AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3OPINIONNCT01873027

OPtical Frequency Domain Imaging vs. INtravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary InterventiON

A Phase 3 study testing OFDI and IVUS in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this randomized study is to evaluate the impact of Optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance for Percutaneous Coronay Intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) as compared with Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
OFDI and IVUS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
829 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
Jun 2013to Jul 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a de novo lesion (in the native coronary circulation) and planned to undergo drug-eluting stent implantation for indications according to the Japan and USA guidelines
  • Patients aged between 20 and 85 years old
  • Patients who has provided written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) within 3 months
  • Patients with cardiogenic shock
  • Patients with chronic heart failure
  • Patients with renal failure (eGFR <= 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or Serum creatinine level >=1.5mg/dL)
  • Patients who are currently enrolled in other clinical trial which has possibility to influence the primary endpoint of OPINION trial.
  • Patients planned use of bare metal stent
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Patients with 3-vessel diseases
  • Planned surgery within 1 year
  • Patient on dialysis
  • Target lesion such as:
  • Left main coronary artery
  • Aorto-Ostial lesion location within 3mm of the aorta junction
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • Small vessel (reference vessel diameter <2.5mm)
  • Coronary artery bypass graft

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Wakayama Medical University

    Wakayama, Wakayama, 641-8510

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: OPtical Frequency Domain Imaging vs. INtravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary InterventiON (OPINION)

The aim of this randomized study is to evaluate the impact of Optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance for Percutaneous Coronay Intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) as compared with Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance.

Read the detailed description

Optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) is a novel, high resolution intravascular imaging modality. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a widely used conventional imaging modality for achieving optimal stent deployment.

The aim of this randomized study is to evaluate the impact of OFDI guidance for Percutaneous Coronay Intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) as compared with IVUS guidance.

We will enroll 800 patients with a de novo lesion who will undergo PCI with DES as is routine practice. Patients will be rondomely assigned to either OFDI-guided PCI arm or IVUS-guided PCI arm.

Patients will then have a follow-up contact at the time of hospital discharge, 8 month and 12 month after PCI.

Being tested
OFDI, IVUS
Keywords
Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Optical Frequency Domain Imaging, Intravascular Ultrasound
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OFDIDevice

    Also called LUNAWAVE, Fastview, Biolimus a9-eluting stent (Nobori stent)

    • OFDI-guided PCI and assessment by OFDI at pre-PCI and post-PCI
    • Follow-up contact at the time of hospital discharge, 8 months and 12months after PCI
  • IVUSDevice

    Also called VISIWAVE, ViewIT, Biolimus A9-eluting stent (Nobori stent)

    • IVUS-guided PCI and assessment by IVUS at pre-PCI and post-PCI
    • Follow-up contact at the time of hospital discharge, 8 months and 12months after PCI
Study groups in NCT01873027
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OFDI-guided PCIExperimental* OFDI-guided PCI and assessment by OFDI at pre-PCI and post-PCI * Follow-up contact at the time of hospital discharge, 8 months and 12 months after PCI.
Receives: Device: OFDI
IVUS-guided PCIActive comparator* IVUS-guided PCI and assessment by IVUS at pre-PCI and post-PCI * Follow-up contact at the time of hospital discharge, 8 months and 12 months after PCI.
Receives: Device: IVUS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

    The composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR)

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Cardiac death

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  2. Myocardial Infarction (MI)

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  3. Clinically-driven Target lesion revascularization (TLR)

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  4. MACE (composite of cardiac death, MI, TLR)

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  5. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  6. Stroke

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  7. Stent thrombosis

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  8. Binary restenosis

    Measured: 12 months after PCI

  9. Renal dysfunction

    Measured: 8 months after PCI

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
829 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01873027
Sponsor's protocol ID
TRICVD1225
Other IDs
UMIN000010580
Acronym
OPINION
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
26 May 2013
Last updated
14 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, Shite J, Fusazaki T, Otake H, Kozuma K, Ioji T, Kaneda H, Serikawa T, Kataoka T, Okada H, Akasaka T; OPINION Investigators. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3139-3147. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx351.

    PubMed 29121226

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing OFDI and IVUS in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) (time frame: 12 months after PCI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01873027, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in