MicrosurgeryMTMNCT01879384
Monitoring of Bone Free Flaps With Microdialysis
A study testing CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue in people with Microsurgery and Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Microdialysis is admitted to be reliable by numerous surgeons to monitor flaps. Nevertheless, a few authors reported follow up with microdialysis in bone flaps, and they all described the position of the catheter in the surrounding soft tissue muscle. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Microsurgery, Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer
- What is being tested?
- CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- head and neck reconstruction with iliac crest or fibula free flaps
- informed consent obtained
Who cannot join
- reconstruction with other types of free flaps
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Feasibility of Monitoring of Bone Free Flaps With Microdialysis Catheter Directly Positioned in Bone Tissue
Microdialysis is admitted to be reliable by numerous surgeons to monitor flaps. Nevertheless, a few authors reported follow up with microdialysis in bone flaps, and they all described the position of the catheter in the surrounding soft tissue muscle. This surrounding soft tissue is not always the reflect of bone vascularisation.
The aim is to study the feasibility of a follow up of microanastomosed bone flaps with microdialysis. To reach this goal, investigators perform a clinical prospective research project untitled MTM project
Read the detailed description
In addition to our classical clinical monitoring, bone microanastomosed flaps for reconstructive facial surgery will be monitored with CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue.
The monitoring is recorded during 5 days. Glucose, lactate , pyruvate , glycerol rates will be analysed :
- every hour at day 1,
- every two hours at day 2,
- every three hours at day 3,4 and 5.
Data are managed with Labpilot software.
- Conditions
- Microsurgery, Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer, Head and/or Neck Shotgun Trauma, Bone Free Flap
- Being tested
- CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue
- Keywords
- microdialysis, bone free flap, head and neck, monitoring free flap, reconstructive surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissueDevice
At the end of the surgery the CMA microdialysis catheter is placed inside the bone
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Microdialysis with CMA 70 catheter | Experimental | CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue Receives: Device: CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility study of monitoring bone free flaps with microdialysis (catheter directly positioned in bone tissue)
Success of microdialysis is defined as the collection and measurement of metabolites levels as: lactate, pyruvate,glycerol and glucose.
Measured: Day 5 after catheter insertion
Secondary outcomes (2)
Evaluation of "flush-out" period
Time required to acquire interpretable data after opening microdialysis circuit
Measured: Day 5 after catheter insertion
Compliance of the prescription
Compliance rate of simples collected and analysed
Measured: Day 5 after catheter insertion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MicrosurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Regional Council Picardie
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bernard DEVAUCHELLE, MD, phD, Principal investigator, Amiens University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01879384
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI08-PR-DEVAUCHELLE
- Other IDs
- 2010-A01176-33
- Acronym
- MTM
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Abdel-Galil K, Mitchell D. Postoperative monitoring of microsurgical free-tissue transfers for head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review of current techniques--part II. Invasive techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;47(6):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
PubMed 19155107Benacquista T, Kasabian AK, Karp NS. The fate of lower extremities with failed free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Oct;98(5):834-40; discussion 841-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199610000-00013.
PubMed 8823023Birke-Sorensen H, Toft G, Bengaard J. Pure muscle transfers can be monitored by use of microdialysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Nov;26(9):623-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267382. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
PubMed 20927696Bogehoj M, Emmeluth C, Overgaard S. Blood flow and microdialysis in the human femoral head. Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):56-62. doi: 10.1080/17453670610013420.
PubMed 17453393Brix M, Muret P, Ricbourg B, Humbert P. [Monitoring free flaps with cutaneous microdialysis: preliminary study in oral cavity reconstruction]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2006 Dec;107(6):460-4. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1768(06)77088-7. French.
PubMed 17195000Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2092-2100. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260598.24376.e1.
PubMed 17519706Delgado JM, DeFeudis FV, Roth RH, Ryugo DK, Mitruka BM. Dialytrode for long term intracerebral perfusion in awake monkeys. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1972;198(1):9-21. No abstract available.
PubMed 4626478Ferguson REH Jr, Yu P. Techniques of monitoring buried fasciocutaneous free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Feb;123(2):525-532. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318196b9a3.
PubMed 19182610Holzle F, Rau A, Loeffelbein DJ, Mucke T, Kesting MR, Wolff KD. Results of monitoring fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, osteocutaneous and perforator flaps: 4-year experience with 166 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;39(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
PubMed 19944567Jallali N, Ridha H, Butler PE. Postoperative monitoring of free flaps in UK plastic surgery units. Microsurgery. 2005;25(6):469-72. doi: 10.1002/micr.20148.
PubMed 16134095Jyranki J, Suominen S, Vuola J, Back L. Microdialysis in clinical practice: monitoring intraoral free flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Apr;56(4):387-93. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000205231.39853.87.
PubMed 16557069Laure B, Sury F, Bayol JC, Goga D. [Microdialysis: experience in postoperative monitoring of 30 free flaps]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2009 Feb;54(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Nov 29. French.
PubMed 19042067Mourouzis C, Anand R, Bowden JR, Brennan PA. Microdialysis: use in the assessment of a buried bone-only fibular free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Oct;120(5):1363-1366. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000279555.75241.4c. No abstract available.
PubMed 17898613Rojdmark J, Blomqvist L, Malm M, Adams-Ray B, Ungerstedt U. Metabolism in myocutaneous flaps studied by in situ microdialysis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998 Mar;32(1):27-34. doi: 10.1080/02844319850158921.
