Indolent Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaPhase 2PrE0401NCT01889797
Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing GA101 and Rituximab in Untreated Low Tumor Burden Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing Arm A: Rituximab and Arm B: GA101 in people with Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, run by PrECOG, LLC. at 28 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Patients with previously untreated low tumor burden indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) will receive either rituximab or GA101 weekly for 4 weeks followed by re-staging to determine response. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Arm A: Rituximab and Arm B: GA101
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 28 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Registration: Patients having both diffuse and follicular architectural elements will be considered eligible if the histology is predominantly follicular (≥ 50% of the cross-sectional area), and there is no evidence of transformation to a large cell histology.
- Biopsy-proven diagnosis of Grade 1 or 2 follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with no evidence of transformation to large cell histology.
- Meet criteria for Low Tumor Burden:
- No nodal or extra nodal mass ≥ 7 centimeter (cm)
- <3 nodal masses >3 cm in diameter
- No systemic symptoms or B symptoms
Show all 43Show fewer
- No splenomegaly >16 cm by CT scan
- No risk of compression of a vital organ.
- No leukemic phase with >5000/mm³ circulating lymphocytes.
- No cytopenias defined as:
- Platelets <100,000/mm³
- Hemoglobin (Hgb) <10 g/dL
- Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) <1500/mm³
- Must have Stage III or Stage IV disease.
- Baseline measurements/evaluations obtained within 6 weeks of registration. Patient must have at least one objective measurable disease parameter.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group Performance Status 0-1.
- Must not have received investigational agents within 30 days of registration.
- Signed Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent.
- Willing to provide blood samples for research purposes.
- Women must not be pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males must use an accepted and effective method of contraception.
- No prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy for lymphoma.
- No prior treatment with cytotoxic drugs or rituximab for a previous cancer or another condition (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) or prior use of an anti-CD20 antibody.
- No prior use of any monoclonal antibody within 3 months of randomization.
- No history of severe allergic/anaphylactic reactions to humanized/murine monoclonal antibodies or known sensitivity/allergy to murine products.
- No history of prior malignancy except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has been disease-free for at least 2 years and did not require treatment with cytotoxic drugs or rituximab.
- No major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization, other than for diagnosis.
- Must be Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) negative.
- Have adequate organ function without growth factor and/or transfusion support within ≤ 2 weeks prior to registration:
- ANC ≥ 1500/mm³
- Hgb ≥ 10 g/dL
- Platelets ≥ 100,000/mm³
- Serum Creatinine ≤ 2x Upper Limit Normal (ULN)
- Total Bilirubin ≤ 2x ULN
- AST (aspartate aminotransferase)/ALT (alanine aminotransferase) ≤ 5x ULN
- PTT (Partial Thromboplastin Time) or aPTT (activated Partial Thromboplastin Time) >1.5x the ULN in the absence of a lupus anticoagulant
- INR (International Normalized Ratio) >1.5x the ULN in the absence of therapeutic anticoagulation
- No active, uncontrolled infections (afebrile for ≥ 48 hours off antibiotics).
- Must not receive immunization with attenuated live vaccines within 28 days prior to registration or during the study period.
- Must be tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and total hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) within 2 weeks of registration. Patients who are chronic carriers of HBsAg and anti-HBc are excluded.
- Must be tested for hepatitis C antibody within 2 week of registration. If this test is positive, patients are excluded unless a hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) is negative.
- No evidence of significant, uncontrolled concomitant diseases that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results, including significant cardiovascular disease (i.e., severe arrhythmia, myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months, unstable arrhythmias, or unstable angina) or pulmonary disease.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
28 sites in 1 country.
28 sites in 1 country
United States28 sites
St. Joseph Mercy Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Aultman Hospital
Canton, Ohio, 44710
Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC)
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304
University of Virginia
Charlottesburg, Virginia, 22908
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Decatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Marin Cancer Care
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Gundersen Health System
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Dean Clinic
Madison, Wisconsin, 53717
University of South Alabama
Mobile, Alabama, 36604
Ochsner Cancer Institute
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Metro MN CCOP
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
St. Joseph's/Candler Health System
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Siouxland Hematology Oncology Associates
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Toledo Community Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43617
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
ProHealth Care, Inc.
