Hepatitis B, ChronicNCT01855997
A Study to Collect Blood Biomarker Samples From Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Who Received Treatment With Pegasys (Peginterferon Alfa-2a) ± Nucleoside/Nucleotide Analogue
An observational study of Hepatitis B, Chronic, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 84 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This Phase 4 study is designed for the collection of blood biomarker samples from participants who have completed CHB treatment with at least 24 weeks of a pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFN alfa-2a) containing regimen and at least 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Peg-IFN alfa-2a
- How many people
- 1,669 participants
- Where
- 84 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Aug 2013to 28 Nov 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants with CHB who received therapy with Peg-IFN ± nucleoside/nucleotide analogue will be included.
Who may be able to join
- Adults greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age
- CHB
- Previously enrolled in a Roche study and treated for CHB for ≥24 weeks with Peg-IFN ± nucleoside analogue (lamivudine or entecavir) or Peg-IFN ± nucleotide analogue (adefovir) and with ≥24 weeks post-treatment follow-up; or
- Treated in general practice for CHB with Peg-IFN according to standard of care and in line with the current Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)/local labeling who have no contraindication to Peg-IFN therapy as per local label and have been treated with Peg-IFN for ≥24 weeks and have ≥24 week post-treatment response available at the time of blood sample collection
Who cannot join
- Hepatitis A, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Trial locations and contacts
84 sites in 15 countries.
84 sites in 15 countries
China25 sites
Beijing Ditan Hospital
Beijing, 100011
Beijing 302 Hospital; No. 2 Infectious Disease Section
Beijing, 100039
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, 100044
Beijing You An Hospital; Digestive Dept
Beijing, 100069
Xiangya Hospital of Centre-South University
Changsha, 410008
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, 610041
The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, 400010
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, 350005
The Eighth People's Hospital of Guangzhou
Guangzhou, 510060
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, 510515
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou
Hangzhou Sixth People's Hospital
Hangzhou
The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Harbin, 150001
Jinan Infectious Diseases Hospital
Jinan, 250021
Nanjing No.2 Hospital; Liver Disease Department
Nanjing, 210003
The First Affiliate Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Nanning, 530021
Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Shanghai, 200021
Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center
Shanghai, 201508
Shenzhen Donghu Hospital
Shenzhen, 518020
The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, 050051
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Hospital of Chinese Traditional Medicine
Ürümqi, 830001
Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med. Col, Huazhong Univ. of Sci. & Tech
Wuhan, 430030
The Second Affiliated Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University (Tangdu Hospital)
Xi'an, 710038
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Yinchuan, 750004
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, 450003
Italy12 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Consorziale di Bari; Clinica Malattie Infettive
Bari, Apulia, 70124
UNI DEGLI STUDI - POLICLINICA S. ORSOLA; Dipartimento Malattie dell'Apparato Digerente e Medicina In
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
Uni Di Cagliari; Dept. Di Scienze Mediche
Cagliari, Sardinia, 09042
Az. Osp. S. Sebastiano; Divisione Malattie Infettive
Caserta, Campania, 81100
Ospedale de Bellis; Reparto Medicina Generale
Castellana Grotte, Apulia, 70013
Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Gastroenterologia
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Iii Divisione Medicina Generale
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
Az. Osp. Cardarelli; Unita Operativa A Struttura Complessa Di Epatologia
Naples, Campania, 80131
Az. Osp. Di Padova; Dipart. Scienze Chirurgiche E Gastroent.
Padova, Veneto, 35128
Istituto Di Clinica Medica 1 A; Divisione Di Medicina Generale E Gastroenterologia
Palermo, Sicily, 90127
Az. Osp. Uni Ria Di Parma; Gastro-Enterology
Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100
Ospedale Cisanello - Az. Osp. Pisana; Unità Operativa Di Gastroenterologia Ed Epatologia
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124
Taiwan9 sites
Changhua Christian Hospital; Internal Medicine
Changhua, 500
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Dept of Internal Medicine
Kaohsiung City, 00833
Kaohsiung Medical Uni Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital; Dept of Internal Medicine
Kaohsiung City, 807
Chang Gung Medical Foundation - Keelung; Dept. of Hepato-Gastroenterology
Keelung, 204
China Medical University Hospital; Department of Rheumatology
Taichung, 404
National Taiwan Uni Hospital; Gastro-Enterology Dept.