PubMed 9556818Setala L, Papp A, Romppanen EL, Mustonen P, Berg L, Harma M. Microdialysis detects postoperative perfusion failure in microvascular flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006 Feb;22(2):87-96. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932502.
PubMed 16456768
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of Monitoring of Bone Free Flaps With Microdialysis Catheter Directly Positioned in Bone Tissue
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01879384
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MTM / PI08-PR-DEVAUCHELLE
- Conditions
- Microsurgery, Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer, Head and/or Neck Shotgun Trauma, Bone Free Flap
- Keywords
- microdialysis, bone free flap, head and neck, monitoring free flap, reconstructive surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Regional Council Picardie
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Microdialysis is admitted to be reliable by numerous surgeons to monitor flaps. Nevertheless, a few authors reported follow up with microdialysis in bone flaps, and they all described the position of the catheter in the surrounding soft tissue muscle. This surrounding soft tissue is not always the reflect of bone vascularisation.
The aim is to study the feasibility of a follow up of microanastomosed bone flaps with microdialysis. To reach this goal, investigators perform a clinical prospective research project untitled MTM project
Detailed description
In addition to our classical clinical monitoring, bone microanastomosed flaps for reconstructive facial surgery will be monitored with CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue.
The monitoring is recorded during 5 days. Glucose, lactate , pyruvate , glycerol rates will be analysed :
- every hour at day 1,
- every two hours at day 2,
- every three hours at day 3,4 and 5.
Data are managed with Labpilot software.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Microdialysis with CMA 70 catheter | Experimental | Device: CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissueCMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- head and neck reconstruction with iliac crest or fibula free flaps
- informed consent obtained
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- reconstruction with other types of free flaps
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissueAt the end of the surgery the CMA microdialysis catheter is placed inside the bone | Device | Microdialysis with CMA 70 catheter |
Primary outcome
Feasibility study of monitoring bone free flaps with microdialysis (catheter directly positioned in bone tissue)
Time frame: Day 5 after catheter insertion
Success of microdialysis is defined as the collection and measurement of metabolites levels as: lactate, pyruvate,glycerol and glucose.
2 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of "flush-out" period
Time frame: Day 5 after catheter insertion
Compliance of the prescription
Time frame: Day 5 after catheter insertion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2025.
- Background: PubMed 19155107Abdel-Galil K, Mitchell D. Postoperative monitoring of microsurgical free-tissue transfers for head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review of current techniques--part II. Invasive techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;47(6):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
- Background: PubMed 8823023Benacquista T, Kasabian AK, Karp NS. The fate of lower extremities with failed free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Oct;98(5):834-40; discussion 841-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199610000-00013.
- Background: PubMed 20927696Birke-Sorensen H, Toft G, Bengaard J. Pure muscle transfers can be monitored by use of microdialysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Nov;26(9):623-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267382. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
- Background: PubMed 17453393Bogehoj M, Emmeluth C, Overgaard S. Blood flow and microdialysis in the human femoral head. Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):56-62. doi: 10.1080/17453670610013420.
- Background: PubMed 17195000Brix M, Muret P, Ricbourg B, Humbert P. [Monitoring free flaps with cutaneous microdialysis: preliminary study in oral cavity reconstruction]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2006 Dec;107(6):460-4. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1768(06)77088-7. French.
- Background: PubMed 17519706Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2092-2100. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260598.24376.e1.
- Background: PubMed 4626478Delgado JM, DeFeudis FV, Roth RH, Ryugo DK, Mitruka BM. Dialytrode for long term intracerebral perfusion in awake monkeys. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1972;198(1):9-21. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19182610Ferguson REH Jr, Yu P. Techniques of monitoring buried fasciocutaneous free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Feb;123(2):525-532. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318196b9a3.
- Background: PubMed 19944567Holzle F, Rau A, Loeffelbein DJ, Mucke T, Kesting MR, Wolff KD. Results of monitoring fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, osteocutaneous and perforator flaps: 4-year experience with 166 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;39(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 16134095Jallali N, Ridha H, Butler PE. Postoperative monitoring of free flaps in UK plastic surgery units. Microsurgery. 2005;25(6):469-72. doi: 10.1002/micr.20148.
- Background: PubMed 16557069Jyranki J, Suominen S, Vuola J, Back L. Microdialysis in clinical practice: monitoring intraoral free flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Apr;56(4):387-93. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000205231.39853.87.
- Background: PubMed 19042067Laure B, Sury F, Bayol JC, Goga D. [Microdialysis: experience in postoperative monitoring of 30 free flaps]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2009 Feb;54(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Nov 29. French.
Related trials for Microsurgery
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-market, Real-world Experience: Expanding Access to Care by Incorporating the Symani® Surgical System and Enabling Surgeons
Open Surgery, Lymphedema
RecruitingObservational study
Use of Reconstructive Microsurgery for the Treatment of Lymphedema
Lymphedema
Not yet recruiting
Bone-Bioactive Liquid as an Adjunct in Endodontic Surgery
Patients Diagnosed With Persistent Apical Periodontitis in Maxillary Anterior Regions Require Endodontic Microsurgery
Recruiting
Cervical Lymphatic Microsurgery in Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparing Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging With Standard Clinical Assessment for Flap Perfusion in Head and Neck Reconstruction (VISION Trial)
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N), Free Tissue Flaps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bernard DEVAUCHELLE, MD, phD principal investigator
Amiens University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CMA 70 catheter directly positioned in bone tissue in people with Microsurgery and Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility study of monitoring bone free flaps with microdialysis (catheter directly positioned in bone tissue) (time frame: Day 5 after catheter insertion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01879384, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2025.