AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaPhase 3NCT01850524

IXAZOMIB Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3 study testing Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 147 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to provide continued access to ixazomib and/or lenalidomide to participants who are continuing to have clinical benefit and to continue collecting relevant safety data to monitor safety in participants with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) who are not eligible for stem cell… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
705 participants
Where
147 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
29 Apr 2013to 24 Jun 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female participants 18 years or older diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma according to standard criteria who have not received prior treatment for multiple myeloma.
  • Participants for whom lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment is appropriate and who are not eligible for high-dose therapy followed by stem-cell transplantation (HDT-SCT) for 1 or more of the following reasons:
  • The participant is 65 years of age or older.
  • The participant is less than 65 years of age but has significant comorbid condition(s) that are, in the opinion of the investigator, likely to have a negative impact on tolerability of HDT-SCT.
  • Measurable disease as specified in study protocol.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Meet the clinical laboratories criteria as specified in the protocol.
  • Female participants who are post menopausal, surgically sterile, or agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception or agree to practice true abstinence, and must also agree to ongoing pregnancy testing; must also adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program.
  • Male participants who agree to practice effective barrier contraception or agree to practice true abstinence AND must adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program.
  • Suitable venous access for the study-required blood sampling.
  • Must be able to take concurrent aspirin 70 mg to 325 mg daily (or enoxaparin if aspirin allergic).
  • Voluntary written consent.
  • Participant is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment for multiple myeloma with either standard of care treatment or investigational regimen.
  • Diagnosed and treated for another malignancy within 5 years before randomization or previously diagnosed with another malignancy and have any evidence of residual disease. Participants with nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of any type are not excluded if they have undergone complete resection.
  • Inability or unwillingness to receive antithrombotic therapy.
  • Female participants who are lactating or pregnant.
  • Major surgery or radiotherapy within 14 days before randomization.
  • Infection requiring intravenous antibiotics within 14 days before the first dose of study drug.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Central nervous system involvement.
  • Diagnosis of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome, plasma cell leukemia, primary amyloidosis, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative syndrome.
  • Evidence of current uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions within 6 months prior to randomization, including: Uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, or congestive heart failure; Unstable angina, or Myocardial infarction.
  • Systemic treatment with strong inhibitors of CYP1A2 (fluvoxamine, enoxacin, ciprofloxacin), strong inhibitors of CYP3A (clarithromycin, telithromycin,itraconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, posaconazole) or strong CYP3A inducers (rifampin, rifapentine, rifabutin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital), or use of Ginkgo biloba or St. John's wort within 14 days before randomization in the study.
  • Active hepatitis B or C virus infection, or known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive.
  • Comorbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens (e.g., peripheral neuropathy that is Grade 1 with pain or Grade 2 or higher of any cause).
  • Psychiatric illness/social situation that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Known allergy to any of the study medications.
  • Inability to swallow oral medication, inability or unwillingness to comply with the drug administration requirements, or gastrointestinal (GI) procedure that could interfere with the oral absorption or tolerance of treatment.
  • Treatment with any investigational products within 60 days before randomization.

Trial locations and contacts

147 sites in 7 countries.

147 sites in 7 countries

United States78 sites
  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Study site

    Anaheim, California

  • Study site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas

  • Study site

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Bridgeton, Missouri

  • Study site

    Buffalo, New York

  • Study site

    Burlington, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Chandler, Arizona

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Christiansburg, Virginia

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio

  • Study site

    Cookeville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Corona, California

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado

  • Study site

    Duluth, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Eugene, Oregon

  • Study site

    Everett, Washington

  • Study site

    Farmington, New Mexico

  • Study site

    Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Study site

    Fort Myers, Florida

  • Study site

    Fountain Valley, California

  • Study site

    Fullerton, California

  • Study site

    Galveston, Texas

  • Study site

    Hartford, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Honolulu, Hawaii

  • Study site

    Iowa City, Iowa

  • Study site

    Irvine, California

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Study site

    Kansas City, Missouri

  • Study site

    La Jolla, California

  • Study site

    Lake Success, New York

  • Study site

    Lansing, Michigan

  • Study site

    Las Cruces, New Mexico

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Little Silver, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Louisville, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Marietta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Miami Beach, Florida

  • Study site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Mission Hills, California

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Oakland, California

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Plainville, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Portland, Oregon

  • Study site

    Poughkeepsie, New York

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Study site

    Riverside, California

  • Study site

    Rochester, Minnesota

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Study site

    San Diego, California

  • Study site

    San Jose, California

  • Study site

    San Leandro, California

  • Study site

    Santa Clara, California

  • Study site

    Scranton, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Study site

    Shreveport, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Sioux City, Iowa

  • Study site

    South San Francisco, California

  • Study site

    Southfield, Michigan

  • Study site

    Spokane, Washington

  • Study site

    Temple, Texas

  • Study site

    Towson, Maryland

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Study site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    Tyler, Texas

  • Study site

    Vallejo, California

  • Study site

    Vancouver, Washington

  • Study site

    West Palm Beach, Florida

  • Study site

    Worcester, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Yakima, Washington

