Clostridium Difficile InfectionPhase 3NCT01887912
Study of a Candidate Clostridium Difficile Toxoid Vaccine in Subjects at Risk for C. Difficile Infection
A Phase 3 study testing C. difficile Toxoid Vaccine in people with Clostridium Difficile Infection, run by Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company at 335 sites in 26 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Clostridium difficile vaccine to prevent primary symptomatic C. difficile infection (CDI) in participants at risk for CDI where there is a substantial unmet medical need. Primary objective: To assess the efficacy of the C. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Clostridium Difficile Infection
- What is being tested?
- C. difficile Toxoid Vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 9,302 participants
- Where
- 335 sitesin 26 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Jul 2013to 12 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged >= 50 years on the day of inclusion
- Informed consent form had been signed and dated.
- Attended all scheduled visits and complied with all trial procedures.
- Covered by health insurance (if required).
- Must fulfill at least 1 of the following criteria
- Risk Stratum 1:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Had at least 2 hospital stays, each lasting at least >= 24 hours, in the 12 months before enrollment, and
- Had received systemic (not topical) antibiotics in the 12 months before enrollment, or
- Risk Stratum 2:
- Was anticipated to have an in-patient hospitalization for a planned surgical procedure within 60 days of enrollment. The impending hospital stay was planned to be >= 72 hours for a surgery involving 1 of the following:
- Kidney/bladder/urinary system
- Musculoskeletal system
- Respiratory system
- Circulatory system
- Central nervous system.
Who cannot join
- Participant was pregnant, or lactating, or of childbearing potential (to be considered of non-childbearing potential, a female must be post-menopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile, or using an effective method of contraception or abstinence from at least 4 weeks prior to the first vaccination and until at least 4 weeks after the last vaccination).
- Participation in the 4 weeks preceding the first trial vaccination or participation during the present trial period in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or medical procedure.
- Receipt of any vaccine in the 4 weeks preceding the first trial vaccination except for influenza (seasonal or pandemic) and pneumococcal vaccines. This exception includes monovalent pandemic influenza vaccines and multivalent influenza vaccines.
- Previous vaccination against C. difficile with either the trial vaccine, another vaccine, or monoclonal antibodies.
- Diarrhea on day of enrollment.
- Self-reported current or prior CDI episode.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Anticipated or current receipt of kidney dialysis treatment.
- History of gastrointestinal surgery for gastrointestinal malignancy (Note: Colonoscopy, polypectomy, and appendectomy are not exclusion criteria).
- History of inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome (must include diarrhea as a symptom), colostomy, or small or large intestine bowel surgery where resection was performed.
- Receiving enteral feeding (e.g., nasogastric, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy tube feeding).
- Known or suspected congenital or acquired immunodeficiency; or receipt of immunosuppressive therapy, such as anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy, within the preceding 6 months; or long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy (prednisone or equivalent for more than 2 consecutive weeks within the past 3 months).
- Known systemic hypersensitivity to any of the vaccine components, or history of a life-threatening reaction to the vaccine used in the trial or to a vaccine containing any of the same substances.
- Self-reported thrombocytopenia, contraindicating intramuscular vaccination.
- Deprived of freedom by an administrative or court order, or in an emergency setting, or hospitalized involuntarily.
- Current alcohol abuse or drug addiction that might interfere with the ability to comply with trial procedures in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Chronic illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, is at a stage where it might interfere with trial conduct or completion.
- Moderate or severe acute illness/infection (according to investigator judgment) on the day of vaccination or febrile illness (temperature >= 38.0 degree Celsius [>= 100.4°Fahrenheit]). A prospective participant should not be included in the study until the condition has resolved or the febrile event has subsided.
- Identified as an Investigator or employee of the Investigator or study center with direct involvement in the proposed study, or identified as an immediate family member (i.e., parent, spouse, natural or adopted child) of the Investigator or employee with direct involvement in the proposed study.
Trial locations and contacts
335 sites in 26 countries.
