AzTrials
AzTrials

SpondylolisthesisD-RodNCT01852526

Efficacy of Hybrid Systems in Comparison to the Rigid Spondylodesis in Lumbar-spine Fusion

A study testing Experimental: hybrid system and Active Comparator: Plif in people with Spondylolisthesis, run by University of Cologne at 2 sites in Germany.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed as a randomized, parallel-group, therapy-controlled trial in a clinical care setting at a university hospital. Patients presenting to our outpatient clinic with degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis will be assessed against study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Spondylolisthesis
What is being tested?
Experimental: hybrid system and Active Comparator: Plif
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5 participants
Where
2 sitesGermany
Study dates
Mar 2013to Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Radiological signs of existing instability of the adjacent segment
  • Normal endplates and no disc desiccation in MRI in the adjacent seg-ment
  • Previous surgery of the lumbar spine

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Germany2 sites
  • University hospital, Department of orthopedics & traumasurgery

    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50924

  • University hospital, Department of orthopedics

    Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, 06112

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Clinical Trial (Phase II, Therapeutic Explorative) of the Efficacy of Hybrid Systems in Comparison to the Rigid Spondylodesis in Fusion-surgery in the Lumbar Spine: a Prospective, Randomised, Monocenter Pilotstudy

This study is designed as a randomized, parallel-group, therapy-controlled trial in a clinical care setting at a university hospital. Patients presenting to our outpatient clinic with degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis will be assessed against study inclusion and exclusion criteria. After informed consent and randomization of patients, surgery will be performed. Follow-up examinations will take place immediately after treatment during hospital stay, and then after another 6 and 24 weeks, for a total study duration of 6 months. Data will be assessed after 12, 24 and 36 months for a supplemental investigation. A further assessment will be performed every year, owing to the possibility that a statement regarding ASD cannot be given after 36 months.

Experimental research in this trial will be performed with the approval of the ethics committee of the medical faculty of the University of Cologne and of the university of Halle.

Read the detailed description

Patients over 30 years of age presenting to our outpatient clinic with degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis and indications for monosegmental lumbar spine fusion are eligible for trial inclusion. Indication for the fusion procedure will not be stated earlier than after 6 months of conservative therapy. Patients with spondylolisthesis have to respond positively to facet joint injection. Radiologic inclusion criteria are summarized in the appendix.

Prerequisite to inclusion is the presence of radiologic degeneration of the adjacent segment (Pfirrmann grades II-IV in MRI findings) without signs of instability. Definition of radiologic and clinical instability as well as further inclusion criteria are summarized in the appendix.

Study subjects will be approached and recruited by experienced spine surgeons. A number of 150 patients per year, who undergo primary monosegmental fusion in the department, is estimated for the screening procedure. A recruitment rate of 30 patients per year is anticipated.

Patients will receive one of two treatments:

Conventional monosegmental posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion (PLIF) Hybrid system (PLIF + flexible pedicle screw system above the fusion)

Control group - conventional PLIF The control group will receive a monosegmental posterior lumbar spine fusion with an intervertebral cage (PLIF). This is the current well-established therapy for several pathologies of the lumbar spine (e.g. spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease). Thus, the control group will receive the standard of care. This is the only acceptable control/comparison in a trial of this kind. Surgery will be performed using the following devices: S4® AESCULAP AG, Cage: Wave® Cage, Fa. AMT®

Intervention group - hybrid system The intervention group will receive a hybrid system with PLIF and a flexible pedicle screw system above the fusion. Surgery will be performed using the following devices: S4® Dynamic rod: AESCULAP AG (Tuttlingen)

Only skilled spine surgeons (experience of at least 30 fusion-procedures) will participate in the trial. Intraoperative photo documentation will help preventing variations of the procedure (e.g. enlargement of decompression/approach). We will also provide an instructional movie on the standards of the procedures and the rating of the x-rays.

All patients will receive a surgical drain, to be removed 2 days post-surgery. Both groups of patients will receive physical therapy, beginning on the day after surgery. Patients will be discharged only after sufficient convalescence with unremarkable wound healing. Hospital admission lasting 8-10 days will be necessary. Physical therapy will be performed during the inpatient period. After hospital discharge, physical therapy will be continued under outpatient conditions. This therapy will not be standardized in order to reflect reality.

Adverse and Serious Adverse Events

Adverse Event An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a study patient that may or may not have a causal relationship with the study treatment. Abnormal laboratory test values will be recorded as AE only if they require treatment.

  1. Concomitant Diseases In this context, deterioration of a pre-existing disease is also to be regarded as an Adverse Event. But it will not be regarded as an Adverse Event if it is due to a treatment that was already planned before the patient was enrolled in the study.
  2. Pregnancy In this study, the occurrence of pregnancy is considered as an Adverse Event. Before surgery, laboratory tests will be conducted to exclude pregnancy in women below 50 years of age.
  3. Laboratory Test Values Any abnormal laboratory test values during the study will be checked for plausibility and evaluated for clinical relevance by the responsible investigator. If during the study, an abnormal test value is found that, in the baseline visit, was not considered to be clinically relevant, but is now considered to be clinically relevant, it must be recorded as an AE in the eCRF.

