AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal Cancer ScreeningMyCRCSNCT01885351

An Interactive Preventive Health Record to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening

A study testing MyCRCS+Prefs and MyCRCS+Prefs+Barriers in people with Colorectal Cancer Screening, run by Temple University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study involves 3 phases that modifies current Interactive Preventative Health Record-Colorectal Cancer Screening (IPHR-CRCS) modules to address each patient's individual colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) knowledge, attitudes, preferences, and test-specific barriers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer Screening
What is being tested?
MyCRCS+Prefs and MyCRCS+Prefs+Barriers
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
683 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Mar 2013to 10 Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults 50-75 years
  • Non-adherent to CRCS guidelines (i.e., no FOBT in last year, no sigmoidoscopy or barium enema in last 5 years, and no colonoscopy in last 10 years)
  • English-speaking
  • Have computer access (e.g. home, work, library)
  • Additional eligibility for Phase I: focus group participants will be ineligible for the subsequent prototype testing and cognitive/usability testing interviews
  • Additional eligibility for Phase I: prototype testing participants will be ineligible for the cognitive/usability testing interviews
  • Additional eligibility for Phase II: Seen in the clinic in the last 2 years

Who cannot join

  • Personal CRC history
  • Additional exclusion for Phase III: Patients seen at any clinic participating in Phase II

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Temple University - General Internal Medicine

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19122

  • Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network

    Richmond, Virginia, 23298

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study involves 3 phases that modifies current Interactive Preventative Health Record-Colorectal Cancer Screening (IPHR-CRCS) modules to address each patient's individual colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) knowledge, attitudes, preferences, and test-specific barriers. The study will engage patients, ages 50-75 years who are non-adherent to CRCS, to assess their CRCS test preferences and corresponding test-specific barriers in "real time". Based on patient characteristics (e.g. age, personal and family history, physician CRCS recommendation, CRCS test preferences, top test-specific barriers), tailored messages/videos will appear in the pop-up screens to address/reduce the top patient-reported, test-specific CRCS barriers while incorporating an action plan for CRCS adherence. The investigators hypothesize that modifying the IPHR-CRCS module to address each patient's individual CRCS knowledge, attitudes, preferences, and test-specific barriers will further increase CRCS.

Being tested
MyCRCS+Prefs, MyCRCS+Prefs+Barriers
Keywords
Colorectal Cancer Screening, Ambulatory Care, Patient-Centered Care, Intervention Studies, Longitudinal Studies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MyCRCS+PrefsBehavioural

    Patients who are identified by the IPHR as study participants will see an attractive link. In the Prefs arm, via question prompt lists, patients will first identify their CRCS preference using previously developed elicitation strategies.

    Tailoring will be used to increase salience of information, motivation, communication, and action plans. We envision the Prefs+ arm in its entirety will be 5-7 minutes, but will depend on Phase I formative work. If the patient remains non-adherent, they will receive an e-mail reminder generated by the IPHR (specific text and frequency determined in Phase I). The Prefs content is identical to the preference portion of the Prefs+Barriers arm, which will allow us to assess the incremental benefit of addressing preferences only and the incremental benefit of addressing preferences and barriers.

  • MyCRCS+Prefs+BarriersBehavioural

    Patients who are identified by the IPHR as study participants will see an attractive link. In the Prefs+Barriers arm, via question prompt lists, patients will first identify their CRCS preference using previously developed elicitation strategies, and subsequently based on their test preference determine their top 3-5 test-specific barriers/concerns in "real time".

    Tailoring will be used to increase salience of information, motivation, communication, and action plans. We envision the Prefs+Barriers arm in its entirety will be 15-25 minutes, but will depend on Phase I formative work. If the patient remains non-adherent, they will receive an e-mail reminder generated by the IPHR (specific text and frequency determined in Phase I). The Prefs content is identical to the preference portion of the Prefs+Barriers arm, which will allow us to assess the incremental benefit of addressing preferences only and the incremental benefit of addressing preferences and barriers.

Study groups in NCT01885351
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Phase II: MyCRCS+PrefsExperimentalPatients who are identified by the IPHR as study participants will see an attractive link. In the Prefs arm, via question prompt lists, patients will first identify their CRCS preference using previously developed elicitation strategies. Tailoring will be used to increase salience of information, motivation, communication, and action plans. We envision the Prefs+ arm in its entirety will be 5-7 minutes, but will depend on Phase I formative work. If the patient remains non-adherent, they will receive an e-mail reminder generated by the IPHR (specific text and frequency determined in Phase I). The Prefs content is identical to the preference portion of the Prefs+Barriers arm, which will allow us to assess the incremental benefit of addressing preferences only and the incremental benefit of addressing preferences and barriers.
Receives: Behavioral: MyCRCS+Prefs
Phase II: MyCRCS+Prefs+BarriersExperimentalPatients who are identified by the IPHR as study participants will see an attractive link. In the Prefs+Barriers arm, via question prompt lists, patients will first identify their CRCS preference using previously developed elicitation strategies, and subsequently based on their test preference determine their top 3 test-specific barriers/concerns in "real time". Tailoring will be used to increase salience of information, motivation, communication, and action plans. We envision the Prefs+Barriers arm in its entirety will be 15-25 minutes, but will depend on Phase I formative work. If the patient remains non-adherent, they will receive an e-mail reminder generated by the IPHR (specific text and frequency determined in Phase I). The Prefs content is identical to the preference portion of the Prefs+Barriers arm, which will allow us to assess the incremental benefit of addressing preferences only and the incremental benefit of addressing preferences and barriers
Receives: Behavioral: MyCRCS+Prefs+Barriers
Phase II: Usual CareNo interventionThe IPHR will be programmed so that where the IPHR-CRCS would normally present patients, who based on their demographics and health conditions, with content advising them to seek CRCS and links to third-party sites, they would instead be randomized to receive the usual care (IPHR-CRCS).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. CRCS adherence provided by the electronic medical record

    Having had ≥1 test (i.e., fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and barium enema) within the time frame specified for each procedure will count as adherent CRCS.