335 sites in 26 countries
United States142 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 27103
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Study site
Anderson, Indiana, 46011
Investigational Site 190
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Investigational Site 146
Asheville, North Carolina, 28805
Study site
Auburn, Maine, 04210
Investigational Site 149
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Investigational Site 544
Austin, Texas, 78726
Study site
Bakersfield, California, 93301
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
Study site
Banning, California, 92220
Study site
Bend, Oregon, 97701
Investigational Site 002
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Investigational Site 143
Bradenton, Florida, 34209
Investigational Site 187
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Study site
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Study site
Butte, Montana, 59701
Investigational Site 528
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011
Investigational Site 523
Canton, Ohio, 44710
Study site
Cary, North Carolina, 27518
Investigational Site 540
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Investigational Site 075
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Investigational Site 517
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Investigational Site 129
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44118
Investigational Site 003
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78413
Investigational Site 055
Crystal River, Florida, 34429
Investigational Site 006
Dallas, Texas, 75216
Study site
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Investigational Site 061
Dayton, Ohio, 45419
Study site
Dayton, Ohio, 45428
Investigational Site 529
Decatur, Georgia, 30030
Study site
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Investigational Site 175
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Investigational Site 022
Endwell, New York, 13760
Study site
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Investigational Site 031
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104
Study site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Study site
Flagstaff, Arizona, 86001
Investigational Site 183
Flint, Michigan, 48504
Investigational Site 119
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Study site
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067
Investigational Site 506
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
Study site
Garden Grove, California, 92844
Study site
Groesbeck, Texas, 76642
Study site
Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, 48236
Study site
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Investigational Site 099
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Study site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Investigational Site 189
Hillsborough, New Jersey, 8844
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35803
Investigational Site 049
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83494
Investigational Site 101
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Investigational Site 009
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Study site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
Study site
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
Study site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Study site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Study site
Livonia, Michigan, 48152
Investigational Site 534
Los Angeles, California, 90022
Investigational Site 051
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Investigational Site 012
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24501
Study site
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Study site
Marion, Ohio, 43302
Investigational Site 030
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Investigational Site 091
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Investigational Site 095
Middletown, Ohio, 45005
Investigational Site 104
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Study site
Modesto, California, 95350
Investigational Site 047
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37082
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Investigational Site 044
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753
Investigational Site 084
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Study site
Opelousas, Louisiana, 70570
Study site
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
Investigational Site 135
Orem, Utah, 84058
Investigational Site 050
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, 02860
Investigational Site 112
Pensacola, Florida, 32504
Study site
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Study site
Peoria, Illinois, 61614
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Investigational Site 194
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240
Investigational Site 543
Pocatello, Idaho, 83201
Study site
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34987
Study site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Study site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 48202
Investigational Site 086
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Study site
Redding, California, 96001
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14621
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Investigational Site 069
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95817
Investigational Site 080
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124
Investigational Site 193
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Investigational Site 088
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Investigational Site 010
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Investigational Site 077
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
