AzTrials
AzTrials

ExerciseNCT01878162

Work Injury Prevention in Law Enforcement Officials

A study testing Exercise in people with Exercise, run by University of the Pacific at 5 sites in United States.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Law enforcement officials (LEOs) demonstrate an elevated risk for occupational injury. The effectiveness of exercise-based work injury prevention programs (WIPPs) to reduce the risk and costs associated with occupational injury has yet to be tested rigorously in LEOs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Exercise
What is being tested?
Exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
108 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2012to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 60 years
  • Working full duty as a law enforcement official

Who cannot join

  • Current history of pathology or symptoms that preclude exercise
  • Medical or rehabilitative treatment for a work-related injury within the past year prior to enrollment in this study

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Butte Premier Physical Therapy

    Chico, California, 95928

  • Physical Edge

    Davis, California, 95618

  • PUMP Institute

    Lodi, California, 95240

  • Lodi Physical Therapy

    Lodi, California, 95242

  • University of the Pacific

    Stockton, California, 95211

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of an Exercise-based Work Injury Prevention Program in Law Enforcement Officials

Law enforcement officials (LEOs) demonstrate an elevated risk for occupational injury. The effectiveness of exercise-based work injury prevention programs (WIPPs) to reduce the risk and costs associated with occupational injury has yet to be tested rigorously in LEOs. The accuracy of existing field tests of physical functioning to predict occupational injuries and related expenses remains unclear. The objectives of this study are to: (i) determine the effect of an exercise-based WIPP on occupational wellness and productivity in a cohort of LEOs, and (ii) to determine the accuracy of 2 common field assessments of physical function to predict lost work productivity and related expenses in a cohort of LEOs.

Conditions
Exercise
Being tested
Exercise
Keywords
Prevention, Wellness, Occupation, Work, Law Enforcement, Exercise
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ExerciseOther

Study groups in NCT01878162
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExerciseExperimentalExercise will occur 3 times weekly for 6 months in 20-minute exercise sessions. Sessions will take place independently. Follow-up and progression of the home program will be completed in person or by video teleconferencing at regular intervals throughout the intervention phase.
Receives: Other: Exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Work Injury Claims During the Study Period

    Measured: One time, at one year following enrollment into the study

  2. Medical Expenditures Related to Work Injury Claims During the Study Period

    Measured: One time, at one year following enrollment into the study

  3. Number of Missed Work Days Due to Illness or Injury

    Measured: One time, at one year following enrollment into the study

  4. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - General Health Subscale

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire was developed to measure the personal and economic effects of lost workplace productivity in the context of clinical trials. In this study, the WPAI-General Health (GH) version will be used in order to assess lost productivity and wellness during the study period. The WPAI-GH is a 6-item scale that solicits the number of hours missed from work and level of functional impairment perceived at work during the previous week. Four scores are calculated from the WPAI-GH, including percentage of work time missed due to health, percentage impairment while working due to health, percentage activity impairment due to health, an overall percentage work impairment. Time series data will be collected to observe trends over time that may relate to independent variables in this study, as well as to examine for previously unknown and uncontrolled variation (ie, seasonal variability).

    Measured: Weekly, up to one year following enrollment into the study

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Functional Movement Screen

    The purpose of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is to provide the clinician with a rapid triage for potentially problematic regions that can contribute to symptoms, disablement, or injury. As a triage tool, FMS is used to determine regions that require additional clinical investigation. The FMS is a battery of 7 tests that are intended as an integrated assessment for limitations in range of motion, weakness, and incoordination. FMS tests consider spine, upper extremity, and lower extremity movements in the context of their respective regional kinetic chain. Component tests of the FMS involve rating of performance by a standardized examiner on a 3-point scale, and specific criteria exist for each rating. A composite score for the FMS may be calculated by summing the item scores.

    Measured: One time, at 3 months following enrollment into the study

  2. Star Balance Excursion Test

    The Star Excursion Balance Test is a clinical test of dynamic balance. Subjects will assume unilateral stance in the center of a grid marked circumferentially in 45-degree increments. After a learning trial consisting of 6 repetitions in each of the 8 test directions, subjects will complete 3 repetitions of single limb squat reach. The evaluating therapist will record the distance achieved between the stance toe and heel of the reaching extremity in each of 3 repetitions in each direction.

    Measured: One time, at 3 months following enrollment into the study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
108 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01878162
Sponsor's protocol ID
UPacific_Davenport1
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
3 Aug 2012
Last updated
2 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercise in people with Exercise, run by University of the Pacific at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Work Injury Claims During the Study Period (time frame: One time, at one year following enrollment into the study). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in