    Measured: Phase II: Baseline up to 12 months post randomization

  2. CRCS adherence provided by the electronic medical record

    Having had ≥1 test (i.e., fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and barium enema) within the time frame specified for each procedure will count as adherent CRCS.

    Measured: Phase III: Baseline up to 12 months post intervention

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Self-reported CRCS adherence

    The four NCI-recommended CRCS history questions will be included on the self-report surveys. Respondents will identify the last time they had each test (i.e., fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and barium enema). Having had ≥1 test within the time frame specified for each procedure will count as adherent CRCS.

    Measured: Phase II: Baseline, 3 months, and 9 months post randomization

  2. EHR Paradata

    We will track participants' use of the intervention and usual care arms to capture number of log-ins, pages viewed, length of view, links clicked. In addition to elucidating patients' uptake of intervention components, these data can indicate engagement for dose-response analyses or be examined as potential mediators. For Phase II, this data will allow us to assess the timing of intervention reminders to make a decision about what frequency is most appropriate so that we can modify before we begin the feasibility study (phase III).

    Measured: Phase II: continuous

  3. Psychosocial Constructs

    Scales (e.g. Decisional conflict, intentions , self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, worry, etc.) are included in the patient questionnaire, which have good psychometric properties.

    Measured: Phase II: Baseline, 3 months, and 9 months post randomization

  4. General and test-specific colorectal cancer screening barriers

    A previously validated modality-specific colorectal cancer screening barrier instrument will be used. The FOBT-specific scale includes 19 questions relating to barriers for fecal occult blood test, and the colonoscopy-specific scale includes 21 questions relating barriers to colonoscopy. All items are measured on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with 5 representing greater barrier endorsement. Items are summated to create continuous scale scores (range: FOBT=19-95; colonoscopy=21-105).

    Measured: Phase II: Baseline, 3 months, and 9 months post randomization

  5. Self-reported CRCS adherence

    The four NCI-recommended CRCS history questions will be included on the self-report surveys. Respondents will identify the last time they had each test (i.e., fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy and barium enema). Having had ≥1 test within the time frame specified for each procedure will count as adherent CRCS.

    Measured: Phase III: Baseline and 9 months post intervention

  6. EHR Paradata

    We will track participants' use of the intervention and usual care arms to capture number of log-ins, pages viewed, length of view, links clicked. In addition to elucidating patients' uptake of intervention components, these data can indicate engagement for dose-response analyses or be examined as potential mediators. For Phase II, this data will allow us to assess the timing of intervention reminders to make a decision about what frequency is most appropriate so that we can modify before we begin the feasibility study (phase III).

    Measured: Phase III: Continuous

  7. Psychosocial Constructs

    Scales (e.g. Decisional conflict, intentions , self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, worry, etc.) are included in the patient questionnaire, which have good psychometric properties.

    Measured: Phase III: Baseline and 9 months post intervention

  8. General and test-specific colorectal cancer screening barriers

    A previously validated modality-specific colorectal cancer screening barrier instrument will be used. The FOBT-specific scale includes 19 questions relating to barriers for fecal occult blood test, and the colonoscopy-specific scale includes 21 questions relating barriers to colonoscopy. All items are measured on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with 5 representing greater barrier endorsement. Items are summated to create continuous scale scores (range: FOBT=19-95; colonoscopy=21-105).

    Measured: Phase III: Baseline and 9 months post intervention

  9. Feasibility of MyCRCS+ in target setting - patient survey

    Phase III is a feasibility study to determine among other things, implementation in the "real world" setting. The outcomes we propose to measure are defined by the RE-AIM model. Specifically, we selected four essential elements pertaining to the feasibility of fielding MyCRCS+: Reach, Effectiveness, Implementation, and Maintenance.

    The patient survey will include key questions related to intervention reach and potential future implementation adaptations addressing patient awareness and perception of the practices' MyCRCS+ integration strategies.Surveys will assess: patients' awareness of MyCRCS+, how they learned about it, what they liked or disliked about how practices promoted and used MyCRCS+; to what extent they used the MyCRCS+, the factors that influenced use, facilitators and barriers to both using and acting on MyCRCS+ recommendations; anxiety and worry; and quality of life (QOL).

    Measured: Phase III: Baseline and 9 months post intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Mar 2013
  3. Primary completionJul 2020
  4. Study completion10 Aug 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
683 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01885351
Sponsor's protocol ID
HM14658
Other IDs
R01CA166375-01A1, MYCRCS-302259
Acronym
MyCRCS
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
23 Apr 2013
Last updated
17 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MyCRCS+Prefs and MyCRCS+Prefs+Barriers in people with Colorectal Cancer Screening, run by Temple University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

CRCS adherence provided by the electronic medical record (time frame: Phase II: Baseline up to 12 months post randomization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in