AzTrials
AzTrials

ObesityNCT01876602

Test of an Intervention to Increase Physical Activity Among School Children

A study testing feeling states exercise intervention in people with Obesity, run by University of California, Irvine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The specific aims of this study are to: 1) evaluate the impact of a novel intervention delivered via school-based physical education (PE) on adolescents who have a high sensitivity to exercise-induced negative affect; 2) determine whether adolescents' tendency to feel uncomfortable during exercise is a stable trait… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Obesity
What is being tested?
feeling states exercise intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2011to Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy
  • not a member of a sports team
  • right handed

Who cannot join

  • no past head trauma
  • not depressed

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California at Irvine

    Irvine, California, 92697

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Feeling States and Heart Rates; A Translational Study

The specific aims of this study are to: 1) evaluate the impact of a novel intervention delivered via school-based physical education (PE) on adolescents who have a high sensitivity to exercise-induced negative affect; 2) determine whether adolescents' tendency to feel uncomfortable during exercise is a stable trait that persists even in the face of an intervention; and 3) compare and contrast three alternative methods of measuring adolescents' sensitivity to exercise-induced affect.

Healthy middle-school students who do not participate in team or individual competitive sports will be recruited and assessed to determine their existing predisposition toward exercise (i.e., "reluctant exercisers" and "latent exercisers"). The assessment will be conducted using three methods that have been used to measure individuals' propensity to experience positive affect in the face of a stimulus: 1) a pencil-and-paper assessment that measures tendency to respond to a challenge with positive affect; 2) electroencephalogram (EEG) to ascertain frontal cortical asymmetry; and 3) empirically assessed affective response to a standardized exercise task. Reluctant and latent exercisers will be assigned in equal numbers to one of two conditions. One condition will implement a PE-based intervention that differs from the traditional approach in that students will be instructed to exercise at an intensity that has been determined to elicit positive affect in that individual (based on baseline testing). In the other condition, students will be instructed to exercise at an intensity derived from standard formulas typically used in exercise prescriptions. It is hypothesized that the non-traditional approach will increase reluctant exercisers' enjoyment of PE and also their level of participation in physical activity outside of PE. The latter will be determined using portable monitors (accelerometers) worn at baseline, after the intervention, and again 1 year after the end of the intervention.

Read the detailed description

This project addresses the current epidemic in obesity and physical inactivity among adolescents in the United States. The goal of the research is to develop effective ways of encouraging adolescents to become and remain physically active. In particular, this project is concerned with identifying adolescents who are reluctant to exercise because they have a high sensitivity to unpleasant feelings while exercising at higher intensities. Once identified, these adolescents can be targeted with an intervention that is designed to teach them to exercise at an intensity level that will generate pleasant feelings and therefore make it more likely that they will seek out opportunities to be physically active. The specific aims of this study are to: 1) evaluate the impact of a novel intervention delivered via school-based physical education (PE) on adolescents who have a high sensitivity to exercise-induced negative affect; 2) determine whether adolescents' tendency to feel uncomfortable during exercise is a stable trait that persists even in the face of an intervention; and 3) compare and contrast three alternative methods of measuring adolescents' sensitivity to exercise-induced affect.

Healthy middle-school students who do not participate in team or individual competitive sports will be recruited and assessed to determine their existing predisposition toward exercise (i.e., "reluctant exercisers" and "latent exercisers"). The assessment will be conducted using three methods that have been used to measure individuals' propensity to experience positive affect in the face of a stimulus: 1) a pencil-and-paper assessment that measures tendency to respond to a challenge with positive affect; 2) electroencephalogram (EEG) to ascertain frontal cortical asymmetry; and 3) empirically assessed affective response to a standardized exercise task. Reluctant and latent exercisers will be assigned in equal numbers to one of two conditions. One condition will implement a PE-based intervention that differs from the traditional approach in that students will be instructed to exercise at an intensity that has been determined to elicit positive affect in that individual (based on baseline testing). In the other condition, students will be instructed to exercise at an intensity derived from standard formulas typically used in exercise prescriptions. It is hypothesized that the non-traditional approach will increase reluctant exercisers' enjoyment of PE and also their level of participation in physical activity outside of PE. The latter will be determined using portable monitors (accelerometers) worn at baseline, after the intervention, and again 1 year after the end of the intervention.

This study is relevant to the prevention of type 2 diabetes in that it addresses the mechanisms of physical activity behavior change among adolescents. This developmental period is typically characterized by declining participation in physical activity, and thus represents a critical period for intervention. The results will increase understanding about why some adolescents remain active while others do not and will test a novel intervention that may be more effective among reluctant exercisers.

Conditions
Obesity
Being tested
feeling states exercise intervention
Keywords
adolescents, exercise, fitness, school-based
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • feeling states exercise interventionBehavioural

    exercise prescription based on intensity of exercise that feels good.

Study groups in NCT01876602
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exercise prescriptionExperimentalParticipants are given an exercise prescription in the form of a target heart rate range for exercising. The range is determined based on their personal preferences so that it is an intensity that feels "good".
Receives: Behavioral: feeling states exercise intervention
traditional exerciseActive comparatorparticipants are given an exercise prescription based on percent of vo2 peak
Receives: Behavioral: feeling states exercise intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Physical Activity

    Participation in physical activity is assessing objectively (using activity monitors), by self-report, and indirectly via cardiorespiratory fitness.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. affective response to exercise

    Affective response to exercise is assessed by measuring how participants feel during a standardized exercise task and by self-report of enjoyment of activity.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionMar 2017
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
140 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01876602
Sponsor's protocol ID
DK088800
Other IDs
R01DK088800
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
10 Jun 2013
Last updated
15 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Schneider M, Schmalbach P, Godkin S. Impact of a personalized versus moderate-intensity exercise prescription: a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;40(2):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9776-0. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

    PubMed 27481104
  • Schneider M. Intrinsic Motivation Mediates the Association Between Exercise-Associated Affect and Physical Activity Among Adolescents. Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 30;9:1151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01151. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30104987
  • Schneider M, Schmalbach P. Affective Response to Exercise and Preferred Exercise Intensity Among Adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2015 Apr;12(4):546-52. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0442. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

    PubMed 24770461

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing feeling states exercise intervention in people with Obesity, run by University of California, Irvine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Physical Activity (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01876602, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in