StrokePhase 2NCT01879787
Effects of tDCS Combined With mCIMT or Mental Practice in Poststroke Patients
A Phase 2 study testing tDCS in people with Stroke, run by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate systematically and controlled the effectiveness of mental practice techniques and modified constraint- induced movement therapy (mCIMT)in the treatment of post-stroke patients with motor deficit in the upper limb. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- tDCS
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- chronic stroke (> 6 months)
- score ≥ 20 at the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination
- score ≤ 3 at the Ashworth Scale
- score ≤ 4 at the Visual Analog Pain Scale
Who cannot join
- multiple brain lesions
- medication for treatment of spasticity
- attention deficit
- deficit in perceptual ability and motivation to follow the instructions for the mental training
- pregnant
- pacemaker
Show all 9Show fewer
- metal implant in the region of the skull and face
- history of convulsion
- epilepsy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)on the Effects of Mental Practice and Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Stroke Patients
This study aims to evaluate systematically and controlled the effectiveness of mental practice techniques and modified constraint- induced movement therapy (mCIMT)in the treatment of post-stroke patients with motor deficit in the upper limb. As well as finding a protocol of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS)that will maximize the effects of the practice of mental image and mCIMT. To this end, the subjects included will be submitted to 12 therapy sessions with active or sham tDCS combined with at least one of the following techniques: conventional physiotherapy, mental practice technique or mCIMT
Read the detailed description
Eighty-four patients chronic post-stroke will be recruited to participate in the study. After screening to check the eligibility criteria and giving informed consent, the patients will be randomized into seven distinct groups (12 per group). All the patients will be submitted to 12 therapeutic sessions that will occur with a frequency of three times a week.
Before, immediately after and 1 month after the beginning of the experimental sessions patients will be submitted to an evaluation at each moment will be applied: (i) Fugl- Meyer Scale, (ii) Motor Activity Log Scale, (iii ) Jebsen-Taylor hand functional test, (iv) Independence Functional Measure (v) Box-Block Test, (vi) Dynamometry and (vii) Berg Balance Scale.
In experimental sessions, the subjects always receive physiotherapy treatment with conventional techniques, the protocol will follow the guidelines outlined in Clinical Practice Guideline for physical therapy in stroke patients with the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (2004). Besides physical therapy, the patient may be subjected to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated with the techniques of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) or mental practice (MP).
tDCS protocol During tDCS sessions, the patients will be seated in a comfortable chair with head and arm rests. Continuous direct current will be applied by clinical microcurrent stimulator (Soterix, USA) using a pair of saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes (surface 35 cm2). For anodal and sham stimulation (the polarity refers always to the motor cortical electrode), the anode electrode will be placed over primary motor cortex (M1; EEG 10/20 system) of the affected hemisphere and cathode above contralateral orbit. For cathodal tDCS, the cathode will be positioned over M1 of the non-affected hemisphere and the anode was placed above the contralateral orbit. For bi-hemispheric tDCS the anode electrode will be placed over M1 of the affected hemisphere and the cathode over the M1 of the healthy hemisphere. Transcranial direct current stimulation will be administered with a current strength of 1 mA for 13 (anodal/bi-hemispheric tDCS) or 9 min (cathodal tDCS). Sham tDCS will be performed by current flow for 30 s, a method shown to achieve a good level of blinding mCIMT protocol The modified CIMT consisted of (i) complete immobilization of the non-paretic upper limb and (ii) intensive training the paretic upper limb and will be administered by a trained therapist, who was not involved in the pre-post evaluations.
Continuously for six hours daily over a period of four weeks, including weekend, all patients will be remained with complete immobilization of the non paretic upper limb. For this, an arm sling with the shoulder in adduction and internal rotation, elbow flexed at 90º, wrist and fingers in neutral position, made specifically for each patient will be used. They will be advised to use the restriction during their daily activities and instructed to remove it every hour for 10 minutes to perform stretching, which has been previously taught by the researchers to avoid functional deterioration caused by disuse. All muscle groups of the upper extremity will be stretched. A guide with instructions of the stretching will be distributed to patients. The patients will be instructed to take the immobilization on every day at same hour the tDCS sessions. In addition, the patients will be allowed to take the arm sling off during activities in which safety would be compromised, such as toileting, dressing, and bathing.
