AzTrials
AzTrials

Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearNCT01850758

Regenexx™ SD Versus Exercise Therapy for ACL Tears

A study testing Regenexx SD and Exercise Therapy in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear, run by Regenexx, LLC at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the improvement in subject-reported clinical outcomes for Regenexx SD vs. Exercise Therapy treatment of partial and complete, non-retracted knee ACL ligament tears, from baseline to 3 months, with continued evaluation of efficacy and durability up to 24 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
What is being tested?
Regenexx SD and Exercise Therapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2013to 8 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pain, swelling, or functional disability in the affected knee with activity, having failed conservative treatment (e.g. NSAIDs, physician initiated physical therapy) for at least 3 months or unable to return to normal day to day activities by 6 weeks
  • Physical examination consistent with lax ACL ligament (Anterior Drawer Test)
  • Abnormal Telos Arthrometer measurement
  • Positive diagnostic MR imaging of the affected knee with at least 1/3 of the ACL ligament at any area along its length having high signal on MRI PDFS/Fat Sat images.
  • Full range of motion of the affected knee (other than restriction clearly due to effusion)
  • Normal range of motion of the non-treated knee
  • Is independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits

Who cannot join

  • A massive ACL tear or one that includes more than 2/3'rds of the ligament that's retracted.
  • Previous surgery to the affected ACL (i.e. previous ACL replacement with an autograft or allograft)
  • Prior ACL prolotherapy, PRP, corticosteroid injection or other injection therapy within the past three months,
  • Concomitant meniscus tear or cartilage injury that occurred at the same time as the as the ACL tear and which is considered a pain generator by the treating physician at the time intake into the study (i.e. a meniscus tear or cartilage lesion associated with an active BML).
  • Concomitant PCL or LCL tears
  • Inflammatory or auto-immune based joint diseases or other lower extremity pathology (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, polymyalgia, polymyositis, gout pseudogout)
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Quinolone or Statin induced myopathy/ tendinopathy
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or greater knee osteoarthritis
  • Significant knee extension lag compared to the opposite knee
  • Symptomatic lumbar spine pathology (e.g. radicular pain)
  • Severe neurogenic inflammation of the cutaneous nerves about the knee or thigh
  • Contraindications for MRI
  • Tested positive or has been treated for a malignancy in the past or is suspected of having a malignancy or is currently undergoing radiation or chemotherapy treatment for a malignancy anywhere in the body, whether adjacent to or distant from the proposed injection site
  • Condition represents a worker's compensation case
  • Currently involved in a health-related litigation procedure
  • Is pregnant
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Currently taking anticoagulant or immunosuppressive medication
  • Allergy or intolerance to study medication
  • Use of chronic opioid,

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Centeno-Schultz Clinic

    Broomfield, Colorado, 80021

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Regenexx™ SD Versus Exercise Therapy for Treatment of Partial and Complete, Non-retracted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

The primary objective of this study is to compare the improvement in subject-reported clinical outcomes for Regenexx SD vs. Exercise Therapy treatment of partial and complete, non-retracted knee ACL ligament tears, from baseline to 3 months, with continued evaluation of efficacy and durability up to 24 months.

Secondary objectives include evaluation of MRI evidence of tendon repair; incidence of post-operative complications, adverse events, re-injections, and surgical intervention; change in pain score and use of pain medications.

Read the detailed description

Prospective, randomized, controlled to include 25 subjects treated with Regenexx SD and 25 subjects treated with exercise therapy alone with the exercise group crossing over to the injection group at 3 months.

Subjects will have a partial or complete, non-retracted ACL ligament tear as evidenced with MRI.

Subjects will be enrolled within 60 days prior to Regenexx-SD injection or initiation of exercise therapy and take part in follow-up visits for two years following treatment. A preoperative visit will occur at the time of enrollment; follow-up visits will occur at the clinical site at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post injection.

The primary endpoint analysis will be conducted once all subjects reach the 3 month endpoint. Subjects will continue to be followed through the 2 year endpoint with data analysis performed at the 1 year and 2 year time points.

Being tested
Regenexx SD, Exercise Therapy
Keywords
ACL, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, ACL Tear, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear, Partial ACL Tear
Medical subject headings
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Regenexx SDProcedure or surgery

    stem cell treatment

  • Exercise TherapyOther

    exercise therapy control

Study groups in NCT01850758
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Regenexx SDActive comparatorBone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate injected under imaging guidance into the area of the damaged ligament.
Receives: Procedure: Regenexx SD
Exercise TherapyActive comparatorSubjects will be instructed in a set of appropriate knee strengthening exercises and given an instructional hand-out to take home.
Receives: Other: Exercise Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Score Change from Baseline

    The primary endpoint for this study is the difference between treatment groups in the within patient mean change from baseline to 3 months in IKDC scores.

    Measured: Change from Baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Mean Pain Scales

    Difference between treatment groups in mean 0-10 pain scales at each follow-up timepoint

    Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

  2. Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of ligament repair

    Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of ligament repair at 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Mean IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores

    Difference between treatment groups in mean KDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores at 6, 12 and 24 months.

    Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months

  4. Incidence of complications and adverse events

    Incidence and time to resolution of post-operative complications and adverse events between treatment groups.

    Measured: 24 months

  5. Incidence of re-injection and surgical revision

    Incidence of and time to re-injection and surgical revision between treatment groups.

    Measured: 24 months

  6. Use of pain medications

    Difference between treatment groups in use of pain medications at each follow-up timepoint

    Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2013
  3. Primary completion22 May 2020
  4. Study completion8 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01850758
Sponsor's protocol ID
RSI2013-RCT01
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
7 May 2013
Last updated
8 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Centeno CJ, Berger DR, Pitts J, Markle J, Pelle AJ, Murphy M, Dodson E. Non-surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tears with percutaneous bone marrow concentrate and platelet products versus exercise therapy: a randomized-controlled, crossover trial with 2-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Sep 30;26(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09153-2.

    PubMed 41029301

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Regenexx SD and Exercise Therapy in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear, run by Regenexx, LLC at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Score Change from Baseline (time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01850758, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in