Duchenne Muscular DystrophyDMDNCT01874275
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Clinical Trial
A study testing VECTTOR in people with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, run by Alan Neuromedical Technologies, LLC at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this investigation is to assess the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied using VECTTOR to reduce the symptoms of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and reduce the impact of DMD upon the participants' quality of life. The primary outcome measures will include: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 20 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
- What is being tested?
- VECTTOR
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 20 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must have Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy diagnosis as confirmed by licensed physician, wheelchair bound, \& age 8 - 20 years old.
Who cannot join
- Active cancer in the area of application of the treatment, infection, skin infection, pregnancy, thrombophlebitis, pacemaker, amputation of any part of feet or hands, taking steroids. In addition, the participant may not be in any other clinical trial during the time they are in this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of VECTTOR Treatment for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
The primary objective of this investigation is to assess the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied using VECTTOR to reduce the symptoms of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and reduce the impact of DMD upon the participants' quality of life.
The primary outcome measures will include:
- increased muscle strength,
- increased range of joint motions and
- improved sleep parameters of ASI, N3 and REM.
Read the detailed description
Muscle Strength and Joint Range of Motion Testing - All muscle and joint testing was performed at the MedCenter Therapy clinic in Houston, Texas. JTech computerized testing system was utilized including Goniometry, Grip testing, Inclinometry, Muscle Testing and Joint Range of Motion testing occurred on Day 0, 30, 60, 90, 180, and repeated at 12 months to determine muscular strength and joint Range of Motion. JTech computerized testing system was chosen on the basis of reliability and accuracy. At each of the testing intervals, the testing was administered by the same technician with the same equipment to all of the participants. Inter-and intra-tester reliability of the JTech computerized testing system has been the subject of multiple studies. Each of which found high ICCs (>0.93) for both inter- and intra-tester reliability.
All sleep studies were performed at Sleep Diagnostics of Texas in The Woodlands, Texas. Prior to the clinical trial, all of the participants spent two nights in the sleep unit and their sleep study examinations were performed. The second night was used as the Day 0 data. Sleep, breathing, arousals and limb movements were scored manually according to guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The sleep studies were repeated at 6 months and 1 year.
- Conditions
- Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
- Being tested
- VECTTOR
- Medical subject headings
- Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VECTTORDevice
Also called electrical nerve stimulator
The VT-200, or VECTTOR system, delivers electrical stimulation via electrodes on the acupuncture points of a patient's feet/legs and hands/arms to provide symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain and/or management of post-surgical pain.
Once these electrodes are placed, the machine determines the appropriate choice of stimulation by automatically measuring body temperatures through the use of thermistors placed on the fingers during a testing sequence.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VECTTOR | Experimental | nerve stimulator treatment twice daily for duration of study - 365 days Receives: Device: VECTTOR |
| Device - sham | Placebo comparator | placebo treatment - no electrical stimulation treatment twice daily for duration of study, 180 days - if VECTTOR arm experiencing improvement, subjects in Device-Sham arm will be crossed over into the VECTTOR group and followed for an additional 180 days, for a total study involvement (duration) of 365 days> Receives: Device: VECTTOR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change in Range of Motion From Baseline to 180 Days
Range of Motion (ROM) testing (Wireless Tracker System) - All muscle and joint testing was performed using the JTech computerized testing system, including Goniometry, Grip Testing, Inclinometry, Muscle Testing and Joint Range of Motion. Testing occurred at Baseline (Day 0), 30, 60, 90 and 180 days to determine changes in joint Range of Motion. JTech computerized testing system determined the joint range of motion by radio signals from a goniometer measuring movement of the participants' joints. 44 separate tests were performed for Range of Motion for each participant at each time interval. The results from the range of motion tests were averaged the percent change from baseline to 180 days. Efficacy is defined as an increase in range of motion.
Measured: Baseline to 180 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percent Change in Muscle Strength
Muscle strength testing (Wireless Tracker system) - All muscle strength testing was performed using the JTech computerized testing system, including Goniometry, Grip Testing, Inclinometry, Muscle Testing and Joint Range of Motion. Testing occurred at Baseline (Day 0), 30, 60, 90, and 180 days to determine changes in muscle strength. JTech computerized testing system determined the muscle strength by radio signals from a strain gauge measuring strength of the participant's muscles. 44 separate tests were performed for muscle strength for each participant at each time interval. Efficacy is defined as an increase in the strength measurement (pounds) from Baseline to 180 days.
Measured: Baseline to 180 days
Percent Change in Percent Range of Motion From Baseline to 365 Days
Range of Motion (ROM) testing (Wireless Tracker System) - All muscle and joint testing was performed using the JTech computerized testing system, including Goniometry, Grip Testing, Inclinometry, Muscle Testing and Joint Range of Motion. Testing occurred at Baseline (Day 0), 30, 60, 90, 180 and 365 days to determine changes in joint Range of Motion. JTech computerized testing system determined the joint range of motion by radio signals from a goniometer measuring movement of the participants' joints. 44 separate tests were performed for Range of Motion for each participant at each time interval. The results from the range of motion tests were averaged the percent change from baseline to 365 days. Efficacy is defined as an increase in range of motion.