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
Aurora Health Care
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53266
Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
Susquehanna Health Cancer Center
Williamsport, Pennsylvania, 17701
About this study
Official title: Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing GA101 (Obinutuzumab) and Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Low Tumor Burden Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Patients with previously untreated low tumor burden indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) will receive either rituximab or GA101 weekly for 4 weeks followed by re-staging to determine response.
Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric antibody, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1998 for the treatment of patients with relapsed low-grade B-cell lymphomas. Clinically, four weekly doses of rituximab have proven to be well tolerated and effective in previously untreated as well as relapsed patients with low-grade lymphoma.
Read more
GA101 is an anti-CD20 humanized and glyco-engineered monoclonal antibody. GA101 has been shown to have increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and direct cell-death induction compared to Rituximab. It is possible that GA101 may have greater efficacy than rituximab.
PrE0401 Sub-Study Evaluation of Corrected QT (QTc) Interval and Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Participating in GA101 (Obinutuzumab)
Approximately twenty-five patients randomized to GA101 may participate in the sub-study. Electrocardiograms and blood samples will be obtained.
Read the detailed description
According to the American Cancer Society, it is estimated that approximately 70,800 individuals will be diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and over 18,990 men and women will die of the disease in 2014. The survival rates for patients with indolent NHL remained unchanged from the 1950s through the early 1990s, but recent evidence suggests that outcomes are improving. Indolent NHL is a particular challenge because it is an incurable disease requiring multiple treatments; yet relatively long survivals elevate the importance of quality of life associated with treatment.
Agents such as rituximab are active in patients with a low burden of disease and result in high response rates and durable remissions for most patients. However, the optimal therapeutic approach to patients with low-grade lymphoma with a low disease burden is controversial as conventional chemotherapy also results in high rates of response. Regardless of whether patients receive immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination thereof, they unfortunately exhibit a continuing pattern of disease relapse and the median survival for newly diagnosed patients is between 7-10 years.
Rituximab and GA101 both target the CD20 antigen. The CD20 antigen is located on the surface of normal and malignant B-cell lymphocytes. An attractive feature of this target is that CD20 is not on hematopoietic stem cells, nor is it expressed in any great extent on other normal body tissues.
Studies in vitro have shown that rituximab predominantly induces antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), but also binds complement and directly induces apoptosis in lymphoma cells.
GA101 shows increased ADCC related to an improved binding of the GA101 to the different allotypes expressed by natural killer cells and monocytes. It also has increased direct cell-death related to an elbow hinge amino acid exchange and Type II binding of the CD20 epitope. The safety of GA101 in NHL so far appears to be similar to that observed with rituximab in patients with NHL, except for a higher incidence of infusion-related reactions.
Depletion of malignant B-cells using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies has an acceptable safety profile, particularly in patients with low-grade B-cell lymphomas with a low disease burden. To determine whether treatment with GA101 results in better outcomes than that seen with rituximab and to determine which anti-CD20 antibody to utilize in future studies, we will conduct a randomized Phase II trial of rituximab and GA101 in patients with previously untreated low-grade lymphoma. Patients will receive either rituximab or GA101 weekly for 4 weeks followed by re-staging. The endpoints of the study will be the Complete Response (CR), Overall Response Rate (ORR), time to next treatment, progression free survival (PFS), and safety of each treatment arm.
PrE0401 Sub-Study Evaluation of Corrected QT (QTc) Interval and Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Participating in GA101 (Obinutuzumab)
Patients randomized to GA101 and who consent to the sub-study will have electrocardiograms obtained pre and post Week 1 and Week 4 to investigate the effect of GA101 on QTc interval. Pharmacokinetic blood samples will also be done to evaluate serum concentrations of GA101 at the same time-points.
- Conditions
- Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Arm A: Rituximab, Arm B: GA101
- Keywords
- Untreated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Low Tumor Burden Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, NHL, Indolent, Rituximab, Rituxan, GA101, Obinutuzumab
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Arm A: RituximabBiological
Also called IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan, NSC# 687451
Rituximab 375 mg/m² IV x 4 weekly doses.
