Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT01863667
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Omarigliptin (MK-3102) Compared With Glimepiride in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for Whom Metformin is Inappropriate (MK-3102-027)
A Phase 3 study testing Omarigliptin and Glimepiride in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
Trial summary
This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of omarigliptin (MK-3102) compared with the sulfonylurea, glimepiride, in type 2 diabetes mellitus participants who are metformin intolerant or who have a contraindication to the use of metformin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Omarigliptin and Glimepiride
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 8 Jul 2013to 3 Apr 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Have intolerability to metformin ≥1000 mg/day or have a contraindication to the use of metformin
- Females of reproductive potential agree to remain abstinent or use or have their partner use 2 acceptable methods of birth control
Who cannot join
- History of type 1 diabetes mellitus or a history of ketoacidosis or assessed by the investigator as possibly having type 1 diabetes
- Has been treated with:
- A thiazolidinedione (TZD) within 4 months of study participation, or
- A glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor mimetic or agonist (such as exenatide or liraglutide) within 6 months of study participation, or
- Insulin within 12 weeks prior to study participation, or
- Dual antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) therapy within 12 weeks of study participation (4 months if a component of the dual AHA therapy was a TZD)
Show all 14Show fewer
- Omarigliptin (MK-3102) at any time prior to study participation
- On a weight loss program and is not in the maintenance phase; has started a weight loss medication in the past 6 months; or has undergone bariatric surgery within 12 months prior to study participation
- Medical history of active liver disease (other than non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis), including chronic active hepatitis B or C, primary biliary cirrhosis, or symptomatic gallbladder disease
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- New or worsening coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery intervention, stroke or transient ischemic neurological disorder within the past 3 months
- History of malignancy ≤5 years prior to study participation except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, or in situ cervical cancer
- Clinically important hematological disorder (such as aplastic anemia, myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndromes, thrombocytopenia)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding, or is expecting to conceive or donate eggs during the trial, including 21 days following the last dose of study drug
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-3102 Compared With Glimepiride in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus For Whom Metformin is Inappropriate Due to Intolerance or Contraindication
This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of omarigliptin (MK-3102) compared with the sulfonylurea, glimepiride, in type 2 diabetes mellitus participants who are metformin intolerant or who have a contraindication to the use of metformin. The primary hypothesis is that after 54 weeks, the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in participants treated with omarigliptin is non-inferior compared with that in participants treated with glimepiride.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Omarigliptin, Glimepiride, Omarigliptin Placebo, Glimepiride Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OmarigliptinDrug
Omarigliptin (MK-3102) 25 mg capsule administered orally once weekly
GlimepirideDrug
Also called AMARYL®, GLIMY
Glimepiride tablet 1 mg and/or 2 mg (uptitrated to a maximum dose 6 mg/day) administered orally once daily with breakfast or the first main meal
Omarigliptin PlaceboDrug
Matching placebo to omarigliptin capsule administered orally once weekly
Glimepiride PlaceboDrug
Matching placebo to glimepiride tablet administered orally once daily with breakfast or the first main meal
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Omarigliptin | Experimental | Participants receive an omarigliptin (MK-3102) 25 mg capsule once weekly and glimepiride placebo tablet(s) once daily, for 54 weeks. Receives: Drug: Omarigliptin; Drug: Glimepiride Placebo |
| Glimepiride | Active comparator | Participants receive glimepiride 1 mg and/or 2 mg tablet(s) (maximum dose 6 mg/day) once daily and an omarigliptin placebo capsule once weekly, for 54 weeks. Receives: Drug: Glimepiride; Drug: Omarigliptin Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 54
A1C is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 54 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.
Measured: Baseline and Week 54
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Adverse events may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions.
Measured: Up to 57 weeks (including 3 weeks following the last dose of study drug)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Adverse events may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions.
Measured: Up to 54 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 54
This change from baseline reflects the FPG level at Week 54 minus the FPG level at Week 0.
Measured: Baseline and Week 54
Percentage of Participants Achieving an A1C Goal <7.0% or <6.5% After 54 Weeks of Treatment
Percentage of participants achieving glycemic goal (A1C <7% or <6.5%) after 54 weeks of treatment.
