AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01866150

A Retrospective, Observational Chart Review of Biologics in Monotherapy Versus the Combination Biologic Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cross-sectional, non-interventional, retrospective chart review will compare the efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy and biologic and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to prior treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
How many people
476 participants
Where
15 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Apr 2013to Mar 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to at least 2 DMARD treatments, one of which includes methotrexate, who are being treated with first-line biologic therapy

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis by a rheumatologist
  • Patients who have responded inadequately to methotrexate or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and are being prescribed a biologic in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate and other classical DMARDs as per NICE guidelines

Who cannot join

  • Primary diagnosis of a condition other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Current treatment with a biologic in combination without methotrexate
  • Prior treatment with an experimental agent for rheumatoid arthritis

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 1 country.

15 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom15 sites
  • Study site

    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

  • Study site

    Chelmsford, CM1 7ET

  • Study site

    Cosham, PO6 3LY

  • Study site

    Derby, DE22 3NE

  • Study site

    Dudley, DY1 2HQ

  • Study site

    Edinburgh, EH4 2XU

  • Study site

    Harlow, CM20 1QX

  • Study site

    London, E11 1NR

  • Study site

    London, SE13 6LH

  • Study site

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

  • Study site

    Norwich, NR4 7UY

  • Study site

    Portadown, BT63 5QQ

  • Study site

    Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG

  • Study site

    Truro, TR1 3LJ

  • Study site

    Wigan, WN6 9EW

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Retrospective Chart Review on the Use of Biologics in Monotherapy for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Biologic Monotreatment and Biologic and Methotrexate (MTX) Combination Treatment

This cross-sectional, non-interventional, retrospective chart review will compare the efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy and biologic and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to prior treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs including methotrexate. Data will be collected from patients who have been on first-line biologic treatment for at least 6 months.

Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01866150
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CohortNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count (DAS-28) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at 6 Months (DAS28<2.6)

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 equals (=) (0.56 multiplied by [*] the square root [√] of TJC) plus (+) (0.28 * √ of SJC) + (0.70 * the natural logarithm [ln] ESR in millimeters per hour [mm/h]) + (0.014 * participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.

    Measured: Month 6

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28-ESR Remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at 3 Months and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 = (0.56 * √ of TJC) + (0.28 * √ of SJC) + (0.70 * ln ESR in mm/h) + (0.014 * participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

    Measured: Month 3 and the last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) (DAS28-ESR <3.2) at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6. LDA was defined as a DAS28 score <3.2.

    Measured: Months 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  3. Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Months 3, 6 and at The Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and either ESR or C Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  4. Percentage of Participants by Category of DAS28 Score and Timepoint

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and either ESR or CRP for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  5. Duration of Treatment

    Drug retention was defined as the total duration of time in months the participant was on treatment (combination therapy or monotherapy). The duration was the time in months between the start date of biologic therapy to the date of most recent visit.

    Measured: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  6. Average Methotrexate Dose of Participants on Biological Combination Treatment

    Measured: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  7. Change From Baseline in Total Number of Tender Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.

    The 28 joints to be assessed for tenderness were shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 1-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints 1-5, and knee on both sides of the body. The sum of tender joints ranged from 0 to 28 with 0 as best possible health status and 28 as worst health status.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  8. Change From Baseline in Total Number of Swollen Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment

    The 28 joints to be assessed for swelling were shoulder, elbow, wrist, MCP joints 1-5, PIP joints 1-5, and knee on both sides of the body. The sum of swollen joints, each, ranged from 0 to 28 with 0 as best possible health status and 28 as worst health status.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
476 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01866150
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML28642
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
21 May 2013
Last updated
5 Oct 2015

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Oct 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count (DAS-28) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at 6 Months (DAS28<2.6) (time frame: Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT01866150 | AzTrials