AzTrials
AzTrials

Hip OsteoarthritisNCT01883492

A Prospective Multi-center Study on Total Hip Arthroplasty With E1

A study testing Femoral Stem, Acetabular Cup and Acetabular Liner in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by Zimmer Biomet at 5 sites in Japan.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objectives of this clinical study include: Evaluate E1 Wear including early bedding-in process, clinical outcomes on patients who received Total Hip Arthroplasty with E1 Compare E1 wear used with CoCr and Biolox Delta heads Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 75 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Hip Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Femoral Stem, Acetabular Cup and Acetabular Liner
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
153 participants
Where
5 sitesJapan
Study dates
11 Mar 2013to 15 Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 75 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Age between 20 - 75 at the time of operation
  • Patients with limited co-morbidity -ASA I-III
  • Patients must be able to understand instructions and be willing to return for follow up

Who cannot join

  • In accordance with approved Absolute and Relative Contraindications for use in participating countries for E1 liner and Delta Ceramic and CoCr femoral head hip system System.
  • Absolute contraindications include: infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis.
  • Relative contraindications include:
  • uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions,
  • osteoporosis,
  • metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation,
Show all 11Show fewer
  • osteomalacia,
  • distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site,
  • rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram, and
  • vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease.
  • pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Japan5 sites
  • Fukuoka University School of Medicine

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180

  • Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital

    Osaka, 530-0012

  • Kitasato University School of Medicine

    Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374

  • Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital

    Tokyo, 108-8642

  • Keio University School of Medicine

    Tokyo, 160-8582

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Multi-center Randomized Study on Total Hip Replacement With E1

The primary objectives of this clinical study include:

  • Evaluate E1 Wear including early bedding-in process, clinical outcomes on patients who received Total Hip Arthroplasty with E1
  • Compare E1 wear used with CoCr and Biolox Delta heads
Read the detailed description

This study is designed as PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, MULTI-CENTER Study to compare two different materials (CoCr and Delta ceramic) articulating against E1 Highly Crosslinked polyethylene in Hip Replacement.

Patient population is 160 (80 each). Follow-up period is 10 year postoperatively. E1 liners with thickness of 4.8mm at 45 degrees position (load bearing direction) will be used in all cases.

Randomization will occur via random number generator by 4 blocks randomization.

Being tested
Femoral Stem, Acetabular Cup, Acetabular Liner
Keywords
Only Female, Age between 20 - 75 at the time of operation
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Hip

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Femoral StemDevice

    Also called Taperloc Complete, Taperloc Microplasty Complete, Taperloc Complete XR123, Taperloc Microplasty Complete XR123

    JMDN classification/Class III device

  • Acetabular CupDevice

    Also called Ringloc Acetabular Cup, Regenerex Ringloc+ Acetabular Cup

    JMDN classification: Class III device

  • Acetabular LinerDevice

    Also called E1 Ringloc Liner

    JMDN classification: Class III device

Study groups in NCT01883492
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BIOLOX delta headExperimentalUncemented Femoral Stem is inserted into femoral medullary canal. Uncemented Acetabular Cup is inserted into acetabular cavity with or without fixation screw(s). Acetabular Liner, which is made of E1 highly crosslinked polyethylene, is fitted into Acetabular cup. Biolox delta head is inserted onto the taper of the Femoral stem, and is articulating against Acetabular Liner made of E1.
Receives: Device: Femoral Stem; Device: Acetabular Cup; Device: Acetabular Liner
CoCr headActive comparatorUncemented Femoral Stem is inserted into femoral medullary canal. Uncemented Acetabular Cup is inserted into acetabular cavity with or without fixation screw(s). Acetabular Liner, which is made of E1 highly crosslinked polyethylene, is fitted into Acetabular cup. CoCr head is inserted onto the taper of the Femoral stem, and is articulating against Acetabular Liner made of E1.
Receives: Device: Femoral Stem; Device: Acetabular Cup; Device: Acetabular Liner

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Polyethylene Wear Between Immediate Postoperative and 2 Year Postoperative Period

    Vector wear, which is defined as movement (difference of femoral prosthetic head positions) between immediate postoperative and 2 years postoperative periods. There is no lower and upper limit, actual measured results. The outcome can be negative value.

