Delayed Graft FunctionPhase 2/3EveredNCT01878786
A Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus With Other Medicines in Recipients of ECD/DCD Kidneys
A Phase 2/3 study testing Everolimus, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA) in people with Delayed Graft Function, run by Matthew Cooper at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Delayed Graft Function
- What is being tested?
- Everolimus, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female recipients 18-65 years of age undergoing primary or secondary kidney transplantation
- Recipients of primary or secondary cadaveric, ECD/DCD kidney (defined as follows)
- Donor whose heart has irreversibly stopped beating, previously referred to as non-heart-beating or asystolic donation
- Brain-dead donor > 60 years old
- Donor aged 50-59 years old with two of the following criteria:
- History of hypertension
Show all 9Show fewer
- Terminal serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL
- Death resulting from cerebrovascular accident
- Patients who have given written informed consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Cold ischemic time (CIT) > 30 hours
- Patients who are ABO incompatible transplants, or T, or B cell crossmatch positive transplant
- Patients with a known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical class
- Non-controlled DCD
- Donor age >70
- Patients with BMI >32 at baseline before surgery
Show all 25Show fewer
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Females of childbearing potential unwilling to use an effective means of contraception or are planning to become pregnant
- Patients with platelet count <100,000/mm3 at the evaluation before randomization.
- Patients with an absolute neutrophil count of < 1,500/mm³ at baseline before surgery or white blood cell count of < 4,500/mm³
- Patients who are recipients of multiple solid organ transplants
- Patients who have severe hypercholesterolemia (>350 mg/dL; >9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (>500 mg/dL; >5.6 mmol/L). Patients with controlled hyperlipidemia are acceptable
- Patients who have an abnormal liver profile such as ALT, AST, Alk Phos or total bilirubin >3 times the upper normal limit
- Patients who are treated with drugs that are strong inducers or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4, such as terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, erythromycin, azithromycin, itraconazole, rifampin or lovastatin
- Patients who received an investigational drug or who have been treated with a non-protocol immunosuppressive drug or treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to randomization
- Patients with a history of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the past 2 years whether or not there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases, with the exception of localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- Patients who are HIV-positive or Hepatitis C (PCR+ only) or B surface antigen positive
- Recipients of organs from donors who test positive for Hepatitis B surface antigen or Hepatitis C (PCR+ only) are excluded
- Patients with a history of severe diarrhea, active peptic ulcer disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (Hgb A1c <7.0 %) at baseline
- Patients who have any surgical or medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of study medication, and/or the presence of severe diarrhea or active peptic ulcer
- Patients who have cardiac failure (e.g. resting dyspnea, symptoms with less than ordinary activity, marked limitation of activity) at time of screening or any other severe cardiac disease as determined by the investigator
- Patients with abnormal physical or laboratory findings of clinical significance within 3 months of randomization which would interfere with the objectives of the study
- Patients with any history of coagulopathy or medical condition requiring long-term anticoagulation therapy after transplantation (Low dose aspirin treatment is allowed)
- Patients with known history of focal segmental glomeruloscrelosis
- Presence of psychiatric illness (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar, major depression) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with study requirements
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Zortress (Everolimus) With Low Dose Tacrolimus to Early Conversion to Calcineulin Inhibitor-Free Regimen and Mycophenolic Acid With Standard Dose Tacrolimus in Recipients of ECD/DCD Kidneys
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Given tacrolimus and MMF/MPA is a widely prescribed immunosuppressive regimen in the United States, comparisons of tacrolimus and MMF/MPA regimens to investigational therapies and treatment regimens are needed. Also, considering the fact that ECD/DCD is a fast growing fraction of donors, evaluation of various regimens' effects on rather delicate ECD/DCD kidneys is necessary.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Given tacrolimus and MMF/MPA is a widely prescribed immunosuppressive regimen in the United States, comparisons of tacrolimus and MMF/MPA regimens to investigational therapies and treatment regimens are needed. Also, considering the fact that ECD/DCD is a fast growing fraction of donors, evaluation of various regimens' effects on rather delicate ECD/DCD kidneys is necessary.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.
The key secondary objective is to compare renal function of the everolimus treatment arms to the MMF/MPA treatment arm at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. Renal function will be measured by the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), using the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula (20).
- Conditions
- Delayed Graft Function
- Being tested
- Everolimus, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)
- Keywords
- kidney failure
- Medical subject headings
- Delayed Graft Function, Renal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EverolimusDrug
Also called Zortress
One of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus .
TacrolimusDrug
Also called Prograf
One of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus.