Arm B: GA101Biological
Also called Obinutuzumab, RO5072759, huMAB<CD20>
GA101 1,000 mg (flat dose) IV x 4 weekly doses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Rituximab | Active comparator | Rituximab 375 mg/m² IV weekly for 4 weeks. Receives: Biological: Arm A: Rituximab |
| Arm B: GA101 | Experimental | GA101 1,000 mg IV weekly for 4 weeks. Receives: Biological: Arm B: GA101 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete Response (CR) Rate
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-documented CR rates after induction therapy (weekly treatment x 4 weeks with GA101 or rituximab)
Definitions for clinical response are modified from the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson BD, et al. Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(5): 579-86). Lymph node measurements were taken from CT, CT portion of the PET/CT, or MRI scans where applicable. CR is defined as complete disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR as a >50% decrease in the sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) and no new sites; SD as failure to attain CR/PR or PD; and PD as any new lesion >1.5cm in any axis or ≥50% increase in previously involved sites.
Measured: Re-staging (week 12, 13 or 14) and during follow-up if physician feels patient is subsequently in CR for up to 4 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
PET Response Rate
PET response rate [PET-documented CR + Partial Response (PR)] based on PET scan results. Patients with unevaluable disease were included in the denominator.
Measured: Re-staging (week 12, 13 or 14)
Overall Response Rate
Overall response rate (CR + PR by Cheson criteria) at re-staging (including bone marrow biopsy if CR suspected) by PET and Neck, Chest, Abdomen and Pelvic Computed Tomography (CT) scan. Patients with unevaluable disease were included in the denominator.
Measured: Baseline and Re-staging (week 12, 13 or 14)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
CT scan every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months until progression. Compare PFS in each treatment arm.
Progressive disease (PD) was defined using Cheson criteria as described in the Primary Outcome section above. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from start of treatment to the documentation of PD or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive and without PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment.
Measured: Percent of participants alive and progression-free at 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Why it stopped: Closed due prolonged enrollment timelines
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Indolent Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- PrECOG, LLC.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephen Ansell, MD, Study chair, Mayo Clinic in Minnesota
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01889797
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PrE0401
- Other IDs
- BO25454
- Acronym
- PrE0401
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 5 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data is proprietary.
Publications
Hainsworth JD, Litchy S, Burris HA 3rd, Scullin DC Jr, Corso SW, Yardley DA, Morrissey L, Greco FA. Rituximab as first-line and maintenance therapy for patients with indolent non-hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Oct 15;20(20):4261-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.674.
PubMed 12377971Beers SA, Chan CH, French RR, Cragg MS, Glennie MJ. CD20 as a target for therapeutic type I and II monoclonal antibodies. Semin Hematol. 2010 Apr;47(2):107-14. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2010.01.001.
PubMed 20350657Mossner E, Brunker P, Moser S, Puntener U, Schmidt C, Herter S, Grau R, Gerdes C, Nopora A, van Puijenbroek E, Ferrara C, Sondermann P, Jager C, Strein P, Fertig G, Friess T, Schull C, Bauer S, Dal Porto J, Del Nagro C, Dabbagh K, Dyer MJ, Poppema S, Klein C, Umana P. Increasing the efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type II anti-CD20 antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell-mediated B-cell cytotoxicity. Blood. 2010 Jun 3;115(22):4393-402. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-225979. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
PubMed 20194898Salles GA, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab (GA101) Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Phase I/II Study (BO20999) American Society of Hematology Annual meeting 2011 Abstract 268.
Sehn LH, Goy A, Offner FC, Martinelli G, Caballero MD, Gadeberg O, Baetz T, Zelenetz AD, Gaidano G, Fayad LE, Buckstein R, Friedberg JW, Crump M, Jaksic B, Zinzani PL, Padmanabhan Iyer S, Sahin D, Chai A, Fingerle-Rowson G, Press OW. Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Obinutuzumab (GA101) With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the GAUSS Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3467-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.2139. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
PubMed 26282650
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing GA101 (Obinutuzumab) and Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Low Tumor Burden Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01889797
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PrE0401 / PrE0401
- Conditions
- Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Untreated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Low Tumor Burden Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, NHL, Indolent, Rituximab, Rituxan, GA101, Obinutuzumab
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Closed due prolonged enrollment timelines
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PrECOG, LLC.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc.
