitz, MD, PhD study director
Abbott
40 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dydrogesterone 30 mg and Micronized Progesterone 600 mg in people with Female Infertility, run by Abbott at 40 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 40 sites in Belgium, Russia, Spain, Finland, Germany and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Being Pregnant as Measured by the Presence of Fetal Heart Beats at 12 Weeks´Gestation Using Transvaginal Ultrasound (time frame: 12 weeks´ gestation (at visit 6)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01850030, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2018.