AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthroplasty, ReplacementNCT01857349

Efficacy of Surgical Preparation Solutions in Knee Surgery

A study testing Chlora Prep and Dura Prep in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, run by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to determine the superiority of surgical scrub preparations in total knee arthroplasty based on the bacterial counts present on the skin surface and in the deep joint tissues. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 89 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Arthroplasty, Replacement
What is being tested?
Chlora Prep and Dura Prep
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2013to 20 Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • >18 years old and less than 89
  • Undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Not undergoing surgical intervention for infection

Who cannot join

  • Injury due to trauma
  • Open wound at the incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Abrasion in the vicinity of the planned incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection at or near the surgical incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection somewhere else in the body determined by pre-op labs and history and physical
  • Prior history of surgical infection or bacteremia determined by pre-op history and physical
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History of rheumatoid arthritis determined by pre-op history and physical
  • History of autoimmune disorder determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Immunosuppressed patient determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Known allergy to iodine, isopropyl alcohol or Chlorhexidine

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Texas Tech University Health Science Center Orthopaedic Surgery

    Lubbock, Texas, 79430

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to determine the superiority of surgical scrub preparations in total knee arthroplasty based on the bacterial counts present on the skin surface and in the deep joint tissues. These counts will be obtained by culturing the skin prior to any scrub preparation, post preparation after the application of the sterile drapes, deep joint tissue sample prior to wound closure, and immediately post wound closure. This study will provide an assessment of the management of sterility by comparing quantitative and qualitative cultures immediately after surgical scrub preparation and the maintenance of sterility throughout the procedure. This study will enhance prior research efforts by contributing quantitative bacterial load and bacterial load within the surgical wound at closure.

Read the detailed description

Prospective randomized study of commonly used surgical prep solutions comparing superiority of Chloraprep to Duraprep

  • Primary Outcome Measure: Quantitative and qualitative bacterial load pre-surgical preparation, post-surgical preparation, and post-wound closure to be obtained by skin cultures and one deep joint tissue culture from the joint space prior to wound closure.
  • Secondary Outcome Measure: Rates of surgical site infection in ChloraPrep and DuraPrep groups to be outlined below.

Patient Population:

Subjects will be recruited from Dr. Brindley's and Dr. Jenkins clinic which are selected for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Inclusion criteria:

  • >18 years old and less than 89
  • Undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Not undergoing surgical intervention for infection

Exclusion criteria:

  • Injury due to trauma
  • Open wound at the incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Abrasion in the vicinity of the planned incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection at or near the surgical incision site determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Active infection somewhere else in the body determined by pre-op labs and history and physical
  • Prior history of surgical infection or bacteremia determined by pre-op history and physical
  • History of rheumatoid arthritis determined by pre-op history and physical
  • History of autoimmune disorder determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Immunosuppressed patient determined by pre-op history and physical
  • Known allergy to iodine, isopropyl alcohol or Chlorhexidine

Subject recruitment:

A total of 120 patients will be recruited to participate in the study upon consent for surgical intervention based on the calculation to see a statistical difference in culture results between duraprep and chloraprep. Please see the statistical analysis section for details on the justification of recruiting 120 patients. All patients undergoing total knee primary operation will be considered consecutively for the study. Patients will receive no undue influence or incentive to participate in this study.

Study Procedure:

Patients will be sent to the OR with a randomized folder pre-made by a computer program (Stata Version 12 College Station, TX) that will provide randomization after the patient is enrolled in the study containing a paper stating the surgical prep solution to be used. On the cover of the folder will be a sheet of paper with the following information to be filled out and returned to the research coordinator. See Attachment

  • Patient randomized identification number
  • Check box for Chloraprep or Duraprep - to be checked after opening sealed folder
  • Start time of prep
  • End time of prep
  • Instructions on how, where and when to take the 8 separate cultures and 1 tissue sample
  • Check boxes to ensure that cultures were finished and sent to the lab
  • Incision start time
  • Surgery end time

Chloraprep vs. Duraprep

  1. Pre Operative standard of Care:

Perioperative Antibiotics: All patients to receive Standard preoperative antibiotics per institution protocol and the same type of non-microbial drape will be used for all cases according to Dr. Brindley's standard protocol for surgery. Patients will receive 1 or 2g of cefazolin (based on weight) prior to surgery unless they have an allergy to penicillin, in which case they will receive 900mg of clindamycin.

