Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3SIRROUND-LTENCT01856309
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Sirukumab in Participants With RA Completing Studies CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
A Phase 3 study testing Sirukumab 100 mg and Sirukumab 50 mg in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 197 sites in 29 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CNTO 136 (sirukumab) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are unresponsive to treatment with modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or anti-TNF alpha agents. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- Sirukumab 100 mg and Sirukumab 50 mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,820 participants
- Where
- 197 sitesin 29 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Aug 2013to 30 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Completed participation in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
- Signed an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study
- Signed an informed consent form (ICF) for pharmacogenetics research (how a person's genes may affect a drug's effects) in order to participate in the optional pharmacogenetics component of this study. Refusal to give consent for this component does not exclude a participant from participation in this clinical study
Who cannot join
- Withdraws consent and/or discontinues participation in study CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
- Is pregnant
- Has active diverticulitis
- Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (eg, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
Trial locations and contacts
197 sites in 29 countries.
197 sites in 29 countries
United States66 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Aventura, Florida
Study site
Beckley, West Virginia
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Boca Raton, Florida
Study site
Bowling Green, Kentucky
Study site
Brandon, Florida
Study site
Brooklyn, New York
Study site
Carrollton, Texas
Study site
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Clarksburg, West Virginia
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas
Study site
Covina, California
Study site
Cumberland, Maryland
Study site
Cypress, Texas
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Dayton, Ohio
Study site
Daytona Beach, Florida
Study site
DeBary, Florida
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania
Study site
Edmond, Oklahoma
Study site
El Cajon, California
Study site
Flowood, Mississippi
Study site
Freehold, New Jersey
Study site
Glendale, Arizona
Study site
Glendale, California
Study site
Hagerstown, Maryland
Study site
Hamden, Connecticut
Study site
Hemet, California
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Huntington Beach, California
Study site
Katy, Texas
Study site
La Jolla, California
Study site
La Palma, California
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Study site
Lubbock, Texas
Study site
Mesa, Arizona
Study site
Mesquite, Texas
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio
Study site
Monroe, Louisiana
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska
Study site
Orlando, Florida
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida
Study site
Peoria, Arizona
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Placentia, California
Study site
Plantation, Florida
Study site
Rochester, Minnesota
Study site
Sarasota, Florida
Study site
Springfield, Missouri
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Study site
Upland, California
Study site
Victoria, Texas
Study site
Victorville, California
Study site
Wheaton, Maryland
Study site
Whittier, California
Study site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania
Study site
Zephyrhills, Florida
Japan37 sites
Study site
Ayauta
Study site
Bunkyō City
Study site
Fukuoka
Study site
Higashihiroshima
Study site
Hiroshima
Study site
Izumo
Study site
Kagoshima
Study site
Katō
Study site
Kawagoe
Study site
Kita-Gun
Study site
Kumamoto
Study site
Kurume
Study site
Matsuyama
Study site
Miyazaki
Study site
Nagano
Study site
Nagasaki
Study site
Nagoya
Study site
Nishimuro-gun
Study site
Nishinomiya
Study site
Okayama
Study site
Osaka
Study site
Sapporo
Study site
Sasebo
Study site
Shibata
Study site
Shimonoseki
Study site
Shimotsuke
Study site
Shinjuku-ku
Study site
Sumida-ku
Study site
Takaoka,Toyama
Study site
Takasaki
Study site
Tokorozawa
Study site
Tokushima
Study site
Tomishiro
Study site
Tonami
Study site
Tsu
Study site
Ureshino
Study site
Yokohama
Russia11 sites
Study site
Barnaul
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Novosibirsk
Study site
Omsk
Study site
Orenburg
Study site
Ryazan
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Saratov