    Measured: Immediate postoperative and 2 year postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Harris Hip Score at 6 Month Follow-up Visit

    Harris Hip Score is Physician rating score to evaluate hip disabilities. Score domains are "pain", "function", "absence of deformity" and "range of hip motion".

    Minimum possible score is 0 and maximum possible score is 100. Higher score means better outcome.

    Measured: 6 month postoperative

  2. Harris Hip Score at 1 Year Follow-up Visit

    Harris Hip Score is Physician rating score to evaluate hip disabilities. Score domains are "pain", "function", "absence of deformity" and "range of hip motion".

    Minimum possible score is 0 and maximum possible score is 100. Higher score means better outcome.

    Measured: 1 year postoperative

  3. Harris Hip Score at 2 Year Follow-up Visit

    Harris Hip Score is Physician rating score to evaluate hip disabilities. Score domains are "pain", "function", "absence of deformity" and "range of hip motion".

    Minimum possible score is 0 and maximum possible score is 100. Higher score means better outcome.

    Measured: 2 year postoperative

  4. Harris Hip Score at 3 Year Follow-up Visit

    Harris Hip Score is Physician rating score to evaluate hip disabilities. Score domains are "pain", "function", "absence of deformity" and "range of hip motion".

    Minimum possible score is 0 and maximum possible score is 100. Higher score means better outcome.

    Measured: 3 year postoperative

  5. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index at 6 Month Follow-up Visit

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is used in evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items.

    The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for "Pain", 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Usually a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a The total WOMAC score ranged from 0 to 96.

    Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Measured: 6 month postoperative

  6. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index at 1 Year Follow-up Visit

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is used in evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items.

    The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for "Pain", 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Usually a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a The total WOMAC score ranged from 0 to 96.

    Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Measured: 1 year postoperative

  7. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index at 2 Year Follow-up Visit

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is used in evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items.

    The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for "Pain", 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Usually a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a The total WOMAC score ranged from 0 to 96.

    Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Measured: 2 year postoperative

  8. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index at 3 Year Follow-up Visit

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is used in evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items.

    The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for "Pain", 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Usually a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a The total WOMAC score ranged from 0 to 96.

    Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Measured: 3 year postoperative

  9. UCLA Activity Score at 6 Month Follow-up Visit

    University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score is questionnaire to assess intensity of patients' activity.

    The score ranges from 1 to 10 (1 point increment), higher score means higher activity level.

    Measured: 6 month postoperative

  10. UCLA Activity Score at 1 Year Follow-up Visit

    University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score is questionnaire to assess intensity of patients' activity.

    The score ranges from 1 to 10 (1 point increment), higher score means higher activity level.

    Measured: 1 year postoperative

  11. UCLA Activity Score at 2 Year Follow-up Visit

    University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score is questionnaire to assess intensity of patients' activity.

    The score ranges from 1 to 10 (1 point increment), higher score means higher activity level.

    Measured: 2 year postoperative

  12. UCLA Activity Score at 3 Year Follow-up Visit

    University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score is questionnaire to assess intensity of patients' activity.

    The score ranges from 1 to 10 (1 point increment), higher score means higher activity level.

    Measured: 3 year postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Mar 2013
  3. Primary completion6 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2019

Why it stopped: Enrollment of the subject could not reach statistically required number.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
153 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01883492
Sponsor's protocol ID
INT.CR.GH2
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
31 Jan 2013
Last updated
17 Feb 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Femoral Stem, Acetabular Cup and Acetabular Liner in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by Zimmer Biomet at 5 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Polyethylene Wear Between Immediate Postoperative and 2 Year Postoperative Period (time frame: Immediate postoperative and 2 year postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in