AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Open Angle GlaucomaIMSNCT01881425

InnFocus MicroShunt Versus Trabeculectomy Study

A study testing Glaucoma Surgery and InnFocus MicroShunt in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, run by InnFocus Inc. at 29 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Assess the safety and effectiveness of the InnFocus MicroShunt when used to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma where the IOP is not controlled when using maximum tolerated glaucoma medications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
What is being tested?
Glaucoma Surgery and InnFocus MicroShunt
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
732 participants
Where
29 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
15 Dec 2015to 15 Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria: - POAG on maximum tolerated glaucoma meds - Medicated ≥15mmHg and ≤40mmHg - Exclusion Criteria: - Previous conjunctival incisional ophthalmic surgery - Anticipated need for additional ocular surgery during the study - Secondary glaucoma - Any condition that prevents the device implantation or trabeculectomy in the superior region of the study eye

Trial locations and contacts

29 sites in 6 countries.

29 sites in 6 countries

United States24 sites
  • Ophthalmic Partners of Pennsylvania

    Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004

  • Specialty Eye Care

    Bellevue, Washington, 98004

  • Minnesota Eye Consultants, PA

    Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431

  • Washington Eye Physicians and Surgeons

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • Cincinnati Eye Institute

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242

  • Ophthalmic Surgeons and Consultants of Ohio

    Columbus, Ohio, 43215

  • Glaucoma Associates of Texas

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • University of California at Davis Eye Center

    Davis, California, 95817

  • Inter-Mountain Eye Care

    Eagle, Idaho, 83616

  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Connecticut

    Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824

  • Vold Vision

    Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72704

  • Ophthalmology Associates

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76102

  • Eye Physicians and Surgeons of Arizona

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Chicago Glaucoma Consultants and CGC Eye Center

    Glenview, Illinois, 60026

  • The Robert Cizik Eye Clinic

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290

  • UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mt. Sinai

    New York, New York, 10003

  • Dean McGee Eye Institute

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Midwest Eye Surgery Center

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68131

  • Stiles Eyecare Excellence

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66213

  • Rashid, Rice, Flynn and Reilley Eye Associates

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Glaucoma Consultants of the Capital Region

    Slingerlands, New York, 12159

  • Arizona Eye Consultants

    Tucson, Arizona, 85710

Other trials in United States

France1 site
  • Pole Ophtalmologique de la Clinique Mutualiste

    Pessac, Bordeaux, 33600

Other trials in France

Italy1 site
  • Pisa University Hospital Cisanello

    Pisa, 56126

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands1 site
  • University Eye Clinic Maastricht

    Maastricht, 6229 HX

Other trials in Netherlands

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos

    Madrid, 28040

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom1 site
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital

    London, EC1V 2PD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of the InnFocus MicroShunt® Glaucoma Drainage System to Standard Trabeculectomy In Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Assess the safety and effectiveness of the InnFocus MicroShunt when used to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma where the IOP is not controlled when using maximum tolerated glaucoma medications.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, study. After informed consent is obtained, patients will be evaluated for eligibility based on glaucoma severity, eye health, and visual acuity.

Clinical follow up will be scheduled over the course of the 24 month study, and examinations will be repeated to monitor eye health. At the 1 and 2 year follow up, diurnal (IOP taken in the morning, mid-day, and afternoon in the same day) IOP evaluation will be done. Annual follow up will occur up to 2 years. The primary effectiveness endpoint is 20% or greater reduction in IOP from pre-op medicated IOP at 12 months.

Being tested
Glaucoma Surgery, InnFocus MicroShunt
Keywords
POAG
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Open-Angle

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Glaucoma SurgeryProcedure or surgery

    An initial pocket is created under the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule and the wound bed is treated for two minutes with mitomycin C (MMC, 0.2 mg/ml)soaked sponges. This is done using a "fornix-based" conjunctival incision at the corneoscleral junction. A partial thickness scleral flap with its base at the corneoscleral junction after cauterization of the flap area, and a window opening is created under the flap with a Kelly-punch to remove a portion of the sclera, Schlemm's canal and the trabecular meshwork to enter the anterior chamber. An iridectomy is done in many cases to prevent future blockage of the sclerostomy. The scleral flap is then sutured loosely back in place with several sutures. The conjunctiva is closed in a watertight fashion at the end of the procedure.

  • InnFocus MicroShuntDevice

    An initial pocket is created under the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule and the wound bed is treated for two minutes with mitomycin C (MMC, 0.2 mg/ml)soaked sponges. This is done using a "fornix-based" conjunctival incision at the corneoscleral junction. After cauterization of the flap area, a knife is used to create a shallow pocket at the scleral surface and an opening into the AC. The device is then threaded through the track until the proximal end is in the anterior chamber and the fin of the device is pushed into the shallow scleral pocket. The device is checked to observe aqueous flow and the distal end placed under the Tenons/conjunctiva. The conjunctiva is closed in a watertight fashion at the end of the procedure.

Study groups in NCT01881425
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InnFocus MicroShuntExperimentalInnFocus MicroShunt
Receives: Device: InnFocus MicroShunt
TrabeculectomyActive comparatorglaucoma surgery to reduce IOP
Receives: Procedure: Glaucoma Surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With > 20% Decrease in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure

    The primary effectiveness outcome is ≥ 20% reduction in mean diurnal IOP without increasing number of glaucoma medications from baseline to 12 months follow-up

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Number of Participants With > 20% Decrease in Diurnal Intraocular Pressure

    The primary effectiveness outcome is ≥ 20% reduction in mean diurnal IOP without increasing number of glaucoma medications from baseline to 24 months follow-up

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Change

    Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint #1 is the mean diurnal change in IOP from Screening at 12 months.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Change

    Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint #1 is the mean diurnal change in IOP from Screening at 24 months

    Measured: 24 months

  3. Number of Participants With Postoperative Interventions at 12 Months

    The Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint #2 was having any physical or medical postoperative intervention (other than eye massage) intended to alter IOP by the Month 12 follow-up visit.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Participants With Postoperative Interventions at 24 Months

    The Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint #2 was having any physical or medical postoperative intervention (other than eye massage) intended to alter IOP by the Month 24 follow-up visit.

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Dec 2015
  3. Primary completion15 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
732 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01881425
Sponsor's protocol ID
INN005
Acronym
IMS
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
17 Jun 2013
Last updated
26 Oct 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Park J, Rittiphairoj T, Wang X, E JY, Bicket AK. Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;3(3):CD010472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010472.pub3.

    PubMed 36912740
  • Baker ND, Barnebey HS, Moster MR, Stiles MC, Vold SD, Khatana AK, Flowers BE, Grover DS, Strouthidis NG, Panarelli JF; INN005 Study Group. Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: One-Year Results from a 2-Year Randomized, Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1710-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 May 27.

    PubMed 34051211

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Glaucoma Surgery and InnFocus MicroShunt in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, run by InnFocus Inc. at 29 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 29 sites in United States, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Oct 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With > 20% Decrease in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01881425, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in