For intensive training the paretic upper limb, the patients will attend a gross motor and fine motor activities program performed for 1 hour per day, three times per week. Each task was performed for 2-3 minutes and the rest interval between tasks will be determined for each subject in order to avoid fatigue and excessive tiredness. The tasks will be progressively adapted by increasing speed or accuracy to allow improvement of patient performance. All tasks will be done with subjects sitting on a chair with standard dimensions and performed on support table. During training sessions, the patients will remain with the non-paretic arm immobilized.
Mental practice protocol Prior to experimental sessions, the mental capacity of subjects to learn the imagery techniques will be tested by the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire and a chronometric test. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire is an imagery assessment tool comprised of 10 items, each scored on a five-point ordinal scale, including the image clarity (visual dimension) and the sensations intensity (kinesthetic dimension) of body movements. Each item describes an action: (i) neck flexion/extension, (ii) shoulder shrugging, (iii) forward trunk flexion, (iv) forward shoulder flexion, (v) elbow flexion, (vi) thumb to finger tips, (vii) knee extension, (viii) hip abduction, (ix) foot external rotation, and (x) foot tapping. Subjects physically execute each movement and immediately afterwards imagine performing the same movement. A score of 5 corresponds to the highest clarity/intensity, and a score of 1 corresponds to the lowest clarity/ intensity (for a review, see Malouin et al., 2007). The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire scores allowed the researcher to assess each participant's abilities and decide whether the subject was a suitable candidate for MP. Comparing actual and imagined movement times, the chronometric test determined the motor imagery ability of participants.
The mental practice will consist of motor imagination of tasks. These tasks will consist of action for the patient to imagine themselves, with the greatest wealth of detail possible, performing motor activities with the hemiparetic upper limb, such as the movement of the touching thumb on each other's toes hand, or even the movement of bringing a cup towards his mouth. The technique of mental practice will be applied at the same time of the tDCS.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tDCSOther
Also called non invasive brain stimulation
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| physiotherapy + anodal tDCS + mCIMT | Experimental | Before a anodal tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. Receives: Other: tDCS |
| Physiotherapy + cathodal tDCS + mCIMT | Experimental | Before a cathodal tDCS with duration of 9 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. Receives: Other: tDCS |
| Physiotherapy+bi-hemispheric tDCS+mCIMT | Experimental | Before a bi-hemispheric tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy (cathode) and injured (anode) motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. Receives: Other: tDCS |
| Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mCIMT | Sham comparator | Before a sham tDCS with duration of 30 seconds and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. Receives: Other: tDCS |
| Physiotherapy+tDCS+mental practice | Experimental | Before a tDCS protocol applied during de mental practice training , the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. Receives: Other: tDCS |
| Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mental practice | Sham comparator | Before a sham tDCS protocol applied during the mental practice training, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. Receives: Other: tDCS |
| Physiotherapy | No intervention | The patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function
The Fugl-Meyer assessment was used to measure recovery of motor control. It is a 226-point scoring system that includes range of motion, pain, sensation, motor function of the upper and lower extremities, and balance.This instrument provides a reliable and valid measure of specific motor function that is also sensitive to change.
Measured: At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change from Motor Activity Log
The MAL is a scripted, structured interview to measure real-world upper extremity function. It was developed to measure the effects of therapy on the more impaired arm following stroke. The original MAL consists of 14 activities of daily living (ADLs) such as using a towel, brushing teeth, and picking up a glass. For a specified time period post-stroke, the individual is asked about the extent of the activity performed and how well it was performed by the more impaired arm. The response scale ranges from 0 (never used) to 5 (same as pre-stroke). The mean of the scores for frequency of the activity comprises the Amount of Use (AOU) scale; the mean of the scores for how well the activity was performed comprises the Quality of Movement (QOM) scale. Ideally, ratings are obtained from the individual with a stroke as well as a knowledgeable informant (caregiver).
