Colorectal CancerNCT01853774
Navigation From Community to Clinic to Promote CRC Screening in Underserved Populations
A study testing Tailored navigation in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a two-phase intervention using "community-to-clinic navigators" to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, to track effects of the intervention on completion of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Tailored navigation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 419 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2012to 31 Mar 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Phase I Inclusion criteria:
- participants will be aged 50-75,
- speak either English or Spanish,
- live in low-income neighborhoods (including a range of race and ethnicity),
- are due for CRC screening,
- may be at average or high risk for CRC,
Show all 9Show fewer
- either will not identify a regular clinic they attend or will be registered (or identify) with one of the clinic systems engaged in our study. Those who do identify a clinic home, however, will also be encouraged to join the study as long as they are due for screening.
- Phase II Inclusion criteria:
- Participants who keep their clinic appointment from Phase I will be enrolled in the study by clinic navigators and the Phase I inclusion criteria (above) will be re-confirmed.
Who cannot join
- Individuals who are compliant with CRC screening guidelines will not be eligible.
- While we will not intentionally exclude any specific racial/ethnic group, our study materials are offered in Spanish and English. As such, anyone who does cannot speak, read, and write English or Spanish will not be eligible to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a two-phase intervention using "community-to-clinic navigators" to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, to track effects of the intervention on completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in clinics. A cost-effectiveness analysis will lay the foundation for further implementation and dissemination research.
Aim 1: Test effectiveness of community group education + tailored navigation versus community group education only in increasing clinic attendance among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents, aged 50 to 75 yrs.
Read more
Hypothesis 1: Individuals receiving group education classes + tailored navigation will show higher rates of clinic attendance than those receiving only group education.
- As a separate critical step for those who make clinic appointments, the investigators will examine the effect on follow through to screening, using initial group assignment as a control variable in analysis. Patients making clinic appointments will receive referral for screening and tailored navigation as usual care.
Aim 2: Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on CRC screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic.
Hypothesis 2: Individuals receiving group classes and tailored navigation during Phase I will have higher rates of CRC screening test completion than those receiving classes only, (however this outcome will be primarily due to clinic attendance).
Aim 3: Determine the cost-effectiveness of each phase of the interventions on increasing CRC screening completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years.
Exploratory Aim 4: Examine the levels of program dissemination from community to clinic to final screenings using the RE-AIM model.
Research Question 2: What is the degree of Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the community-to-clinic navigation, and clinic-to-screening outcomes?
Read the detailed description
Design overview:
This study will employ a 2-phase experimental, randomized design to test a community to clinic navigation intervention: (1) to increase attendance at primary care clinics (Phase I), and (2) to track CRC screening among those who visit clinics (Phase II). The investigators will recruit non-adherent individuals from multicultural community sites in low-income zip codes in the Phoenix Arizona metropolitan area.
In Phase I, community sites will be randomized to either group education (GE) or group education plus tailored navigation (GE +TN) to increase attendance at the primary care clinics. In Phase II, individuals who complete a clinic appointment (from Phase I) will then receive the standard of care (provider prompts, navigation calls to patients) in the clinic. Phase I brings individuals into the primary care system (clinic attendance), and Phase II follows them through to CRC screening completion (either stool-based or colonoscopy). An accelerated plan will be initiated for individuals identified as at high risk for CRC, referring them for colonoscopy, to realistically evaluate effects of the interventions in real-world conditions, including the range of patient risk profiles in this setting. Recruitment, intervention, and data collection materials have been developed in English and Spanish and reviewed by a Cultural Community Advisory Board (CCAB) for cultural fit across our multicultural population of low-income participants.
