AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic StrokeNCT01852201

POSITIVE Stroke Clinical Trial

A study testing Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 20 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Endpoint: The primary objective is to show that AIS patients, ineligible for or refractory to treatment with IV-tPA, with appropriate image selection, treated with mechanical thrombectomy within 6-12 hours of symptom onset have less stroke related disability and improved good functional outcomes as compared to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Stroke
What is being tested?
Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
33 participants
Where
20 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2013to 31 May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 and older (i.e., candidates must have had their 18th birthday)
  • NIHSS ≥8 at the time of neuroimaging
  • Presenting or persistent symptoms within 6-12 hours of when groin puncture can be obtained
  • Neuroimaging demonstrates large vessel proximal occlusion (distal ICA through MCA M1 bifurcation)
  • The operator feels that the stroke can be appropriately treated with traditional endovascular techniques (endovascular mechanical thrombectomy without adjunctive devices such as stents)
  • Pts are within 6-12 hours of symptom onset, that have received IV-tPA without improvement in symptoms are eligible for this study. Patients presenting earlier than 6 hours should be treated according to local standard of care.
  • Pre-event Modified Rankin Scale score 0-1
  • Consenting requirements met according to local IRB

Who cannot join

  • Patient is less than 6-hours from symptom onset
  • Rapidly improving neurologic examination
  • Absence of large vessel occlusion on non-invasive imaging
  • Known or suspected pre-existing (chronic) large vessel occlusion in the symptomatic territory
  • Absence of an associated large penumbra as defined by physiologic imaging according to standard of practice at the participating institution
  • Any intracranial hemorrhage in the last 90 days
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Known irreversible bleeding disorder
  • Known hereditary or acquired hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 2.5 or institutionally equivalent prothrombin time of 2.5 times normal
  • Platelet count < 100 x 103 cells/mm3 or known platelet dysfunction
  • Inability to tolerate, clinically documented evidence in medical history of adverse reaction to, or contraindication to medications used in treatment of the stroke
  • Contraindication to CT and MRI (i.e., iodine contrast allergy or other condition that prohibits imaging from either CT or MRI)
  • Known allergy to contrast used in angiography that cannot be medically controlled
  • Relative contraindication to angiography (e.g., serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL)
  • Women who are currently pregnant or breast-feeding (Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to the study procedure (either serum or urine)
  • Evidence of active infection (indicated by fever at or over 99.9 °F and/or open draining wound) at the time of randomization
  • Current use of cocaine or other vasoactive substance
  • Any comorbid disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments through 90 days
  • Patients who lack the necessary mental capacity to participate or are unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol's follow up appointment schedule (based on the investigator's judgment)
  • Head CT or MRI Scan Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of blood on imaging (subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), etc.)
  • High density lesion consistent with hemorrhage of any degree
  • Significant mass effect with midline shift
  • Large (more than 1/3 of the middle cerebral artery) regions of clear hypodensity on the baseline CT scan or ASPECTS of < 7; Sulcal effacement and/or loss of grey-white differentiation alone are not contraindications for treatment

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 1 country.

20 sites in 1 country

United States20 sites
  • University of Buffalo Neurosurgery

    Buffalo, New York, 14203

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29461

  • Tennessee Interventional Associates

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Ohio Health

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214

  • Swedish/Colorado Neurological Institute

    Englewood, Colorado, 80113

  • Baptist Health

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32207

  • Saint Luke's Hospital

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64111

  • Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37916

  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Wisconsin University

    Madison, Wisconsin, 98374

  • Methodist Healthcare - Memphis

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38104

  • West Virginia University

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506

  • Vanderbilt University

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

  • St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

  • Stony Brook Medical Center

    Stony Brook, New York, 11764

  • Captial Health

    Trenton, New Jersey, 08638

  • Univesity of Massachusetts-Worcester

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: POSITIVE: PerfusiOn Imaging Selection of Ischemic STroke PatIents for EndoVascular ThErapy

Primary Endpoint:

The primary objective is to show that AIS patients, ineligible for or refractory to treatment with IV-tPA, with appropriate image selection, treated with mechanical thrombectomy within 6-12 hours of symptom onset have less stroke related disability and improved good functional outcomes as compared to those treated with best MT with respect to endpoint defined as:

Read more
  • 90-day global disability assessed via the modified Rankin score (mRS), analyzed using raw mRS scores. Statistical details can be found in section 7.2.

