AzTrials
AzTrials

Intraventricular HemorrhagePREMODNCT01866982

The PREMOD Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Umbilical Cord Milking vs. Delayed Cord Clamping in Premature Infants

A study testing Umbilical Cord Milking and Delayed Cord Clamping in people with Intraventricular Hemorrhage, run by Sharp HealthCare at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Premature babies can be very sick and have bleeding in the brain. Giving babies more blood before cutting the umbilical cord by delayed cord clamping or umbilical cord milking has been shown to reduce the risk of bleeding in the brain. This may be related to improving perfusion to the brain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Intraventricular Hemorrhage
What is being tested?
Umbilical Cord Milking and Delayed Cord Clamping
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
197 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
2 Jul 2013to 10 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Singleton or multiples pregnancies in patients admitted for medically indicated delivery or in advanced spontaneous preterm labor with imminent delivery at 23 0/7 - 31 6/7 weeks gestation

Who cannot join

  • Planned vaginal breech delivery
  • Major fetal abnormalities (defined as those that are lethal or require prenatal or postnatal surgery)
  • Fetal death in utero
  • Red cell isoimmunization
  • Patients who are incapable of informed consent (unconscious, severely ill, mentally handicapped), or are unwilling to undergo randomization
  • Placenta accreta or abruption

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Loma Linda Medical Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92350

  • Sharp Mary Birch

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • University of California, San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92130

Other trials in United States

About this study

Premature babies can be very sick and have bleeding in the brain. Giving babies more blood before cutting the umbilical cord by delayed cord clamping or umbilical cord milking has been shown to reduce the risk of bleeding in the brain. This may be related to improving perfusion to the brain. However, some studies suggest that delayed cord clamping may not increase hemoglobin or blood volume in babies delivered by cesarean section. Milking the umbilical cord may give more blood in babies delivered by Cesarean Section may improve perfusion and reduce bleeding in the brain.

Being tested
Umbilical Cord Milking, Delayed Cord Clamping
Keywords
umbilical cord milking, delayed cord clamping

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Umbilical Cord MilkingProcedure or surgery

    Umbilical cord milked toward the neonate four times at a speed of 20cm/2seconds, prior to clamping and cutting umbilical cord. Procedure takes about 10-20 seconds.

  • Delayed Cord ClampingProcedure or surgery

    Performed by positioning the baby 20 cm below the placenta for 45-60 seconds prior to umbilical cord clamping and cutting.

Study groups in NCT01866982
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Umbilical Cord MilkingActive comparatorMilking the umbilical cord 4 times towards the infants at a speed of 20cm/2 seconds
Receives: Procedure: Umbilical Cord Milking
Delayed Cord ClampingActive comparatorDelayed clamping of the umbilical cord for 45-60 seconds
Receives: Procedure: Delayed Cord Clamping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Superior Vena Cava Flow

    Measured: <12 hours of life

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Delivery Room Interventions

    Measured: 10 minutes of life

  2. Hemoglobin

    Measured: <1 hour

  3. Hemoglobin

    Measured: 12 hours

  4. Hemoglobin

    Measured: 4 weeks of life

  5. Neurodevelopmental impairment 18-36 months

    Measured: 18-36 months

  6. Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or 4)

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

  7. Phototherapy

    Requirement and length of phototherapy

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

  8. Ionotropic support

    Requirement and length of ionotropic support

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

  9. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

  10. Necrotizing enterocolitis

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

  11. Number of blood transfusions while in the neonatal intensive care unit

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

  12. Ventilator time

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

  13. Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes

    Measured: at 5 minutes after birth

  14. Umbilical cord pH < 7.0

    Measured: up to 30 minutes after birth

  15. Blood pressure in first 2 hours of admission to neonatal intensive care unit

    Measured: 2 hours after birth

  16. Polycythemia

    Measured: up to 24 hours of life

  17. Neonatal death

    Measured: up to 24 weeks of life

  18. Use of uterotonic agents

    Measured: up to 1 hour after birth

  19. Peak transcutaneous and/or serum bilirubin concentrations

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birt

  20. Maternal hemoglobin

    Measured: within 48 hours after delivery

  21. Intraventricular Hemorrhage detected on Head Ultrasound

    Measured: up to 24 weeks after birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Jul 2013
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2014
  4. Study completion10 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
197 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01866982
Sponsor's protocol ID
PREMOD
Other IDs
R03HD072934-01
Acronym
PREMOD
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
29 May 2013
Last updated
24 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Katheria AC, Truong G, Cousins L, Oshiro B, Finer NN. Umbilical Cord Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):61-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0368.

    PubMed 26122803
  • Katheria A, Garey D, Truong G, Akshoomoff N, Steen J, Maldonado M, Poeltler D, Harbert MJ, Vaucher YE, Finer N. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Umbilical Cord Milking vs Delayed Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants: Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 22-26 Months of Corrected Age. J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.037. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

    PubMed 29246467

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Umbilical Cord Milking and Delayed Cord Clamping in people with Intraventricular Hemorrhage, run by Sharp HealthCare at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Superior Vena Cava Flow (time frame: <12 hours of life). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01866982, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in