Investigational Site 504
Simi Valley, California, 93065
Investigational Site 180
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Investigational Site 040
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
Investigational Site 114
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713
Investigational Site 057
Stanford, California, 94305
Study site
Statesville, North Carolina, 28625
Study site
Stevensville, Michigan, 49127
Investigational Site 503
Surprise, Arizona, 85374
Study site
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Study site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Study site
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Study site
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Study site
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Investigational Site 013
The Bronx, New York, 10468
Study site
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Study site
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Study site
Troy, Michigan, 48098
Investigational Site 083
Uniontown, Pennsylvania, 15401
Investigational Site 176
Upland, California, 91786
Study site
Ventura, California, 93003
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Study site
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
Investigational Site 035
West Roxbury, Massachusetts, 02132
Study site
Weston, Wisconsin, 54476
Investigational Site 546
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 90033
Investigational Site 020
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, 18711
Study site
Williamsburg, Virginia, 23185
Study site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Investigational Site 196
Winchester, Virginia, 22601
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
South Korea22 sites
Investigational Site 413
Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15355
Investigational Site 446
Busan, 49201
Study site
Cheongju-si, 361-711
Study site
Daegu, Jung-Gu, 700-721
Investigational Site 439
Gyeonggi-do, 16247
Study site
Gyeonggi-do, 443-380
Investigational Site 427
Incheon, Namdong-gu, 22332
Investigational Site 412
Incheon, 21565
Study site
Seoul, Gangnam-gu, 135-710
Study site
Seoul, Seocho-gu, 137-701
Study site
Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752
Study site
Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, 136-705
Study site
Seoul, Seongdong-gu, 132-792
Study site
Seoul, Songpa-gu, 138-736
Investigational Site 409
Seoul, 2841
Investigational Site 408
Seoul, 3722
Investigational Site 415
Seoul, 5355
Investigational Site 418
Seoul, 5505
Investigational Site 411
Seoul, 6351
Investigational Site 437
Seoul, 7441
Investigational Site 438
Seoul, 8308
Investigational Site 407
Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, 26427
Japan20 sites
Investigational Site 450
Aichi, 491-8551
Investigational Site 468
Chiba, 278-0004
Investigational Site 467
Fukui, 910-0067
Investigational Site 464
Fukuoka, 800-0344
Investigational Site 465
Fukuoka, 814-8525
Investigational Site 466
Fukuoka, 838-0069
Investigational Site 457
Gunma, 371-0014
Investigational Site 455
Hyōgo, 666-0125
Investigational Site 453
Ibaraki, 300-0028
Investigational Site 460
Kyoto, 611-0041
Investigational Site 454
Kyoto, 613-0034
Investigational Site 456
Nagano, 382-0091
Investigational Site 452
Nagano, 390-8601
Investigational Site 458
Nagano, 392-8510
Investigational Site 469
Okinawa, 904-2293
Investigational Site 461
Ōsaka, 596-8522
Investigational Site 459
Saitama, 348-0044
Investigational Site 467
Shimonoseki, 750-8520
Investigational Site 451
Tokyo, 171-0014
Investigational Site 463
Yamaguchi, 750-8520
Brazil15 sites
Study site
Aparecida de Goiânia, Goiás, 74935-530
Study site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-221
Study site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30190-130
Study site
Campinas, 13020431
Study site
Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, 92425-900
Study site
Curitiba, Paraná, 80810-040
Study site
Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, 36010-570
Study site
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59025-600
Study site
Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro, 26030-380
Study site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003
Study site
Recife, Pernambuco, 52020-010
Study site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22271-100
Study site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40420-000
Study site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 41253-190
Study site
Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650
Canada13 sites
Study site
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 1B1
Study site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Study site
New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W7
Study site
Pierrefonds, Quebec, H9H 4Y6
Investigational Site 152
Québec, Quebec, G1E 7G9
Investigational Site 151
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H5N4
Investigational Site 156
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
Investigational Site 161
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 3R9
Investigational Site 163
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 1L2
Investigational Site 158
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z IM9
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A IR9
Germany13 sites
Study site
Berlin, 10629
Study site
Berlin, 13347
Study site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Investigational Site 244
Deggingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73326
Study site
Essen, 45355
Study site
Goch, 47574
Investigational Site 247
Hamburg, 20359
Investigational Site 245
Hamburg, 22143
Study site
Jena, Thuringia, 07747
Study site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04109
Study site
Leipzig, 97074
Study site