Secondary Endpoints:

  • 90-day global disability in the 6-12 hr cohort assessed via the overall distribution of mRS
  • Proportion of patients with good functional recovery for the 6-12 hr cohort as defined by mRS 0-2 at 90 days
  • Mortality at 30 and 90 days
  • Intracranial hemorrhage with neurological deterioration (NIHSS worsening >4) within 24 hours of randomization
  • Procedure related serious adverse events (SAE's)
  • Arterial revascularization measured by TICI 2b or 3 following device use
Read the detailed description

Intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration has been shown to be safe and effective for treatment of AIS within 3 hours of symptom onset, and newer evidence has shown potential benefit out to 4.5 hours. Mechanical thrombectomy for AIS patients has been shown in clinical trials to be safe up to 8 hours after symptom onset. The rapid progression of thrombectomy devices over the last several years has resulted in faster recanalization times while maintaining a high degree of safety. This has resulted in improved patient outcomes, similar to prior randomized trial data showing improved outcomes over medical therapy or earlier devices. Data from the MERCI trial suggests that patients > 85 as well as those with a baseline NIHSS score > 30 are unlikely to benefit from thrombectomy. Patients with rapidly improving neurologic deficits likely will have an excellent recovery with conventional care, precluding the ability to detect a beneficial treatment effect of thrombectomy.

Pilot data incorporating physiologic imaging has shown that appropriate patients can be selected for thrombectomy. This selection methodology has shown the ability to maintain the same level of safety and efficacy as those patients treated in the highly selective environment of a clinical trial, despite presenting far beyond accepted time based standards. Vertebrobasilar occlusion patients are excluded to maintain a homogenous study population, particularly since no data currently is available addressing the comparability of imaging penumbral patterns in the anterior vs. posterior circulation. This has also been shown to be reproducible at multiple centers and with different imaging modalities. However, all prospective interventional stroke studies performed to date have been restricted by the 8-hour time window.

Conditions
Ischemic Stroke
Being tested
Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endovascular Mechanical ThrombectomyDevice

    Also called mechanical revascularization

    Endovascular intervention can be performed under either general anesthesia or conscious sedation based on best practices as determined by treating physician. Attempt should be made to expedite the transition from imaging to treatment in as rapid a fashion as possible. The subject should be prepared for the planned interventional procedure according to standard hospital procedures. Mechanical revascularization should be performed with the operators standard thrombectomy technique using aspiration or a stent retriever, separately or in combination.

Study groups in NCT01852201
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Best medical therapyNo interventionPatients randomized to the control group will receive best conventional MT for acute ischemic stroke as determined by the attending stroke physician. Standardization of medical management in both arms will occur according to the following: * General medical management according to AHA/ASA guidelines * Admission to monitored or intensive care unit for at least 24 hours * Aggressive hypertensive-hypervolemic therapy should be used only in the case of symptomatic blood pressure fluctuations or if blood pressure drops below the normal range for the patient * Antithrombotics: ASA 325 mg PO qd for 7 days (clopidogrel may be used as adjunctive therapy if indicated for cardiac disease) then per discretion of treating physician * Close monitoring of BP and glucose with treatment according to AHA/ASA guidelines * Follow-up imaging study required in any patient with neurologic deterioration
Endovascular treatmentExperimentalEndovascular intervention can be performed under either general anesthesia or conscious sedation based on best practices as determined by treating physician. Attempt should be made to expedite the transition from imaging to treatment in as rapid a fashion as possible. The subject should be prepared for the planned interventional procedure according to standard hospital procedures. Mechanical revascularization should be performed with the operators standard thrombectomy technique using aspiration or a stent retriever, separately or in combination.
Receives: Device: Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Good Functional Outcomes Measured by Modified Rankin Score (mRS)

    Modified rankin score measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. The range is 0-6 (0 is highest function with no symptoms and 6 is death). This outcome measured percentage of subjects with a "good" functional outcome with a score ranging from 0-2.

    The primary objective is to show that AIS patients, ineligible for or refractory to treatment with IV-tPA, (patients seen within 6 hours of symptom onset will be immediately considered for endovascular therapy according to the site's standard of care. Likewise, patients presenting beyond 12 hours will be treated according to the site's standard of care), with appropriate image selection, treated with mechanical thrombectomy within 6-12 hours of symptom onset have less stroke related disability and improved good functional outcomes as compared to those treated with best MT.