Study site
Smolensk
Study site
Ulyanovsk
Study site
Yaroslavl
South Korea10 sites
Study site
Busan
Study site
Daegu
Study site
Daejeon
Study site
Gwangju
Study site
Incheon
Study site
Jeonju
Study site
Namdong-Gu
Study site
Seongnam-si
Study site
Seoul
Study site
Suwon
Germany7 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Cologne
Study site
Frankfurt am Main
Study site
Göttingen
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Vogelsang-Gommern
Study site
Würzburg
Mexico7 sites
Study site
Cuernavaca
Study site
Guadalajara
Study site
Mérida
Study site
Mexicali
Study site
México
Study site
Morelia
Study site
San Luis de Potosi
Poland7 sites
Study site
Bialystok
Study site
Bydgoszcz
Study site
Elblag
Study site
Lublin
Study site
Poznan
Study site
Ustroń
Study site
Warsaw
Ukraine5 sites
Study site
Kharkiv
Study site
Kyiv
Study site
Odesa
Study site
Vinnytsia
Study site
Zaporizhzhya
Lithuania4 sites
Study site
Alytus
Study site
Kaunas
Study site
Klaipėda
Study site
Šiauliai
Spain4 sites
Study site
A Coruña
Study site
Barakaldo
Study site
Santander
Study site
Santiago de Compostela
Argentina3 sites
Study site
Buenos Aires
Study site
Rosario
Study site
San Miguel de Tucumán
Canada3 sites
Study site
Edmonton
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba
South Africa3 sites
Study site
Cape Town
Study site
Port Elizabeth
Study site
Pretoria
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CNTO 136 (Sirukumab) for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Subjects Completing Treatment in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 (SIRROUND-D) and CNTO136ARA3003 (SIRROUND-T)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CNTO 136 (sirukumab) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are unresponsive to treatment with modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or anti-TNF alpha agents.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, long-term study of sirukumab (CNTO 136) that will be conducted in two groups of participants at the same time (parallel-group study). The maximum duration of participation in this study is 208 weeks, followed by approximately 16 weeks of safety and efficacy follow-up after the administration of the final study agent injection of sirukumab. Participant safety will be monitored throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- Sirukumab 100 mg, Sirukumab 50 mg, Placebo
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Sirukumab, CNTO 136, CNTO136ARA3002, SIRROUND-D, CNTO136ARA3003, SIRROUND-T, SIRROUND-LTE
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sirukumab 100 mgDrug
Sirukumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 2, and every 2 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003.
Sirukumab 50 mgDrug
Sirukumab 50 mg SC at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 4, and every 4 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003.
PlaceboDrug
Between sirukumab 50 mg injections, placebo SC injections will be administered at Weeks 2, 6, and every 4 weeks until the study becomes open-label, and placebo injections are discontinued.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sirukumab 100 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Sirukumab 100 mg |
| Sirukumab 50 mg / placebo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Sirukumab 50 mg; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
MACE was defined as a composite of Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke, death, hospitalization for unstable angina, and hospitalization for Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). Adjudication of these events by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC) was performed in a blinded fashion.
Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Malignancies
Percentage of participants with one or more malignancy was reported.
Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Serious Infections
Percentage of participants with one or more serious infections was reported.
Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforations
Percentage of participants with one or more GI perforations was reported. GI perforation is a hole that develops through the entire wall of the stomach, small intestine, large bowel, or gallbladder.
Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Hepatobiliary Abnormalities
Percentage of participants with hepatobiliary abnormalities was reported.
Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of Participants With Serious or Moderate/Severe Systemic Hypersensitivity Reactions, or Serum Sickness Adverse Events
Percentage of participants with serious or moderate/severe systemic hypersensitivity reactions, or serum sickness adverse events (AEs) was reported.
Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Secondary outcomes (16)
Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Neutrophils
Percentage of participants with toxicity grade 4 decrease in neutrophils was reported. As per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, toxicity grade 4 was defined as decrease in neutrophils less than (<) 500 per Cubic Millimeter (mm^3) or < 0.5 * 10^9 per liter.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Platelets
Percentage of participants with toxicity grade 4 decrease in platelets was reported. As per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, toxicity grade 4 was defined as decreased in platelets <25000/mm^3 or < 25.0 * 10^9 per liter.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With ALT >= 3*ULN, ALT >= 5*ULN and ALT >= 8*ULN
Percentage of participants with Alanine Aminotranserase (ALT) >= 3*Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), ALT >= 5*ULN or ALT >= 8*ULN was reported.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With AST >= 3*ULN, AST >= 5*ULN and AST >= 8*ULN
Percentage of participants with Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >= 3*ULN, AST >= 5*ULN and AST >= 8*ULN was reported.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Either ALT >= 3*ULN or AST >= 3*ULN, and Total Bilirubin >= 2*ULN
Percentage of participants with either ALT >= 3*ULN or AST >= 3*ULN and total bilirubin >= 2*ULN was reported.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal Total Cholesterol Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Percentage of participants with normal total cholesterol value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal total cholesterol value was defined as total cholesterol value more than (>) 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Percentage of participants with normal LDL value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal LDL value was defined as LDL value > 130 mg/dL.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Percentage of participants with normal HDL value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal HDL value was defined as HDL value < 40 mg/dL.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal Triglyceride Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Percentage of participants with normal triglyceride value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal triglyceride value was defined as triglyceride value > 250 mg/dL.
Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response Through Week 260
ACR 50 response is greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement in both tender joint count (68) and swollen joint count (66) and >= 50% improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments:Participant's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10 scale, 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain),Participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, [0 = very well to 10 = very poor]), Physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, [0=no arthritis activity to 10=extremely active arthritis]), Participant's assessment of physical function as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (scale ranges from 0= no difficulty to 3= inability to perform a task in that area), and Serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Boolean-Based American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260
Boolean based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following 4 criteria at that visit are met: tender joint count (68 joints) <=1; swollen joint count (66 joints) <=1; CRP <=1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); and patient's global assessment of disease activity on visual analog scale (VAS) <=1 on a 0 (very well ) to 10 (extremely bad) scale. Higher scores indicates worst health condition. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Index Score 28 (CRP) Remission Through Week 260
The Disease Activity Index Score 28 (DAS28) based on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a statistically derived index combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), CRP and patient's global assessment of disease activity. The set of 28 joint count is based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. The values are 0=best to 10=worst. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as a DAS28 (CRP) value of less than (<) 2.6 at any study visit. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Through Week 260
The CDAI score is a derived score of 4 components: tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and physician's global assessments of disease activity. The total score ranges from 0 to 76 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicates a worsening of disease activity. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index Based (SDAI-based) American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260
Participant having SDAI-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if SDAI score is of <= 3.3. SDAI derived by combining 5 disease assessments: tender joint (28), swollen joint (28) counts, participants global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10 [0 =very well to 10 = very poor]), physicians global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10 [0=no arthritis to 10=extremely active arthritis]) and CRP. 28 joints evaluated for swelling and tenderness are same set of 28 joints used in DAS28 includes shoulder, elbow, wrist, MCP1, MCP2, MCP3, MCP4, MCP5, PIP1, PIP2, PIP3, PIP4, PIP5 joints of upper right and left extremities and knee joints of lower right and left extremities. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Through Week 260
The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score is an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response Through Week 260
HAQ-DI response was defined as change of less than -0.22 from baseline in HAQ-DI score. The HAQ-DI score is an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study start7 Aug 2013
- Primary completion30 Apr 2018
- Study completion30 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,820 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01856309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR102023
- Other IDs
- CNTO136ARA3004, 2012-001176-10
- Acronym
- SIRROUND-LTE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 15 May 2013
- Last updated
- 6 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Aletaha D, Bingham CO, Karpouzas GA, Takeuchi T, Thorne C, Bili A, Agarwal P, Hsu B, Rao R, Brown K, Tanaka Y. Long-term safety and efficacy of sirukumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who previously received sirukumab in randomised controlled trials (SIRROUND-LTE). RMD Open. 2021 Jan;7(1):e001465. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001465.