Munich, Bavaria, 81675
Investigational Site 242
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97074
Mexico13 sites
Study site
Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20230
Investigational Site 363
Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas
Investigational Site 351
Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62290
Investigational Site 326
Durango, 34000
Investigational Site 352
Ecatepec de Morelos, State of Mexico, 55076
Investigational Site 324
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280
Investigational Site 325
Mexico City, D.F., 14000
Investigational Site 329
Mexico City, D.F., 14080
Study site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Study site
Morelos
Study site
San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78240
Study site
San Luis Potosí City, 78240
Study site
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22320
France12 sites
Investigational Site 230
Dijon, 21079
Study site
Lille, 49100
Study site
Limoges, 87042
Study site
Lyon, 69004
Study site
Montpellier, 34295
Study site
Orléans, 45100
Investigational Site 221
Paris, 75014
Investigational Site 229
Pringy, 21079
Study site
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Investigational Site 223
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
Study site
Tourcoing, 59208
Investigational Site 232
Tours, 37044
United Kingdom12 sites
Investigational Site 276
Blackpool, FY3 7EN
Study site
Blackpool, FY3 8NR
Investigational Site 277
Coventry, CV2 2DX
Study site
Harrow, HA1 3UJ
Investigational Site 281
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Study site
Liverpool, L78XP
Investigational Site 271
London, SW17 0RE
Study site
Manchester, M8 5RB
Study site
Middlesex, HA1 3UJ
Study site
North Shields, NE29 8NH
Investigational Site 275
Penzance, TR19 7HX
Study site
Stoke-on-Trent, SR53SY
Finland11 sites
Study site
Espoo, FIN-02100
Study site
Helsinki, FIN-00100
Study site
Helsinki, FIN-00930
Investigational Site 203
Jarvenpaa, FIN-04400
Study site
Kokkola, 67100
Study site
Oulu, FIN-90220
Study site
Pori, 28100
Study site
Seinäjoki, 60100
Investigational Site 201
Tampere, FIN-33100
Investigational Site 202
Turku, FIN-20520
Study site
Vantaa, FIN-01300
Peru9 sites
Investigational Site 332
Jesus Maria, Lima region, lima 11
Investigational Site 356
Lima, callao 2
Investigational Site 355
Lima, lima 1
Study site
Lima
Study site
Lima Cercado, Lima region
Investigational Site 365
Piura, 200101
Investigational Site 334
San Martín de Porres, Lima region, lima 31
Study site
Surquillo, Lima region
Investigational Site 364
Trujillo, La Libertad, 130101
Colombia8 sites
Study site
Armenia, Quindío Department
Study site
Barranquilla, Alantico
Study site
Bogotá, Ditrito Capital
Study site
Bogotá, Ditrito
Study site
Bucaramanga, Santander Department
Study site
Floridablanca, Santander Department
Study site
Medellín, Antioquia
Study site
Yopal
Australia7 sites
Investigational Site 404
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Investigational Site 401
Cairns, Queensland, 4870
Investigational Site 403
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Study site
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Study site
Subiaco, Western Australia, 6008
Study site
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Study site
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Philippines7 sites
Study site
Alabang, 1770
Study site
Dasmariñas, 4114
Study site
Manila, 1000
Study site
Manila, 1004
Study site
Pasig, 1600
Study site
Quezon City, 1100
Study site
Quezon City, 1101
Taiwan7 sites
Study site
Kaohsiung City, 813
Investigational Site 426
New Taipei City, 22056
Study site
New Taipei City, 23156
Investigational Site 429
Taichung, 40201
Investigational Site 421
Tainan, 71004
Investigational Site 425
Taipei, 10002
Study site
Tiachung, 404
Singapore5 sites
Study site
Singapore, 119074
Investigational Site 419
Singapore, 119228
Study site
Singapore, 169608
Investigational Site 428
Singapore, 308433
Investigational Site 445
Singapore, 768828
Spain4 sites
Investigational Site 294
Córdoba, 14004
Investigational Site 293
Santander, 39008
Investigational Site 292
Terrassa, 08221
Investigational Site 295
Vigo, 36312
Sweden3 sites
Study site
Göthenburg, SWE, 41685
Study site
Stockholm, 11157
Study site
Umeå, 90185
Thailand3 sites
Investigational Site 443
Bangkok, 10330
Investigational Site 442
Bangkok, 10400
Investigational Site 441
Khon Kaen, 40002
Poland2 sites
Investigational Site 284
Bydgoszcz, 85-863
Investigational Site 283
Nowy Duninów, 09-505
Puerto Rico2 sites
Investigational Site 171
Bayamón, PR, 00960
Study site
Bayamón, 00961
About this study
Official title: Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety Study of Clostridium Difficile Toxoid Vaccine in Subjects at Risk for C. Difficile Infection (Cdiffense™)
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Clostridium difficile vaccine to prevent primary symptomatic C. difficile infection (CDI) in participants at risk for CDI where there is a substantial unmet medical need.
Primary objective:
Read more
- To assess the efficacy of the C. difficile vaccine in preventing the onset of symptomatic primary CDI confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in adult participants aged >= 50 years who are at risk for CDI and have received at least 1 injection.
Secondary Objectives:
Efficacy:
- To assess prevention of symptomatic PCR-confirmed primary CDI cases after 3 injections administered at 0, 7, and 30 days.
- To assess prevention of symptomatic PCR-confirmed primary CDI cases after completion of at least 2 injections.
Immunogenicity:
- To describe the immunogenicity to toxin A and toxin B at specific time points in a subset of participant and in participants with CDI at Day 0 and Day 60.
Safety:
- To describe the safety profile of all participants who received at least 1 injection.
