AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT01863667

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Omarigliptin (MK-3102) Compared With Glimepiride in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for Whom Metformin is Inappropriate (MK-3102-027)

A Phase 3 study testing Omarigliptin and Glimepiride in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of omarigliptin (MK-3102) compared with the sulfonylurea, glimepiride, in type 2 diabetes mellitus participants who are metformin intolerant or who have a contraindication to the use of metformin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Omarigliptin and Glimepiride
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
65 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
8 Jul 2013to 3 Apr 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Have intolerability to metformin ≥1000 mg/day or have a contraindication to the use of metformin
  • Females of reproductive potential agree to remain abstinent or use or have their partner use 2 acceptable methods of birth control

Who cannot join

  • History of type 1 diabetes mellitus or a history of ketoacidosis or assessed by the investigator as possibly having type 1 diabetes
  • Has been treated with:
  • A thiazolidinedione (TZD) within 4 months of study participation, or
  • A glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor mimetic or agonist (such as exenatide or liraglutide) within 6 months of study participation, or
  • Insulin within 12 weeks prior to study participation, or
  • Dual antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) therapy within 12 weeks of study participation (4 months if a component of the dual AHA therapy was a TZD)
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Omarigliptin (MK-3102) at any time prior to study participation
  • On a weight loss program and is not in the maintenance phase; has started a weight loss medication in the past 6 months; or has undergone bariatric surgery within 12 months prior to study participation
  • Medical history of active liver disease (other than non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis), including chronic active hepatitis B or C, primary biliary cirrhosis, or symptomatic gallbladder disease
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • New or worsening coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery intervention, stroke or transient ischemic neurological disorder within the past 3 months
  • History of malignancy ≤5 years prior to study participation except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, or in situ cervical cancer
  • Clinically important hematological disorder (such as aplastic anemia, myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndromes, thrombocytopenia)
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding, or is expecting to conceive or donate eggs during the trial, including 21 days following the last dose of study drug

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-3102 Compared With Glimepiride in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus For Whom Metformin is Inappropriate Due to Intolerance or Contraindication

This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of omarigliptin (MK-3102) compared with the sulfonylurea, glimepiride, in type 2 diabetes mellitus participants who are metformin intolerant or who have a contraindication to the use of metformin. The primary hypothesis is that after 54 weeks, the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in participants treated with omarigliptin is non-inferior compared with that in participants treated with glimepiride.

Being tested
Omarigliptin, Glimepiride, Omarigliptin Placebo, Glimepiride Placebo
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OmarigliptinDrug

    Omarigliptin (MK-3102) 25 mg capsule administered orally once weekly

  • GlimepirideDrug

    Also called AMARYL®, GLIMY

    Glimepiride tablet 1 mg and/or 2 mg (uptitrated to a maximum dose 6 mg/day) administered orally once daily with breakfast or the first main meal

  • Omarigliptin PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo to omarigliptin capsule administered orally once weekly

  • Glimepiride PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo to glimepiride tablet administered orally once daily with breakfast or the first main meal

Study groups in NCT01863667
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OmarigliptinExperimentalParticipants receive an omarigliptin (MK-3102) 25 mg capsule once weekly and glimepiride placebo tablet(s) once daily, for 54 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Omarigliptin; Drug: Glimepiride Placebo
GlimepirideActive comparatorParticipants receive glimepiride 1 mg and/or 2 mg tablet(s) (maximum dose 6 mg/day) once daily and an omarigliptin placebo capsule once weekly, for 54 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Glimepiride; Drug: Omarigliptin Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 54

    A1C is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 54 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 54

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Adverse events may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions.

    Measured: Up to 57 weeks (including 3 weeks following the last dose of study drug)

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Adverse events may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions.

    Measured: Up to 54 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 54

    This change from baseline reflects the FPG level at Week 54 minus the FPG level at Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 54

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving an A1C Goal <7.0% or <6.5% After 54 Weeks of Treatment

    Percentage of participants achieving glycemic goal (A1C <7% or <6.5%) after 54 weeks of treatment.

    Measured: 54 weeks

  3. Percentage of Participants Meeting the Composite Endpoint of an A1C Decrease >0.5%, No Symptomatic Hypoglycemia, and No Body Weight Gain After 54 Weeks of Treatment

    Percentage of Participants who had an A1C decrease >0.5%, no symptomatic hypoglycemia, and no body weight gain after 54 weeks of treatment

    Measured: 54 weeks

  4. Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. AEs may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. Per protocol, an adverse event was defined as symptomatic hypoglycemia if hypoglycemia was an adverse event collected on the AE form AND the symptoms associated with it were collected on the hypoglycemia assessment (HA) form. Due to the early termination of the study, the HA form information was not assessed; therefore, this endpoint cannot be reported.

    Measured: Up to 54 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 54

    Body weight was to be measured (in duplicate) using a calibrated digital scale.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 54

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Jul 2013
  3. Primary completion3 Apr 2014
  4. Study completion3 Apr 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
65 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01863667
Sponsor's protocol ID
3102-027
Other IDs
2013-000301-23
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
23 May 2013
Last updated
10 Sep 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Omarigliptin and Glimepiride in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 54 (time frame: Baseline and Week 54). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in