Measured: 54 weeks
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Composite Endpoint of an A1C Decrease >0.5%, No Symptomatic Hypoglycemia, and No Body Weight Gain After 54 Weeks of Treatment
Percentage of Participants who had an A1C decrease >0.5%, no symptomatic hypoglycemia, and no body weight gain after 54 weeks of treatment
Measured: 54 weeks
Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. AEs may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. Per protocol, an adverse event was defined as symptomatic hypoglycemia if hypoglycemia was an adverse event collected on the AE form AND the symptoms associated with it were collected on the hypoglycemia assessment (HA) form. Due to the early termination of the study, the HA form information was not assessed; therefore, this endpoint cannot be reported.
Measured: Up to 54 weeks
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 54
Body weight was to be measured (in duplicate) using a calibrated digital scale.
Measured: Baseline and Week 54
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study start8 Jul 2013
- Primary completion3 Apr 2014
- Study completion3 Apr 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01863667
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3102-027
- Other IDs
- 2013-000301-23
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 23 May 2013
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-3102 Compared With Glimepiride in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus For Whom Metformin is Inappropriate Due to Intolerance or Contraindication
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01863667
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3102-027
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 8 Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Apr 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Jan 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of omarigliptin (MK-3102) compared with the sulfonylurea, glimepiride, in type 2 diabetes mellitus participants who are metformin intolerant or who have a contraindication to the use of metformin. The primary hypothesis is that after 54 weeks, the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in participants treated with omarigliptin is non-inferior compared with that in participants treated with glimepiride.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Omarigliptin | Experimental | Drug: Omarigliptin, Drug: Glimepiride PlaceboParticipants receive an omarigliptin (MK-3102) 25 mg capsule once weekly and glimepiride placebo tablet(s) once daily, for 54 weeks. |
| Glimepiride | Active comparator | Drug: Glimepiride, Drug: Omarigliptin PlaceboParticipants receive glimepiride 1 mg and/or 2 mg tablet(s) (maximum dose 6 mg/day) once daily and an omarigliptin placebo capsule once weekly, for 54 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Have intolerability to metformin ≥1000 mg/day or have a contraindication to the use of metformin
- Females of reproductive potential agree to remain abstinent or use or have their partner use 2 acceptable methods of birth control
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- History of type 1 diabetes mellitus or a history of ketoacidosis or assessed by the investigator as possibly having type 1 diabetes
- Has been treated with:
- On a weight loss program and is not in the maintenance phase; has started a weight loss medication in the past 6 months; or has undergone bariatric surgery within 12 months prior to study participation
- Medical history of active liver disease (other than non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis), including chronic active hepatitis B or C, primary biliary cirrhosis, or symptomatic gallbladder disease
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OmarigliptinOmarigliptin (MK-3102) 25 mg capsule administered orally once weekly | Drug | Omarigliptin |
| GlimepirideAlso: AMARYL®, GLIMYGlimepiride tablet 1 mg and/or 2 mg (uptitrated to a maximum dose 6 mg/day) administered orally once daily with breakfast or the first main meal | Drug | Glimepiride |
| Omarigliptin PlaceboMatching placebo to omarigliptin capsule administered orally once weekly | Drug | Glimepiride |
| Glimepiride PlaceboMatching placebo to glimepiride tablet administered orally once daily with breakfast or the first main meal | Drug | Omarigliptin |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 54
Time frame: Baseline and Week 54
A1C is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 54 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event
Time frame: Up to 57 weeks (including 3 weeks following the last dose of study drug)
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Adverse events may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
Time frame: Up to 54 weeks
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Adverse events may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions.
5 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 54
Time frame: Baseline and Week 54
Percentage of Participants Achieving an A1C Goal <7.0% or <6.5% After 54 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: 54 weeks
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Composite Endpoint of an A1C Decrease >0.5%, No Symptomatic Hypoglycemia, and No Body Weight Gain After 54 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: 54 weeks
Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Time frame: Up to 54 weeks
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 54
Time frame: Baseline and Week 54
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Omarigliptin and Glimepiride in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) at Week 54 (time frame: Baseline and Week 54). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2018.