Intervention details:
Group education (Phase I): Groups will be assembled for an educational class after all baseline surveys are completed for a community site. The curriculum for the 60 minute class will include:
- general information on cancer risk,
- specific risk factors for CRC,
- brief review of dietary and physical activity guidelines,
- stool blood test: purpose, preparation, and procedures(emphasis on the fecal occult blood test-- FOBT-- and FIT test),
- requirements and reasons for annual testing,
- meaning of results, and importance of follow-up for positive tests,
- instructions and sample kit discussion
- colonoscopy discussion,
- preventative potential when polyps are removed,
- colonoscopy preparation,
- anesthesia,
- guidelines regarding use of colonoscopy as the primary screening tool for individuals at higher risk, and for those who test positive on stool-based screening will be discussed
Tailored navigation (TN) Phase I: Participants randomized to the groups receiving GE + TN intervention will be called within 5 days of the completion of the class and will be encouraged to schedule an appointment at the nearby identified clinic. Trained, culturally sensitive navigators will navigate participants through their individual barriers and concerns, using the tailored set of responses from the message library (with a multi-theoretical basis) developed in the co-PI's previous research (R21CA100566;PI:Menon \& R01NR8425; PI: Menon). Calls will continue, for a total of 5 within an 8-week period (or less, if attendance to clinic and/or adherence to screening are obtained). In whichever call becomes the final, Tracking Questions will be administered to assess the status of clinic attendance or reasons for not scheduling or keeping a clinic appointment (with the same data collected at the end of 8 weeks for non-navigated control group participants).
Tailored navigation (TN) Phase II will utilize the full message library to assist patients to overcome barriers to care, negotiate healthcare systems, and access quality care. Within each clinic, an existing trained, staff member(or study navigator) will follow up on the patients who attend a clinic appointment.
Although patient navigators vary by site, the primary role of the clinic-based navigator includes connecting patients to resources and support systems; assisting in communication with clinic providers and staff; streamlining appointments and paperwork; helping patients identify and access financial services, basic counseling on psychosocial issues such as fear, anxiety, appropriate social services; and tracking all interactions and outcomes. Our TN will cover all these components in the proposed study. Calls will continue for a total of 5 within an 8-week period.
Control conditions clarification. In Phase I, participants in the control arm of the study will receive 3 calls designed to support data collection and tracking, but will not receive navigation messages. Call 1: 1-2 weeks after the initial clinic visit to verify contact information; Call 2: during weeks 5-6 to inquire if a clinic appointment was made and kept and to schedule data collection call for week 8 (Call 3). Call 3 (or earlier, if clinic was attended) will utilize the Tracking survey to document clinic attendance or reasons for non-attendance. During any call if an appointment was made and kept, the clinic name and provider visited will be documented, and the patient will be followed through Phase II.
Data Collection:
Eligibility status will be determined using initial screening questions. Participants who we determine to be ineligible will be thanked for their time, encouraged to continue with CRC screening annually (or on whatever schedule appropriate based on risk status, age and type of screening obtained). Those who are eligible will be administered the study consent. Consent procedures will inform participants the purpose and details of the study.
Once participants are consented, they will be interviewed for baseline data collection. The demographic data to be collected at baseline and confirmed (repeated) if participants appear in clinics for Phase II include age, date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity, education, income and insurance, marital status, and number of adults and children in household. Screening history and risk status will be obtained to determine eligibility and serve as baseline CRC screening data.
Questionnaires will be administered face to face by a Survey Interviewers who will ask questions and record the answers. Questionnaire administration will be distributed across three different points: 1) at baseline, 2) post-intervention, and 3) 6 month post-intervention.
Data collection materials have been developed in English and Spanish and reviewed by a Cultural Community Advisory Board for cultural fit across our multicultural population of low-income participants.
Data collection for cost-effectiveness analysis:
Data for the cost analyses will be drawn from study and clinic records and tracked separately for each phase of the study. Navigators will keep logs of time spent to recruit sites, run the group classes and implement TN to account for salary spent for Phase I intervention and control. Phase II navigation calls will be tracked by clinic staff in contracting clinics. We will also capture the number of clinic appointments made, kept, and missed without timely cancellation and the number of each of the different types of screenings received.
Sample Size:
We expect to recruit and randomize 1,840 participants total, allowing 15% attrition (that is, 85% retention) for a final sample size of 1,600 participants. Approximately 266 groups of 5-7 participants will be formed, resulting in approximately 133 each in the control condition and intervention condition. Education groups will begin in staggered sessions over 46 months. Approximately 450 participants will be recruited each year to achieve total recruitment goals.