Measured: Baseline to 365 days
Percent Change in Muscle Strength
Muscle strength testing (Wireless Tracker system) - All muscle strength testing was performed using the JTech computerized testing system, including Goniometry, Grip Testing, Inclinometry, Muscle Testing and Joint Range of Motion. Testing occurred at Baseline (Day 0), 30, 60, 90, 180 and 365 days to determine changes in muscle strength. JTech computerized testing system determined the muscle strength by radio signals from a strain gauge measuring strength of the participant's muscles. 44 separate tests were performed for muscle strength for each participant at each time interval. Efficacy is defined as an increase in the strength measurement (pounds) from Baseline to 365 days.
Measured: Baseline to 365 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Duchenne Muscular DystrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alan Neuromedical Technologies, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charlotte Stelly-Seitz, MD, Principal investigator, Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Houston, Texas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01874275
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VECTTOR DMD2012
- Acronym
- DMD
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 4 May 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of VECTTOR Treatment for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01874275
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DMD / VECTTOR DMD2012
- Conditions
- Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alan Neuromedical Technologies, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Mar 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this investigation is to assess the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation applied using VECTTOR to reduce the symptoms of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and reduce the impact of DMD upon the participants' quality of life.
The primary outcome measures will include:
- increased muscle strength,
- increased range of joint motions and
- improved sleep parameters of ASI, N3 and REM.
Detailed description
Muscle Strength and Joint Range of Motion Testing - All muscle and joint testing was performed at the MedCenter Therapy clinic in Houston, Texas. JTech computerized testing system was utilized including Goniometry, Grip testing, Inclinometry, Muscle Testing and Joint Range of Motion testing occurred on Day 0, 30, 60, 90, 180, and repeated at 12 months to determine muscular strength and joint Range of Motion. JTech computerized testing system was chosen on the basis of reliability and accuracy. At each of the testing intervals, the testing was administered by the same technician with the same equipment to all of the participants. Inter-and intra-tester reliability of the JTech computerized testing system has been the subject of multiple studies. Each of which found high ICCs (>0.93) for both inter- and intra-tester reliability.
All sleep studies were performed at Sleep Diagnostics of Texas in The Woodlands, Texas. Prior to the clinical trial, all of the participants spent two nights in the sleep unit and their sleep study examinations were performed. The second night was used as the Day 0 data. Sleep, breathing, arousals and limb movements were scored manually according to guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The sleep studies were repeated at 6 months and 1 year.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VECTTOR | Experimental | Device: VECTTORnerve stimulator treatment twice daily for duration of study - 365 days |
| Device - sham | Placebo comparator | Device: VECTTORplacebo treatment - no electrical stimulation treatment twice daily for duration of study, 180 days - if VECTTOR arm experiencing improvement, subjects in Device-Sham arm will be crossed over into the VECTTOR group and followed for an additional 180 days, for a total study involvement (duration) of 365 days> |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 20 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants must have Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy diagnosis as confirmed by licensed physician, wheelchair bound, \& age 8 - 20 years old.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Active cancer in the area of application of the treatment, infection, skin infection, pregnancy, thrombophlebitis, pacemaker, amputation of any part of feet or hands, taking steroids. In addition, the participant may not be in any other clinical trial during the time they are in this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VECTTORAlso: electrical nerve stimulatorThe VT-200, or VECTTOR system, delivers electrical stimulation via electrodes on the acupuncture points of a patient's feet/legs and hands/arms to provide symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain and/or management of post-surgical pain. Once these electrodes are placed, the machine determines the appropriate choice of stimulation by automatically measuring body temperatures through the use of thermistors placed on the fingers during a testing sequence. | Device | Device - sham, VECTTOR |
Primary outcome
Percent Change in Range of Motion From Baseline to 180 Days
Time frame: Baseline to 180 days
Range of Motion (ROM) testing (Wireless Tracker System) - All muscle and joint testing was performed using the JTech computerized testing system, including Goniometry, Grip Testing, Inclinometry, Muscle Testing and Joint Range of Motion. Testing occurred at Baseline (Day 0), 30, 60, 90 and 180 days to determine changes in joint Range of Motion. JTech computerized testing system determined the joint range of motion by radio signals from a goniometer measuring movement of the participants' joints. 44 separate tests were performed for Range of Motion for each participant at each time interval. The results from the range of motion tests were averaged the percent change from baseline to 180 days. Efficacy is defined as an increase in range of motion.
3 secondary outcomes
Percent Change in Muscle Strength
Time frame: Baseline to 180 days
Percent Change in Percent Range of Motion From Baseline to 365 Days
Time frame: Baseline to 365 days
Percent Change in Muscle Strength
Time frame: Baseline to 365 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
RecruitingObservational study
Biomarker Development for Muscular Dystrophies
Myotonic Dystrophy, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Extracellular RNA Biomarkers of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Recruiting
Transcriptomic Analysis to Put an End to Misdiagnosis in Patients With Rare Muscle Diseases
Rare Genetic Muscle Diseases, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Investigate the Safety and Biodistribution of a Single Intrathecal (IT) Injection of INS1201 in Ambulatory Males With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
RecruitingObservational study
Does Chronic Pain Change Over Time in Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy?
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charlotte Stelly-Seitz, MD principal investigator
Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Houston, Texas
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VECTTOR in people with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, run by Alan Neuromedical Technologies, LLC at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change in Range of Motion From Baseline to 180 Days (time frame: Baseline to 180 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2015.