  1. Skin Preparation
  2. Patients enrolled in the study will be randomized at the time of enrollment for surgery to be treated with one of two widely used Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, surgical skin preparation solutions: ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol; Enturia, El Paso, Texas) or DuraPrep (0.7% available iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol; 3MHealthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota). The agent used for each patient will be determined immediately prior to skin preparation by opening a sealed, randomly-assigned envelope that will state the prep to be used. Due to the unique shapes and colors of each scrub it is not feasible to cover the label of each prep used for randomization. The surgical site will be prepped in the usual sterile fashion using 2 sticks of either ChloraPrep or DuraPrep. Each operating room will contain enough for 4 sticks for unforeseen errors (dropping the prep solution during surgical site preparation or patients' body habitus, etc.).
  3. Randomization Folders will have a label including:
  4. Patient randomized ID ii. Check box for Duraprep or Chloraprep iii. Starting time of prep and end time of prep iv. Time of start of surgery (Each scrub solution has a set time to dry on it's label and this will document that each scrub was allowed to dry for the appropriate time before the start of surgery. Chloraprep 3 min::::Duraprep 3 min)
  5. Knee sites: 1. Midline anterior patella 2. Midline - popliteal area Please See Attachment - Flyer for instruction on culture sites
  6. First Culture from native skin (specimens from sites 1 and 2) - To be taken at time of consent at the History and Physical pre-surgery visit by those educated on the study which includes residents, research coordinator, or holding room/pre-op nurses/ staff prior to any sterile agents being used including alcohol wipes and chlorhexidine baths.
  7. Second culture(specimens from sites 1 and 2)- to be taken in the OR before the surgical prep solutions are applied, but after the pre-op surgical scrub is done.
  8. Third Culture (specimens from sites 1 and 2) - To be taken after application of Duraprep or Chloraprep after waiting appropriate timing (3 minutes) and before application of the sterile drapes Tissue Culture (one specimen) - To be taken as a tissue sample from within 1 cm of the lateral side of the patella/patellar implant. Will be excised using a scalpel. This tissue sample will be weighed and homogenized to provide quantitative and qualitative cultures.
  9. Fourth Culture (specimens from sites 1 and 2) - To be taken after the final closure of the wound and before removal of the sterile drapes. Culture must be taken within 1cm of the incision.

Total of 9 cultures per participant

Method to Obtain Cultures - Primary surgeon, resident surgeons and holding room nurses will be educated and utilized to obtain cultures. Each culture will be taken from a 17x17mm square area (The length of the culture brush) area on the skin at each site to provide a standardized area for quantitative cultures. A neutralizing solution will be used prior to taking the culture to stop the killing action of the chlorhexidine and duraprep in order to provide accurate results at the time of culture. The neutralizing solution formula is based from the study by Savage et al [10] and is outlined below. Cultures will be marked for identification based on site and time of culture, then placed in an envelope with the patient's randomized ID. The culture folder will then be delivered to Dr. Hamood's microbiology lab located on the TTUHSC campus.

Neutralizing solution quoted from Savage et al [10]

  • The swab was then placed in a sealed sterile transport container and was immediately brought to the microbiology laboratory at our institution. All cultures were monitored for seven days.
  • The ChloraPrep sampling (neutralizing) solution consisted of 0.04% monobasic potassium phosphate, 1.01% dibasic sodium phosphate, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.0% polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80), 0.3% lecithin, and 1.0% Tamol. The DuraPrep sampling (neutralizing) solution consisted of 0.04% monobasic potassium phosphate, 1.01% dibasic sodium phosphate, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.2% sodium thiosulfate. The pH of each solution was adjusted to 7.9 ± 0.1 prior to dispensing into water dilution bottles and steam sterilizing for twenty minutes at 121_C. An independent contract laboratory (Microbiotest, Sterling, Virginia) formulated and tested the neutralization solutions and found that they were both effective and nontoxic.
  1. Culture Analysis Dr. Colmer-Hamood and/or student to be trained by Dr. Colmer-Hamood will receive the samples, prepare the specimens for quantitative culture, and plate each specimen for quantitation of aerobic and anaerobic growth. Tissue samples will be ground in 1 ml of sterile broth to evenly distribute any microorganisms present and allow quantitative culture. Cultures will be monitored for 7 days post-inoculation, due to the average time required for detection of Propionibacterium acnes first growth being 5.1 days [1]. All colonies will be counted and each morphotype will be sub-cultured for identification. Standard Total bacterial load in colony forming units (CFU) will be calculated per mm2 of skin swabbed or gm of tissue. CFU for individual species will also be calculated. Results will be documented on our data collection form and reviewed.
  2. Data Reporting Data will reported from Dr. Colmer-Hamood's lab including quantitative and qualitative bacteria connected to the patient's randomized number. This data will be stored on a password protected workstation at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center campus in Lubbock, Texas.

Data will also be taken from the medical record based of on history and physical preoperative and postoperative evaluations. Patients will be monitored for 3 months post operatively for wound infections. These wound infections will be reported in the study, but the incidence between the two surgical prep solutions will not be calculated due to the number of patients required to meet statistical power. We will follow the CDC's definitions of surgical site infections (SSIs) in reporting data [12].

Being tested
Chlora Prep, Dura Prep
Keywords
Efficacy, surgical scrubs, Total Knee Arthroplasty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Chlora PrepOther

    Also called 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol

    Surgical Scrub skin preparation

  • Dura PrepOther

    Also called 0.7% available iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol

    Surgical Scrub skin preparation

Study groups in NCT01857349
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Chlora PrepActive comparatorFood and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, surgical skin preparation solution: ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol; Enturia, El Paso, Texas)
Receives: Other: Chlora Prep
Dura PrepActive comparatorFood and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, surgical skin preparation solution:DuraPrep (0.7% available iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol; 3MHealthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota).
Receives: Other: Dura Prep

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quantitative and qualitative bacterial load

    Quantitative and qualitative bacterial load will be obtained by skin cultures and one deep joint tissue culture from the joint space prior to wound closure in primary and revision total knee surgeries.

    Measured: At time of surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Rate of surgical site infections

    Rate of surgical site infections in chloraprep and duraprep groups.

    Measured: at time of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completion30 May 2018
  4. Study completion20 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01857349
Sponsor's protocol ID
L13-016
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
15 May 2013
Last updated
20 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Chlora Prep and Dura Prep in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, run by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quantitative and qualitative bacterial load (time frame: At time of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in