Measured: At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionAug 2013
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kátia Monte-Silva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
- Investigators
- Kátia K Monte Silva, PhD, Study director, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01879787
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- tDCS_mCIMT_MP_Stroke
- Status last verified
- May 2014
- First submitted
- 10 May 2013
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)on the Effects of Mental Practice and Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Stroke Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01879787
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tDCS_mCIMT_MP_Stroke
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, transcranial direct current stimulation, constraint-induced movement therapy, mental practice
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de PernambucoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate systematically and controlled the effectiveness of mental practice techniques and modified constraint- induced movement therapy (mCIMT)in the treatment of post-stroke patients with motor deficit in the upper limb. As well as finding a protocol of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS)that will maximize the effects of the practice of mental image and mCIMT. To this end, the subjects included will be submitted to 12 therapy sessions with active or sham tDCS combined with at least one of the following techniques: conventional physiotherapy, mental practice technique or mCIMT
Detailed description
Eighty-four patients chronic post-stroke will be recruited to participate in the study. After screening to check the eligibility criteria and giving informed consent, the patients will be randomized into seven distinct groups (12 per group). All the patients will be submitted to 12 therapeutic sessions that will occur with a frequency of three times a week.
Before, immediately after and 1 month after the beginning of the experimental sessions patients will be submitted to an evaluation at each moment will be applied: (i) Fugl- Meyer Scale, (ii) Motor Activity Log Scale, (iii ) Jebsen-Taylor hand functional test, (iv) Independence Functional Measure (v) Box-Block Test, (vi) Dynamometry and (vii) Berg Balance Scale.
In experimental sessions, the subjects always receive physiotherapy treatment with conventional techniques, the protocol will follow the guidelines outlined in Clinical Practice Guideline for physical therapy in stroke patients with the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (2004). Besides physical therapy, the patient may be subjected to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated with the techniques of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) or mental practice (MP).
tDCS protocol During tDCS sessions, the patients will be seated in a comfortable chair with head and arm rests. Continuous direct current will be applied by clinical microcurrent stimulator (Soterix, USA) using a pair of saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes (surface 35 cm2). For anodal and sham stimulation (the polarity refers always to the motor cortical electrode), the anode electrode will be placed over primary motor cortex (M1; EEG 10/20 system) of the affected hemisphere and cathode above contralateral orbit. For cathodal tDCS, the cathode will be positioned over M1 of the non-affected hemisphere and the anode was placed above the contralateral orbit. For bi-hemispheric tDCS the anode electrode will be placed over M1 of the affected hemisphere and the cathode over the M1 of the healthy hemisphere. Transcranial direct current stimulation will be administered with a current strength of 1 mA for 13 (anodal/bi-hemispheric tDCS) or 9 min (cathodal tDCS). Sham tDCS will be performed by current flow for 30 s, a method shown to achieve a good level of blinding mCIMT protocol The modified CIMT consisted of (i) complete immobilization of the non-paretic upper limb and (ii) intensive training the paretic upper limb and will be administered by a trained therapist, who was not involved in the pre-post evaluations.
Continuously for six hours daily over a period of four weeks, including weekend, all patients will be remained with complete immobilization of the non paretic upper limb. For this, an arm sling with the shoulder in adduction and internal rotation, elbow flexed at 90º, wrist and fingers in neutral position, made specifically for each patient will be used. They will be advised to use the restriction during their daily activities and instructed to remove it every hour for 10 minutes to perform stretching, which has been previously taught by the researchers to avoid functional deterioration caused by disuse. All muscle groups of the upper extremity will be stretched. A guide with instructions of the stretching will be distributed to patients. The patients will be instructed to take the immobilization on every day at same hour the tDCS sessions. In addition, the patients will be allowed to take the arm sling off during activities in which safety would be compromised, such as toileting, dressing, and bathing.
