Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01866150
A Retrospective, Observational Chart Review of Biologics in Monotherapy Versus the Combination Biologic Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This cross-sectional, non-interventional, retrospective chart review will compare the efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy and biologic and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to prior treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- How many people
- 476 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to at least 2 DMARD treatments, one of which includes methotrexate, who are being treated with first-line biologic therapy
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis by a rheumatologist
- Patients who have responded inadequately to methotrexate or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and are being prescribed a biologic in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate and other classical DMARDs as per NICE guidelines
Who cannot join
- Primary diagnosis of a condition other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Current treatment with a biologic in combination without methotrexate
- Prior treatment with an experimental agent for rheumatoid arthritis
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom15 sites
Study site
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Study site
Chelmsford, CM1 7ET
Study site
Cosham, PO6 3LY
Study site
Derby, DE22 3NE
Study site
Dudley, DY1 2HQ
Study site
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
Study site
Harlow, CM20 1QX
Study site
London, E11 1NR
Study site
London, SE13 6LH
Study site
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Study site
Norwich, NR4 7UY
Study site
Portadown, BT63 5QQ
Study site
Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG
Study site
Truro, TR1 3LJ
Study site
Wigan, WN6 9EW
About this study
Official title: A Retrospective Chart Review on the Use of Biologics in Monotherapy for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Biologic Monotreatment and Biologic and Methotrexate (MTX) Combination Treatment
This cross-sectional, non-interventional, retrospective chart review will compare the efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy and biologic and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to prior treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs including methotrexate. Data will be collected from patients who have been on first-line biologic treatment for at least 6 months.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count (DAS-28) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at 6 Months (DAS28<2.6)
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 equals (=) (0.56 multiplied by [*] the square root [√] of TJC) plus (+) (0.28 * √ of SJC) + (0.70 * the natural logarithm [ln] ESR in millimeters per hour [mm/h]) + (0.014 * participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Month 6
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28-ESR Remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at 3 Months and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 = (0.56 * √ of TJC) + (0.28 * √ of SJC) + (0.70 * ln ESR in mm/h) + (0.014 * participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.
Measured: Month 3 and the last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) (DAS28-ESR <3.2) at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6. LDA was defined as a DAS28 score <3.2.
Measured: Months 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Months 3, 6 and at The Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and either ESR or C Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Percentage of Participants by Category of DAS28 Score and Timepoint
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and either ESR or CRP for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Duration of Treatment
Drug retention was defined as the total duration of time in months the participant was on treatment (combination therapy or monotherapy). The duration was the time in months between the start date of biologic therapy to the date of most recent visit.
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Average Methotrexate Dose of Participants on Biological Combination Treatment
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Change From Baseline in Total Number of Tender Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.
The 28 joints to be assessed for tenderness were shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 1-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints 1-5, and knee on both sides of the body. The sum of tender joints ranged from 0 to 28 with 0 as best possible health status and 28 as worst health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Change From Baseline in Total Number of Swollen Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment
The 28 joints to be assessed for swelling were shoulder, elbow, wrist, MCP joints 1-5, PIP joints 1-5, and knee on both sides of the body. The sum of swollen joints, each, ranged from 0 to 28 with 0 as best possible health status and 28 as worst health status.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 476 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01866150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML28642
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 21 May 2013
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Retrospective Chart Review on the Use of Biologics in Monotherapy for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Biologic Monotreatment and Biologic and Methotrexate (MTX) Combination Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01866150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML28642
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 476 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Oct 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This cross-sectional, non-interventional, retrospective chart review will compare the efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy and biologic and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to prior treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs including methotrexate. Data will be collected from patients who have been on first-line biologic treatment for at least 6 months.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to at least 2 DMARD treatments, one of which includes methotrexate, who are being treated with first-line biologic therapy
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis by a rheumatologist
- Patients who have responded inadequately to methotrexate or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and are being prescribed a biologic in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate and other classical DMARDs as per NICE guidelines
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Primary diagnosis of a condition other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Current treatment with a biologic in combination without methotrexate
- Prior treatment with an experimental agent for rheumatoid arthritis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count (DAS-28) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at 6 Months (DAS28<2.6)
Time frame: Month 6
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 equals (=) (0.56 multiplied by [*] the square root [√] of TJC) plus (+) (0.28 * √ of SJC) + (0.70 * the natural logarithm [ln] ESR in millimeters per hour [mm/h]) + (0.014 * participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28-ESR Remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at 3 Months and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment
Time frame: Month 3 and the last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) (DAS28-ESR <3.2) at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.
Time frame: Months 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Months 3, 6 and at The Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Percentage of Participants by Category of DAS28 Score and Timepoint
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Duration of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Average Methotrexate Dose of Participants on Biological Combination Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Change From Baseline in Total Number of Tender Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Change From Baseline in Total Number of Swollen Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Frequency and Complications of Major Orthopedic Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A PHASE II PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-MASKED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RHPRG4 (450 µG/ML RECOMBINANT HUMAN PROTEOGLYCAN 4) COMPARED TO VEHICLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SJÖGREN'S RELATED DRY EYE DISEASE
Sjögren's Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Diseases With Salivary Gland Involvement
Healthy Volunteer, Sjogren's Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-8690 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (MK-8690-004)
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Oct 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count (DAS-28) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at 6 Months (DAS28<2.6) (time frame: Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2015.