Read the detailed description
The study was designed as an event-driven group sequential protocol with 4 interim analyses at defined information milestones and a final analysis when a specific number of clinical endpoints are reached. Analyses of trial futility (non-efficacy) were to be performed at the first 2 interim analyses, and the study was to be stopped if either of those analyses provided robust and compelling evidence that meaningful levels of vaccine efficacy (VE) would not be demonstrated.
Following completion of the first interim analysis (50 cases of confirmed CDI observed), the futility criterion was met and in accordance with IDMC recommendation, enrollment and further vaccination ceased in November 2017.
Due to the early termination of the study, some of the planned secondary efficacy endpoints could not be analyzed as all planned data were not collected.
Participants were randomized to receive either the candidate vaccine or a placebo that was to be administered in a 3-dose schedule. At the time of group assignment, 928 participants (10% of total enrollment) were randomized to an immunogenicity subset; and 1859 participants (20% of total enrollment) were randomized to a reactogenicity subset.
Safety was assessed in all participants in terms of unsolicited adverse events from Day 0 to Day 60, as well as serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study. Solicited adverse reactions were collected for 6 days following each injection in the reactogenicity subset.
- Conditions
- Clostridium Difficile Infection
- Being tested
- C. difficile Toxoid Vaccine, Placebo: 0.9% normal saline
- Keywords
- Clostridium difficile Toxoid Vaccine, Clostridium difficile infection, Cdiffense
- Medical subject headings
- Clostridium Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
C. difficile Toxoid VaccineBiological
0.5 mL, Intramuscular
Placebo: 0.9% normal salineBiological
0.5 mL, Intramuscular
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| C. difficile Vaccine Group | Experimental | Participants received 1 injection of 0.5 mL C. difficile toxoid vaccine at Days 0 (Injection 1), 7 (Injection 2), and 30 (Injection 3). Receives: Biological: C. difficile Toxoid Vaccine |
| Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Participants received 1 injection of 0.5 mL placebo matched to vaccine at Days 0 (Injection 1), 7 (Injection 2), and 30 (Injection 3). Receives: Biological: Placebo: 0.9% normal saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Confirmed Primary C. Difficile Infection (CDI) Cases
Symptomatic PCR-confirmed CDI cases were defined as the number of participants with combination of clinical and laboratory findings. Clinical components were: >= 3 loose stools in <= 24 hours, loose stools (defined as type 6 [fluffy pieces with ragged edges, mushy] or type 7 [watery, no solid pieces] according to the Bristol Stool Chart) lasting >= 24 hours. Laboratory findings were: stool sample positive for C. difficile Toxin B by PCR at central laboratory or diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis visualized at colonoscopy.
Measured: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Secondary outcomes (10)
Number of Participants With Severe PCR-Confirmed Primary CDI Cases
Severe CDI cases were defined as number of participants with at least one of the following symptoms: fever >= 38.5 degree Celsius (°C), white blood cell count >= 15,000 cells/mm^3, ileus, pseudomembranous colitis, serum albumin <3 gram per deciliter, abdominal distension, abdominal tenderness, or admission to the intensive care unit within 7 days of CDI diagnosis.
Measured: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Number of Participants With Loose Stool Episodes
Loose stools were defined as type 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, mushy) or type 7 (watery, no solid pieces) according to the Bristol Stool Chart. In this outcome measure, participants with number of loose stool episodes (categorized as: loose stool episodes less than 3, 3 to 6, 7 to 10, 11 to 15 and greater than 15) were reported.
Measured: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Number of Participants With Symptomatic PCR Confirmed CDI Cases: Per-Protocol Population
Symptomatic PCR confirmed CDI cases were defined as the number of participants with combination of clinical and laboratory findings. Clinical components were: >= 3 loose stools in <= 24 hours, loose stools (defined as type 6 [fluffy pieces with ragged edges, mushy] or type 7 [watery, no solid pieces] according to the Bristol Stool Chart) lasting >= 24 hours. Laboratory findings were: stool sample positive for C. difficile Toxin B by PCR at central laboratory or diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis visualized at colonoscopy. Analysis was performed on per-protocol efficacy analysis set (PPEAS).