For intensive training the paretic upper limb, the patients will attend a gross motor and fine motor activities program performed for 1 hour per day, three times per week. Each task was performed for 2-3 minutes and the rest interval between tasks will be determined for each subject in order to avoid fatigue and excessive tiredness. The tasks will be progressively adapted by increasing speed or accuracy to allow improvement of patient performance. All tasks will be done with subjects sitting on a chair with standard dimensions and performed on support table. During training sessions, the patients will remain with the non-paretic arm immobilized.
Mental practice protocol Prior to experimental sessions, the mental capacity of subjects to learn the imagery techniques will be tested by the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire and a chronometric test. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire is an imagery assessment tool comprised of 10 items, each scored on a five-point ordinal scale, including the image clarity (visual dimension) and the sensations intensity (kinesthetic dimension) of body movements. Each item describes an action: (i) neck flexion/extension, (ii) shoulder shrugging, (iii) forward trunk flexion, (iv) forward shoulder flexion, (v) elbow flexion, (vi) thumb to finger tips, (vii) knee extension, (viii) hip abduction, (ix) foot external rotation, and (x) foot tapping. Subjects physically execute each movement and immediately afterwards imagine performing the same movement. A score of 5 corresponds to the highest clarity/intensity, and a score of 1 corresponds to the lowest clarity/ intensity (for a review, see Malouin et al., 2007). The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire scores allowed the researcher to assess each participant's abilities and decide whether the subject was a suitable candidate for MP. Comparing actual and imagined movement times, the chronometric test determined the motor imagery ability of participants.
The mental practice will consist of motor imagination of tasks. These tasks will consist of action for the patient to imagine themselves, with the greatest wealth of detail possible, performing motor activities with the hemiparetic upper limb, such as the movement of the touching thumb on each other's toes hand, or even the movement of bringing a cup towards his mouth. The technique of mental practice will be applied at the same time of the tDCS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 7
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| physiotherapy + anodal tDCS + mCIMT | Experimental | Other: tDCSBefore a anodal tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. |
| Physiotherapy + cathodal tDCS + mCIMT | Experimental | Other: tDCSBefore a cathodal tDCS with duration of 9 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. |
| Physiotherapy+bi-hemispheric tDCS+mCIMT | Experimental | Other: tDCSBefore a bi-hemispheric tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy (cathode) and injured (anode) motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. |
| Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mCIMT | Sham comparator | Other: tDCSBefore a sham tDCS with duration of 30 seconds and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb. |
| Physiotherapy+tDCS+mental practice | Experimental | Other: tDCSBefore a tDCS protocol applied during de mental practice training , the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. |
| Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mental practice | Sham comparator | Other: tDCSBefore a sham tDCS protocol applied during the mental practice training, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. |
| Physiotherapy | No intervention | –The patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- chronic stroke (> 6 months)
- score ≥ 20 at the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination
- score ≤ 3 at the Ashworth Scale
- score ≤ 4 at the Visual Analog Pain Scale
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- multiple brain lesions
- medication for treatment of spasticity
- attention deficit
- deficit in perceptual ability and motivation to follow the instructions for the mental training
- pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tDCSAlso: non invasive brain stimulationtDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability. | Other | Physiotherapy + cathodal tDCS + mCIMT, Physiotherapy+bi-hemispheric tDCS+mCIMT, Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mCIMT, Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mental practice, Physiotherapy+tDCS+mental practice, physiotherapy + anodal tDCS + mCIMT |
Primary outcome
Change from Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function
Time frame: At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
The Fugl-Meyer assessment was used to measure recovery of motor control. It is a 226-point scoring system that includes range of motion, pain, sensation, motor function of the upper and lower extremities, and balance.This instrument provides a reliable and valid measure of specific motor function that is also sensitive to change.
1 secondary outcome
Change from Motor Activity Log
Time frame: At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2015.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kátia K Monte Silva, PhD study director
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing tDCS in people with Stroke, run by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function (time frame: At baseline, 1 month and 2 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2015.