AzTrials
AzTrials

PreeclampsiaPET and urineNCT01881542

Standard 24-hour Urine Protein vs Shorter Period for Diagnosis of Pre-eclampsia

An observational study of Preeclampsia, run by HaEmek Medical Center, Israel at 1 site in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background and project rationale: Preeclampsia is a common complication of pregnancy, affecting 6-8% of all pregnancies and constitutes a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Preeclampsia
How many people
307 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
Jun 2013to Aug 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: pregnant women admitted for assessment of suspected preeclampsia

Who may be able to join

  • pregnant women
  • age 18-55 years
  • blood pressure >140mmHg systolic or >90mmHg diastolic

Who cannot join

  • known renal disease
  • urinary tract infection
  • spontaneous labor or need to induce labor within the first 24 hours of admission

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • HaEmek Medical Center

    Afula

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Standard 24-hour Urine Protein With Shorter Collection Periods for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia

Background and project rationale:

Preeclampsia is a common complication of pregnancy, affecting 6-8% of all pregnancies and constitutes a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia is liable to endanger the lives of both the gravida and the fetus, particularly if treatment is initiated inappropriately or in an untimely fashion.

Read more

Diagnosis of preeclampsia is dependent on the finding of proteinuria, determined as being over 300mg of protein in a 24 hours urine sample. However, urine collection spanning 24 hours sometimes constitutes a "bottleneck", extending the time to diagnosis of preeclampsia. Additionally, the collection of urine for 24 hours entails a degree of discomfort, requiring that the woman be in proximity to for collection vessel, and increases the length of her hospital admission.

The use of an abbreviated test may permit diagnosis and treatment in a more timely fashion. Similarly, the ability to exclude the diagnosis more rapidly could reduce length of hospital stay and consumption of the health system's limited resources. Further, a shorter test may reduce the discomfort associated with the 24-hour test and thus increase compliance.

Previous research has suggested that briefer tests correlate with the traditional 24 hour urine collection, however these studies were based on small study populations.

Research Objective:

To validate a brief and rapid test for the diagnosis of urinary protein excretion.

To assess whether, in women with suspected preeclampsia, a difference exists between protein excretion during the daytime and at night.

Methods:

Urine collection will be performed on pregnant women admitted for investigation of suspected preeclampsia, with volumes recorded and samples taken at 6, 12 and 24 hour intervals for assessment of urinary protein content. As such, a comparison will be made between the protein excretion after 6 and 12 hours with that over a full 24 hour period; in addition, comparison will be made between daytime and nighttime urinary protein excretion. The results will allow for assessment of whether a shorter test can substitute the full 24 hour collection in the diagnosis of preeclampsia; results of women who are shown to not suffer from preeclampsia will be used to assess whether a short test can rule out the disease. Additionally a urine sample for protein/creatinine ratio will be examined and correlated with results of the different collection periods.

Read the detailed description

Literature review and project rationale:

Preeclampsia is a common complication of pregnancy, affecting 6-8% of all pregnancies and constitutes a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia is liable to endanger the lives of both the gravida and the fetus, particularly if treatment is initiated inappropriately or in an untimely fashion.

The diagnosis of preeclampsia is based on findings of raised blood pressure (over 140/90mmHg) and the presence of proteinuria. The accepted means of measuring proteinuria is by 24-hour urine collection, with a pathological value defined as 300mg or greater in the 24 hour period. When the proteinuria is greater than 5000mg in 24 hours, the pr-eclampsia is classified as severe and is further endangers the lives of the expectant mother and fetus and often results in early delivery.

Diagnosis and assessment of severity of preeclampsia require a timely situation assessment. Urine collection spanning 24 hours sometimes constitutes a "bottleneck", extending the time to diagnosis of preeclampsia. Additionally, the collection of urine for 24 hours entails a degree of discomfort, requiring that the woman be in proximity to for collection vessel, and increases the length of her hospital admission.

The use of an abbreviated test may permit diagnosis and treatment in a more timely fashion. Similarly, the ability to exclude the diagnosis more rapidly could reduce length of hospital stay and consumption of the health system's limited resources. Further, a shorter test may reduce the discomfort associated with the 24-hour test and thus increase compliance.