Measured: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Serum antibody concentrations against toxins A and B were measured by ELISA and expressed as geometric mean concentration (GMC). The 2-sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of GMC was based on the Student t-distribution. Analysis was performed on Per Protocol Immunogenicity Analysis Set, which included participants who had at least 1 injection, no relevant protocol deviations (not met inclusion criteria/ met exclusion criteria, not received vaccine/ not received in proper time window, received different vaccine than randomized, preparation and/ or administration of vaccine not per protocol, protocol-restricted therapy, not provided post-dose serology sample/serology sample did not produced a valid test result).
Measured: Day 0, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 210, Day 390, Day 570, Day 750, Day 930, and Day 1110
Percentage of Participants With >= 2 and 4-Fold Rise in Serum Antibody Concentrations From Baseline Against Toxins A and B Measured by ELISA
Percentage of Participants with >= 2 and 4-fold rise in serum antibody concentrations against toxins A and B were measured by ELISA. The 2-sided 95% Cl of the percentage was based on Exact method calculations.
Measured: Day 60
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by ELISA in Participants With CDI
Serum antibody concentrations against toxins A and B were measured by ELISA and expressed as GMC. The 2-sided 95% CI GMC was based on the Student t-distribution. Symptomatic PCR-confirmed CDI cases were defined as the number of participants with combination of clinical and laboratory findings. Clinical components were: >= 3 loose stools in <= 24 hours, loose stools (defined as type 6 [fluffy pieces with ragged edges, mushy] or type 7 [watery, no solid pieces] according to the Bristol Stool Chart) lasting >= 24 hours. Laboratory findings were: stool sample positive for C. difficile Toxin B by PCR at central laboratory or diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis visualized at colonoscopy.
Measured: Day 0 and Day 60
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by Toxin Neutralization Assay (TNA)
Serum antibody concentrations against toxins A and B were measured by TNA and expressed as geometric mean titer (GMT). The 2-sided 95% Cl of GMT was based on the Student t-distribution.
Measured: Day 0, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 210, Day 390, Day 570, Day 750, Day 930, and Day 1110
Percentage of Participants With >= 2 and 4-Fold Rise in Serum Antibody Concentrations From Baseline Against Toxins A and B Measured by TNA
Percentage of Participants with >= 2 and 4-fold rise in serum antibody concentrations against toxins A and B were measured by TNA. The 2-sided 95% CI of the percentage was based on Exact method calculations.
Measured: Day 60
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by TNA in Participants With CDI
Serum antibody concentrations against toxins A and B were measured by TNA and were expressed as GMT. The 2-sided 95% CI GMC was based on the Student t-distribution. Symptomatic PCR confirmed CDI cases were defined as the number of participants with combination of clinical and laboratory findings. Clinical components were: >= 3 loose stools in <= 24 hours, loose stools (defined as type 6 [fluffy pieces with ragged edges, mushy] or type 7 [watery, no solid pieces] according to the Bristol Stool Chart) lasting >= 24 hours. Laboratory findings were: stool sample positive for C. difficile Toxin B by PCR at central laboratory or diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis visualized at colonoscopy.
Measured: Day 0 and Day 60
Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection Site and Systemic Reactions
Solicited injection site reactions: pain, erythema, and swelling. Pain: Grade 1: no interference with activity, Grade 2: some interference with activity, Grade 3: significant; prevents daily activity; Erythema and swelling: Grade 1: >= 25 to <=50 mm, Grade 2: >51 to <=100 mm, Grade 3: >100 mm. Solicited systemic reactions: fever, headache, malaise, myalgia, and arthralgia. Fever: Grade 1: >= 38.0°C to <=38.4°C or >= 100.4° Fahrenheit (F) to <=101.1°F, Grade 2: >=38.5°C to <= 38.9°C or >=101.2°F to <=102.0°F, Grade 3: >=39.0°C or >=102.1°F. Headache, malaise, and myalgia: Grade 1: no interference with activity, Grade 2: some interference with activity, Grade 3: significant; prevents daily activity; Arthralgia: Grade 1: free range of motion but complains of pain or discomfort, Grade 2: decreased range of motion due to pain or discomfort, Grade 3: unwilling to move due to pain.
