ContraceptionEto BMINCT01855620
The Effect of Body Mass Index on Etonogestrel Hormone Levels in Women Using the Single-rod Contraceptive Implant
An observational study of Contraception and Obesity, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Two-thirds of young women in the United States are overweight or obese. This excess weight may affect how their body metabolizes drugs such as different birth control methods. There is a not a lot of research about how excess weight could affect the hormone levels of the contraceptive implant. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Contraception, Obesity
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population is English or Spanish-speaking women ages 15-45 years old at the New York Presbyterian Hospital's Title X Family Planning Clinic and the Columbia University Medical Center's Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Family Planning Practice who have been using the etonogestrel contraceptive implant for at least the six months prior to their visit.
Who may be able to join
- Woman using contraceptive implant for more than 12 months
- English or Spanish-speaking
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Body Mass Index on Etonogestrel Levels in Women Using the Single-rod Contraceptive Implant
Two-thirds of young women in the United States are overweight or obese. This excess weight may affect how their body metabolizes drugs such as different birth control methods. There is a not a lot of research about how excess weight could affect the hormone levels of the contraceptive implant. Methods like the implant contain only progesterone, which is a hormone that does not increase a woman's risk of blood clot. These methods would be preferred for overweight and obese women because excess weight also increases a woman's risk of blood clot.
The investigators propose a study comparing blood hormone levels of women using the implant for at least twelve months and in all weight categories. The investigators hope to show that all women, regardless of weight, will have hormone levels high enough to prevent pregnancy.
Read the detailed description
Two-thirds of reproductive-age women in the United States are either overweight or obese. Body composition may affect contraceptive hormone metabolism and possibly efficacy. Phase III studies to date included few women weighing more than 70 kilograms (134 of 923, 14.5%); there were no reported pregnancies in that group. Data about pregnancy rates for women in higher body mass index (BMI) categories using the etonogestrel implant exists, but we know little about how weight affects the serum etonogestrel levels. Progestin-only methods, such as the etonogestrel implant, may be preferred over combined methods including estrogens because obesity increases thrombosis risk.
The investigators propose a prospective study to compare serum etonogestrel levels in the second and third years of implant use between women across body mass index categories.
Based on previous studies, the investigators expect a difference in etonogestrel levels based on body weight; however, the investigators hypothesize that etonogestrel levels will remain above the threshold for ovulation suppression through three years of implant use for women across BMI categories.
The investigators will measure the serum levels of etonogestrel in normal weight (BMI < 25kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 and < 30kg/m2), and obese women (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) using the single-rod contraceptive implant for at least twelve months. Their primary objective is to compare the three groups and to evaluate whether etonogestrel levels fall below the critical level for contraceptive efficacy (90 pg/mL) (Díaz 1991) in any group.
- Conditions
- Contraception, Obesity
- Keywords
- Contraception, Implant, Obesity
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Normal weight women | Women with implant for more than twelve months who have BMI <25. | |
| Overweight women | Women with implant for more than twelve months who have BMI > or = 25 and <30. | |
| Obese women | Women with implant for more than twelve months who have BMI > or = 30. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Serum Etonogestrel Level
The investigators will measure the serum levels of etonogestrel in normal weight (BMI < 25kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 and < 30kg/m2), and obese women (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) using the single-rod contraceptive implant for at least twelve months. The primary objective is to compare the three groups and to evaluate whether etonogestrel levels fall below the critical level for contraceptive efficacy (90 pg/mL) (Díaz 1991) in any group.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionNov 2013
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ContraceptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kathleen M. Morrell, Columbia University
- Investigators
- Kathleen M Morrell, MD, Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01855620
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAK6606
- Acronym
- Eto BMI
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 14 May 2013
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Jacobson JC, Aikins Murphy P. United States medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use 2010: a review of changes. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;56(6):598-607. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00093.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
PubMed 22060220Ciangura C, Corigliano N, Basdevant A, Mouly S, Decleves X, Touraine P, Lloret-Linares C. Etonorgestrel concentrations in morbidly obese women following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: three case reports. Contraception. 2011 Dec;84(6):649-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 May 8.
PubMed 22078197Davies GC, Feng LX, Newton JR, Van Beek A, Coelingh-Bennink HJ. Release characteristics, ovarian activity and menstrual bleeding pattern with a single contraceptive implant releasing 3-ketodesogestrel. Contraception. 1993 Mar;47(3):251-61. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90042-6.