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Percentage of Participants in the 6-12 hr Cohort With Global Disability as Assessed by the Modified Rankin Score (mRS)

    The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. A score of 3-6 represents global disability are defined as follows: (3) moderate disability (requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance); (4) moderate severe disability (unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance); (5) severe disability (bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; and (6) dead.

    Measured: 90 day

  2. Percentage of Participants in the 6-12hr Cohort With Good Functional Recovery as Assessed by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. A score of 0-2 represents good functional recovery. The scores are defined as follows: (0) No symptoms at all; (1) No significant disability despite symptoms, able to carry out all usual duties and activities; (2) Slight disability, unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance.

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Percentage of Participants Mortality at 30 Days

    Mortality at 30 days will be compared between randomized groups in an ITT fashion; with overall Type I error controlled using hierarchical testing. That is, if statistical significance is observed on the primary effectiveness endpoint, the secondary clinical efficacy endpoints will then be tested in sequential fashion each at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, with testing ceasing once a null hypothesis cannot be rejected.

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Percentage of Participants Mortality at 90 Days

    Mortality at 90 days will be compared between randomized groups in an ITT fashion; with overall Type I error controlled using hierarchical testing. That is, if statistical significance is observed on the primary effectiveness endpoint, the secondary clinical efficacy endpoints will then be tested in sequential fashion each at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, with testing ceasing once a null hypothesis cannot be rejected.

    Measured: 90 days

  5. Percentage of Participants With ICH (Intracranial Hemorrhage) With Neurological Deterioration (NIHSS Worsening >4).

    ICH with neurological deterioration (NIHSS worsening >4) will be compared between randomized groups in an ITT fashion; with overall Type I error controlled using hierarchical testing. That is, if statistical significance is observed on the primary effectiveness endpoint, the secondary clinical efficacy endpoints will then be tested in sequential fashion each at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, with testing ceasing once a null hypothesis cannot be rejected.

    Measured: 90 days

  6. Percentage of Participants With SAE's Related to a Thrombectomy Procedure

    A Thrombectomy is an interventional procedure to remove a blood clot (thrombus) from a blood vessel in the brain.

    Procedure related SAE's will be compared between randomized groups in an ITT fashion; with overall Type I error controlled using hierarchical testing. That is, if statistical significance is observed on the primary effectiveness endpoint, the secondary clinical efficacy endpoints will then be tested in sequential fashion each at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, with testing ceasing once a null hypothesis cannot be rejected.

    Measured: 90 days

  7. Arterial Revascularization Measured by TICI 2b or 3 Following Device Use

    Arterial revascularization measured by TICI 2b or 3 following device use will be compared between randomized groups in an ITT fashion; with overall Type I error controlled using hierarchical testing. That is, if statistical significance is observed on the primary effectiveness endpoint, the secondary clinical efficacy endpoints will then be tested in sequential fashion each at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, with testing ceasing once a null hypothesis cannot be rejected.

    Measured: 90 days

  8. Percentage of Patients With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Related to Thrombectomy Device.

    A Thrombectomy device is a device intended to restore blood flow in a vessel in the brain by removing a blood clot (thrombus).

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completion31 May 2017
  4. Study completion31 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01852201
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRO23329
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
23 Apr 2013
Last updated
13 Nov 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Roaldsen MB, Jusufovic M, Berge E, Lindekleiv H. Endovascular thrombectomy and intra-arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 14;6(6):CD007574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007574.pub3.

    PubMed 34125952
  • Mocco J, Siddiqui AH, Fiorella D, Alexander MJ, Arthur AS, Baxter BW, Budzik RF, Froehler MT, Hanel RA, Lena J, Persaud S, Puri AS, Rai AT, Wintermark M, Woodward K, Zhang X, Turk A. POSITIVE: Perfusion imaging selection of ischemic stroke patients for endovascular therapy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):126-132. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017315. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

    PubMed 33632884

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 20 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Good Functional Outcomes Measured by Modified Rankin Score (mRS) (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01852201, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
POSITIVE Stroke Clinical Trial (NCT01852201) | AzTrials