Recruitment:
We will recruit older adult, low-income participants in community settings in Phase I by (a) identifying previously engaged and new formal sites (churches, senior citizen centers, employers) for recruitment, (b) continuing to canvass nontraditional options (apartment complexes, neighborhood associations, barber shops/salons, areas of commerce), and (c) investigating new types of sites to reach a broader range of multicultural populations in low-income areas.
Members of our Cultural Community Advisory Board (CCAB) include both lay advisors and strong community leaders and directors representing key institutions with community links. Eligibility screening will be done in a face-to-face interview and if the criteria are met the informed consent will be administered.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Tailored navigation
- Keywords
- Tailored navigation, Tailored messages
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tailored navigationBehavioural
Also called Tailored messages
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored Navigation | Experimental | Participants will receive tailored navigation phone calls to assist them with barriers in making a clinic appointment or attending the clinic. The tailored navigation intervention protocol will be used to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, track the effects of this intervention through a clinic navigation program to complete Colorectal cancer screening. Receives: Behavioral: Tailored navigation |
| Control | No intervention | Participants in the control arm will receive phone calls to support data collection and tracking, but not receive tailored messages |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Outcome is Clinic Attendance
Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic.
Measured: Attendance at the community educational class and 8 weeks beyond to attendance at a clinic.
Secondary outcomes (1)
The Secondary Outcome is Participant Completion of a CRC Screening Test.
Individuals receiving group classes and tailored navigation during Phase I will have higher rates of CRC screening test completion than those receiving classes only, (however this outcome will be primarily due to clinic attendance).
Measured: At 3- and 6-months post clinic visit, we will collect screening data from patient self-report and medical chart reviews.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2012
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completion31 Mar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Arizona State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 419 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, University of Arizona
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- LInda K Larkey, PhD, Principal investigator, Arizona State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01853774
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5R01CA162393-02
- Other IDs
- 1207008010
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 13 May 2013
- Last updated
- 11 May 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kim JH, Menon U. Pre- and postintervention differences in acculturation, knowledge, beliefs, and stages of readiness for mammograms among Korean American women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Mar;36(2):E80-92. doi: 10.1188/09.onf.e80-e92.
PubMed 19273397Herman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Menon U, Szalacha LA, Larkey L. Cost-Effectiveness of Community-to-Clinic Tailored Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Underserved Population: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Group-Randomized Trial. Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):678-686. doi: 10.1177/08901171211068454. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
PubMed 35081762Menon U, Szalacha LA, Kue J, Herman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Lance P, Larkey L. Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People. Ann Behav Med. 2020 Apr 20;54(5):308-319. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz049.
PubMed 31676898
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Navigation From Community to Clinic to Promote CRC Screening in Underserved Populations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01853774
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5R01CA162393-02
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Tailored navigation, Tailored messages
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 419 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, University of Arizona
- Study start
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jan 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a two-phase intervention using "community-to-clinic navigators" to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, to track effects of the intervention on completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in clinics. A cost-effectiveness analysis will lay the foundation for further implementation and dissemination research.
Aim 1: Test effectiveness of community group education + tailored navigation versus community group education only in increasing clinic attendance among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents, aged 50 to 75 yrs.
Hypothesis 1: Individuals receiving group education classes + tailored navigation will show higher rates of clinic attendance than those receiving only group education.
- As a separate critical step for those who make clinic appointments, the investigators will examine the effect on follow through to screening, using initial group assignment as a control variable in analysis. Patients making clinic appointments will receive referral for screening and tailored navigation as usual care.
Aim 2: Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on CRC screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic.
Hypothesis 2: Individuals receiving group classes and tailored navigation during Phase I will have higher rates of CRC screening test completion than those receiving classes only, (however this outcome will be primarily due to clinic attendance).
Aim 3: Determine the cost-effectiveness of each phase of the interventions on increasing CRC screening completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years.
Exploratory Aim 4: Examine the levels of program dissemination from community to clinic to final screenings using the RE-AIM model.
Research Question 2: What is the degree of Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the community-to-clinic navigation, and clinic-to-screening outcomes?
Detailed description
Design overview:
This study will employ a 2-phase experimental, randomized design to test a community to clinic navigation intervention: (1) to increase attendance at primary care clinics (Phase I), and (2) to track CRC screening among those who visit clinics (Phase II). The investigators will recruit non-adherent individuals from multicultural community sites in low-income zip codes in the Phoenix Arizona metropolitan area.