Taipei, 100
Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Gastroenterology Division
Taipei, 112
Tri-Service Hospital; Dept. of Internal Medicine
Taipei
Chang Gung Medical Foundation - Linkou; Dept. of Hepato-Gastroenterology
Taoyuan, 333
Poland8 sites
Hospital For Infectious Diseases; Infectiology
Bydgoszcz, 85-030
Szpital Specjalistyczny; Oddzial Obserwacyjno - Zakayny
Chorzów, 41-500
Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Jana Pawla II; Oddzial Wirusowego Zapalenia Watroby
Krakow, 31-202
Centrum Medyczne
Łańcut, 37-100
Specjalistyczny Szpital Wojewódzki im. Biegańskiego; Klinika Chorób Zakaźnych i Hepatologii UM
Lodz, 91-347
Wojewodzki Szpital Zakazny; Klinika Chorob Zakaznych
Warsaw, 01-201
Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSWiA; Oddzial Chorob Wewnetrznych i Hepatologii
Warsaw, 02-507
NZOZ Lubuska Specjalistyczna Poradnia Chorob Watroby
Zielona Góra, 65-044
Germany5 sites
Praxis Dr. med. Christine John
Berlin, 10117
Praxis Dr. Heyne
Berlin, 10969
Charité Uni.-medizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum; Med. Klinik m.S. Hepatologie Gastroenterologie
Berlin, 13353
Ifi- Studien und Projekte GmbH, An der Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099
Medizinische Hochschule Zentrum Innere Medizin Abt.Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie und Hepatologie
Hanover, 30625
France4 sites
Hopital Beaujon;Hepatologie
Clichy, 92118
Hopital Henri Mondor; Hepatologie Gastro Enterologie
Créteil, 94010
Hopital de Pontchaillou; Medicine Interne - Hepatologie
Rennes, 35033
Institut Arnault Tzanck; Medecine I Gastro Enterologie
Saint-Laurent-du-Var, 06721
Greece3 sites
Laiko General Hospital Athen; Uni Clinic of Gastrenterology
Athens, 115 27
University Hospital of Larissa; Pathological Clinic
Larissa, 41 110
Hippokratio Hospital; 4Th Internal Medicine Dpt
Thessaloniki, 546 42
Portugal3 sites
Hospital de Santa Maria; Servico de Gastrenterologia e Hepatologia
Lisbon, 1649-035
Hospital Geral de Santo Antonio; Servico de Gastrenterologia
Porto, 4099-001
Hospital de Sao Joao; Servico de Gastrenterologia
Porto, 4202-451
Romania3 sites
Institutul De Boli Infectioase Matei Bals; Sectia Clinica II Boli Infectioase Adulti
Bucharest, 021105
The Hospital of Tropical and Infectious Disease Victor Babes
Bucharest, 030303
Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital Victor Babes
Craiova, 200515
South Korea3 sites
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital; Nephrology
Busan, 633-165
Chooncheon Sacred Heart Hospital
Chooncheon, 200-060
Samsung Medical Center; Gastroenterology
Seoul, 135-710
Thailand3 sites
Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok, 10700
Chiang Mai Uni Hospital; Faculty of Medicine
Chiang Mai, 50200
Songklanagarind Hospital; Division of Gastroenterology
Songkhla, 90112
Bulgaria2 sites
MHAT Tokuda Hospital Sofia; Department of Gastroenterology at Clinic of Internal Deseases
Sofia, 1407
Mhat Sveta Marina; Clinic of Gastroenterology
Varna, 9010
United Kingdom2 sites
The Royal London Hospital
London, E1 1BB
Manchester Royal Infirmary; Department Of Medicine
Manchester, M13 9WL
Austria1 site
Medizinische Universität Wien; Univ.Klinik für Innere Medizin III - Gastroenterologie & Hepatologie
Vienna, 1090
New Zealand1 site
Auckland Hospital; New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit
Auckland, 100
About this study
Official title: A Phase IV, Blood Sample Collection Study For Exploratory Evaluation of the Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms With Treatment Responses From Subjects With HBe-Antigen Positive or Negative Chronic Hepatitis B, Who Received Therapy for Hepatitis B With Peginterferon Alfa-2a 40kD (Peg-IFN) ± Nucleos(t)Ide Analogue
This Phase 4 study is designed for the collection of blood biomarker samples from participants who have completed CHB treatment with at least 24 weeks of a pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFN alfa-2a) containing regimen and at least 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. Participants may be enrolled from historical studies supported or sponsored by Roche, ongoing studies supported or sponsored by Roche, or from general medical practice. The follow-up of individuals who choose to participate in this study will be in accordance with the ongoing studies or with the general medical practice of the physician. Data from whole blood deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples collected in the GV28555 study or available from previously collected Roche Clinical Repository (RCR) samples will be used for combined analysis with data from other applicable studies. Procedures will include blood sample collection (not applicable for participants who previously have consented and donated RCR DNA samples) and medical record capture.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
- Being tested
- Peg-IFN alfa-2a
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peg-IFN alfa-2aDrug
Also called Pegasys
Participants received Peg-IFN alfa-2a prior to enrollment for at least 24 weeks. Dosing was chosen according to standard of care or at the discretion of the treating physician.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adult CHB Participants Treated With Peg-IFN Alfa-2a | Adult participants with CHB infection, and who have completed at least 24 weeks of Peg-IFN alfa-2a with/without nucleoside analogue therapy and at least 24 weeks of follow-up, will be included. Participants will be recruited from Roche clinical trials or general practice; no treatment will be administered in this non-interventional study. Receives: Drug: Peg-IFN alfa-2a |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive East Asian (CN) Population: Additive Model
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of the antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe). HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of the antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as HBV DNA level below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of 2000 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Non-East Asian (Non-CN) Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs2464266) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs12992677) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs12992677) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs7549785) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs7549785) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs6592052) was included in the analysis.
