AzTrials
AzTrials

Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationABLATENCT01877486

PVI Using Cryoablation Alone in Paroxysmal AF Patients Converted From Persistent AF With Dofetilide

An observational study of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the efficacy of cryoablation alone in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who have been pretreated with dofetilide and converted from persistent atrial fibrillation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2016to Dec 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients referred for catheter ablation of AF

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 to 80 years
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent
  • Paroxysmal AF, defined as recurrent AF ( ≥ 2 episodes in 1 month) that terminates within 7 days as assessed by ECG recordings
  • Prior persistent AF, defined as sustained beyond seven days and up to one year, successfully converted to paroxysmal AF by dofetilide

Who cannot join

  • Previous ablation for AF
  • Left atrial size larger than 60mm (parasternal view on transthoracic echocardiogram)
  • Patients who have AF episodes triggered by another uniform arrhythmia (e.g. atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia)
  • Presence of severe valvular disease with the need for surgical correction
  • AF deemed secondary to a transient or correctable abnormality including electrolyte imbalance, trauma, recent surgery, infection, toxic ingestion, and endocrinopathy
  • Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential and not on reliable methods of birth control
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Second or third degree AV block, sinus pause > 3 seconds, resting heart rate< 30 bpm without permanent pacemaker
  • History of drug-induced Torsades de Pointes or congenital long QT syndrome
  • Uninterrupted AF for more than 12 months prior to randomization unless sinus rhythm maintained for ≥ 24 hours after cardioversion.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Valley Hospital

    Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Cryoablation Alone in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients Converted From Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Dofetilide

To determine the efficacy of cryoablation alone in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who have been pretreated with dofetilide and converted from persistent atrial fibrillation.

Read the detailed description

Pulmonary vein isolation is now considered a cornerstone of all atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. In patients with paroxysmal AF, pulmonary vein isolation alone is usually sufficient. The cryoballoon is now FDA approved to achieve PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Although no ablation system is yet approved in patients with persistent AF, these patients are increasingly undergoing ablation. Many investigators feel that these patients have more atrial disease and thus PVI alone is insufficient in these patients. As a result, it is common for these patients to undergo additional ablation, which is often quite extensive and exposes patients to proarrhythmia. Commonly utilized strategies include linear lesions (left atrial roof; mitral isthmus line), ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs), left atrial appendage isolation and/or even right atrial ablation. For years, the investigators have been concerned about the adverse effects of this additional ablation. The investigators postulated that the "answer" is not more ablation but trying to "reverse remodel" patients with persistent AF back to a paroxysmal form, whereby PVI alone would again be justified and sufficient. The efficacy of such a strategy has previously been demonstrated.

In brief, the investigators start patients with persistent AF on dofetilide 3 months prior to scheduled ablation. In 96% of patients, AF either suppresses completely or is transformed into a paroxysmal pattern. The net effect is "reverse remodeling" of the left atria. The investigators have confirmed this by using a reduction in P wave duration as a surrogate of remodeling. At the ablation procedure, the investigators perform PVI alone.

Being tested
Ablation
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, cryoballoon ablation, persistent AF, paroxysmal AF, dofetilide
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AblationProcedure or surgery

    Pulmonary vein isolation following dofetilide

Study groups in NCT01877486
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cryoballoon ablationAfter pre-treatment with dofetilide and conversion of persistent AF to sinus rhythm, performance of PVI using cryoballoon
Receives: Procedure: Ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Freedom from atrial fibrillation/flutter

    As assessed by one week Holters and symptoms

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionJun 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)

Why it stopped: funding not available

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01877486
Sponsor's protocol ID
UR Cryo PVI
Acronym
ABLATE
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
26 May 2013
Last updated
4 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Freedom from atrial fibrillation/flutter (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in