In Phase I, community sites will be randomized to either group education (GE) or group education plus tailored navigation (GE +TN) to increase attendance at the primary care clinics. In Phase II, individuals who complete a clinic appointment (from Phase I) will then receive the standard of care (provider prompts, navigation calls to patients) in the clinic. Phase I brings individuals into the primary care system (clinic attendance), and Phase II follows them through to CRC screening completion (either stool-based or colonoscopy). An accelerated plan will be initiated for individuals identified as at high risk for CRC, referring them for colonoscopy, to realistically evaluate effects of the interventions in real-world conditions, including the range of patient risk profiles in this setting. Recruitment, intervention, and data collection materials have been developed in English and Spanish and reviewed by a Cultural Community Advisory Board (CCAB) for cultural fit across our multicultural population of low-income participants.
Intervention details:
Group education (Phase I): Groups will be assembled for an educational class after all baseline surveys are completed for a community site. The curriculum for the 60 minute class will include:
- general information on cancer risk,
- specific risk factors for CRC,
- brief review of dietary and physical activity guidelines,
- stool blood test: purpose, preparation, and procedures(emphasis on the fecal occult blood test-- FOBT-- and FIT test),
- requirements and reasons for annual testing,
- meaning of results, and importance of follow-up for positive tests,
- instructions and sample kit discussion
- colonoscopy discussion,
- preventative potential when polyps are removed,
- colonoscopy preparation,
- anesthesia,
- guidelines regarding use of colonoscopy as the primary screening tool for individuals at higher risk, and for those who test positive on stool-based screening will be discussed
Tailored navigation (TN) Phase I: Participants randomized to the groups receiving GE + TN intervention will be called within 5 days of the completion of the class and will be encouraged to schedule an appointment at the nearby identified clinic. Trained, culturally sensitive navigators will navigate participants through their individual barriers and concerns, using the tailored set of responses from the message library (with a multi-theoretical basis) developed in the co-PI's previous research (R21CA100566;PI:Menon \& R01NR8425; PI: Menon). Calls will continue, for a total of 5 within an 8-week period (or less, if attendance to clinic and/or adherence to screening are obtained). In whichever call becomes the final, Tracking Questions will be administered to assess the status of clinic attendance or reasons for not scheduling or keeping a clinic appointment (with the same data collected at the end of 8 weeks for non-navigated control group participants).
Tailored navigation (TN) Phase II will utilize the full message library to assist patients to overcome barriers to care, negotiate healthcare systems, and access quality care. Within each clinic, an existing trained, staff member(or study navigator) will follow up on the patients who attend a clinic appointment.
Although patient navigators vary by site, the primary role of the clinic-based navigator includes connecting patients to resources and support systems; assisting in communication with clinic providers and staff; streamlining appointments and paperwork; helping patients identify and access financial services, basic counseling on psychosocial issues such as fear, anxiety, appropriate social services; and tracking all interactions and outcomes. Our TN will cover all these components in the proposed study. Calls will continue for a total of 5 within an 8-week period.
Control conditions clarification. In Phase I, participants in the control arm of the study will receive 3 calls designed to support data collection and tracking, but will not receive navigation messages. Call 1: 1-2 weeks after the initial clinic visit to verify contact information; Call 2: during weeks 5-6 to inquire if a clinic appointment was made and kept and to schedule data collection call for week 8 (Call 3). Call 3 (or earlier, if clinic was attended) will utilize the Tracking survey to document clinic attendance or reasons for non-attendance. During any call if an appointment was made and kept, the clinic name and provider visited will be documented, and the patient will be followed through Phase II.
Data Collection:
Eligibility status will be determined using initial screening questions. Participants who we determine to be ineligible will be thanked for their time, encouraged to continue with CRC screening annually (or on whatever schedule appropriate based on risk status, age and type of screening obtained). Those who are eligible will be administered the study consent. Consent procedures will inform participants the purpose and details of the study.