PubMed 33526709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CNTO 136 (Sirukumab) for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Subjects Completing Treatment in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 (SIRROUND-D) and CNTO136ARA3003 (SIRROUND-T)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01856309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIRROUND-LTE / CR102023
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Sirukumab, CNTO 136, CNTO136ARA3002, SIRROUND-D, CNTO136ARA3003, SIRROUND-T, SIRROUND-LTE
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,820 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- 7 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CNTO 136 (sirukumab) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are unresponsive to treatment with modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or anti-TNF alpha agents.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, long-term study of sirukumab (CNTO 136) that will be conducted in two groups of participants at the same time (parallel-group study). The maximum duration of participation in this study is 208 weeks, followed by approximately 16 weeks of safety and efficacy follow-up after the administration of the final study agent injection of sirukumab. Participant safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sirukumab 100 mg | Experimental | Drug: Sirukumab 100 mg |
| Sirukumab 50 mg / placebo | Experimental | Drug: Sirukumab 50 mg, Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Completed participation in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
- Signed an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study
- Signed an informed consent form (ICF) for pharmacogenetics research (how a person's genes may affect a drug's effects) in order to participate in the optional pharmacogenetics component of this study. Refusal to give consent for this component does not exclude a participant from participation in this clinical study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Withdraws consent and/or discontinues participation in study CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
- Is pregnant
- Has active diverticulitis
- Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (eg, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sirukumab 100 mgSirukumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 2, and every 2 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003. | Drug | Sirukumab 100 mg |
| Sirukumab 50 mgSirukumab 50 mg SC at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 4, and every 4 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003. | Drug | Sirukumab 50 mg / placebo |
| PlaceboBetween sirukumab 50 mg injections, placebo SC injections will be administered at Weeks 2, 6, and every 4 weeks until the study becomes open-label, and placebo injections are discontinued. | Drug | Sirukumab 50 mg / placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
MACE was defined as a composite of Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke, death, hospitalization for unstable angina, and hospitalization for Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). Adjudication of these events by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC) was performed in a blinded fashion.
Percentage of Participants With Malignancies
Time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of participants with one or more malignancy was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Infections
Time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of participants with one or more serious infections was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforations
Time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of participants with one or more GI perforations was reported. GI perforation is a hole that develops through the entire wall of the stomach, small intestine, large bowel, or gallbladder.
Percentage of Participants With Hepatobiliary Abnormalities
Time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of participants with hepatobiliary abnormalities was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Serious or Moderate/Severe Systemic Hypersensitivity Reactions, or Serum Sickness Adverse Events
Time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Percentage of participants with serious or moderate/severe systemic hypersensitivity reactions, or serum sickness adverse events (AEs) was reported.
16 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Neutrophils
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Platelets
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With ALT >= 3*ULN, ALT >= 5*ULN and ALT >= 8*ULN
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With AST >= 3*ULN, AST >= 5*ULN and AST >= 8*ULN
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Either ALT >= 3*ULN or AST >= 3*ULN, and Total Bilirubin >= 2*ULN
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal Total Cholesterol Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Normal Triglyceride Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Time frame: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response Through Week 260
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Boolean-Based American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Index Score 28 (CRP) Remission Through Week 260
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index Based (SDAI-based) American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Percentage of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response Through Week 260
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33526709Aletaha D, Bingham CO, Karpouzas GA, Takeuchi T, Thorne C, Bili A, Agarwal P, Hsu B, Rao R, Brown K, Tanaka Y. Long-term safety and efficacy of sirukumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who previously received sirukumab in randomised controlled trials (SIRROUND-LTE). RMD Open. 2021 Jan;7(1):e001465. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001465.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
197 sites in 29 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sirukumab 100 mg and Sirukumab 50 mg in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 197 sites in 29 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 197 sites in United States, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Germany and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01856309, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2019.