Measured: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study start20 Aug 2013
- Primary completion28 Nov 2014
- Study completion28 Nov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatitis B, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 1,669 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01855997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GV28855
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 8 May 2013
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Wei L, Pavlovic V, Bansal AT, Chen X, Foster GR, He H, Kao JH, Lampertico P, Liaw YF, Motoc A, Papatheodoridis GV, Piratvisuth T, Plesniak R, Wat C. Genetic variation in FCER1A predicts peginterferon alfa-2a-induced hepatitis B surface antigen clearance in East Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2019 Sep;26(9):1040-1049. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13107. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
PubMed 30972912
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase IV, Blood Sample Collection Study For Exploratory Evaluation of the Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms With Treatment Responses From Subjects With HBe-Antigen Positive or Negative Chronic Hepatitis B, Who Received Therapy for Hepatitis B With Peginterferon Alfa-2a 40kD (Peg-IFN) ± Nucleos(t)Ide Analogue
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01855997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GV28855
- Conditions
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,669 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Apr 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Phase 4 study is designed for the collection of blood biomarker samples from participants who have completed CHB treatment with at least 24 weeks of a pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFN alfa-2a) containing regimen and at least 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. Participants may be enrolled from historical studies supported or sponsored by Roche, ongoing studies supported or sponsored by Roche, or from general medical practice. The follow-up of individuals who choose to participate in this study will be in accordance with the ongoing studies or with the general medical practice of the physician. Data from whole blood deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples collected in the GV28555 study or available from previously collected Roche Clinical Repository (RCR) samples will be used for combined analysis with data from other applicable studies. Procedures will include blood sample collection (not applicable for participants who previously have consented and donated RCR DNA samples) and medical record capture.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adult CHB Participants Treated With Peg-IFN Alfa-2a | – | Drug: Peg-IFN alfa-2aAdult participants with CHB infection, and who have completed at least 24 weeks of Peg-IFN alfa-2a with/without nucleoside analogue therapy and at least 24 weeks of follow-up, will be included. Participants will be recruited from Roche clinical trials or general practice; no treatment will be administered in this non-interventional study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants with CHB who received therapy with Peg-IFN ± nucleoside/nucleotide analogue will be included.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age
- CHB
- Previously enrolled in a Roche study and treated for CHB for ≥24 weeks with Peg-IFN ± nucleoside analogue (lamivudine or entecavir) or Peg-IFN ± nucleotide analogue (adefovir) and with ≥24 weeks post-treatment follow-up; or
- Treated in general practice for CHB with Peg-IFN according to standard of care and in line with the current Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)/local labeling who have no contraindication to Peg-IFN therapy as per local label and have been treated with Peg-IFN for ≥24 weeks and have ≥24 week post-treatment response available at the time of blood sample collection
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Hepatitis A, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peg-IFN alfa-2aAlso: PegasysParticipants received Peg-IFN alfa-2a prior to enrollment for at least 24 weeks. Dosing was chosen according to standard of care or at the discretion of the treating physician. | Drug | Adult CHB Participants Treated With Peg-IFN Alfa-2a |
Primary outcome
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive East Asian (CN) Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of the antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe). HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of the antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as HBV DNA level below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of 2000 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Non-East Asian (Non-CN) Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs2464266) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs12992677) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs12992677) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs7549785) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs7549785) was included in the analysis.
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
Time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p<10^-5 and p<5x10^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs6592052) was included in the analysis.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30972912Wei L, Pavlovic V, Bansal AT, Chen X, Foster GR, He H, Kao JH, Lampertico P, Liaw YF, Motoc A, Papatheodoridis GV, Piratvisuth T, Plesniak R, Wat C. Genetic variation in FCER1A predicts peginterferon alfa-2a-induced hepatitis B surface antigen clearance in East Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2019 Sep;26(9):1040-1049. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13107. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
Related trials for Hepatitis B, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of HT-101 and HT-102 in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effectiveness of TAF in Reducing Clinical Events in CHB Patients Beyond Treatment Indications by Current Guidelines
Chronic Hepatitis b
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment in Cirrhotic Patients With Low-level Hepatitis B Virus DNA Levels
Hepatitis B, Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
84 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hepatitis B, Chronic, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 84 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 84 sites in China, Italy, Taiwan, Poland, Germany and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive East Asian (CN) Population: Additive Model (time frame: Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment). The study lists 32 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01855997, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.