AzTrials
AzTrials

Medical Errors Related to Emergency Department Sign OutSAID-EDNCT01859286

Improving Signout Accuracy and Information Delivery in the Emergency Department

An observational study of Medical Errors Related to Emergency Department Sign Out, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators sought to determine if implementing a standardized sign out process would reduce the amount of medical errors related to patient sign out. The standardized process included the following interventions: implementation of a data resident to review patients lab values, vital signs, radiologist results… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
standardized sign out process
How many people
321 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2012to May 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: ED Physicians. We looked at the amount of errors due to signout that ED Physicians commit with standard signout procedure and then with a revised signed out process

Who may be able to join

  • ED transfers of care occurring at 0700 or 1900.

Who cannot join

  • Attending only handovers (1500, 2300)
  • Handovers including midlevel providers (Thursday 0700, 1300).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Improving Transfer of Care Accuracy and Information Delivery in the Emergency Department

The investigators sought to determine if implementing a standardized sign out process would reduce the amount of medical errors related to patient sign out. The standardized process included the following interventions: implementation of a data resident to review patients lab values, vital signs, radiologist results, and orders in real time, conducting sign out in a standardized location and using the attending physician as an "interruption manager." The investigators defined medical errors related to sign out as any piece of information was incorrectly reported or omitted during sign out that caused a change in treatment or disposition discussed during sign out. The investigators hypothesis was that implementing a standardized sign out process would lead to a decrease in the amount of sign out related errors.

Being tested
standardized sign out process

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • standardized sign out processOther

    The intervention phase included was the introduction of a standardized TOC (transfer of care) process, which occurred during April and May of 2012. TOC was done at a predefined location in each section of the emergency department (Medicine and Trauma). All participating residents were given a diagram detailing the central location and seating arrangement. The outgoing attending was designated to handle all distractions or disturbances that occurred during sign out. The most senior resident coming on to shift was designated the data resident. The data resident's role was to operate a centralized computer with the ED tracking board and EMR and review pending orders, vital signs and resulted labs and radiology reports after each patient was signed out. A brief pause was implemented to allow the oncoming team to ask any questions regarding that patient's care or course. The post TOC data form and protocol were identical to that of the control phase.

Study groups in NCT01859286
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
regular sign out processNot described
Receives: Other: standardized sign out process

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sign out related errors

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. perception of sign out

    Measured: 1 year after implementation of revised sign out process

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionMay 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
321 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01859286
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC-MS-11-0655
Acronym
SAID-ED
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
27 Apr 2013
Last updated
21 May 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Medical Errors Related to Emergency Department Sign Out, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sign out related errors (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in