Other trials in United States

France37 sites
  • Study site

    Amiens

  • Study site

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire

  • Study site

    Bayonne

  • Study site

    Bordeaux

  • Study site

    Brest, Finistere

  • Study site

    Caen

  • Study site

    Castelnau-le-Lez, Herault

  • Study site

    Chalon-sur-Saône

  • Study site

    Créteil

  • Study site

    Dunkirk

  • Study site

    La Roche-sur-Yon

  • Study site

    La Tronche, Isere

  • Study site

    Le Chesnay

  • Study site

    Le Mans

  • Study site

    Lens, Pas-de-Calais

  • Study site

    Lille, Nord

  • Study site

    Lille

  • Study site

    Limoges, Haute-Vienne

  • Study site

    Montivilliers, Seine-Maritime

  • Study site

    Montpellier

  • Study site

    Mulhouse

  • Study site

    Nantes, Loire-Atlantique

  • Study site

    Nice, Alpes-Maritimes

  • Study site

    Paris

  • Study site

    Périgueux

  • Study site

    Pierre-Bénite

  • Study site

    Poitiers, Vienne

  • Study site

    Pontoise

  • Study site

    Reims, Marne

  • Study site

    Rouen

  • Study site

    Saint-Brieuc, Finistere

  • Study site

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, Rhone

  • Study site

    Strasbourg, Bas-Rhin

  • Study site

    Toulouse

  • Study site

    Tours

  • Study site

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle

  • Study site

    Vannes, Morbihan

Other trials in France

Canada12 sites
  • Study site

    Calgary, Alberta

  • Study site

    Edmonton, Alberta

  • Study site

    Fleurimont, Quebec

  • Study site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia

  • Study site

    Hamilton, Ontario

  • Study site

    Lévis, Quebec

  • Study site

    London, Ontario

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Study site

    Saint John, New Brunswick

  • Study site

    Surrey, British Columbia

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia

Other trials in Canada

Belgium7 sites
  • Study site

    Bruges

  • Study site

    Brussels, Brussels Capital

  • Study site

    Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen

  • Study site

    Leuven, Vlaams Brabant

  • Study site

    Liège

  • Study site

    Roeselare, West-Vlaanderen

  • Study site

    Yvoir, Namur

Other trials in Belgium

South Korea7 sites
  • Study site

    Daegu

  • Study site

    Daejeon

  • Study site

    Goyang, Gyeonggido

  • Study site

    Incheon

  • Study site

    Jeongnam

  • Study site

    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggido

  • Study site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

New Zealand5 sites
  • Study site

    Auckland, North Island

  • Study site

    Christchurch, South Island

  • Study site

    Dunedin, South Island

  • Study site

    Hamilton

  • Study site

    Wellington, North Island

Other trials in New Zealand

Russia1 site
  • Study site

    Ryazan

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral MLN9708 Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to provide continued access to ixazomib and/or lenalidomide to participants who are continuing to have clinical benefit and to continue collecting relevant safety data to monitor safety in participants with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) who are not eligible for stem cell transplant.

Being tested
Ixazomib, Placebo, Dexamethasone, Lenalidomide
Keywords
Newly Diagnosed multiple myeloma, multiple myeloma, MLN9708, IXAZOMIB, Proteasome inhibitor, Tourmaline MM2
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IxazomibDrug

    Also called MLN9708

    IXAZOMIB capsules.

  • PlaceboDrug

    IXAZOMIB matching-placebo capsules.

  • DexamethasoneDrug

    Dexamethasone tablets.

  • LenalidomideDrug

    Lenalidomide capsules.

Study groups in NCT01850524
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo + LenDexPlacebo comparatorParticipants who were randomly assigned to receive placebo matching capsule single oral dose on Days 1, 8 and 15 along with standard regimen of LenDex (lenalidomide 25 mg capsules orally on Days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg tablets orally on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22) for the first 18 cycles (each cycle was of 28 days). Following Cycle 18, participants received 3.0 mg ixazomib matching placebo capsule as single oral dose on Days 1, 8 and 15 along with lenalidomide 10 mg capsules orally on Days 1-21 in each 28-day cycle until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity, whichever comes first up to end of study (up to approximately 109 months).
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Dexamethasone; Drug: Lenalidomide
Active Comparator: Ixazomib + LenDexActive comparatorParticipants who were randomly assigned to receive Ixazomib 4.0 mg capsule single oral dose on Days 1, 8 and 15 along with standard regimen of LenDex (lenalidomide 25 mg capsules orally on Days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg tablets orally on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22) for the first 18 cycles (each cycle was of 28 days). Following Cycle 18, participants received 3.0 mg ixazomib capsule as single oral dose on Days 1, 8 and 15 along with lenalidomide 10 mg capsules orally on Days 1-21 in each 28-day cycle until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity, whichever comes first up to end of study (up to approximately 109 months).
Receives: Drug: Ixazomib; Drug: Dexamethasone; Drug: Lenalidomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria whichever occurs first. PD required one of the following: Increase of >=25% from nadir in: Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute % must be >10%; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.85 mmol/L).

