AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Pulmonary LesionsNCT01863836

Study on the Influence of Fluoroscopy in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Lesions With Endobronchial Ultrasound Guidance

A study testing Fluoroscopy and Radial EBUS-guided biopsy in people with Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of fluoroscopy improves the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions' biopsy guided by radial endobronchial ultrasound (with the use of a guide sheath). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions
What is being tested?
Fluoroscopy and Radial EBUS-guided biopsy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
133 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Apr 2013to Apr 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Consecutive patients referred for the bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions at the Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec(not visible endobronchially)
  • Adults over the age of 18

Who cannot join

  • Therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Antiplatelet therapy other than aspirin
  • Known hemorrhagic diathesis
  • Acute respiratory failure
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of Fluoroscopy Use for Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Biopsy of Peripheral Lung Lesions

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of fluoroscopy improves the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions' biopsy guided by radial endobronchial ultrasound (with the use of a guide sheath).

Read the detailed description

See above

Being tested
Fluoroscopy, Radial EBUS-guided biopsy
Keywords
Radial endobronchial ultrasound, Peripheral lung lesion, Fluoroscopy, Lung cancer
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FluoroscopyProcedure or surgery

  • Radial EBUS-guided biopsyProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01863836
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FluoroscopyExperimentalPatients will undergo bronchoscopy and radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy of a peripheral lung lesion like patients in the other group. However, single-plane fluoroscopy will be used to help locate the lesion (with the help of a steerable curette) in case of failure to locate the lesion, and it will also be used to guide tissue sampling and ensure appropriate sampling tool function. Transbronchial biopsies, transbronchial needle aspiration, brushings, and bronchoalveolar lavage will be performed for each lesion.
Receives: Procedure: Fluoroscopy; Procedure: Radial EBUS-guided biopsy
No fluoroscopyActive comparatorPatients will undergo biopsy of peripheral lung lesions using radial endobronchial ultrasound guidance only, without the use of fluoroscopy. Transbronchial biopsies, transbronchial needle aspiration, brushings, and bronchoalveolar lavage will be performed for each lesion.
Receives: Procedure: Radial EBUS-guided biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic yield

    Diagnostic yield of radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy for peripheral lung lesions defined as the proportion of patients in whom a specific diagnosis is established by radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy. The analysis will be stratified by lesion size, location, the presence of the bronchus sign, type of echographic image obtained (central/peripheral), physician involved, resident involvement.

    Measured: Upon production of pathology results, usually within 2 weeks after the test

  2. Sensitivity and specificity

    Sensitivity and specificity are determined separately for malignancy and benign etiologies. Case records will be reviewed for patients with non-diagnostic specimen and results from other diagnostic procedures (TTNA, surgical biopsy) will be reviewed. For patients without further diagnostic tests, stability or progression of the lesion over time will be used for etiology attribution.

    Measured: Upon completion of ancillary or confirmatory tests, usually within 2 months after the test

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Lesion localization

    Proportion of patients in whom the peripheral pulmonary lesion was localized using the radial endobronchial ultrasound.

    Measured: Immediate (during the test)

  2. Procedure duration

    Total duration of the bronchoscopic test.

    Measured: During the test

  3. Complications

    occurrence of pneumothorax (and its management), bleeding more than 50ml, sustained desaturation below 90%, cardiac dysrhythmias, or any other adverse events occuring during or after the procedure.

    Measured: Immediately during the test and up to 4 hours after the test

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2015
  4. Study completionApr 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
133 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01863836
Sponsor's protocol ID
IUCPQ-20913
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
19 Apr 2013
Last updated
20 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fluoroscopy and Radial EBUS-guided biopsy in people with Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic yield (time frame: Upon production of pathology results, usually within 2 weeks after the test). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in