Measured: Day 0 to Day 6 after any vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study start30 Jul 2013
- Primary completion12 Jun 2018
- Study completion12 Jun 2018
Why it stopped: The Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) concluded that the probability that the study will meet its primary objective is low.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Clostridium Difficile InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study was observer-blind. The vaccine preparer and administrator may have been unblinded to treatment assignment due to the steps necessary for vaccine preparation. However, the participant, the Investigator, and study staff members who collected the safety data and laboratory personnel who analyzed the blood and stool samples were all blinded to the group assignment.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 9,302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01887912
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-030-014
- Other IDs
- 2013-000775-32, U1111-1127-7162
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
de Bruyn G, Gordon DL, Steiner T, Tambyah P, Cosgrove C, Martens M, Bassily E, Chan ES, Patel D, Chen J, Torre-Cisneros J, Fernando De Magalhaes Francesconi C, Gesser R, Jeanfreau R, Launay O, Laot T, Morfin-Otero R, Oviedo-Orta E, Park YS, Piazza FM, Rehm C, Rivas E, Self S, Gurunathan S. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a Clostridioides difficile toxoid vaccine candidate: a phase 3 multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):252-262. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30331-5. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
PubMed 32946836
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety Study of Clostridium Difficile Toxoid Vaccine in Subjects at Risk for C. Difficile Infection (Cdiffense™)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01887912
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-030-014
- Conditions
- Clostridium Difficile Infection
- Keywords
- Clostridium difficile Toxoid Vaccine, Clostridium difficile infection, Cdiffense
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) concluded that the probability that the study will meet its primary objective is low.
- Enrolment
- 9,302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Clostridium difficile vaccine to prevent primary symptomatic C. difficile infection (CDI) in participants at risk for CDI where there is a substantial unmet medical need.
Primary objective:
- To assess the efficacy of the C. difficile vaccine in preventing the onset of symptomatic primary CDI confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in adult participants aged >= 50 years who are at risk for CDI and have received at least 1 injection.
Secondary Objectives:
Efficacy:
- To assess prevention of symptomatic PCR-confirmed primary CDI cases after 3 injections administered at 0, 7, and 30 days.
- To assess prevention of symptomatic PCR-confirmed primary CDI cases after completion of at least 2 injections.
Immunogenicity:
- To describe the immunogenicity to toxin A and toxin B at specific time points in a subset of participant and in participants with CDI at Day 0 and Day 60.
Safety:
- To describe the safety profile of all participants who received at least 1 injection.
Detailed description
The study was designed as an event-driven group sequential protocol with 4 interim analyses at defined information milestones and a final analysis when a specific number of clinical endpoints are reached. Analyses of trial futility (non-efficacy) were to be performed at the first 2 interim analyses, and the study was to be stopped if either of those analyses provided robust and compelling evidence that meaningful levels of vaccine efficacy (VE) would not be demonstrated.
Following completion of the first interim analysis (50 cases of confirmed CDI observed), the futility criterion was met and in accordance with IDMC recommendation, enrollment and further vaccination ceased in November 2017.
Due to the early termination of the study, some of the planned secondary efficacy endpoints could not be analyzed as all planned data were not collected.
Participants were randomized to receive either the candidate vaccine or a placebo that was to be administered in a 3-dose schedule. At the time of group assignment, 928 participants (10% of total enrollment) were randomized to an immunogenicity subset; and 1859 participants (20% of total enrollment) were randomized to a reactogenicity subset.
Safety was assessed in all participants in terms of unsolicited adverse events from Day 0 to Day 60, as well as serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study. Solicited adverse reactions were collected for 6 days following each injection in the reactogenicity subset.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study was observer-blind. The vaccine preparer and administrator may have been unblinded to treatment assignment due to the steps necessary for vaccine preparation. However, the participant, the Investigator, and study staff members who collected the safety data and laboratory personnel who analyzed the blood and stool samples were all blinded to the group assignment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| C. difficile Vaccine Group | Experimental | Biological: C. difficile Toxoid VaccineParticipants received 1 injection of 0.5 mL C. difficile toxoid vaccine at Days 0 (Injection 1), 7 (Injection 2), and 30 (Injection 3). |
| Placebo Group | Placebo comparator | Biological: Placebo: 0.9% normal salineParticipants received 1 injection of 0.5 mL placebo matched to vaccine at Days 0 (Injection 1), 7 (Injection 2), and 30 (Injection 3). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Aged >= 50 years on the day of inclusion
- Informed consent form had been signed and dated.
- Attended all scheduled visits and complied with all trial procedures.
- Covered by health insurance (if required).