    Measured: Up to approximately 79 months

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis are censored at the date last known to be alive.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)

  2. Complete Response (CR) Rate

    CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR assessed by an IRC relative to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population during the treatment period. Percentage of participants with CR, as assessed by IMWG disease assessment criteria were reported. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % plasma cells (PC's) in bone marrow.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  3. Pain Response Rate as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) and Analgesic Use

    Pain response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of at least a 30% reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic use for 2 consecutive measurements > 28 days apart, were reported. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  4. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR + partial response (PR) + very good partial response (VGPR) (including sCR) or better relative to the ITT population during treatment period. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % PC's in bone marrow. PR was defined as ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% along with ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR was defined as ≥90% in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24. sCR is defined as stringent complete response. Percentages are rounded off to nearest whole numbers.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  5. Time to Response

    Time to response was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PR or better, as measured by IMWG criteria.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  6. Duration of Response

    Duration of response was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of PR or better to the date of first documented progression (PD) for responders, as measured by IMWG criteria.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  7. Time to Progression (TTP)

    Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  8. Progression Free Survival (PFS)-2

    PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documentation of disease progression on the subsequent line of anticancer therapy, as assessed by the investigator in accordance with IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  9. Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline to Worst Value in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score

    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale score ranged from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated normal activity and 5 indicated death. The data is reported for those categories where at least 1 participant had worst post-baseline value for each ECOG score.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  10. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent.

    Measured: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

  11. Number of Participants With Abnormal Serum Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Values Based on Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    The laboratory values assessment included serum chemistry and hematology. The Serum chemistry assessment included blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, bilirubin (total), urate, lactate dehydrogenase, phosphate, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glucose, sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide (CO2), magnesium, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). Hematology assessment included hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet (count), leukocytes with differential neutrophils (ANC). Participants with abnormal serum chemistry laboratory values reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were defined as events that occurred after administration of the first dose of any agent in the study drug regimen and through 30 days after the last dose of any agent in the study drug regimen.

    Measured: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

  12. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ)-C30 Scale Total Score

    EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale was used to assess HRQOL in cancer participants and contains 30 items. Subscale with individual items include physical functioning items 1-5, role functioning items 6-7, emotional functioning items 21-24, cognitive functioning items 20, 25, social functioning items 26-27, quality of life items 29-30, fatigue items 10, 12, 18, nausea and vomiting items 14-15, pain items 9, 19, dyspnoea item 8, insomnia item 11, appetite loss item 13, constipation item 16, diarrhoea item 17, financial difficulties item 28. Raw scores were converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status scale, higher scores represent better HRQOL; whereas for the symptom scales lower scores represent better HRQOL. Positive change in functional and global health status scale indicated improvement; negative change for the symptom scales indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to approximately 9 years

  13. Change From Baseline in HRQOL Measured by EORTC-QLQ-MY20 Scale

    EORTC QLQ-MY20 was a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. The scale has 20 questions. Subscale and individual items include future perspective items 18-20, body image item 17, disease symptoms items 1-6, side effects of treatment items 7-16. Raw scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher score is better quality of life. Positive change indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to approximately 9 years

  14. OS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations. High risk category includes t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17) abnormalities.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)

  15. PFS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease based on central laboratory results and IMWG criteria as evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations.

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  16. Percentage of Participants With MRD-Negative Status as Assessed by Flow Cytometry

    The absence of minimal residual disease (MRD negativity) was tested in all participants who achieve a CR and maintained it until Cycle 18, using bone marrow aspirates.

    Measured: Up to Cycle 18 (cycle length = 28 days)

  17. Time to Pain Progression

    Time to pain progression was assessed as the time from randomization to the date of initial progression classification. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by 2 consecutive evaluations (To qualify as progression, the participant must have a BPI-SF worst pain score > 4 during pain progression): 1) a ≥ 2 point and 30% increase from Baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or 2) a 25% or more increase in analgesic use from Baseline without a decrease in BPI-SF worst pain score from Baseline. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Measured: Up to approximately 9 years

  18. Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1: Post-dose at multiple timepoints up to 4 hours; Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 14, Cycles 2-3 Day 1 and Day 14, Cycles 4-11 Day 1 (Each cycle length = 28 days)

  19. Percentage of Participants With New or Worsening of Existing Skeletal-related Events (SREs)

    SRE is defined as new fractures [including vertebral compression fractures], irradiation of or surgery on bone, or spinal cord compression.

    Measured: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start29 Apr 2013
  3. Primary completion2 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion24 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
705 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01850524
Sponsor's protocol ID
C16014
Other IDs
2013-000326-54, U1111-1158-2646, 163325
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
26 Apr 2013
Last updated
21 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Facon T, Venner CP, Bahlis NJ, Offner F, White DJ, Karlin L, Benboubker L, Rigaudeau S, Rodon P, Voog E, Yoon SS, Suzuki K, Shibayama H, Zhang X, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Yung G, Rifkin RM, Moreau P, Lonial S, Kumar SK, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2021 Jul 1;137(26):3616-3628. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020008787.

    PubMed 33763699

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 147 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 147 sites in United States, France, Canada, Belgium, South Korea and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: Up to approximately 79 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01850524, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in