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with previously untreated low tumor burden indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) will receive either rituximab or GA101 weekly for 4 weeks followed by re-staging to determine response.
Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric antibody, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1998 for the treatment of patients with relapsed low-grade B-cell lymphomas. Clinically, four weekly doses of rituximab have proven to be well tolerated and effective in previously untreated as well as relapsed patients with low-grade lymphoma.
GA101 is an anti-CD20 humanized and glyco-engineered monoclonal antibody. GA101 has been shown to have increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and direct cell-death induction compared to Rituximab. It is possible that GA101 may have greater efficacy than rituximab.
PrE0401 Sub-Study Evaluation of Corrected QT (QTc) Interval and Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Participating in GA101 (Obinutuzumab)
Approximately twenty-five patients randomized to GA101 may participate in the sub-study. Electrocardiograms and blood samples will be obtained.
Detailed description
According to the American Cancer Society, it is estimated that approximately 70,800 individuals will be diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and over 18,990 men and women will die of the disease in 2014. The survival rates for patients with indolent NHL remained unchanged from the 1950s through the early 1990s, but recent evidence suggests that outcomes are improving. Indolent NHL is a particular challenge because it is an incurable disease requiring multiple treatments; yet relatively long survivals elevate the importance of quality of life associated with treatment.
Agents such as rituximab are active in patients with a low burden of disease and result in high response rates and durable remissions for most patients. However, the optimal therapeutic approach to patients with low-grade lymphoma with a low disease burden is controversial as conventional chemotherapy also results in high rates of response. Regardless of whether patients receive immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination thereof, they unfortunately exhibit a continuing pattern of disease relapse and the median survival for newly diagnosed patients is between 7-10 years.
Rituximab and GA101 both target the CD20 antigen. The CD20 antigen is located on the surface of normal and malignant B-cell lymphocytes. An attractive feature of this target is that CD20 is not on hematopoietic stem cells, nor is it expressed in any great extent on other normal body tissues.
Studies in vitro have shown that rituximab predominantly induces antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), but also binds complement and directly induces apoptosis in lymphoma cells.
GA101 shows increased ADCC related to an improved binding of the GA101 to the different allotypes expressed by natural killer cells and monocytes. It also has increased direct cell-death related to an elbow hinge amino acid exchange and Type II binding of the CD20 epitope. The safety of GA101 in NHL so far appears to be similar to that observed with rituximab in patients with NHL, except for a higher incidence of infusion-related reactions.
Depletion of malignant B-cells using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies has an acceptable safety profile, particularly in patients with low-grade B-cell lymphomas with a low disease burden. To determine whether treatment with GA101 results in better outcomes than that seen with rituximab and to determine which anti-CD20 antibody to utilize in future studies, we will conduct a randomized Phase II trial of rituximab and GA101 in patients with previously untreated low-grade lymphoma. Patients will receive either rituximab or GA101 weekly for 4 weeks followed by re-staging. The endpoints of the study will be the Complete Response (CR), Overall Response Rate (ORR), time to next treatment, progression free survival (PFS), and safety of each treatment arm.
PrE0401 Sub-Study Evaluation of Corrected QT (QTc) Interval and Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Participating in GA101 (Obinutuzumab)
Patients randomized to GA101 and who consent to the sub-study will have electrocardiograms obtained pre and post Week 1 and Week 4 to investigate the effect of GA101 on QTc interval. Pharmacokinetic blood samples will also be done to evaluate serum concentrations of GA101 at the same time-points.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Rituximab | Active comparator | Biological: Arm A: RituximabRituximab 375 mg/m² IV weekly for 4 weeks. |
| Arm B: GA101 | Experimental | Biological: Arm B: GA101GA101 1,000 mg IV weekly for 4 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (43 listed)
- Registration: Patients having both diffuse and follicular architectural elements will be considered eligible if the histology is predominantly follicular (≥ 50% of the cross-sectional area), and there is no evidence of transformation to a large cell histology.
- Biopsy-proven diagnosis of Grade 1 or 2 follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with no evidence of transformation to large cell histology.
