AzTrials
AzTrials

Crohn's DiseaseCERTNCT01876264

Crohn's Extent of Resection Trial

A study testing Extended resection and Conventional resection in people with Crohn's Disease and Recurrence, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The trial will investigate if removing an additional length of small bowel will result in lower risk of recurrence at the surgical join (anastomosis), thereby decreasing the need for further surgery in the future. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Crohn's Disease, Recurrence
What is being tested?
Extended resection and Conventional resection
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jun 2013to Jun 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Male or Female, aged 16 years or above.
  • Patients with ileocolic Crohn's disease requiring surgical resection

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • Patients requiring formation of a stoma at the time of surgical resection
  • Patients having less than 200cm of small bowel as assessed intra-operatively
  • Simultaneous strictureplasty or small bowel resection
  • Age <16 or >80

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

    Oxford, OX3 7LJ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Crohn's Extent of Resection Trial (CERT): A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Anastomotic Disease Recurrence Following 2cm Versus 10cm Resection Margins for Patients With Ileocolic Crohn's Disease

The trial will investigate if removing an additional length of small bowel will result in lower risk of recurrence at the surgical join (anastomosis), thereby decreasing the need for further surgery in the future.

Read the detailed description

The study will be conducted as a randomised controlled trial. The patient will be blinded to the procedure undertaken, as will the endoscopist performing the 6 month post operative colonoscopy. It is not possible to blind the operating team, for obvious reasons.

Patients undergoing elective or urgent ileocolic resection, both primary and redo resections, will be invited to participate in the trial. Randomisation will take place in the operating theatre after a conventional ileocolic resection has been performed. Those patients randomised to the modest resection (10cm margin) will have an additional 8cm of distal small bowel resected prior to the formation of the surgical anastomosis.

All patients will be seen in the colorectal clinic at approximately 6 weeks post operatively for their routine follow up appointment, as is current practice. A colonoscopy will be performed at 6 months post operatively to assess the anastomosis, in keeping with our current practice. Any additional follow up will be at the discretion of the colorectal or gastroenterological teams, in keeping with their clinical practice.

Patients recruited to the trial will not have any additional ongoing following up directly related to their trial participation. At 5 years following the recruitment of the a patient, the medical notes will be reviewed to identify those patients who have had symptomatic recurrence, further surgery and to assess the duration of medication-free interval following surgery.

Performing a colonoscopy at 6 months post operatively to assess the appearances of the surgical anastomosis will assess the primary endpoint. This will be performed by a senior gastroenterological trainee or consultant gastroenterologist who is familiar with assessment of post operative Crohn's disease and the Rutgeert's score. The appearances of the anastomosis will be scored, and biopsies taken from around the anastomosis to assess for microscopic changes. The use of the Rutgeert's score is widely accepted by the gastroenterological community as the standard assessment tool for post operative anastomotic disease recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease.

The duration of medication-free interval following resection will be assessed from review of the medical notes. This is clinically relevant to patients, as it has been previously shown that quality of life is improved in patients who do not have to take regular medication.

The duration of symptom-free interval will be assessed from review of the medical notes. This is clinically relevant to patients, as abdominal symptoms such as pain and bloating have a significantly deleterious effect on quality of life.

The duration of time to reoperation for Crohn's disease recurrence at the surgical anastomosis will be assessed from the clinical notes. This is of relevance to the patient population as well as the medical community. Crohn's disease commonly recurs, necessitating further surgery. Multiple operations resulting in resection of the bowel results in a reduction in the length of bowel available for absorption of nutrients from food. Ultimately, patients may develop short bowel syndrome. This requires total parenteral nutrition, with the associated risks this carries, and may require small bowel transplantation.

Being tested
Extended resection, Conventional resection
Keywords
Colorectal surgery, Colonoscopy, Randomized controlled trial
Medical subject headings
Crohn Disease, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Extended resectionProcedure or surgery

  • Conventional resectionProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01876264
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Extended resectionExperimentalPatients undergoing an extended resection are subjected to a traditional ileocolic resection with a 2cm macroscopically normal proximal margin. A further 8cm of ileum is then resected from the proximal margin prior to formation of the ileocolic anastomosis
Receives: Procedure: Extended resection
Conventional resectionActive comparatorPatients undergoing a traditional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with a 2cm proximal macroscopically disease-free margin
Receives: Procedure: Conventional resection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Endoscopic recurrence

    The primary objective of the study is to assess whether undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margins) leads to a reduction in the incidence of Crohn's disease recurrence at the surgical anastomosis as assessed by colonoscopy 6 months post operatively, when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin).

    Measured: 6 months post operatively

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Medication-free interval

    To assess the impact of undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margin) on the duration of medication-free interval following surgery, with respect to disease-modifying drugs (e.g. azathioprine), when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin)

    Measured: 5 years post operatively

  2. Symptom-free interval

    To assess the impact of undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margin) on the duration of the symptom-free interval following surgery, when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin)

    Measured: 5 years post operatively

  3. Time to reoperation

    To assess the impact of undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margin) on the interval to reoperation (if clinically needed) for anastomotic recurrence when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin)

    Measured: 5 years post operatively

  4. Extent of plexitis

    To assess the extent of plexitis through the length of macroscopically normal small bowel that is resected

    Measured: 1 month postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2013 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Study abandoned

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01876264
Sponsor's protocol ID
CERT2013
Acronym
CERT
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
10 Jun 2013
Last updated
7 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Extended resection and Conventional resection in people with Crohn's Disease and Recurrence, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Endoscopic recurrence (time frame: 6 months post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in