Serious Adverse Event The present clinical study is not subject to the Sections 20-23a of the German Medical Product Law (Medizinproduktgesetz - MPG), but its definitions will apply here. A Serious Adverse Event is any untoward occurrence in a clinical trial or in a performance evaluation text subject to approval that

  • directly or indirectly leads to death; or
  • have led, could have led, or could lead to a serious deterioration in the state of health of a study subject, of a user or of another person, irrespective of whether the occurrence has been caused by the medical product.

This definition of a SAE will serve as basis for the documentation of Serious Adverse Events during the study. .

Ascertainment of AE and SAE The study centre concerned is responsible for recording and reporting AEs and SAEs. The study director/main investigator will ensure that all persons involved in the treatment of the study patients are fully aware of their responsibilities in the event of Adverse Events. At each visit, the patients will be asked if they have experienced any Adverse/Serious Events. The Adverse Events will be recorded both in the patients' medical record and in the survey questionnaires. At each visit, the physician will review the patients' medical records to determine whether Adverse Events have occurred.

If an Adverse Event occurs, the patient in question, irrespective of the causal relationship between the Adverse Event and the study treatment, must be kept under constant supervision. In any case, the patient must remain under observation until the symptoms have subsided, or the laboratory test values have returned to acceptable levels, or a plausible explanation has been found for the Adverse Event, or until the patient has died, or has been discharged from the study (last visit after 6 months or 36 months).

All Adverse Events will be recorded in the CFR, including the following information:

  • Time and date of start and end
  • Gravity
  • Relationship to the study therapy
  • Serious or not serious
  • Expected or not expected
Being tested
Experimental: hybrid system, Active Comparator: Plif
Keywords
degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, Lumbar spine, fusion, adjacent instability
Medical subject headings
Spondylolisthesis, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental: hybrid systemDevice

    Also called D-Rod

    The intervention group will receive a hybrid system with PLIF and a flexible pedicle screw system above the fusion. Surgery will be performed using the following devices (Dynamic Rod® Hersteller: AESCULAP AG, Tuttlingen

  • Active Comparator: PlifDevice

    Also called S4® AESCULAP AG, Cage: Wave® Cage, Fa. AMT®

    monosegmental PLIF

Study groups in NCT01852526
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
hybrid systemExperimentalhybrid system (PLIF + flexible pedicle screw system above the fusion) (Dynamic Rod®: AESCULAP AG, Tuttlingen: Germany
Receives: Device: Experimental: hybrid system; Device: Active Comparator: Plif
Plif posterior lumbar intervertebral fusionActive comparatorConventional monosegmental posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion (PLIF) (Fixateur: S4®: AESCULAP AG, Cage: Wave® Cage, Fa. AMT®)
Receives: Device: Experimental: hybrid system; Device: Active Comparator: Plif

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oswestry Disability Index

    ODI (cross-cultural adaption of the ODI version 2.1 for use with German-speaking patients) - this is one of the condition-specific questionnaires recommended for use with back pain patients. The ODI is a standardized, patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living for those rehabilitating from low back pain. The questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living

    Measured: 6 month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. SF-36

    The baseline and follow-up values after 6 weeks after the operation as well as 6 ,12,24,36 months after baseline of the SF-36 (Short-Form-36)-Measured Outcome regarding the Physical Component Summary (PCS).

    The baseline and follow-up values after 6 weeks after the operation as well as 6 and 12 months after baseline of the SF-36 (Short-Form-36)-Measured Outcome regarding the Physical Component Summary (PCS).

    Measured: 6 weeks and 6 ,12,24,36 months

  2. Mental Component Summary (MCS) and individual dimensions and subscales of the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and individual dimensions and subscales of SF-36

    Mental Component Summary (MCS) and individual dimensions and subscales of the SF-36 follow-up values after 6 weeks after the operation as well as 6, 12,24 and 36 months after baseline

    Measured: 6 weeks,6, 12,24 and 36 months after baseline

  3. COMI questionnaire (version 2008)-

    COMI questionnaire (version 2008)- a patient-oriented, short, multidimensional outcome instrument validated for patients with spinal disorders

    Measured: 6 weeks, 6, 12, 24, 36 month after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2017 (estimated)

Why it stopped: device failure

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01852526
Sponsor's protocol ID
Uni-Koeln-1510
Other IDs
AAG-I-H-1110
Acronym
D-Rod
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
8 May 2013
Last updated
16 Sep 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Siewe J, Bredow J, Oppermann J, Koy T, Delank S, Knoell P, Eysel P, Sobottke R, Zarghooni K, Rollinghoff M. Evaluation of efficacy of a new hybrid fusion device: a randomized, two-centre controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Sep 5;15:294. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-294.

    PubMed 25189113

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental: hybrid system and Active Comparator: Plif in people with Spondylolisthesis, run by University of Cologne at 2 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: device failure). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oswestry Disability Index (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01852526, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in