AzTrials
AzTrials

Nuclear Sclerosis of the LensNCT01878838

The Comparison of Cataract Lasers Using the Optimedica Catalys Laser and the Alcon LenSx Laser.

A study testing Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ Catalys Laser and Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ LenSx Laser in people with Nuclear Sclerosis of the Lens and Posterior Subcapsular Cataract, run by Steven H. Linn, OD at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares two FDA approved Cataract Lasers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 years and older
What is being tested?
Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ Catalys Laser and Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ LenSx Laser
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2013to Jan 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have grade 2 to 4 nuclear sclerotic and or cortical or posterior subcapsular cataracts with visual impairment.
  • Pupillary dilation of at least 6.0 mm
  • Axial length between 21 mm to 26 mm
  • Age ≥ 22 years of either gender
  • Require laser assisted corneal incisions, capsulotomy and nucleus segmentation
  • Understand and sign a written Informed Consent form
  • Be able to comply with the treatment and follow-up schedule

Who cannot join

  • Enrolment in another drug or device study within the prior 3 months
  • History of ocular trauma
  • Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised, etc.)
  • Uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease
  • Corneal abnormalities (e.g., stromal, epithelial or endothelial dystrophies, severe corneal opacities, significant corneal edema, etc)
  • Diminished aqueous clarity that obscures OCT imaging of the anterior lens capsule
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Corneal ring and/or inlay implant(s)
  • Pseudoexfoliation
  • Known steroid IOP responder or ocular hypertension IOP >25 mmHg by tonometry
  • Retinal detachment within the last 6 months
  • Anterior chamber depth less than 2.5 mm

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Hoopes Vision

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84020

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Intra-operative Effects, Safety, Efficacy and Performance of Two Commercially Available Laser Systems in Patients Undergoing Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.

This study compares two FDA approved Cataract Lasers.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the performance of two commercially available and FDA cleared femtosecond laser systems in patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Objective data on the repeatability and accuracy of the studied parameters will be gathered and reported as endpoints of the study.

The two systems studied are the Catalys™ Precision Laser System (OptiMedica, CA, USA) and the LenSx® Laser System (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).

Published data have suggested that the femtosecond laser is a useful tool for cataract surgery.

This study is to determine whether differences or similarities exist in specific treatment parameters achieved with two FDA cleared and commercially available femtosecond laser cataract surgery platforms

Being tested
Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ Catalys Laser, Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ LenSx Laser
Medical subject headings
Cataract, Age-Related Nuclear

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ Catalys LaserProcedure or surgery

    Also called Optimedica Catalys Precision Laser System

    Cohort subjects will undergo Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery in both eyes, with the Optimedica Catalys laser on one eye, and the Alcon LensX laser on the other. First eyes will be randomized.

  • Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ LenSx LaserProcedure or surgery

    Also called Alcon LenSx Laser System

    Cohort subjects will undergo Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery in both eyes, with the Optimedica Catalys laser on one eye, and the Alcon LensX laser on the other. First eyes will be randomized.

Study groups in NCT01878838
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Catalys Treated EyesActive comparatorPatient's aged 22 and older with visually significant cataracts undergoing Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ Catalys Laser
Receives: Procedure: Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ Catalys Laser
LenSx Treated EyesActive comparatorPatient's aged 22 and older with visually significant cataracts undergoing Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ LenSx Laser.
Receives: Procedure: Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ LenSx Laser

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulative Dissipated Energy

    The total amount of phacoemulsification energy delivered during the procedure.

    Measured: Intraoperative

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Complete Laser Capsulotomy

    Did the laser perform a complete capsulotomy with no tags or untreated segments.

    Measured: Intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01878838
Sponsor's protocol ID
HV-AVO1
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
12 Jun 2013
Last updated
11 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009 Jan 28;(11):1-25.

    PubMed 19294964
  • Vasavada AR, Vasavada V, Vasavada VA, Praveen MR, Johar SR, Gajjar D, Arora AI. Comparison of the effect of torsional and microburst longitudinal ultrasound on clear corneal incisions during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 May;38(5):833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.050.

    PubMed 22520307
  • Georgescu D, Kuo AF, Kinard KI, Olson RJ. A fluidics comparison of Alcon Infiniti, Bausch & Lomb Stellaris, and Advanced Medical Optics Signature phacoemulsification machines. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;145(6):1014-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.024. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

    PubMed 18343350
  • Dooley IJ, O'Brien PD. Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Apr;32(4):604-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.045.

    PubMed 16698480
  • Gimbel HV, Neuhann T. Development, advantages, and methods of the continuous circular capsulorhexis technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Jan;16(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80870-x.

    PubMed 2299571
  • Friedman NJ, Palanker DV, Schuele G, Andersen D, Marcellino G, Seibel BS, Batlle J, Feliz R, Talamo JH, Blumenkranz MS, Culbertson WW. Femtosecond laser capsulotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1189-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.022.

    PubMed 21700099
  • Artzen D, Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Stenevi U, Lydahl E, Montan P. Capsule complication during cataract surgery: Case-control study of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors: Swedish Capsule Rupture Study Group report 2. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;35(10):1688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.026.

    PubMed 19781460
  • Bellini LP, Brum GS, Grossi RS, Borowsky C. Cataract surgery complication rates. Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1432; author reply 1432-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.009. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18675698
  • Richard J, Hoffart L, Chavane F, Ridings B, Conrath J. Corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract extraction by using ultrasound phacoemulsification versus a fluid-based system. Cornea. 2008 Jan;27(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181583115.

    PubMed 18245961
  • Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Oct;22(8):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80121-0.

    PubMed 8915805
  • Uy HS, Edwards K, Curtis N. Femtosecond phacoemulsification: the business and the medicine. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;23(1):33-9. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd622.

    PubMed 22081031

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ Catalys Laser and Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery w/ LenSx Laser in people with Nuclear Sclerosis of the Lens and Posterior Subcapsular Cataract, run by Steven H. Linn, OD at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cumulative Dissipated Energy (time frame: Intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01878838, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in