PubMed 8462316Diaz S, Pavez M, Moo-Young AJ, Bardin CW, Croxatto HB. Clinical trial with 3-keto-desogestrel subdermal implants. Contraception. 1991 Oct;44(4):393-408. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90030-j.
PubMed 1756627Graesslin O, Korver T. The contraceptive efficacy of Implanon: a review of clinical trials and marketing experience. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jun;13 Suppl 1:4-12. doi: 10.1080/13625180801942754.
PubMed 18330813Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.39. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PubMed 22253363Huber J, Wenzl R. RETRACTED: Pharmacokinetics of Implanon. An integrated analysis. Contraception. 1998 Dec;58(6 Suppl):85S-90S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00120-6.
PubMed 10095978Mornar S, Chan LN, Mistretta S, Neustadt A, Martins S, Gilliam M. Pharmacokinetics of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):110.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 8.
PubMed 22717269Schnabel P, Merki-Feld GS, Malvy A, Duijkers I, Mommers E, van den Heuvel MW. Bioequivalence and x-ray visibility of a radiopaque etonogestrel implant versus a non-radiopaque implant: a 3-year, randomized, double-blind study. Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Jun 1;32(6):413-22. doi: 10.2165/11631930-000000000-00000.
PubMed 22540269Sivin I, Wan L, Ranta S, Alvarez F, Brache V, Mishell DR Jr, Darney P, Biswas A, Diaz S, Kiriwat O, Anant MP, Klaisle C, Pavez M, Schechter J. Levonorgestrel concentrations during 7 years of continuous use of Jadelle contraceptive implants. Contraception. 2001 Jul;64(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00226-8.
PubMed 11535213Xu H, Wade JA, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura GM. Contraceptive failure rates of etonogestrel subdermal implants in overweight and obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):21-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318259565a.
PubMed 22678035Morrell KM, Cremers S, Westhoff CL, Davis AR. Relationship between etonogestrel level and BMI in women using the contraceptive implant for more than 1 year. Contraception. 2016 Mar;93(3):263-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
PubMed 26577754
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Body Mass Index on Etonogestrel Levels in Women Using the Single-rod Contraceptive Implant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01855620
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Eto BMI / AAAK6606
- Conditions
- Contraception, Obesity
- Keywords
- Contraception, Implant, Obesity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Two-thirds of young women in the United States are overweight or obese. This excess weight may affect how their body metabolizes drugs such as different birth control methods. There is a not a lot of research about how excess weight could affect the hormone levels of the contraceptive implant. Methods like the implant contain only progesterone, which is a hormone that does not increase a woman's risk of blood clot. These methods would be preferred for overweight and obese women because excess weight also increases a woman's risk of blood clot.
The investigators propose a study comparing blood hormone levels of women using the implant for at least twelve months and in all weight categories. The investigators hope to show that all women, regardless of weight, will have hormone levels high enough to prevent pregnancy.
Detailed description
Two-thirds of reproductive-age women in the United States are either overweight or obese. Body composition may affect contraceptive hormone metabolism and possibly efficacy. Phase III studies to date included few women weighing more than 70 kilograms (134 of 923, 14.5%); there were no reported pregnancies in that group. Data about pregnancy rates for women in higher body mass index (BMI) categories using the etonogestrel implant exists, but we know little about how weight affects the serum etonogestrel levels. Progestin-only methods, such as the etonogestrel implant, may be preferred over combined methods including estrogens because obesity increases thrombosis risk.
The investigators propose a prospective study to compare serum etonogestrel levels in the second and third years of implant use between women across body mass index categories.
Based on previous studies, the investigators expect a difference in etonogestrel levels based on body weight; however, the investigators hypothesize that etonogestrel levels will remain above the threshold for ovulation suppression through three years of implant use for women across BMI categories.
