Community Acquired PneumoniaNCT01875731
Bacterial Pneumonia Score (BPS) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Pneumonia and Pneumococcal Vaccine
A study testing BPS and Guideline in people with Community Acquired Pneumonia, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and pneumoccocal vaccine will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 months to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Community Acquired Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- BPS and Guideline
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 months to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children aged 3-60 months assisted as outpatients for non severe community acquired pneumonia and pneumoccocal vaccine and complete immunisation with pneumoccocal vaccine.
Who cannot join
- Wheezing
- Severe pneumonia
- Pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease
- Antibiotic use in the previous two weeks
- Hospitalization for any reason in the previous two weeks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Argentina1 site
Hospital General de NIños Pedro de Elizalde
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., C1270AAN
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia on Reducing Antibiotic Use as Compared to Standard Care Practice (Current Guidelines for CAP) in the Era of Pneumococcal Vaccine
The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and pneumoccocal vaccine will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP).
Read the detailed description
Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children. Despite more than 50% of pneumonias are due to viruses, because it is difficult to rule out bacterial etiology, initial management of pneumonia in children usually includes antibiotics, often unnecessary. In 2006 was designed and validated a clinical prediction rule (BPS: Bacterial Pneumonia Score) which accurately identifies hospitalized children's risk of bacterial pneumonia. Recently, we assessed BPS efficacy on reducing antibiotic use by 50% in children with CAP, in an ambulatory setting. However, BPS was tested in children not vaccinated against S. pneumoniae.
Aim: The aim of this study is to test if BPS guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP)in children vaccinated against S. penumoniae.
Design: This is a randomized, controlled, blinded trial, to assess antibiotics use regarding two methods for initial management of children aged 3-60 months with non severe community acquired pneumonia and pneumoccocal vaccine. Children will be randomly allocate to be managed according to BPS or currently enforced guidelines. Use of antibiotics (%) and clinical outcome of both groups will be compared.
Setting: Tertiary children hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients: Consecutive children aged 3-60 months assisted for non severe community acquired pneumonia as outpatients. Patients with wheezing, severe pneumonia, pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease, or antibiotic use or hospitalization in the previous two weeks will be excluded.
Endpoints:
Primary: Use of antibiotics in each group (proportion) Secondary: Treatment failure (proportion) in each group Endpoints will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days by a blinded investigator.
Intervention: Patients with CAP will be randomized (1:1) to BPS versus enforced guidelines. In the BPS group antibiotics will be indicated in patients with a BPS ≥ 4 points, while in the control group antibiotics will be indicated according to current guidelines.
Variables and measurement: Antibiotic use will be defined as initial use of any antibiotic, immediately after diagnosis. Treatment failure will be defined as persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm. after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.
Study hypothesis: BPS antibiotic use guidance will reduce at least 20% antibiotic use, as compared to standard care practice.
Analyses: These will be done based on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol principle. With an assumed 20% less use of antibiotics in the intervention group, a maximum of 5% losses to follow-up, a confidence of 5% and power of 90%, the total sample size is 60. This will allow detecting a difference in clinical outcome of 28%. Proportion will be compared by Chi square test.
Interim monitoring: Regular review of serious adverse events, quality and integrity of the study by an independent data safety and monitoring board. Safety interim analysis after 50% of the patients recruited.
Significance: Due to the high prevalence of CAP in children, this study will offer the potential for a substantial reduction in health costs and antibiotics resistance.
- Conditions
- Community Acquired Pneumonia
- Being tested
- BPS, Guideline
- Keywords
- Pneumonia, Acute respiratory infection, Decision-support techniques
- Medical subject headings
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia, Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BPSBehavioural
In this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline.
GuidelineBehavioural
Strategy based on enforced guideline guided antibiotic use
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) | Experimental | Strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use Receives: Behavioral: BPS |
| Guideline | Active comparator | Strategy based on enforced guideline guided antibiotic use Receives: Behavioral: Guideline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Use of Antibiotics in Each Group
Number of participants with use of any antibiotic, at any time after diagnosis
Measured: At day 7 from baseline
Secondary outcomes (1)
Treatment Failure in Each Group
Number of participants with persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm. after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.
Measured: 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days from baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Community Acquired PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fernando A Torres, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01875731
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HGNPE 67-2012
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Moreno L, Krishnan JA, Duran P, Ferrero F. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Apr;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20364.
PubMed 16493666Ferrero F, Torres F, Noguerol E, Gonzalez N, Lonegro L, Chiolo MJ, Ossorio MF, Benguigui Y. [Evaluation of two standardized methods for chest radiographs interpretation in children with pneumonia]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2008 Dec;106(6):510-4. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752008000600007. Spanish.
PubMed 19107303
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) Guided Antibiotic Use in Children With Community Acquired Pneumonia on Reducing Antibiotic Use as Compared to Standard Care Practice (Current Guidelines for CAP) in the Era of Pneumococcal Vaccine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01875731
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HGNPE 67-2012
- Conditions
- Community Acquired Pneumonia
- Keywords
- Pneumonia, Acute respiratory infection, Decision-support techniques
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General de Niños Pedro de ElizaldeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 May 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to test if BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and pneumoccocal vaccine will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP).