- Must fulfill at least 1 of the following criteria
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Participant was pregnant, or lactating, or of childbearing potential (to be considered of non-childbearing potential, a female must be post-menopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile, or using an effective method of contraception or abstinence from at least 4 weeks prior to the first vaccination and until at least 4 weeks after the last vaccination).
- Participation in the 4 weeks preceding the first trial vaccination or participation during the present trial period in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or medical procedure.
- Receipt of any vaccine in the 4 weeks preceding the first trial vaccination except for influenza (seasonal or pandemic) and pneumococcal vaccines. This exception includes monovalent pandemic influenza vaccines and multivalent influenza vaccines.
- Previous vaccination against C. difficile with either the trial vaccine, another vaccine, or monoclonal antibodies.
- Diarrhea on day of enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| C. difficile Toxoid Vaccine0.5 mL, Intramuscular | Biological | C. difficile Vaccine Group |
| Placebo: 0.9% normal saline0.5 mL, Intramuscular | Biological | Placebo Group |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Confirmed Primary C. Difficile Infection (CDI) Cases
Time frame: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Symptomatic PCR-confirmed CDI cases were defined as the number of participants with combination of clinical and laboratory findings. Clinical components were: >= 3 loose stools in <= 24 hours, loose stools (defined as type 6 [fluffy pieces with ragged edges, mushy] or type 7 [watery, no solid pieces] according to the Bristol Stool Chart) lasting >= 24 hours. Laboratory findings were: stool sample positive for C. difficile Toxin B by PCR at central laboratory or diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis visualized at colonoscopy.
10 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Severe PCR-Confirmed Primary CDI Cases
Time frame: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Number of Participants With Loose Stool Episodes
Time frame: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Number of Participants With Symptomatic PCR Confirmed CDI Cases: Per-Protocol Population
Time frame: Up to 3 years post injection 1
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Time frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 210, Day 390, Day 570, Day 750, Day 930, and Day 1110
Percentage of Participants With >= 2 and 4-Fold Rise in Serum Antibody Concentrations From Baseline Against Toxins A and B Measured by ELISA
Time frame: Day 60
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by ELISA in Participants With CDI
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 60
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by Toxin Neutralization Assay (TNA)
Time frame: Day 0, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 210, Day 390, Day 570, Day 750, Day 930, and Day 1110
Percentage of Participants With >= 2 and 4-Fold Rise in Serum Antibody Concentrations From Baseline Against Toxins A and B Measured by TNA
Time frame: Day 60
Serum Antibody Concentrations Against Toxins A and B Measured by TNA in Participants With CDI
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 60
Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection Site and Systemic Reactions
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 6 after any vaccination
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32946836de Bruyn G, Gordon DL, Steiner T, Tambyah P, Cosgrove C, Martens M, Bassily E, Chan ES, Patel D, Chen J, Torre-Cisneros J, Fernando De Magalhaes Francesconi C, Gesser R, Jeanfreau R, Launay O, Laot T, Morfin-Otero R, Oviedo-Orta E, Park YS, Piazza FM, Rehm C, Rivas E, Self S, Gurunathan S. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a Clostridioides difficile toxoid vaccine candidate: a phase 3 multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):252-262. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30331-5. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Clostridium Difficile Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Epidemiology of Clostridioides Difficile Infection (CDI) in Long-term Care Facilities, Assessment of Professional Practices Related to CDI Risk Prevention, and Strategies for Improving Care.
Clostridioides Difficile Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (Auto-FMT) for Prophylaxis of Clostridium Difficile Infection in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell
Active, not recruitingObservational study
C. Difficile Toxin Levels in Stool From Healthy Individuals Following Standard of Care Antibiotic Treatment for CDI.
Clostridioides Difficile Infection Recurrence
RecruitingPhase 3
VE303 for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection
Clostridium Difficile, Clostridium Difficile Infections
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Prevention of Recurrence of Clostridioides Difficile Colitis With Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UCDA) as a Supplement to Standard Therapy
Clostridioides Difficile Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
335 sites in 26 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing C. difficile Toxoid Vaccine in people with Clostridium Difficile Infection, run by Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company at 335 sites in 26 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 335 sites in United States, South Korea, Japan, Brazil, Canada and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Confirmed Primary C. Difficile Infection (CDI) Cases (time frame: Up to 3 years post injection 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01887912, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.