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)Drug
Also called CellCept
Control Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ERL & TAC | Experimental | Concentration controlled everolimus(ERL) \& Low dose tacrolimus(TAC) + corticosteroid withdraw Receives: Drug: Everolimus; Drug: Tacrolimus |
| ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA | Experimental | Concentration controlled everolimus \& low dose tacrolimus --> mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at Month 3 + corticosteroid Receives: Drug: Everolimus; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA) |
| Standard dose TAC + MMF/MPA | Experimental | Standard dose of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid withdraw Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate Concentration-controlled Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus Compared to MMF/MPA With Standard Dose Tacrolimus at 24 Months
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Compare Renal Function of the Everolimus Treatment Arms to the MMF/MPA Treatment Arm at 12 and 24 Months Post-transplantation
The key secondary objective is to compare renal function of the everolimus treatment arms to the MMF/MPA treatment arm at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. Renal function will be measured by the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), using the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula (20).
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionNov 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Why it stopped: Interim results suggested a concern for patient outcomes and safety
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Delayed Graft FunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Matthew Cooper
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Matthew Cooper, Georgetown University
- Investigators
- Matthew Cooper, Principal investigator, Georgetown University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01878786
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIRPCRAD001AUS183T
- Acronym
- Evered
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Zortress (Everolimus) With Low Dose Tacrolimus to Early Conversion to Calcineulin Inhibitor-Free Regimen and Mycophenolic Acid With Standard Dose Tacrolimus in Recipients of ECD/DCD Kidneys
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01878786
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Evered / IIRPCRAD001AUS183T
- Conditions
- Delayed Graft Function
- Keywords
- kidney failure
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Interim results suggested a concern for patient outcomes and safety
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Matthew CooperUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Given tacrolimus and MMF/MPA is a widely prescribed immunosuppressive regimen in the United States, comparisons of tacrolimus and MMF/MPA regimens to investigational therapies and treatment regimens are needed. Also, considering the fact that ECD/DCD is a fast growing fraction of donors, evaluation of various regimens' effects on rather delicate ECD/DCD kidneys is necessary.
Detailed description
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Given tacrolimus and MMF/MPA is a widely prescribed immunosuppressive regimen in the United States, comparisons of tacrolimus and MMF/MPA regimens to investigational therapies and treatment regimens are needed. Also, considering the fact that ECD/DCD is a fast growing fraction of donors, evaluation of various regimens' effects on rather delicate ECD/DCD kidneys is necessary.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.
The key secondary objective is to compare renal function of the everolimus treatment arms to the MMF/MPA treatment arm at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. Renal function will be measured by the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), using the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula (20).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ERL & TAC | Experimental | Drug: Everolimus, Drug: TacrolimusConcentration controlled everolimus(ERL) \& Low dose tacrolimus(TAC) + corticosteroid withdraw |
| ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA | Experimental | Drug: Everolimus, Drug: Tacrolimus, Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)Concentration controlled everolimus \& low dose tacrolimus --> mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at Month 3 + corticosteroid |
| Standard dose TAC + MMF/MPA | Experimental | Drug: Tacrolimus, Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)Standard dose of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid withdraw |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male or female recipients 18-65 years of age undergoing primary or secondary kidney transplantation
- Recipients of primary or secondary cadaveric, ECD/DCD kidney (defined as follows)
- Donor whose heart has irreversibly stopped beating, previously referred to as non-heart-beating or asystolic donation
- Brain-dead donor > 60 years old
- History of hypertension
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Cold ischemic time (CIT) > 30 hours
- Patients who are ABO incompatible transplants, or T, or B cell crossmatch positive transplant
- Patients with a known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical class
- Non-controlled DCD
- Donor age >70
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EverolimusAlso: ZortressOne of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus . | Drug | ERL & TAC, ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA |
| TacrolimusAlso: PrografOne of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus. | Drug | ERL & TAC, ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA, Standard dose TAC + MMF/MPA |
| Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)Also: CellCeptControl Drug | Drug | ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA, Standard dose TAC + MMF/MPA |
Primary outcome
Evaluate Concentration-controlled Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus Compared to MMF/MPA With Standard Dose Tacrolimus at 24 Months
Time frame: 24 months
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.
1 secondary outcome
Compare Renal Function of the Everolimus Treatment Arms to the MMF/MPA Treatment Arm at 12 and 24 Months Post-transplantation
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Delayed Graft Function
Not yet recruiting
Bioimpedance and Multiparametric Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Management After Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplantation, Delayed Graft Function
Enrolling by invitation
Feasibility of Physical Prehabilitation for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy
Prehabilitation, Cardiac Surgery
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
ARGX-117 in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients at Risk for Delayed Graft Function
Delayed Graft Function
Not yet recruiting
Drone Transport of Deceased-Donor Kidney Grafts Between Two French Hospitals Before Transplantation: a Pilot Safety Study
Kidney Failure, Chronic, Kidney Transplantation
Recruiting
The Impact of Intraoperative Diuretic Use on Delayed Graft Function Following Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation
Delayed Graft Function, Kidney Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matthew Cooper principal investigator
Georgetown University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Everolimus, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA) in people with Delayed Graft Function, run by Matthew Cooper at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate Concentration-controlled Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus Compared to MMF/MPA With Standard Dose Tacrolimus at 24 Months (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2019.