Previous research has shown that 8-hour urine collection does indeed produce results paralleling the 24-hour collection, and recent research also demonstrates concordance between 12-hour and 24-hour urine collections. That said, both these studies were based on small sample populations, fewer than 100 women. Another study of women with preeclampsia showed good correlation between the results of urinary protein in samples collected over 12 hours at night and those collected over 12 hours during daytime.

Research Assumptions:

  1. urine collection for a period of time less than 24 hours will reflect the degree of urinary protein excretion.
  2. urine collection for a period of time less than 24 hours will constitute an alternative test for 24-hour urine collection, the accepted diagnostic test today.

Research Objective:

To validate a brief and rapid test for the diagnosis of urinary protein excretion.

To assess whether, in women with suspected preeclampsia, a difference exists between protein excretion during the daytime and at night.

Methods:

Urine collection is to be performed on every pregnant admitted for investigation of suspected preeclampsia. After 6, 12 and 24 hours samples of the collected urine will be taken for protein concentration assessment. Quantitative urinary protein will be established according to urinary protein concentration and collected urine volume. Results of the tests after 6 and 12 hours will be compared to the final results after 24 hours, that being the test of choice for diagnosis of proteinuria in preeclampsia and thus the test that will determine management (according to department protocol).

Women for whom preeclampsia has been ruled out (viz, those who underwent investigation following raised BP but without a finding of proteinuria) will serve to assess the ability of a short urine collection to rule out proteinuria and, as such, preeclampsia.

So as to assess whether there is a difference between results of daytime urinary protein excretion and those at night, the urine collection will be performed in two vessels as follows:

  1. 8:00am - beginning of urine collection
  2. 2:00pm, vessel 1 - recording of collected urine volume, removal of a 10mL sample of urine for protein concentration testing.
  3. 8:00pm, vessel 1 - recording of total collected urine volume, removal of a 10mL sample of urine for protein concentration testing. at this point urine collection will be continued in the second vessel
  4. 8:00am the following morning, vessel 2 - recording of collected urine volume as of 8:00pm (the previous 12 hours), removal of a 10mL sample of urine for protein concentration testing.
  5. contents of the two vessels are mixed, 24 hour urine volume recorded and a 10mL sample taken, this being the sample that will establish the result of the 24 hour urine collection.

Additionally a urine sample for protein/creatinine ratio will be examined and correlated with results of the different collection periods.

Conditions
Preeclampsia
Keywords
preeclampsia, proteinuria, urine collection
Medical subject headings
Pre-Eclampsia, Proteinuria

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. to validate a shorter urine collection time for assessment of proteinuria

    urine collection over 6 and 12 hours to compare with results of the official 24 hours urine collection for proteinuria in the investigation of suspected preeclampsia

    Measured: one year

  2. To examine if a shorter urine collection time for assessment of proteinuria is comparable to the standard 24 hours

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionJul 2023
  4. Study completionAug 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
307 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01881542
Sponsor's protocol ID
0157-12-EMC
Acronym
PET and urine
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
11 Jun 2013
Last updated
15 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Tun C, Quinones JN, Kurt A, Smulian JC, Rochon M. Comparison of 12-hour urine protein and protein:creatinine ratio with 24-hour urine protein for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;207(3):233.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

    PubMed 22939731
  • Shennan AH, Redman C, Cooper C, Milne F. Are most maternal deaths from pre-eclampsia avoidable? Lancet. 2012 May 5;379(9827):1686-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60785-X. Epub 2011 Dec 14. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22177535
  • Adelberg AM, Miller J, Doerzbacher M, Lambers DS. Correlation of quantitative protein measurements in 8-, 12-, and 24-hour urine samples for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):804-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117302.

    PubMed 11641655
  • Kieler H, Zettergren T, Svensson H, Dickman PW, Larsson A. Assessing urinary albumin excretion in pre-eclamptic women: which sample to use? BJOG. 2003 Jan;110(1):12-7.

    PubMed 12504929

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Preeclampsia, run by HaEmek Medical Center, Israel at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

to validate a shorter urine collection time for assessment of proteinuria (time frame: one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01881542, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in