Once participants are consented, they will be interviewed for baseline data collection. The demographic data to be collected at baseline and confirmed (repeated) if participants appear in clinics for Phase II include age, date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity, education, income and insurance, marital status, and number of adults and children in household. Screening history and risk status will be obtained to determine eligibility and serve as baseline CRC screening data.
Questionnaires will be administered face to face by a Survey Interviewers who will ask questions and record the answers. Questionnaire administration will be distributed across three different points: 1) at baseline, 2) post-intervention, and 3) 6 month post-intervention.
Data collection materials have been developed in English and Spanish and reviewed by a Cultural Community Advisory Board for cultural fit across our multicultural population of low-income participants.
Data collection for cost-effectiveness analysis:
Data for the cost analyses will be drawn from study and clinic records and tracked separately for each phase of the study. Navigators will keep logs of time spent to recruit sites, run the group classes and implement TN to account for salary spent for Phase I intervention and control. Phase II navigation calls will be tracked by clinic staff in contracting clinics. We will also capture the number of clinic appointments made, kept, and missed without timely cancellation and the number of each of the different types of screenings received.
Sample Size:
We expect to recruit and randomize 1,840 participants total, allowing 15% attrition (that is, 85% retention) for a final sample size of 1,600 participants. Approximately 266 groups of 5-7 participants will be formed, resulting in approximately 133 each in the control condition and intervention condition. Education groups will begin in staggered sessions over 46 months. Approximately 450 participants will be recruited each year to achieve total recruitment goals.
Recruitment:
We will recruit older adult, low-income participants in community settings in Phase I by (a) identifying previously engaged and new formal sites (churches, senior citizen centers, employers) for recruitment, (b) continuing to canvass nontraditional options (apartment complexes, neighborhood associations, barber shops/salons, areas of commerce), and (c) investigating new types of sites to reach a broader range of multicultural populations in low-income areas.
Members of our Cultural Community Advisory Board (CCAB) include both lay advisors and strong community leaders and directors representing key institutions with community links. Eligibility screening will be done in a face-to-face interview and if the criteria are met the informed consent will be administered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored Navigation | Experimental | Behavioral: Tailored navigationParticipants will receive tailored navigation phone calls to assist them with barriers in making a clinic appointment or attending the clinic. The tailored navigation intervention protocol will be used to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, track the effects of this intervention through a clinic navigation program to complete Colorectal cancer screening. |
| Control | No intervention | –Participants in the control arm will receive phone calls to support data collection and tracking, but not receive tailored messages |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- participants will be aged 50-75,
- speak either English or Spanish,
- live in low-income neighborhoods (including a range of race and ethnicity),
- are due for CRC screening,
- may be at average or high risk for CRC,
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Individuals who are compliant with CRC screening guidelines will not be eligible.
- While we will not intentionally exclude any specific racial/ethnic group, our study materials are offered in Spanish and English. As such, anyone who does cannot speak, read, and write English or Spanish will not be eligible to participate in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored navigationAlso: Tailored messages | Behavioural | Tailored Navigation |
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome is Clinic Attendance
Time frame: Attendance at the community educational class and 8 weeks beyond to attendance at a clinic.
Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic.
1 secondary outcome
The Secondary Outcome is Participant Completion of a CRC Screening Test.
Time frame: At 3- and 6-months post clinic visit, we will collect screening data from patient self-report and medical chart reviews.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19273397Kim JH, Menon U. Pre- and postintervention differences in acculturation, knowledge, beliefs, and stages of readiness for mammograms among Korean American women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Mar;36(2):E80-92. doi: 10.1188/09.onf.e80-e92.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35081762Herman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Menon U, Szalacha LA, Larkey L. Cost-Effectiveness of Community-to-Clinic Tailored Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Underserved Population: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Group-Randomized Trial. Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):678-686. doi: 10.1177/08901171211068454. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31676898Menon U, Szalacha LA, Kue J, Herman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Lance P, Larkey L. Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People. Ann Behav Med. 2020 Apr 20;54(5):308-319. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz049.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
LInda K Larkey, PhD principal investigator
Arizona State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tailored navigation in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Outcome is Clinic Attendance (time frame: Attendance at the community educational class and 8 weeks beyond to attendance at a clinic.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01853774, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2021.