- Meet criteria for Low Tumor Burden:
- No cytopenias defined as:
- Must have Stage III or Stage IV disease.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: RituximabAlso: IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan, NSC# 687451Rituximab 375 mg/m² IV x 4 weekly doses. | Biological | Arm A: Rituximab |
| Arm B: GA101Also: Obinutuzumab, RO5072759, huMAB<CD20>GA101 1,000 mg (flat dose) IV x 4 weekly doses. | Biological | Arm B: GA101 |
Primary outcome
Complete Response (CR) Rate
Time frame: Re-staging (week 12, 13 or 14) and during follow-up if physician feels patient is subsequently in CR for up to 4 years
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-documented CR rates after induction therapy (weekly treatment x 4 weeks with GA101 or rituximab) Definitions for clinical response are modified from the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson BD, et al. Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(5): 579-86). Lymph node measurements were taken from CT, CT portion of the PET/CT, or MRI scans where applicable. CR is defined as complete disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR as a >50% decrease in the sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) and no new sites; SD as failure to attain CR/PR or PD; and PD as any new lesion >1.5cm in any axis or ≥50% increase in previously involved sites.
3 secondary outcomes
PET Response Rate
Time frame: Re-staging (week 12, 13 or 14)
Overall Response Rate
Time frame: Baseline and Re-staging (week 12, 13 or 14)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Percent of participants alive and progression-free at 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 12377971Hainsworth JD, Litchy S, Burris HA 3rd, Scullin DC Jr, Corso SW, Yardley DA, Morrissey L, Greco FA. Rituximab as first-line and maintenance therapy for patients with indolent non-hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Oct 15;20(20):4261-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.674.
- Background: PubMed 20350657Beers SA, Chan CH, French RR, Cragg MS, Glennie MJ. CD20 as a target for therapeutic type I and II monoclonal antibodies. Semin Hematol. 2010 Apr;47(2):107-14. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2010.01.001.
- Background: PubMed 20194898Mossner E, Brunker P, Moser S, Puntener U, Schmidt C, Herter S, Grau R, Gerdes C, Nopora A, van Puijenbroek E, Ferrara C, Sondermann P, Jager C, Strein P, Fertig G, Friess T, Schull C, Bauer S, Dal Porto J, Del Nagro C, Dabbagh K, Dyer MJ, Poppema S, Klein C, Umana P. Increasing the efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type II anti-CD20 antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell-mediated B-cell cytotoxicity. Blood. 2010 Jun 3;115(22):4393-402. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-225979. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
- BackgroundSalles GA, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab (GA101) Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Phase I/II Study (BO20999) American Society of Hematology Annual meeting 2011 Abstract 268.
- Background: PubMed 26282650Sehn LH, Goy A, Offner FC, Martinelli G, Caballero MD, Gadeberg O, Baetz T, Zelenetz AD, Gaidano G, Fayad LE, Buckstein R, Friedberg JW, Crump M, Jaksic B, Zinzani PL, Padmanabhan Iyer S, Sahin D, Chai A, Fingerle-Rowson G, Press OW. Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Obinutuzumab (GA101) With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the GAUSS Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3467-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.2139. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data is proprietary.
Related trials for Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate Adverse Events, Change in Disease Activity, and How Oral ABBV-101 Moves Through the Body in Adult Participants With B-Cell Malignancies
Hematologic Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
First-in-Human (FIH) Trial in Patients With Relapsed, Progressive or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma
DLBCL, High-grade B-cell Lymphoma (HGBCL)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Novel Vaccine (EO2463) as Monotherapy and in Combination, for Treatment of Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal Zone Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Copanlisib and Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Richter's Transformation or Transformed Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Addition of a New Anti-cancer Drug, Venetoclax, to Usual Chemotherapy for High Grade B-cell Lymphomas
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen Ansell, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic in Minnesota
28 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Arm A: Rituximab and Arm B: GA101 in people with Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, run by PrECOG, LLC. at 28 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 43 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 28 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete Response (CR) Rate (time frame: Re-staging (week 12, 13 or 14) and during follow-up if physician feels patient is subsequently in CR for up to 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01889797, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2017.