The investigators will measure the serum levels of etonogestrel in normal weight (BMI < 25kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 and < 30kg/m2), and obese women (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) using the single-rod contraceptive implant for at least twelve months. Their primary objective is to compare the three groups and to evaluate whether etonogestrel levels fall below the critical level for contraceptive efficacy (90 pg/mL) (Díaz 1991) in any group.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Normal weight women | – | –Women with implant for more than twelve months who have BMI <25. |
| Overweight women | – | –Women with implant for more than twelve months who have BMI > or = 25 and <30. |
| Obese women | – | –Women with implant for more than twelve months who have BMI > or = 30. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population is English or Spanish-speaking women ages 15-45 years old at the New York Presbyterian Hospital's Title X Family Planning Clinic and the Columbia University Medical Center's Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Family Planning Practice who have been using the etonogestrel contraceptive implant for at least the six months prior to their visit.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Woman using contraceptive implant for more than 12 months
- English or Spanish-speaking
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Serum Etonogestrel Level
Time frame: Up to 12 months
The investigators will measure the serum levels of etonogestrel in normal weight (BMI < 25kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 and < 30kg/m2), and obese women (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) using the single-rod contraceptive implant for at least twelve months. The primary objective is to compare the three groups and to evaluate whether etonogestrel levels fall below the critical level for contraceptive efficacy (90 pg/mL) (Díaz 1991) in any group.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2014.
- Background: PubMed 22060220Jacobson JC, Aikins Murphy P. United States medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use 2010: a review of changes. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;56(6):598-607. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00093.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 22078197Ciangura C, Corigliano N, Basdevant A, Mouly S, Decleves X, Touraine P, Lloret-Linares C. Etonorgestrel concentrations in morbidly obese women following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: three case reports. Contraception. 2011 Dec;84(6):649-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 8462316Davies GC, Feng LX, Newton JR, Van Beek A, Coelingh-Bennink HJ. Release characteristics, ovarian activity and menstrual bleeding pattern with a single contraceptive implant releasing 3-ketodesogestrel. Contraception. 1993 Mar;47(3):251-61. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90042-6.
- Background: PubMed 1756627Diaz S, Pavez M, Moo-Young AJ, Bardin CW, Croxatto HB. Clinical trial with 3-keto-desogestrel subdermal implants. Contraception. 1991 Oct;44(4):393-408. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90030-j.
- Background: PubMed 18330813Graesslin O, Korver T. The contraceptive efficacy of Implanon: a review of clinical trials and marketing experience. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jun;13 Suppl 1:4-12. doi: 10.1080/13625180801942754.
- Background: PubMed 22253363Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.39. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 10095978Huber J, Wenzl R. RETRACTED: Pharmacokinetics of Implanon. An integrated analysis. Contraception. 1998 Dec;58(6 Suppl):85S-90S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00120-6.
- Background: PubMed 22717269Mornar S, Chan LN, Mistretta S, Neustadt A, Martins S, Gilliam M. Pharmacokinetics of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):110.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 22540269Schnabel P, Merki-Feld GS, Malvy A, Duijkers I, Mommers E, van den Heuvel MW. Bioequivalence and x-ray visibility of a radiopaque etonogestrel implant versus a non-radiopaque implant: a 3-year, randomized, double-blind study. Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Jun 1;32(6):413-22. doi: 10.2165/11631930-000000000-00000.
- Background: PubMed 11535213Sivin I, Wan L, Ranta S, Alvarez F, Brache V, Mishell DR Jr, Darney P, Biswas A, Diaz S, Kiriwat O, Anant MP, Klaisle C, Pavez M, Schechter J. Levonorgestrel concentrations during 7 years of continuous use of Jadelle contraceptive implants. Contraception. 2001 Jul;64(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00226-8.
- Background: PubMed 22678035Xu H, Wade JA, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura GM. Contraceptive failure rates of etonogestrel subdermal implants in overweight and obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):21-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318259565a.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26577754Morrell KM, Cremers S, Westhoff CL, Davis AR. Relationship between etonogestrel level and BMI in women using the contraceptive implant for more than 1 year. Contraception. 2016 Mar;93(3):263-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
- Nexplanon Prescribing informationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Contraception
Enrolling by invitation
Flo Digital Contraceptive Study
Contraception Use
Recruiting
Estimating the Impact of Sexuality Education and Mobile Health Services on Reproductive Health and Empowerment Among Adolescents in Sierra Leone for the Family Planning Impact Lab
Reproductive Health, Sexual Health
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
FLOW: Influence of the Menstrual Cycle on Alcohol Use in Women
Alcohol Use, Alcohol Consumption
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Gender-Transformative Interventions on Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Autonomy in Somalia
Contraceptive Behavior, Social Norms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kathleen M Morrell, MD principal investigator
Columbia University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Contraception and Obesity, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Serum Etonogestrel Level (time frame: Up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01855620, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2014.