Detailed description
Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality in children. Despite more than 50% of pneumonias are due to viruses, because it is difficult to rule out bacterial etiology, initial management of pneumonia in children usually includes antibiotics, often unnecessary. In 2006 was designed and validated a clinical prediction rule (BPS: Bacterial Pneumonia Score) which accurately identifies hospitalized children's risk of bacterial pneumonia. Recently, we assessed BPS efficacy on reducing antibiotic use by 50% in children with CAP, in an ambulatory setting. However, BPS was tested in children not vaccinated against S. pneumoniae.
Aim: The aim of this study is to test if BPS guided antibiotic use in children with non severe community acquired pneumonia will reduce antibiotic use as compared to standard care practice (current guidelines for CAP)in children vaccinated against S. penumoniae.
Design: This is a randomized, controlled, blinded trial, to assess antibiotics use regarding two methods for initial management of children aged 3-60 months with non severe community acquired pneumonia and pneumoccocal vaccine. Children will be randomly allocate to be managed according to BPS or currently enforced guidelines. Use of antibiotics (%) and clinical outcome of both groups will be compared.
Setting: Tertiary children hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Patients: Consecutive children aged 3-60 months assisted for non severe community acquired pneumonia as outpatients. Patients with wheezing, severe pneumonia, pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease, or antibiotic use or hospitalization in the previous two weeks will be excluded.
Endpoints:
Primary: Use of antibiotics in each group (proportion) Secondary: Treatment failure (proportion) in each group Endpoints will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days by a blinded investigator.
Intervention: Patients with CAP will be randomized (1:1) to BPS versus enforced guidelines. In the BPS group antibiotics will be indicated in patients with a BPS ≥ 4 points, while in the control group antibiotics will be indicated according to current guidelines.
Variables and measurement: Antibiotic use will be defined as initial use of any antibiotic, immediately after diagnosis. Treatment failure will be defined as persistence of fever after 2 days, or tachypnea or diminishing in respiratory rate less than 5 bpm. after 2 days, or signs of severe pneumonia or requiring or changing antibiotics at any time.
Study hypothesis: BPS antibiotic use guidance will reduce at least 20% antibiotic use, as compared to standard care practice.
Analyses: These will be done based on an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol principle. With an assumed 20% less use of antibiotics in the intervention group, a maximum of 5% losses to follow-up, a confidence of 5% and power of 90%, the total sample size is 60. This will allow detecting a difference in clinical outcome of 28%. Proportion will be compared by Chi square test.
Interim monitoring: Regular review of serious adverse events, quality and integrity of the study by an independent data safety and monitoring board. Safety interim analysis after 50% of the patients recruited.
Significance: Due to the high prevalence of CAP in children, this study will offer the potential for a substantial reduction in health costs and antibiotics resistance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) | Experimental | Behavioral: BPSStrategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use |
| Guideline | Active comparator | Behavioral: GuidelineStrategy based on enforced guideline guided antibiotic use |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 months to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children aged 3-60 months assisted as outpatients for non severe community acquired pneumonia and pneumoccocal vaccine and complete immunisation with pneumoccocal vaccine.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Wheezing
- Severe pneumonia
- Pulmonary or cardiovascular chronic disease
- Antibiotic use in the previous two weeks
- Hospitalization for any reason in the previous two weeks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BPSIn this study a strategy based on BPS guided antibiotic use in children with community acquired pneumonia implementation will be compared with enforced guideline. | Behavioural | BPS (Bacterial Pneumonia Score) |
| GuidelineStrategy based on enforced guideline guided antibiotic use | Behavioural | Guideline |
Primary outcome
Use of Antibiotics in Each Group
Time frame: At day 7 from baseline
Number of participants with use of any antibiotic, at any time after diagnosis
1 secondary outcome
Treatment Failure in Each Group
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 days from baseline
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16493666Moreno L, Krishnan JA, Duran P, Ferrero F. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Apr;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20364.
- Background: PubMed 19107303Ferrero F, Torres F, Noguerol E, Gonzalez N, Lonegro L, Chiolo MJ, Ossorio MF, Benguigui Y. [Evaluation of two standardized methods for chest radiographs interpretation in children with pneumonia]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2008 Dec;106(6):510-4. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752008000600007. Spanish.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Disease Progression in Survivors of Community Acquired Pneumonia and Lung Infection by Covid-19.
Pneumonia, Community-Acquired, COVID-19 Pneumonia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Ceftriaxone Dosage for Non-Critical Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Inhaled Lexofloxacin vs Usual Care for Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Community-acquired Pneumonia, CAP
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fernando A Torres, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BPS and Guideline in people with Community Acquired Pneumonia, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 May 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Use of Antibiotics in Each Group (time frame: At day 7 from baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01875731, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2017.